Livingston Post Acute Care
348 E Cedar Street, Livingston, NJ 07039 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (973) 758-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.6% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.1% | 0.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 17.4% | 12.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 2.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.6% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.5% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.9% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 5.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.8% | 15.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.8% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.5% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.3% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.8% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.77 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 774 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 36.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 358 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 63% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.0%CMS range 57.7–66.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 9.5–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 36.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 6.1–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed staff credentials were verified upon hire for 56 of newly hired licensed staff reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. 1.On 12/29/25 at 9:49 AM, during entrance conference of Surveyor #1 (S #1) with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Assistant DON (ADON), S #1 asked the LNHA a list of new employees who were hired since the last recertification survey that included their title and date of hire. S #1 also notified the LNHA that all new hired employee files and medical records must be provided to the survey team as soon as possible. On 1/2/26 at 10:02 AM, S #1 met with the LNHA and asked about the loose files that she mentioned to the surveyors that she found with regard to new employees files. The LNHA stated that the Human Resource Manager (HRM) was on a leave, and the employee files were very disorganized and that was the reason why there were loose files and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate the need for the continued use of an indwelling catheter for a resident who were admitted to the facility with an indwelling catheter, failed to include catheter care in the comprehensive care plan and provide appropriate and sufficient care specifically by having the catheter tubing in contact with the floor. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #8, Resident #171), reviewed for indwelling catheter use and was evidenced by the following:1.On 12/29/25 at 10:56 AM, Surveyor #1 (S #1) observed Resident #8 lying in bed asleep, and an indwelling catheter (Foley) bag hung from the left side of the bed with a privacy bag. On 12/30/25 at 12:19 PM, S #1 reviewed the medical records of Resident #8 and revealed: A review of the admission Record (AR; an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but was not limited to; metabolic encephalopathy due to urinary tract infection (UTI),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure; a.) disposition of a narcotic medications for 2 Unsampled Residents (Unsampled Residents #1 and 2), b.) the backup controlled medications cycle count was routinely done, and c.) backup controlled medications discrepancies were resolved in a timely manner, for 3 Unsampled Residents (Unsampled Residents #3, 4, and 5), in accordance with the regulation for accurate reconciliation and accountability. The deficient practices were identified on 2 of the 4 medication carts inspected in 2 of 2 nursing units, and 1 of 1 backup up machine observed, and was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident's representative in advance of treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives to a resident receiving psychoactive medications. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #8), reviewed for unnecessary meds.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/29/25 at 10:56 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #8 lying in bed asleep. On 12/30/25 at 12:19 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical records Resident #8, and revealed:A review of Resident's #8 admission Record (an admission summary) reflected diagnoses which included but not limited to; metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance or systemic illness) due to urinary tract infection (UTI), dementia (loss of intellectual functioning) moderate without behavioral disturbance, psychotic, mood, and anxiety disturbances, and psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that reality is lost). A review of the comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 3 of 26 residents (Residents #2, #15, and #171) call bells were within reach and able to use to accommodate residents' needs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 12/29/25 10:34 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Surveyor #1 (S #1) observed Resident #2, sleeping in bed, with the call bell hung off side of the bed with the cord wrapped around the side rail. S #1 observed that the call bell was not within reach of the resident. S #1 reviewed the electronic medical record (eMR) of Resident #2, which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record (AR; an admission summary) that reflected that the resident had diagnoses of but not limited to; generalized muscle weakness, cerebral infarction (commonly known as a stroke), and aphasia (difficulty in communicating). A review of Resident #2's comprehensive minimum data set (cMDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/13/25, reflected that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor target behavior for the use of a psychotropic medication specifically an antipsychotic medication for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #4 and #9), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1. On 12/29/25 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 seated on a couch in their room. A review of Resident #4's admission Record (AR, an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but not limited to; fracture of neck of right femur (a type of hip fracture, broken bone), unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance (a form of dementia where the underlying cause is unknown, and the individual experiences a range of behavioral and psychological changes beyond the typical memory and cognitive decline associated with dementia) and anemia (problem of not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCYBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional standards of nursing practice for not following physician orders for 2 of 29 residents reviewed, Resident #1 and Resident #4.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure; a.) a physician's order (PO) was transcribed for acute transfer to hospital, b.) the PO for supplement was followed, and c.) the provider's assessment and plan was followed through and clarified for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #166) reviewed.