King Manor Care and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 95.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 41% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Hcited beforedisputed · IIDR2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff provided care in a manner for residents to attain their highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being by ensuring processes were put in place a.) to identify a change in condition in a timely manner, b.) to assess any decline in the functional status of a resident (Resident #58) who required assistance with bathing and was not provided a shower for over three months, and c.) to ensure a recommended physician follow-up appointment was scheduled. On 3/25/26, Resident #58 asked the surveyor to assist them in obtaining a shower, who was then showered, and the resident had a skin assessment completed by the physician who identified bilateral lower extremity cellulitis (infection) that required antibiotic treatment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for quality of care. The facility further failed to ensure processes were in place d.) to ensure for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Hdisputed · IIDR2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide adequate supervision and implement targeted interventions to prevent falls for a resident (Resident #58) who sustained six falls between 12/5/25 and 2/26/26, including multiple unwitnessed falls and three falls that required hospitalization. On 2/8/26, Resident #58 sustained a right periorbital hematoma (bruising and swelling of the tissue around the eye) with a 2-centimeter laceration to the right eyebrow from an unwitnessed fall. This deficient practice was identified for 1of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #58). The facility further failed to b.) have a system in place to identify potential vulnerabilities of residents to reduce and mitigate potentially avoidable accidents for residents with a history of substance use disorder who signed themselves out of the facility on pass. On 8/7/26, Resident #5 signed themself out of the facility on pass at 1:30 PM, did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0568 — widespread
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure quarterly financial statements were provided to residents who maintained Personal Needs Account (PNA) funds with the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 7 of 7 residents who attended a resident council meeting, and affected all 84 residents identified as maintaining a facility PNA account.The evidence was as follows: On 3/23/26 at 8:13 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with a list of all Personal Need Account balances as of 3/19/26. The Trial Balance listed 84 total PNA accounts with a $33,770.89 balance held by the facility. On 03/23/26 at 10:28 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident council meeting with 7 residents. When asked if the residents were provided quarterly statements for their PNA accounts, the residents stated no and they would have to request a PNA statement from the facility.On 03/24/26 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor met with Resident #56 and the regular Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-03-26 · tag F0569 — widespread
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a process was in place to ensure that all residents that maintained a Personal Needs Account (PNA) that approached the limit that could jeopardize a resident's eligibility for Medicaid or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) were notified. This deficient practice was identified for a resident who had PNA funds in excess of $2000.00 (Resident #56) and affected all 84 residents who maintained a facility PNA. The evidence was as follows: On 3/23/26 at 8:13 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with a list of all Personal Need Account balances as of 3/19/26. Resident #56 had a current balance of $2036.12, and the Trial Balance listed 84 total accounts with a $33,770.89 balance held by the facility. On 03/23/26 at 12:45 PM, the surveyor interviewed both Social Workers (SW #1 and SW #2) regarding the PNA process to assist residents to use their funds. SW #1 stated that the Activity Director talked to the residents to determine what they needed from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient competent staff to ensure a) all residents were provided with appropriate and timely incontinence care, nail care and were consistently available to provide appropriate care to maintain residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing and b) the minimum staffing requirements per the New Jersey Department of Health based on acuity of the residents was maintained. The deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #10, #31, # 58, #68 and #122) and had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility.The evidence was as follows: Refer to F677a)1. On 3/22/26 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #122 in bed, the resident informed the surveyor that they just finished their breakfast meal. The resident had the lid tray in their hand and informed the surveyor that they could not see, they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews of all Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) to provide specific education aligned with the facility assessment and based on staff observed needs for improvement. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 CNAs whose personnel records were reviewed, and was evidenced by the following:On 3/24/26 at 10:30 PM, the surveyor requested the Licensed Home Administrator (LNHA) to provide the list of all new hires since the last survey, including employees who were no longer employed by the facility and contracting facility's employees. On 3/24/26 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Nurse educator and required the orientation package, the facility assessment and the Performance Evaluation for 5 selected CNAs. The nurse educator informed the surveyor that the Director of Nursing and the LNHA were responsible for the employees' Performance evaluation. On 3/24/26 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor requested from the LNHA the performance evaluation for five…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0836 — widespread
