No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

New Vista Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr

300 Broadway, Newark, NJ 07104 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 340 certified beds · (973) 484-4222 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (973) 484-4222 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2026$88,556 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $88,556 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-20)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
176 Bloomfield Ave · (973) 484-7702 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
205 Summer Ave · (973) 481-3388 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
253 Broadway · (973) 483-5494 · Call to confirm hours
Park
277 Passaic Ave · (201) 955-7983 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.9%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.4%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.7%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.0%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.9%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.3%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.7%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.2%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.862.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.851.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.1%CMS range 23.7–53.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.8–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.7–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
1.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.35
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.64
RN hoursweekends
30.0%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 340 beds and averages 253.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 86 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-22)
26
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-06)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of Staff to Resident Abuse and did not follow its policy titled Reporting & Investigation Policy, which states that all staff must receive periodic refresher training on the recognition of abuse and neglect. This deficient practice was identified for 1 out of 10 residents (Resident R#3) reviewed for abuse allegations, as evidenced by the following: Review of R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/26 revealed that R3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (without behavioral disturbance), psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and Psychotic disorder with delusions due to a known physiological condition. R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment.Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered laboratory test was performed and failed to ensure results were reported to the ordering physician for one (1) of one (1) resident (R)2 reviewed.Findings include:The review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/08/26 revealed the following diagnoses: syncope and collapse, unspecified dementia, unspecified mental disorder, and Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment.A review of the Orders tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed a physician order dated 09/02/25 by MD 1 for Recheck test for Trichomonas in November 2025.However, the Results tab in the EMR revealed no documentation that the ordered laboratory test was performed, nor were any laboratory results reported to the ordering physician During an interview on 04/09/26 at 6:04 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the ordered test was not performed and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness and, b.) failed to maintain the kitchen environment and equipment in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and potential for the development a food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 7/16/25 at 10:02 AM, in the presence of the Food Services Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following:1. In the food preparation area, the surveyor observed red colored, sticky debris on the tubing of the juice dispenser and observed a spillage of clear liquid below the juice dispenser legging. 2. On oven number 1, the surveyor observed 5 of 12 oven knobs soiled with a white colored substance and 1 of 2 oven handles soiled with a white substance. On oven number 2, the surveyor also observed 7 of 11 oven knobs soiled with a thick brown colored substance.3. In the walk in freezer, the surveyor observed approximately 3 inches thick of ice build…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards and ensure a.) removal of a discontinued antianxiety controlled drug (Clonazepam 0.5 milligrams half-tablet) from [DATE] until surveyor inquiry causing a medication error and accurate documentation on the declining inventory log for 1 of 6 medication carts inspected, b.) accurate documentation for the administration and removal of an antianxiety controlled drug (Alprazolam) for 1 of 6 medication carts inspected and c.) accurate documentation of medication administration and timely receipt of a medication (Lactulose [a medication that assists removal of ammonia from the body]) to prevent borrowing from another resident's supply for 1 of 5 residents observed during the medication administration. The evidence was as follows:1.) On [DATE] at 11:23 AM, the surveyor conducted a medication cart inspection for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's call device was readily accessible. The deficient practice was identified for 3 (three) of the 7 residents (Residents #24, #88, and #140) reviewed for reasonable accommodations of needs/preferences.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/16/2025 at 10:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #24 in bed, awake. The surveyor observed that there was no available call light near the resident's bedside. The surveyor observed a call bell unit on the wall that had two outlets, one for each resident. The outlet on the side of Resident #24, did not have a call light cord connected to it. The surveyor asked the resident about the location of the call light and they stated that they were unsure of its location. On 7/17/2025 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor observed the resident inside the room; there was no physical call light available near the resident. When the surveyor interviewed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' primary physician a.) signed and dated monthly physician orders and b.) wrote physician progress notes each month. The deficient practice was observed for 2 of 35 residents (Resident #53, #248) reviewed and occurred over a 3 month period. The evidence is as follows: 1.The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (electronic and paper) medical record for Resident #53 on 7/21/25, which revealed the primary medical doctor (PMD) had not signed monthly Medication Review Reports (MRR) for the prior 3 months. Additionally, the PMD had not documented monthly Physician Monthly Follow-Up Notes (PMFN) for the prior 3 months.The surveyor interviewed the Nurse Unit Manager (NUM) on 7/21/25 at 11:00 am. The NUM confirmed the medical record did not contain April, May, or June 2025 MRRs or PMFNs. She stated there was a stack of printed MRRs in the nursing office to be signed by the PMD. She stated the PMD would be in later that day to sign them.On 7/21/25 at 11:00 am the NUM provided the surveyor with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication administration observation performed on 7/17/25, the surveyors observed four (4) nurses administer medications to five (5) residents. There were 32 opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 6.25 %. