Laurel Bay Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 86.3 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.95 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ187696Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 6/30/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their protocol and policy to prevent the elopement of a severely cognitive impaired resident (Resident #1) who had a history of elopement from the facility when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) heard the wander guard alarm sound at the front entrance of the facility and failed to respond to the alarm to ensure the safety of its residents. On 6/23/2025 at approximately 8:25PM, LPN #1 was coming down the stairs from the second-floor nursing unit when she heard the wander guard alarm at the front entrance sounding. She stated she called another staff member on the telephone to get the code to the keypad to stop the alarm. Once the LPN was given the code to the keypad, she turned the alarm off and proceeded to go on her break. LPN #1 stated she did not investigate why the wander guard alarm was going off. She further stated that she last saw Resident #1 in his/her room approximately 20 minutes before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ187696Based on interviews, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation on 6/30/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 3 of 3 residents who were identified as an elopement risk. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1.According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Unspecified Convulsions, Unspecified Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), and Hypertension.According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 6/5/2025, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS also indicated that Resident #1 had an elopement alarm in place and was able to ambulate with set-up assistance. According to Resident #1's Care Plan (CP) with an initiated date of 10/14/2024, and a revision date of 11/04/2024. The CP revealed that the resident presented as a risk for elopement. Further review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ187696Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 6/30/2025, it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to consistently document on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) the placement of a resident's wander guard bracelet (elopement device) according to the acceptable standards of nursing practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for documentation. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Documentation, Guidelines.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/30/2024 from 9:25 AM to 10:07 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the cook and later at 10:07 AM joined by the Dietary Director (DD), observed the following: 1.) In the refrigerator known as the Drink Refrigerator, there was a tray that contained 35 bowls of butterscotch pudding, along with a tray holding 7 cups of applesauce and 1 cup of cottage cheese. None of these items were labeled with preparation or use-by dates. The cook said that all the items should be labeled with both dates to ensure freshness and uphold food safety standards. 2.) In the dry storage area, there was an open 4-pound container of peanut butter that lacked both an open date and a use-by date. 1 loaf of raisin bread was labeled with a received date of 12/20/2024. The dietary director (DD) said that the peanut…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview on 12/30/2025 in the presence of the Administrator and the Director of Maintenance (DOM), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident call bell system was properly functioning by notification of an activation when pressing the call bell button. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and was evidenced by the following: An observation at 12:22 PM revealed that the call bell system did not notify staff of a call bell system activation by visual and or audible notification for bed 1 in room [ROOM NUMBER] when the Administrator pressed the call bell button. In an interview at the time, the DOM confirmed that the call bell system light did not activate outside of the room and that notification at the nurse's station was not received. The DOM stated that the call bell button needed to be replaced, and they would make sure it was correct. N.J.A.C 8:39-31.2(e)

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to keep all areas clean. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 floors reviewed under the Environmental Task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/30/2024 at 10:31 AM, Surveyor # 1 observed room [ROOM NUMBER]. At that time, Surveyor # 1 observed water on the floor. No wet-floor sign was observed. On the same date at 10:37 AM, Surveyor # 1 observed Resident # 35 in their room. At that time, Surveyor # 1 observed spilled milk on the floor and no bag liner in the trash bin. On 12/31/2024 at 11:03 AM, Surveyor # 1 observed the first floor shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. At that time, Surveyor # 1 observed brown stains on the floor, tile, and caulked areas. Exposed dry wall was also observed to be present behind the measuring scale. On 1/06/2025 at 11:44 AM during an interview with Surveyor # 1, the Director of Nursing (DON) said that resident rooms are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed provide services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs specifically by failing to keep call devices within reach of the resident. The deficient practice was identified 2 of 2 residents (Resident #80 and Resident # 236) reviewed for call devices. On 12/30/2024 at 10:29 AM during the initial tour of the facility, surveyor # 1 observed Resident # 236's call device on the floor next to the night stand. It was connected to the wall input. On 12/31/2024 at 8:58 AM, surveyor # 1 observed Resident # 236's call device on the floor next to the night stand. It appeared to be in the same location as the previous observation. At that time during an interview with surveyor # 1, Resident # 236s said they would use it if he/she could find it. On 1/06/2025 at 11:44 AM during an interview with surveyor # 1, the Assistant Director of Nursing said they [call devices] are attached to the resident's bed, pillow, or sheet but we do have some that are wrapped around the rail or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess the status of a resident in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #80) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: Upon initial tour of the facility on 12/30/2024 at 10:44 AM, Resident #80 was observed wandering by the 1st Floor nursing station. The surveyor observed an elopement device on the resident's left ankle. On 12/31/2024 at 11:06 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #80 sitting on their bed in their room. The surveyor asked permission from Resident #80 to enter and was granted permission. Resident #80 acknowledged the presence of the bracelet on the left ankle, but did not know what it was. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #80. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: Malignant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan focus for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for comprehensive care plans related to indwelling catheter care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During initial tour on 12/30/2024 at 09:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 68 resting in bed with a urinary drainage bag attached to the bed frame. A review of the admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record, Resident #68 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Functional Quadriplegia (the complete inability to move due to severe disability or frailty due to another medical condition, without injury or damage to spinal cord), and Dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities). A review of the current Care Plan (CP) for Resident #68 did not include documentation of a CP focus area or interventions for the care of indwelling catheters. During an interview on 1/03/2025 at 10:50 AM with the surveyor, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility a) failed to follow a physician's placement order of an elopement device and b) signed the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that identified correct placement of the elopement device per physician's order. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident #80) reviewed for elopement and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment is free from accident hazards specifically by failing to place a fall mat beside the bed while the resident is in bed. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 81) investigated for Falls and 1 of 1 residents (Resident # 75) investigated for Accident Hazards. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 81's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; An assessment tool) dated 11/07/2024 revealed that he/she had a fall without injury upon admission. A review of Resident # 81's physician's orders located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an order for an electric, low bed with a crash mat every shift. A review of Resident # 81's Care Plans located in the EMR revealed a focus for risk for falls related to deconditioning, incontinence, psychoactive drug use, and vision problems. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,873 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,873 — penalty dated 2025-07-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $796K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