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it maintained responsibility for the care and services provided to residents at all times, and ensure a process was in place to integrate care and services for residents who regularly attended an outside Program of All -Inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #115) and attended a PACE program, and had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility and for 6 of 6 residents who attended a PACE program.The evidence was as follows: On 3/22/26 at 8:00 AM, the survey team entered the facility to conduct a survey and at 8:10 AM, while in the lobby, the survey team observed a person ambulating with a walker, then exited the facility, placed a cigarette in their mouth, and proceeded to ambulate down a hill while smoking the cigarette. When asked, the receptionist confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0847 — widespread
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that prior to signing a binding arbitration agreement, that was included within the admission Packet, the agreement was clearly communicated to the resident or representative in a manner they understood, and they acknowledged they understood the agreement. The deficient practice was identified for 7 of 7 residents (Resident #15, #37, #38, #86, #102, #106, and #114) who attended a resident council meeting and a resident with a severely impaired cognition (Resident #105).The evidence was as follows: On 3/22/26 at 10:19 AM, during the facility entrance conference held with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the surveyor asked the LNHA if the facility used Arbitration Agreements and asked if any residents had signed the agreements. The LNHA stated the admission department would handle the Arbitration Agreements and that he would inform the surveyor if anyone had signed the agreement.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-03-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to self-identify systems and processes that may negatively affect resident quality of care, quality of life and review significant events and implement data driven QAPI program. The deficient practice affected all residents who resided at the facility and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F568, F569, F584, F677, F679, F684, F689, F730, F925Refer to F568, F569, F584E, F677E, F679E, F684H, F689H, F730F, F925E a. On 3/23/26 at 8:13 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with a list of all Personal Need Account balances as of 3/19/26. Resident #56 had a current balance of $2036.12, and the Trial Balance listed 84 total accounts with a $33,770.89 balance held by the facility. On 03/24/26 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Business Office Manager (BOM) who worked for the management company and went to multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-03-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, it was determined that the facility Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to utilize the facility Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to follow the facility process to measure and utilize data acquired and develop quantitative and measurable goals, this deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 3/24/2026 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed facility provided Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) for activities regarding resident participation, missed reimbursement related to failure to capture respiratory treatments, CNA staffing, MDS modifications, and baseline care plans. All PIPs reviewed did not include quantitative and measurable goals. In addition, there were no goals and thresholds listed for performance measurements. On 3/26/2026 at 8:42 AM, two surveyors interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding how the facility determined what was reviewed by the QAPI team and how QAPI plans were developed. The LNHA stated every quarter the department heads would present their (PIPs)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 2577317 Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's living environment in a clean, comfortable and homelike manner for 4 of 4 resident rooms (#1, #13, #15 and #19) observed on 1 of 2 resident units (Rosewood), and for 1 of 2 shower rooms ([NAME]). The evidence was as follows: a. On 3/22/26 at 10:40 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor entered Residents room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, observed broken tiles behind the toilet, four (4) of the 9 ceiling tiles had gaps which also surrounded the sprinkler head ,were deteriorated on the corners of the tiles, a plywood on top of the bathtub which was not fastened, and was covered with half a mat, positioned lengthwise. At that time, the surveyor invited the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) to enter room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom. The CNA confirmed she observed the same and stated she would inform the nurse of the concerns. On 3/22/26 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor and the CNA entered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living was provided with a) routine and appropriate incontinence care, b) a shower that was consistent with their needs and preferences, c) assistance to get out of bed, d) routine and appropriate nail care in a timely manner This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #10, Resident #31, Resident # 58 and Resident #122).The evidence was as follows:1) On 3/22/26 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor #1 entered Resident #122's room and observed Resident #122 in bed. Upon inquiry, Resident #122 informed the surveyor that they were not provided with incontinence care on the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift. The surveyor asked a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) in the hallway to assist with an incontinence check. The CNA informed the resident of the procedure, and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$108,000 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $108,000 — penalty dated 2026-03-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