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents, (Resident #212), that were administered medications by one (1) of four (4) nurses. The deficient practices were evidenced as follows: 1.On 7/17/25 at 9:07 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) preparing to administer nine (9) medications to Resident #212 which included Humalog (Insulin Lispro) (a fast-acting insulin-a medication used to lower blood sugar). LPN #1 reviewed a paper that he had recorded Resident #212's blood sugar (BS) result of 156. He stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure enough linen supplies were available for staff to provide resident care including towels and washcloths for resident use for two of two residents (Resident (R) 4 and R10) and to include all 262 census residents in the facility. As a result of this deficient practice the facility had the potential of not meeting basic cleanliness needs of the residents to maintain a homelike environment. Findings include: During a phone interview on 03/25/25 at 4:17 PM, Complainant (C) 4 stated, spoke to a staff member who explained there was not enough linen provided for the staff to provide the necessary care after C4 found the R4 in a soiled brief, so then R4 could not be changed. During an interview on 03/26/25 at 9:30 AM, the Director of Building Services explained linen disappeared when sent up to the floors, ended up in the garbage, hidden by staff, or staff were giving it to families. During an interview on 03/26/25 at 1:10 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 and CNA 4 verbalized there were not enough linens…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to report three allegations of abuse for three of six residents (Resident (R) 12, R13, and R16) reviewed for abuse allegations and one allegation of misappropriation for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for misappropriation of property to the state survey agency within two hours out of a total sample of 19 residents. This had the potential to allow continued abuse and misappropriation of property for all residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. a. Review of R12's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. R12 was discharged from the facility in September 2024. b. Review of R13's admission Record located in the resident's EMR under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly investigate two allegations of abuse for three out of seven residents (Resident (R) 12, R13, and R16) reviewed for abuse and one incident of misappropriation of property for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for misappropriation of property of 19 sample residents. This failure had the potential for ongoing abuse and misappropriation of property. Findings include: 1. a. Review of R12's admission Record located in the resident's EMR under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. R12 was discharged from the facility in September 2024. b. Review of R13's admission Record located in the resident's EMR under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses which included legal blindness, diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the facility document titled, Reportable Event…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) was documented to clarify resident/resident representative the choice between cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and do not resuscitate (DNR), were thoroughly completed to include a date and physician signature for three of three residents (Residents (R) 9, R1, and R10) of 19 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect the accuracy of POLST forms used when transferred from the facility to communicate resident/resident representative choice. Findings include: 1. Review of R9's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date in [DATE] with a readmission date in [DATE] and medical diagnoses to including dementia and other cerebrovascular disease. Review of R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to resolve grievances for two of three residents (Resident (R) 3 and R5) reviewed for grievances of 19 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to resolve grievances related to misappropriation of funds and transportation concerns related to medical appointments. This failure had the potential to violate resident rights for all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of R3's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July 2021 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, bipolar disorder, hypertension, and bladder cancer. Review of R3's Resident Concern Form provided by the facility and dated 06/16/24, revealed R3 states that the unit clerk continuously messes up his/her doctor appointment. She gets dates mixed up, she'll forget transporter or transportation. The action section at the bottom of the form was blank. During an interview on 03/25/25 at 1:06 PM, R3 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a medical appointment was identified and implemented following a surgical procedure according to professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident (R) 8) reviewed for medical appointments of 19 sample residents. This failure had the potential to negatively impact on the residents' health status. Findings include: Review of R8's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated he/she was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with a primary diagnosis of acute cerebrovascular insufficiency. Review of R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/06/25 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six out of 15 indicating R8 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R8's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab and revised 04/11/24 included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R) 3). Specifically, the nursing staff failed to document the completion of physician orders on the resident's medication administration records. This failure had the potential to affect accuracy of records. Findings include: Review of R3's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated he/she was admitted to the facility in July 2021with a primary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Comorbidities included bipolar disorder, benign prostatic hypertrophy, hyperlipidemia, malignant neoplasm of the bladder, and major depressive disorder (MDD). Review of R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/13/25 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating R3 was cognitively intact. Medications included antipsychotics, antidepressants, antihypnotics, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices as well as store and discard potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 01/29/234 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and a Federal Surveyor (FS) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. On a tray cart, the surveyor observed multiple 6 ounce (oz) disposable individual cups that the FSD stated the contained rice crispy cereal. No labels with made or use by dates noted. FSD stated the cereal cups were put together yesterday but could not state why they were not labeled. 2. The juice machine was observed with a clear tubing from orange juice with brown colored spots on the tubing. FSD unable to state what the brown spots were but would call the service company to change the tubing. 