Peace Care St Joseph's

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 287 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 140 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 124.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.09 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ00161813 Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide effective care and services to promote healing of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident #105's right heel wound was left untreated for more than a month. During this period the wound's length doubled in size. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #105's closed hybrid medical record which revealed the following information. The admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. The nurse documented in a 12/5/22 admission Summary Progress Note that the resident had a small skin opening on the coccyx and an Ace Wrap (an elastic bandage wrap) on the right lower extremity. The nurse documented in a 12/6/22 Nursing admission Screening/History report that the resident was admitted with a fibula and tibia fracture (not indicating whether left or right leg) and a Stage II…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) maintain kitchen equipment in a clean, safe and sanitary manner for 3 of 4 kitchenettes (2nd, 3rd, 4th), and b) maintain kitchen equipment in a clean, safe and sanitary manner 4 of 4 pantries (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th), on the nursing floors as evidenced by the following. On 4/09/26 at 11:50 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following on the nursing units:The kitchenette microwaves had multicolored food debris on the interior ceiling of the units for 3 of 4 units, (2nd, 3rd, and 4th). The FSD acknowledged and agreed that they were not cleaned according to facility policy. The pantry microwaves had multicolored food debris on the interior ceiling of the units and food particles on the rotating tray for 3 of 4 units (2nd, 3rd, and 4th). The FSD acknowledged and agreed that they were not cleaned according to facility policy. The refrigerators on 2 of 4unit pantries, (1st and 3rd,) were observed to have copious amounts of standing water on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint NJ# 2593527Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to include a resident in the planning of care by informing them of the risks and benefits of proposed care. This was observed in 1 of 2 residents (Resident #109), reviewed for use of anticoagulant medications.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/9/26 at 11:11 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident # 109 The surveyor asked the resident about his concerns with a discontinued medication in August of 2025. The resident answered My Eliquis was stopped at the end of May and The doctor never talked to me about it, there was no notice, no discussion, I found out when the cariologist caught it in July. The resident added The doctor never discussed it with my sister either. The cardiologist restarted it the day I saw him in July, and he figured out it was stopped. The resident acknowledged his sister was his durable power of attorney for health care. A review of Resident # 109's admission record indicates he was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain the residents' living environment in a safe and homelike manner for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #12) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 4/8/26 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 12 in bed. The surveyor observed a bed controller with the cord attached to it, which was laying on the resident's bedside. The cord sheath attached to the bed controller was broken in several areas and the wires were exposed. The resident stated that the cord was like that for many months and the resident had told the facility about it a while ago but it was never fixed.At 12:41 PM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Practical nurse (LPN), who cared for Resident # 12, to come into the resident's room. The surveyor showed the LPN the broken cord sheath. The LPN stated that she did not notice that the cord sheath was broken and she had been in the resident's room around about 11:45 AM.At 12:49 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON), who also stated that she did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint NJ-2803539 Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident #14) was free from neglect. The facility failed to provide personal care and assistance from the assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) for one 8-hour shift. The deficient practice is evidenced by the following.On 4/9/26 at 10:40 AM, the surveyor observed the resident awake in bed. The resident spoke to the surveyor in Arabic and did not understand the English language. At that time, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who stated a translator phone number is posted in the resident's room to communicate with the resident. He stated the resident's 2 daughters visit daily during the day shift.A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following information.The 3/4/26 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool indicated that the resident had no cognitive deficits and exhibited no mood or behavioral concerns. The resident was noted to be independent eating meals after staff set-up the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees underwent criminal background checks before they began employment at the facility. The deficient practice was identified for 9 of 82 employee records reviewed (Employee #12, 13, 14, 17, 34, 38, 54, 55, 67). The deficient practice is evidenced by the following. On 4/13/26 and 4/14/26, the surveyor reviewed the Human Resources records including Criminal Background Investigations (CBI) for 82 employees who were hired since the previous Department of Health Recertification Inspection. The following concerns were revealed.Employee #12, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), began employment on 10/20/25. The CBI was requested by the facility on 10/27/25.Employee #13, a nurse, began employment on 10/20/25. The CBI was requested on 2/10/26.Employee #14, a nurse, began employment on 12/15/25. The CBI was requested on 2/9/26.Employee #17, a nurse, began employment on 5/5/25. The CBI was requested on 10/3/25.Employee #34, a housekeeper, began employment on 6/2/25. The CBI was requested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for 1 (one) of 1 resident (Resident#104), system selected for resident assessment for MDS record over 120 days old. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual classified the Observation (Look Back) Period as the time period over which the resident's condition or status was to be captured by the MDS. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) referred to the last day of the observation (or look back) period that the assessment covered for the resident. The Quarterly assessment was considered timely if 1) the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of the Quarterly MDS (QMDS) was within 92 days after the ARD of the previous MDS, and 2) the completion date was no later than 14 days after the ARD. On 4/12/26 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Medical Record (eMR) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a) provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure signing from the reconciliation form Controlled Drug Administration Record Tablet (CDART; declining inventory log) form after the dispensed and administered a controlled dangerous substance with high potential for drug diversion medication for 1 (one) of 1 resident (Resident #107) and b) follow physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #5) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0836 — isolated
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #2613352Based on interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles for a resident who was denied admission to the facility to provide services. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents' referrals reviewed, Resident #138.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines dated 4/24/24, the Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for Candida Auris (C. Auris; a multidrug- resistant fungus that can cause severe infections in very sick, vulnerable patients) are similar to those used for other multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). In most instances, facilities equipped to care for patients with other MDROs can also care for patients with C. Auris. In nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities, healthcare providers should use either Contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control measures to prevent the potential spread of infection for failing to ensure a midline intravenous (IV) connector cap was properly secured for 1 of 1 residents (Resident # 12) with a midline IV.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/8/26 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 12, in bed, with a midline IV on the resident's left arm with a date of 4/6/26 on the dressing which covered the IV site. The surveyor observed that the midline IV line was clamped but the connector was uncapped. The resident stated that the nurses gave the resident medicine in the IV yesterday.A review of the resident medical records revealed the following:Resident # 12 was admitted with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to sepsis and cellulitis of right lower limb.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) (an assessment tool), dated 2/3/26, revealed that Resident # 12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure, a.) consistent maintenance of the system of record keeping of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) order Form-222 (a federal narcotic requisition form), that enabled accurate reconciliation of controlled-dangerous substances (narcotic medications, that due to their high potential for abuse, are tracked with a degree of detail and attention) that was ordered and received, b) the development and implementation of policy and procedure for DEA order Form-222, c) removal and disposition of a discharged Resident's medication from the active inventory, and d.) properly label an opened blood glucose test strip. The deficient practice was identified for five (5) of 12 DEA Form-222s reviewed, one (1) of two (2) medication storage rooms, one (1) of three (3) medication carts inspected during the medication storage and labeling observation. The evidence was as follows:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$170,052 in federal fines across 21 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
• $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
• $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
• $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
• $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $57,944 — penalty dated 2023-08-22
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-07 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $452K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