New Community Extended Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 90.1 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 90 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that hot water temperatures were maintained at safe levels to protect residents from third degree burns and/or serious injury on 2 of 2 nursing units (floors 2 and 3). Hot water temperatures obtained on 2/10/25, on all nursing units (2nd and 3rd floor units) and in resident shower rooms, registered between 125 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 152 degrees F. Interviews with the Director of Environmental Services (DEVS) confirmed that the facility did not check hot water temperatures after repairs were made to the hot water system on 2/9/2025. The DEVS stated that the hot water temperatures should have been checked after the repair to ensure temperatures were at a safe level. The facility's failure to ensure that residents were protected from excessive hot water temperatures posed the likelihood of serious harm and injury from third degree burns. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation (IJ). The IJ began on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ# 00167595 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents for 3 of 5 residents observed during incontinence rounds (Residents #59, #65, and #81) on 1 of 2 nursing units (3rd-floor unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/5/25 at 8:00 AM, the surveyor performed incontinence rounds with the Registered Nurse/ Unit Manager (RN/UM) on the 3rd floor Nursing Unit and observed Resident #81 in bed. The RN/UM exposed Resident #81's incontinence brief and observed a second incontinence brief wet with urine inserted inside the adult brief. At that time, the RN/UM confirmed that the brief should have been changed every two hours and that placing two incontinence briefs on a resident was unacceptable as it could cause the resident's skin to breakdown. The surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #81. A review of Resident #81's admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently complete the Dialysis communication monitoring sheets for Residents on dialysis (a treatment that replicates the kidney's function and cleans the waste from the blood for individuals with kidney disease or failure). This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #19 and #25) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/3/25 at 12:31 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #19 seated in a wheelchair. The resident stated that she/he went to dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #19. A review of Resident #19's admission Record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; respiratory failure with hypoxia (a medical condition that occurs when there is not enough oxygen in the body's tissues and hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the blood) and dependence on hemodialysis. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control precautions for: a.) COVID-19 positive resident during dining and meal distribution, for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for transmission based precaution (Resident #56), and b.) perform proper hand hygiene for one (1) of five (5) nurses observed. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: Reference: https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety/ According to the CDC Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, Hand Hygiene Guidance, last reviewed on February 27, 2024, included that Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient Before performing an aseptic task or handling invasive medical devices Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient After touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment After contact with blood, body fluids, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for 2 of 2 nursing unit dining rooms during the lunch meal. Evidence of the deficient practice is as follows. On 2/3/25 at 12:09 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal on the second floor in the day room/dining room. On each of thirteen tables, staff served the residents' meals on plastic trays. Additionally, the dome lids from the plates were placed upside down in the center of the tables and used as trash receptacles. On 2/3/25 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal on the third floor in the day room/dining room. On each of the six tables staff served the residents' meals on plastic trays. Additionally, the dome lids from the plates were placed upside down in the center of the tables and used as trash receptacles. On 2/4/25 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal on the second floor in the day room/dining room. Residents ate their meals on plastic trays, with the dome lids on the tables collecting trash. At each of five tables of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint NJ00166888 Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party of a change in condition and a room change for 1 (#11) of 16 residents reviewed. The deficient practice is as follows. The surveyor reviewed Resident #11's electronic progress notes during the period of 8/23/23 through 9/4/23. The nurse documented in an 8/23/23 electronic progress note that the resident had tested positive for COVID 19 and was on isolation precautions. The resident was noted to be residing on the second floor at that time. An 8/25/23 nurse progress note indicated the resident was relocated to the third floor and continued on isolation precautions. There was no documentation in the progress notes that the responsible party had been notified of the resident's COVID 19 status or of the change to another nursing unit. A 9/4/23 progress note written by the social worker indicated the resident's daughter had been notified that her mother would be transferred back to her room on the second floor nursing unit. On 2/04/25 at 11:33 AM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the call bell within reach of residents. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for the accommodation of needs (Resident # 53 and # 81) and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/3/25 at 12:54 PM, the surveyor observed Resident # 53 in bed. The surveyor greeted the resident and Resident # 53 did not respond to the surveyor. The surveyor observed that the resident's call bell (used to summon staff for assistance) was located behind the resident's bed, on the floor and was not within his/her reach. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident # 53. A review of Resident # 53's admission Record reflected that the Resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; metabolic encephalopathy and was receiving hospice care services. A review of Resident # 53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated , revealed Resident # 53 had severely impaired cognition. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain the residents' living environment in a clean, sanitary, and homelike manner for 2 sampled residents (#11, #53), 2 unsampled residents (room [ROOM NUMBER] window, #220 window) and the area on the 2nd floor nursing unit hallway between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The deficient practice is evidenced by the following. 1. During the 2/03/25 initial tour of the second floor nursing unit at 10:23 AM, the surveyor noted a strong odor of urine in the area between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. A full soiled laundry cart was located in the hallway between these two rooms. On the same day at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #11's privacy curtain was stained with dark brown/black matter, the floor had several broken floor tiles, and the toilet was heavily stained with stool. On the same day at 10:40 AM, the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER] window belonging to an unsampled resident. The resident's overbed table had the veneer broken off of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident # 11 and # 54). This deficient practice was evidenced by: The MDS is a comprehensive tool that is a federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS up to 14 days of the assessment being completed. The following residents were reviewed for late comprehensive MDS assessments. 1. Resident #11 - A review of the MDS schedule of submitted MDSs in the resident's electronic medical records of the previous software program and the current software program used by the facility revealed the last comprehensive MDS was done on 2/23/24. The following MDSs to date were quarterly assessment. The most recent of which was dated 1/24/25. A comprehensive MDS assessment is required to be completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) for Resident #25. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 16 residents reviewed and was evidenced by the following: This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/3/25 at 11:34 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #25 seated on a wheelchair, awake, and conversant. At that time, the resident stated that they went to the dialysis center three times a week. The surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #25. According to the admission Record face sheet, an admission summary, reflected that Resident #25 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis. A review of the physician's progress notes dated 10/16/24, included that when the resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital, Resident #25 had a permanent catheter to the right upper chest with a new diagnosis of End Stage Renal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 16 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident # 11, # 26, and # 54). This deficient practice was evidenced by: The MDS is a comprehensive tool that is a federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS up to 14 days of the assessment being completed. The following residents were reviewed for late quarterly MDS assessments. 1. Resident #11 - The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System report (iQIES) indicated the 10/24/24 quarterly MDS was submitted late. The 10/24/24 quarterly MDS was submitted on 11/15/24, over the required 14 days. 2. Resident #54 - The CMS iQIES report indicated the 11/11/24 quarterly MDS was submitted late. The 11/11/24 quarterly MDS was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$70,317 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $70,317 — penalty dated 2025-02-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