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and well-being, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Repeat Deficiency Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services of residents that were receiving oxygen, according to the standard of clinical practice and the facility's policy and procedure, specifically, having a valid physicians' order and by documenting the date and time the oxygen tubing was changed for 1 of 1 resident, Resident #74. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident did not receive an unnecessary medication by excessive dose for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, (Resident #7). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #7's electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed the following.A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), pain due to internal orthopedic implants, and muscle weakness.A review of Resident #7's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (cMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/25/25, had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated the resident has no cognitive impairment.A review of the resident's Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications (meds) were administered without error of 5% or more during medication (med) administration, 3 nurses administered meds to 3 residents. There were 25 opportunities for error, 6 errors were observed which calculated to a med administration error rate of 24%. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents, (Resident #139, and Resident #83), that was administered meds by 2 of 3 nurses that were observed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide pharmaceutical services by ensuring the accurate administration of a medication (med) Midodrine, with a parameter according to the physician's order to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident #1) reviewed for med management and b.) ensure that residents were free from any significant med errors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #83) during the med pass observation, in accordance with professional standards clinical practice. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) medication was removed from active inventory when resident was discharged from the facility for 1 of 4 medication carts inspected and b.) emergency cart (ecart) supplies were not expired for 1 of 1 ecart inspected.The deficient practices were evidenced by the following:1.On [DATE] at 10:55 AM, the surveyor inspected the second floor medication cart #2 (medcart #2), in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and both observed Unsampled Resident #1's (UR #1's) Cosopt Ophthalmic Solution 2-0.5 % bottle was inside medcart #2. The surveyor asked the LPN if the resident was still at the facility, and he responded no, the resident was discharged (d/c'd) to home probably two days ago. The LPN confirmed that the medication (med) should have been disposed of once resident was d/c'd to home. He also stated that he would dispose it, and he removed it from the medcart. 2. On [DATE] at 11:14 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to perform testing of close contacts to resident that tested positive for COVID-19 to prevent further spread for 2 of 3 identified COVID positive incidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: A review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Infection Control Guidance: SARS-CoV-2, dated June 24, 2024, reflected the following but was not limited to:This guidance applies to all U.S. (United States) settings where healthcare is delivered, including nursing homes and home health. The recommendations in this guidance continue to apply after the expiration of the federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.Under Recommended routine infection prevention and control (IPC) practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.Perform SARS-CoV-2 Viral TestingAnyone with even mild symptoms of COVID-19,regardless of vaccination status, should receive a viral test for SARS-CoV-2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint#: 437202Based on facility policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R) R3 out of a total of 17 residents reviewed in the sample was provided with appropriate quality of care (QOC) related to intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication administration. This failure created the potential for the residents to experience a negative change in physical status related to medication not being provided timely. Review of the facility's policy titled, Unavailable Medication Policy dated adopted 06/2021 revealed, In conjunction with the contracted pharmacy, the facility will make every effort to ensure a medication ordered for the resident is available to meet their needs; and In the event that a medication ordered for a resident is noted to be unavailable near or at the time it is to be dispensed, nursing staff shall: a. Contact the pharmacy regarding the unavailable medication. b. Attempt to obtain the medication from the facility's automated medication dispensing system or emergency kit. c. Notify the physician of the unavailable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain kitchen sanitation in a manner intended to prevent the spread of food borne illness and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/16/24 at 7:55 AM, the surveyor toured the facility kitchen with Dietary Aid (DA#1). DA#1 stated that the Food Service Director (FSD) was not at the facility. The surveyor observed the following concerns: 1. The surveyor observed a refrigerator next to the stove. The contents in the refrigerator included but were not limited to two (2) packages of waffles, one (1) bowl of substance that looked like a chicken salad or tuna salad covered with aluminum foil and one (1) silver pan with pasta and red sauce covered with aluminum foil. The items were not labeled or dated. There was debris on the bottom of the refrigerator. 2. The surveyor observed 2 wheeled carts positioned together with the following food items on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that facility wide assessment included the resources required to establish policies and procedures for the management of staffing contingency plan to meet the requirements and needs of all residents in the facility and b.) meet the staffing plan as reflected in the Facility Assessment. These failures had the potential to affect all 126 residents who currently live in the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the entrance conference on 9/16/24 at 7:54 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) a copy of the Facility Assessment (FA). Both the LNHA and DON stated that the facility's census (the number of residents currently under the care of a specific facility) was 126. 