No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gardens At Monroe Healthcare And Rehabilitation, T

189 Applegarth Road, Monroe Township, NJ 08831 · For profit - Individual · 136 certified beds · (609) 448-7036 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (609) 448-7036 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2023
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
205 Applegarth Rd · (732) 521-3131 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
209 Applegarth Rd · (609) 642-8208 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
238 Cranbury Station Rd · (609) 655-4175 · Call to confirm hours
Park
38 Maplewood Ave · (407) 384-7404 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.2%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%2.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.6%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.2%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.1%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.9%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.2%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.632.071.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.831.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 589 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 231 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.4%CMS range 55.8–64.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.8–11.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 4.3–8.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
20.3%
Total nursing turnover
21.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 136 beds and averages 99.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-09)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) on 2 of 4 Units ([NAME] and [NAME]) caring for Residents #54 and #340, removed (doffed) personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately, and b.) 1 of 3 nurses wore their facemask properly on 1 of 4 units ([NAME]) caring for Resident #2, and in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Guidance. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/03/25 at 11:57 AM, the surveyor observed CNA #1 enter Resident #340's room who was on transmission-based precautions (TBP) [process that is implemented to prevent the spread of infections]. CNA #1 was wearing a surgical mask and donned (put on) a gown, gloves and face shield prior to entering the room. She carried the food tray in the room and assisted the resident with setting up the lunch tray. CNA #1 removed and discarded her gloves in the room and exited the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) documented a resident's assessment after a fall occurred. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #10). Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards by not ensuring a.) an apical heart rate (pulse heard on the chest) was obtained before the medication Digoxin (a medication used to treat heart failure or rhythm problems) was administered by one (1) of three (3) nurses and b.) required vital sign parameters for a medication were obtained in a timely manner by one (1) of three (3) nurses who administered medications to two (2) of five (5) residents, (unsampled Residents #2 and #140), during the medication administration observation. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-04 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespread
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a process was in place and followed to ensure untrained staff without sufficient competencies to meet the health and/or safety needs of one or more residents. [Non-permanent Nurse Aides (NAs)] were competent to provide resident care by failing to ensure: a.) NAs were full-time employees who were enrolled in a State- approved training and competency program, and b.) a system was in place to ensure all NAs received the appropriate training and deemed eligible to provide resident care, which included, but was not limited to; assisting with two person transfers, bathing and feeding dependent residents. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 7 NAs reviewed that provided care on 4 of 4 resident units from 09/04/22 through 04/20/23, and was evidenced by the following: The evidence was as follows: On 04/17/23 at 11:40 AM, during initial tour, a surveyor proceeded toward the end of one of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to a.) ensure policies and procedures were implemented and followed to ensure all agency employed Nurse Aides (NAs) were competent and eligible to provide direct resident care for 5 of 7 NAs who worked on 4 of 4 units and provided facility wide direct resident care from 09/04/22 through 04/20/23 and b.) follow the facility's abuse policy to ensure that all contracted NAs received criminal background check(s) prior to working at the facility and review information from licensing boards or other registries including for alleged foreign credentialed staff. The LNHA failed to to have a system in place to ensure that all staff were appropriately screened to ensure they have never been convicted of a crime or other disqualifying offences. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F728F and 607E On 04/17/23 at 11:40 AM, during initial tour, a surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 4/24/2023 at 12:25 PM, a review of Resident #55's Incident/Accident report dated 12/06/2022, revealed that on 12/06/2022 at 06:50 PM, the resident was noted to have a purplish discoloration below the left eye, on the eye bag area, medial side. No skin opening, surrounding skin intact; no swelling noted. The incident report indicated that Resident #55 was alert and oriented and able to verbalize needs, but not aware of how he/she sustained the bruise. The resident's medical doctor (MD) and family were notified of the incident. Further review of Resident #55's incident report indicated that the resident's condition before the incident was normal and that the exact location of the incident was the resident's room. The incident report included a diagram of the location of the bruise and a description and measurement of the bruise, which revealed a purple discoloration below the left eye bag corner measuring 1.5 cm [centimeters] x 1 cm. The incident report also included three (3) staff investigative statements as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that there was consistent documentation of social service comprehensive assessments for 7 of 11 residents reviewed for social services (Resident's #4, #8, #10, #15, #35, #39, and #61) , and b.) clarify and accurately transcribe a physician's order for Ambien (a Sedative-Hypnotic) which resulted in a resident receiving the incorrect dose of the medication. This was identified for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #387) reviewed for medication management. The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow Physician Orders (PO) with regards to blood pressure medications with parameters for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #76) reviewed for medication management. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/17/22 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #76 in the room and seated in a wheelchair watching television. The surveyor reviewed Resident #76's medical records. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to hypertension (elevated blood pressure), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to limbs) and nonrheumatic mitral (valve) insufficiency (mitral valve does not close properly, allowing blood to flow backward into the heart). A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 2/21/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' bathing choice of a daytime shower was provided for (2) two of (6) six residents (Resident #10 and #61) reviewed for choices during a resident council meeting on 4/19/23. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 4/19/23 at 10:38 AM, a resident council meeting was conducted with six residents who resided on the [NAME] unit. During that meeting six of six residents expressed that residents required the most assistance during the 7 AM - 3 PM shift, and that at times it was difficult to get showered. Two of the six residents stated that they were scheduled to receive a shower that morning but were unable to be showered since they were told that the unit was short staffed. Record Review for Resident #10: Review of the admission Record reflected that the resident had diagnoses that included but were not limited to; heart failure, morbid obesity, generalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safety of the residents by allowing staff to shower residents in a non-resident certified area on 1 of 4 units. