Fountainview Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 88.7 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ162242 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies and procedures by ensuring a resident (Resident #239) was free from verbal abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #239). Resident #239, who had diagnoses of bipolar, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety, was observed by staff at an Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) doctor's office appointment being verbally abused and exploited by their facility escort, Housekeeping Aide (HA #1), who recorded the resident with their cell phone while they verbally abused the resident. The ENT staff who witnessed the incident reported that HA #1 was belittling and yelling at the resident. Observation of the ENT's surveillance video showed the entrance to the ENT's office with HA #1 yelling and cursing at Resident #239 who was observed visibly upset and verbalized that they thought HA #1 was kidnapping them. HA #1 continued to record and yell at the resident; never once reassuring the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ162242 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse and exploitation by a Housekeeping Aide (HA #1) who was observed being verbally abusive and videotaping the incident. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #239). Resident #239, who had diagnoses of bipolar, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety, was observed by staff at an Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) doctor's office appointment being verbally abused and exploited by their facility escort, HA #1, who recorded the resident with their cell phone while they verbally abused the resident. The ENT staff who witnessed the incident reported that HA #1 was belittling and yelling at the resident. Observation of the ENT's surveillance video showed the entrance to the ENT's office with HA #1 yelling and cursing at Resident #239 who was observed visibly upset and verbalized that they thought HA #1 was kidnapping them.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ186666 Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained for a.) weekly cleaning and tubing changes for a resident's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine and b.) filling the chamber of the CPAP machine with distilled water daily from March 2025 through the resident's discharge from the facility in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ162242 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's rights were protected when a staff member video recorded the resident without the resident or their representative's consent. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident rights (Resident #239). Findings include: A review of Resident #239's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to; bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #239's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 01/27/23, revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15; which indicated a severely impaired cognition. The surveyor observed on 03/04/25 at 3:10 PM, a video recording taken on 03/07/23 at 1:38 PM, of the outside entrance and reception area of the Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) doctor's office, revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to respect the right to confidentiality of medical records during medication pass. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 8 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #38 and Resident #290). Findings include: Observation on 03/05/25 at 11:27 AM, Registered Nurse (RN #1) administered medications to resident Resident #290 in the resident's room. RN #1 left Resident #290's electronic medical records (EMR) open which contained confidential and private medical information visible to any resident or visitor in the hallway outside of the dining room. During an interview on 03/05/25 at 11:40 AM, RN #1 stated, I'm nervous, I don't normally leave the computer screen open. Observation on 03/05/25 at 1:02 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) administered medications to Resident #38 in the resident's room. LPN #1 left Resident #38's EMR open which contained confidential and private medical information visible to any resident or visitor in the hallway outside of the dining room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ162242 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for restraints (Resident #239). Findings include: A review of Resident #239's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to; bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #239's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 01/27/23, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15; which indicated a severely impaired cognition. A review of Resident #239's individualized comprehensive care plan 02/13/23, did not include the resident had a restraint or used a wheelchair seatbelt. A review of Resident #239's Physician Orders dated 03/05/23, did not include an order for restraints. Observation on 03/04/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ172235 Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to report an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #289). Findings include: A review of Resident #289's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to; anxiety disorder, dementia with agitation, social phobia, and cognitive communication deficit. The resident expired on [DATE]. A review of Resident #289's BIMS Evaluation dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15; which indicated a severely impaired cognition. A review of Resident #289's individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) revealed that the resident had impaired decision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to installation of bedrails. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for bedrails (Resident 78). Findings include: A review of Resident #78's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was re-admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to ; hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A review of Resident #78's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), and assessment tool dated 12/01/24, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated a fully intact cognition. A review of Resident #78's individualized comprehensive care plan dated 05/29/24, included the resident required left bedrail for mobility and safety. Interventions in place were left sided bedrails as ordered. A review of Resident #78's Bed Rail Evaluation dated 05/29/24, revealed no alternatives were attempted prior to the placement of the bedrails.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered as needed (PRN) antianxiety medication had a stop date. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #141). Findings include: A review of Resident #141's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's with behaviors. A review of Resident #141's physician's Order Summary included an order dated 02/21/25, for alprazolam (an antianxiety medication) .25 milligrams (mg) daily PRN for anxiety. There was no documented evidence of a stop date. A review of Resident #141's corresponding February 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR), revealed that the resident received alprazolam .25 mg PRN on 02/21/25, 02/26/25, and 02/28/25. A review of the March 2025 MAR, revealed that the resident received alprazolam .25 mg PRN on 03/01/25, 03/02/25, and 03/03/25. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/06/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record was maintained complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #87). Findings include: A review of Resident #87's admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included; atherosclerosis of native arteries of bilateral legs, restless leg syndrome (RLS), and nerve pain. A review of Resident's #87's Progress Notes included a Nurses Note dated [DATE], included .At 3:05 PM, [Resident #87] found in bed with eyes closed .no respirations/no pulse. 3:10 PM code blue called, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiated at 3:13 PM .3:30 PM call placed to power of attorney (POA) .During conversation, POA states that [Resident #87] should have been a do not resuscitate (DNR). She stated she had signed practitioner orders for life sustaining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications safely and securely during medication administration. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 8 residents observed during medication pass. Findings include: Observation on 03/05/25 at 11:27 AM, of Resident #290's medication administration, the Registered Nurse (RN #1) left the medication cart unlocked in the hallway outside of the dining room and left a vial of insulin on top of the medication cart unsecured. The cart was not visualized by RN #1 during medication administration. During an interview on 03/05/25 at 11:40 AM, RN #1 stated, I'm nervous, I don't normally leave the cart unlocked or leave insulin on top of the cart. Observation on 03/05/25 at 1:02 PM, of Resident 38's medication administration, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) left the medication cart unlocked in the hallway. The cart was not visualized by LPN #1 during medication administration. During an interview on 03/05/25 at 1:05 PM, LPN #1 stated, someone could get into the medications if the cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint# NJ00174037 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 05/30/24, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete Medical Record (MR) which contained the New Jersey Universal Transfer Form (NJUTF) for a resident who was sent out for an emergent hospitalization. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #4, 1 of 5 sampled residents, and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Benign Neoplasm of Cerebral Meninges, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Diabetes Mellitus type 2. A review of the Resident #4's Progress Notes (PN) revealed that on 05/13/2024 at 09:45, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 documented Resident was noted yelling I can't breathe, I can't breathe. Bp-126/78, R-18, T-97.5, SpO2- 75% on 2L of O2, wheezing noted to bilateral lungs upon auscultation. Call place to [physician] n/o [new order] received to send resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$48,186 in federal fines across 10 penalties.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-03-06
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $3,882 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $3,496 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $3,147 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $29K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