1. A review of the facility's Facility Assessment with a date of July 23, 2024. The FA submitted by the LNHA on 9/17/24 at 9:00 AM did not reflect, under Part 3: Facility Resources Needed to Provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-20 · tag F0920 — widespreadProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent provided facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents provided one or more rooms designated for residents dining and dining activities according to the federal regulation, approved floor plan, and facility policy. This failure had the potential to affect all 126 residents who currently live in the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/16/24 at 9:26 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) and Surveyor #2 (S#2) met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) for an Entrance Conference. The LNHA informed the surveyors that the facility census (the current total number of residents in the facility) was 126. On that same date and time, the LNHA stated that since she started at the facility, there was no physical dining area which was why there were no dining services offered to the residents. The LNHA further stated that we have room tray services. Both the LNHA and DON stated that they were present during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCY Complaint #NJ175244 Refer to F883 Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for three (3) of 28 residents, (Residents #62, #148, and #209), reviewed for accuracy for MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) MDS 3.0 RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual of October 2023, for definitions of the types of therapies listed in this section, please refer to the Glossary in Appendix A. O-23 Coding Instructions: Coding Instructions for Respiratory, Psychological, and Recreational Therapies. o Total Minutes-Enter the actual number of minutes (mins) therapy services were provided in the last 7 (seven) days. Enter 0 if none were provided. o Days-Enter the number of days therapy services were provided in the last 7 days. A day of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) administer oxygen therapy according to the physician's order for one (1) of five (5) residents, Resident #67, b.) followed and clarified the plan for respiratory care of one (1) of five (5) residents, Resident #148), c.) ensure respiratory tubing, cannula, and masks were stored in accordance with infection control measures for four (4) of five (5) residents, Residents #11, #103, #124, and #148, and d.) obtain a physician order for oxygen therapy for one (1) of five (5) residents, Resident #124, reviewed for respiratory care according to the standard of clinical practice, and the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint#: NJ175260 and NJ176352 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and ensure call bells were answered timely without waiting a long period of time for seven (7) of 28 residents (Residents # 36, 60, 83, 84, 100, 102, and 153). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 9/16/24 at 7:45 AM, the surveyor observed the posted Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) dated 9/15/24 -Day shift 7:00 AM- 3:00 PM, which displayed Current Resident Census: 120 and the CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) to Resident ratio of 1:8.6. On 9/17/24 at 8:45 AM, the surveyor observed the posted NHRCSR dated 9/16/24 - Day shift 7:00 AM-3:00 PM, Current Resident Census: 126 and the CNA to Resident ratio of 1:9. On 9/20/24 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Staffing Coordinator (SC). The SC informed the surveyor that she was aware of the mandated New Jersey staffing law. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow appropriate hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) practices for four (4) of nine (9) staff (two Recreation Staff, one Certified Nursing Aide, and one Hospice Aide), b.) follow appropriate infection control practice during the medication pass observation when administering an eye drops for one (1) of three (3) nurses, c.) maintain infection control standards and procedures during wound care treatment for one (1) of one (1) nurse observed for wound treatment, and d.) follow appropriate infection control practices prevent the potential spread of infection for one (1) of two (2) linen carts observed during environmental tour in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ#175244 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's representative and physician of a change in condition in a timely manner for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #209), reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the closed medical record for Resident #209 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in 2023 and discharged from the facility in 2024. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed that Resident #209 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: lower back pain, hypertension (high blood pressure), and metabolic encephalopathy (change in how your brain works due to an underlying condition). A review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 6/16/24, reflected the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 7 out of 15, which indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that staff monitor and document resident's condition status post (s/p) fall and clarify the neurocheck documentation according to standards of clinical practice for one (1) of three (3) residents, Resident #148, reviewed for accidents, b.) follow the physician's written order and appropriately document urinary catheter output for one (1) of two (2) residents, Resident #358, reviewed for urinary catheters. c.) ensure staff follow the physician's order for one (1) of three (3) nurses, (Registered Nurse), observed during medication administration according to the facility's policies and standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #NJ 174669 Based on interview, record review and review of other documents provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for discharge and document the response of an approval or acceptance for the referral of home care/visiting nurse services post discharge to ensure a safe discharge for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #308). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/17/24 at 12:55 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record for Resident #308 which revealed the following: Resident #308's admission Record (or face sheet; admission summary) indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to pressure ulcer of sacral region (a wound that forms when prolonged pressure is applied to the sacrum, tailbone, or lower back), abnormal posture (rigid body movements and chronic abnormal positions of the body) and cognitive communication deficit (a difficulty with communication caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # NJ174669 Based on the interview, review of the medical record, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to document a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a final summary of the resident's status for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #308). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/17/24 at 12:55 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record for Resident #308 which revealed the following: Resident #308's admission Record (or face sheet; admission summary) indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to pressure ulcer of sacral region (a wound that forms when prolonged pressure is applied to the sacrum, tailbone, or lower back), abnormal posture (rigid body movements and chronic abnormal positions of the body) and cognitive communication deficit (a difficulty with communication caused by a disruption in cognitive processes, such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for a resident with pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #36), reviewed for pressure ulcer care and prevention. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/16/24 at 9:36 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #36 lying in their bed with the head of the bed elevated. The resident was alert and verbally responsive. Resident #36 stated they had a right heel wound which they were receiving treatment (tx) for. The resident added the wound was new, and they did not have it prior to being admitted to the facility. On 9/18/24 at 11:17 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) any skin investigations for Resident #36. On 9/19/24 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor asked the LNHA and Director of Nursing (DON) if there were any skin investigations for Resident #36. The DON stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents admitted with decreased range of motion and mobility received appropriate treatment, device, appropriate services, and assistance to maintain and prevent further decline. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of two (2) residents, Resident #67, reviewed for a limited range of motion (ROM). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/16/24 at 10:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #67's room closed. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN#1) came out from the resident's room and informed the surveyor that the surveyor had to come back later. The LPN further stated that there were two aides providing care. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical records of Resident #67 and revealed: The admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to essential hypertension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) the monthly weight and re-weighs were done, documented, and monitored for two (2) of two (2) residents, Residents #2 and #67, b.) the physician was notified the significant weight loss for one (1) of two (2) residents, Resident #2, reviewed for nutrition, and c.) the duplicate physician orders for gastrostomy tube flushes were clarified for one (1) of one (1) resident, Resident #67, reviewed for hydration. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 9/16/24 at 10:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 seated on the bed with a breakfast tray in front of the resident with the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) at the bedside. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical records of Resident #2 and revealed: The admission Record (AR; an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to other low back pain, essential hypertension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ#175244 Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a moderately impaired resident received care and services with regard to pain management for one (1) of one (1) resident, Resident #209, reviewed for pain according to standards of clinical practice and facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #NJ167713 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) maintain the dialysis communication record between the facility and the dialysis center for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #458) and b.) provide care and services in accordance with professional standards clinical practice and facility policy for two (2) of two (2) residents (Resident #98, 458), reviewed for dialysis services. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the daily posting of licensed nurses, certified nursing aide staffing, and the resident census on two (2) of five (5) days during the survey. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On Monday, 9/16/24 at 7:45 AM, upon entry into the facility, the surveyor observed a Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) which was posted in the reception area of the lobby. The NHRCSR posted for day shift was dated 9/15/24. There was no NHRSCR posted for 9/16/24 day shift. On Tuesday, 9/17/24 at 8:45 AM, the surveyor observed the NHRCSR posted in the lobby. The NHRCSR posted for day shift was dated 9/16/24. There was no NHRSCR posted for the 9/17/24 day shift. On 9/18/24 at 11:39 AM, in the presence of the survey team, the surveyor notified the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), Assistance Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (ADON/IP), and Regional Nurse Consultant #1(RNC#1) about the concern…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to address the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #62) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/16/24 at 9:06 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #62 in their room, lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. The resident was alert, verbally responsive, and could not recall how long the resident was at the facility. Resident #62 verbalized no concerns with their care. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record of Resident #62. The admission Record (a summary of important information about the resident) documented that the resident had diagnoses that included but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance, and hypertension. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/08/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored securely and appropriately. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of two (2) medication carts observed on the third floor during the surveyor's initial tour of the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 9/16/24 at 11:49 AM, the surveyor observed the medication (med) cart located on the 3rd floor, side three. The surveyor observed two vials of med located on the top of the med cart. The vials were observed to be opened for use and had a manufacturer label that reflected they contained the drug Acetylcysteine (a med used to decrease mucous in some lung conditions). The surveyor did not observe a nurse or other authorized person at the med cart. As the surveyor was attempting to locate the nurse assigned to the med cart, a nurse approached the cart and placed the vials in her pocket. The surveyor asked the nurse if she was the nurse assigned and she stated that she was. The surveyor asked the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete, available, accurate, and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of the 28 residents reviewed (Residents #62 and #148). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 9/16/24 at 9:06 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #62 in their room, lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. The resident was alert, verbally responsive, and could not recall how long they were at the facility. Resident #62 verbalized no concerns with their care. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (paper and electronic) medical record of Resident #62. The admission Record (AR; a summary of important information about the resident) documented that the resident had diagnoses (Dx) that included but were not limited to, dementia, and hypertension. A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/08/24, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to offer residents a pneumococcal vaccine or document the reason for ineligibility for the pneumococcal vaccine for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #43, #62 and #148). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends pneumococcal vaccination (PCV) for many adults based on age, having certain risk conditions, and pneumococcal vaccines already received . CDC recommends PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21 for adults who never received a PCV and are Ages 65 years or older Ages 19 through 64 years with certain risk conditions. Chronic conditions and other factors that increase someone's risk for pneumococcal disease include: Chronic heart, kidney, liver, or lung disease (Chronic lung disease includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), emphysema, and asthma); Diabetes; Immunocompromising…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