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/17/23 at 11:25 AM, the surveyor toured the [NAME] Unit. On that same day at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed a door held open via a magnet off the [NAME] unit. On 4/17/23 at 11:54 AM, the surveyor observed the same door open and attached to the magnet latch. At that same time, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, the rooms beyond this door are rooms that were converted into staff aide rooms and there is a kitchen and a bathroom beyond the door. She further stated, it's an employee overnight area, an extension. At that same time, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) stated, this area is not nursing home use. He further stated, it is hard to get staff, and this was a wonderful opportunity to get staff. The LNHA stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 8 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report a bruise of unknown origin to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) as required for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/24/2023 at 12:25 PM, a review of Resident #55's Incident/Accident report dated 12/06/2022, revealed that on 12/06/2022 at 06:50 PM, the resident was noted to have a purplish discoloration below the left eye, on the eye bag area, medial side. No skin opening, surrounding skin intact; no swelling noted. The incident report indicated that Resident #55 was alert and oriented and able to verbalize needs, but not aware of how he/she sustained the bruise. The resident's medical doctor (MD) and family were notified of the incident. Further review of Resident #55's incident report indicated that the resident's condition before the incident was normal and that the exact location of the incident was the resident's room. The incident report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a bruise of unknown origin on 12/6/22. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following: On 4/24/2023 at 12:25 PM, a review of Resident #55's Incident/Accident report dated 12/06/2022, revealed that on 12/06/2022 at 06:50 PM, the resident was noted to have a purplish discoloration below the left eye, on the eye bag area, medial side. No skin opening, surrounding skin intact; no swelling noted. The incident report indicated that Resident #55 was alert and oriented and able to verbalize needs, but not aware of how he/she sustained the bruise. The resident's medical doctor (MD) and family were notified of the incident. Further review of Resident #55's incident report indicated that the resident's condition before the incident was normal and that the exact location of the incident was the resident's room. The incident report included a diagram of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure a treatment was administered in accordance with a physician order and in accordance with professional standards of practice, and b.) accurately document skin assessments. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wound care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities in the resident's medical record to the facility staff and attending physician. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of twenty-five (25) residents reviewed, (Resident #76) for medication management and was evidenced by the following: On 4/17/22 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #76 in the room and seated in a wheelchair watching television. The surveyor reviewed Resident #76's medical records. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to; hypertension (elevated blood pressure), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to limbs) and nonrheumatic mitral (valve) insufficiency (mitral valve does not close properly, allowing blood to flow backward into the heart). A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a). properly label, store, and dispose of medications in 1 (one) of 5 (five) medication carts and 1 (one) of 3 (three) medication room refrigerators inspected and b). failed to properly secure medications in 2 (two) of 4 (four) emergency crash carts inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 4/26/23 at 9:35 AM, the surveyor inspected the [NAME] unit medication cart in the presence of a Registered Nurse (RN#1). The surveyor observed an opened and undated bottle of Pro-Stat solution (a protein supplement). The surveyor interviewed RN#1 who stated that an opened bottle of Pro-Stat solution once opened should have been dated because once opened it only had a 90-day expiration date. On 4/26/23 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor inspected the [NAME]/[NAME] medication room refrigerator in the presence of RN#1. The surveyor observed an opened and undated bottle of Lorazepam (anxiety medication) 2 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a contracted staff donned (put on) the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering a transmissions-based precaution (TBP) room for contact precautions. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents on TBP on 1 of 4 units, and b.) disinfect a multi-use wrist blood pressure (BP) cuff in between resident use. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 6 unsampled residents during a medication administration observation. The evidence was as follows: On 4/20/23 at 6:20 AM, the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER] with a yellow paper that had red Stop sign and PPE: Contact Precaution sign affixed to the outside of the a white PPE bin hung on the outside of the door. The sign revealed: Hand Hygiene, Wear Gloves, and Wear Gown. The yellow sign also indicated Visitors (underlined) Please check with nurse before entering room. At that time the surveyor observed, through the open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-11 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to attempt to verify information on a newly hired Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) with Reciprocity qualification status in the multi-state registry. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 newly hired staff in the last four months (CNA #1). On [DATE] at 9 AM, the surveyor reviewed five randomly selected newly hired employees in the last four months. The following was revealed: A review of the employee file for CNA #1 revealed a hire date of [DATE]. A review of the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) Online Public Registry verification revealed that CNA #1 had an active certification in New Jersey but had received it based on a qualifying basis of Reciprocity. The Original Issue Date was [DATE]. A criminal background check performed on [DATE] revealed no findings. There was no documented evidence within the personnel file of CNA #1 of an attempt to seek information on the status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-04-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for accurately coding the MDS according to the Resident Asessment Instrument (RAI-used to assess and care plan residents). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/07/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #87. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; unspecified intracapsular fracture of right femur (a broken thigh bone), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing and lobar pneumonia, unspecified organism (a bacterial lung infection). A review of the MDS dated [DATE], revealed section A0310, F Entry/discharge reporting:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BAMBERGER, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2005
BAMBERGER, ROCHELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2005
SCHON, MORDECHAIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEENO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2005
STEINFELD, YEHUDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2011

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 42%Medicare 25%Other / private 33%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$418per resident / day
operating cost
$12,714per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$421per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315336. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next