C# NJ00169866 Based on interview, medical records (MR) review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 02/08/24 and 02/12/24, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the residents care plan (CP) that was initiated on 11/22/23 for a Resident who was at risk for falls for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #2 was admitted with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Alzheimer's Disease, Adult Failure to Thrive, Difficulty in Walking, and Muscle Weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 11/28/23, revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 which indicated cognition was severely impaired and the resident needed help in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the progress notes (PN), dated 12/02/2023 at 2:21 p.m., documented by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), indicated Patient [Resident #2] received walking around, stable, verbally responsive. Medication given as prescribed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Entry Reporting Assessment in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 38 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #90, #133). This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 8/10/23 at 10:26 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment task that included the Resident's MDS Assessments. A MDS is a comprehensive tool that is a federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS within 14 days of the assessment being completed. 1. Resident #90 was observed to have an Entry MDS of 6/19/23 and was due to be transmitted no later than 7/3/23. The Entry MDS was not transmitted until 7/4/23. 2. Resident #133 was observed to have an Entry MDS of 7/22/23 and was due to be transmitted no later than 8/5/23. The Entry MDS was not transmitted until 8/10/23. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for 3 of 22 residents (Resident # 138, #140, and #86) reviewed for accuracy for MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 12:13 PM the surveyor reviewed the closed medical chart for Resident #138 who was MDS coded for hospitalization. The surveyor reviewed the Progress Notes (PN) created on [DATE] by the Social Worker (SW) for Resident #138. The PN documented that Resident #138 was discharged home per their family's request. Review of the [DATE] Nursing PN documented that Resident #138 was discharged at 11:30 with the family via a wheelchair, without any distress or discomfort, all discharge papers ready and signed by the resident. Review of Resident #138's Face Sheet (FS) (a one-page summary of important information about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to properly administer a medication used to treat hypotension in accordance with the physician's order (PO) in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice, for 1 of 22 residents, Resident #97. The deficient practice is evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain weekly weights for a resident according to the physician's order (PO) and facility policy for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #97 reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/7/23 at 9:10 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #97's electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed the following: A review of the Resident #97's face sheet (FS) (an admission summary) revealed that they were admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Pneumonitis (inflammation in your lung tissues), Sepsis (the body's life threatening response to infection that can lead to tissue damage, organ failure, and death), Acute Respiratory Failure (serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), muscle wasting and atrophy (the decrease in size and wasting of muscle tissue), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and adult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor an enteral tube feeding administration pump to assure the total volume administered was in accordance with physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for enteral tube feeding, (Resident #391), and was evidenced by the following: On 8/2/23 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #391 in bed awake, alert, and verbal. Communication board on table at bed side. observed with an enteral tube feeding pump (TF; a tube feeding surgically inserted to the stomach) administering Glucerna 1.2 (nutritional formula) at a rate of 65 milliliters (ml) an hour. On 8/3/23 at 9:13 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed on specialized mattress awake, alert, and responded appropriately to surveyor. The surveyor observed Glucerna 1.2 being administered at a rate of 80 ml per hour. The surveyor reviewed the Electronic Medical Record for Resident #391. Review of the Face Sheet (FS) (a one-page summary of information about a resident that documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to act upon recommendations reported to the facility by the Pharmacy Consultant (PC) within an acceptable timeframe. This deficient practice was observed for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #105) reviewed. On 8/7/23 at 12:24 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #105 lying in bed, awake and alert. The resident was placed under contact isolation due to diagnosis of Clostridium Difficile (Infection of the large intestine (colon) caused by the bacteria Clostridium difficile). A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) section, dated 6/21/23 reflected that Resident #105 was cognitively intact. A review of the resident's face sheet (FS) (an admission summary) indicated that Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnosis which included but not limited to, Acute Respiratory Failure, Sepsis, Congestive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHPA OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/28/2023 |
| AMO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/02/2023 |
| AMO TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/02/2023 |
| SJR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/02/2023 |
| SCHUSTER, JEREMY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/02/2023 |
| METROPOLITAN COMMERCIAL BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 07/28/2023 |
| GASTWIRTH, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/28/2023 |
| KLEID, LAURIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/28/2023 |
| 849 BIG OAK RD HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/02/2023 |
| 849 BIG OAK RD LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/02/2023 |
| ABE AND RACHEL BAK FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/02/2023 |
| BAGZ HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/02/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315526. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.