3. Dietary aide (DA #1) was observed preparing salads with lettuce, cucumbers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and review of pertinent facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This failure had the potential to affect all 273 residents who currently live in the facility. Refer to F607E, F728E, F730E, F804D, F883E, and S0560 The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/29/24 at 10:22 AM, during the entrance conference held with the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the surveyor in the presence of another surveyor requested information regarding the QAA (Quality assessment and assurance) committee, last three quarters sign in sheets for QAPI meetings, and QAPI plan. On 02/05/24 at 01:09 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided QAA (a committee composition and frequency of meetings in nursing facilities requires facilities to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-06 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, the facility failed to have the Infection Preventionist present for three (3) of three (3) quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This failure had the potential to affect all 273 residents who currently live in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/05/24 at 8:45 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Social Services Director interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) regarding the submitted QAPI Attendance for the last three quarters: 5/11/23, 9/07/23, and 11/30/23. The surveyor asked the LNHA to confirm who attended the last three quarters of QAPI because the 5/11/23 QAPI Attendance did not include the title and department for some attendees. During an interview, the LNHA confirmed that on 5/11/23, 9/07/23, and 11/30/23 there was no Infection Preventionist (IP) who attended the quarterly QAPI meetings. The LNHA acknowledged that IP was part of the key members of the QAPI team that should be present in the QAPI meetings. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the residents with a safe, comfortable, clean, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified in one (1) of three (3) residents' rooms, (Resident #132) and one (1) of two (2) dining areas on the 4th floor observed during environmental rounds. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 01/30/24 at 8:25 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #132 on the bed with an air mattress, indwelling catheter in use, and head of the bed elevated approximately 45 degrees while on tube feeding (TF, a way to provide nutrition when a resident cannot eat or drink safely by mouth) pump, at 75 ml/hr (milliliters per hour). The surveyor observed that the TF pole with scattered dried brownish color and resembled the color of the milk that was hung on the pole, and the surrounding floor area with the same dried brownish color. On that same date and time, the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility it was determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed staff credentials were verified upon hire. This deficient practice was identified for five (5) of seven (7) newly hired licensed staff reviewed, Staff #2, #4, #5, #7, and #10 evidenced by the following: On 02/05/24 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor reviewed ten randomly selected new facility employee files. The review for license verification for seven of the new licensed employees revealed the following: 1. Review of Staff Member #2 (SM2), an Occupational Therapist, hired on 5/02/22, had a New Jersey Division Consumer Affairs (NJDCA) license verification printout (used to verify the status of a license for license verification) dated 11/03/22. The verification was completed after the staff member was hired. There was no documented evidence that SM2's license was verified prior to the date of hire (doh). 2. Review of Staff Member #4 (SM4), a Registered Nurse, hired on 12/05/23, did not have a NJDCA license verification printout. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of medical records and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care to meet residents' preferences and goals and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This deficient practice was identified for four (4) of 38 residents (Residents #19, #36, #132, and #267) reviewed for a care plan. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On [DATE] at 12:54 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #19 in their room with tube feeding (TF, a way to provide nutrition when a resident cannot eat or drink safely by mouth). The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (a combination of paper-based and electronic health records that primarily involves tracking and storing a resident's health records in several formats and places) medical records of Resident #19 as follows: Resident's admission Record (AR, admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent provided facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen care and services were provided according to the standard of clinical practice and physician's order for three (3) of five (5) residents, (Residents #19, #145, and #235 reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 02/01/24 at 8:48 AM, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN#1) who informed the surveyor that Resident #19 was cognitively impaired and required total care with activities of daily living (ADL). He further stated that the resident was recently hospitalized and came back three weeks ago for pneumonia (an infection that affects one or both lungs). On that same date and time, LPN#1 stated that it was the responsibility of the Unit Manager (UM) to initiate and update the care plan of the resident including the care plan for oxygen (O2) use. He further stated that there was no UM for one and a half (1 1/2) years and he did not know who does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) received annual performance reviews for five (5) of five (5) CNA files reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/29/24 at 10:22 AM, in the presence of a federal surveyor, the survey Team Coordinator met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) for an entrance conference and requested a list of the facility's CNAs with their date of hire and license numbers listed. On 2/1/24 at 11:02 AM, the LNHA provided the survey Team Coordinator an updated list of CNAs. The surveyor randomly chose five CNAs from the updated facility list and requested the education provided, annual performance reviews and competencies done for the five CNAs. On 2/5/24 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor still had not received the annual performance reviews for the selected 5 CNAs and once again requested them from the LNHA. The facility did not provide the requested performance reviews. There was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards and procedures to address the risk of infection transmission by failing to: a) conduct COVID-19 testing and to conduct appropriate surveillance for COVID-19 (a deadly, highly transmissible infectious disease) during an outbreak, for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #62, #121 and #155) and three (3) of (3) staff members reviewed for unit-based testing, b) follow appropriate storage of PPE (personal protective equipment) for one (1) of one (1) nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse #1 [LPN#1]), and c) follow appropriate hand hygiene practices for two (2) of three (3) staff (LPN#2 and Certified Nursing Aide #3), in accordance with the facility's policies and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for infection control. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC guidance titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) that the resident's medical record included documentation that indicated the consent for administration or refusal of the Influenza Annual Vaccination for four (4) of six (6) residents (Resident #7, #132, #149, and #214) reviewed for influenza immunizations, and b) the Pneumococcal vaccine was administered to the residents, (Residents #100 and #127) identified during the medication storage and labeling observation for one (1) of three (3) medication rooms. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: A review of the Centers for Disease and Control Prevention (CDC) guidelines for Pneumococcal vaccination included: For adults who only received the Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax/PPSV 23) regardless of risk and condition, should received one (1) dose of Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV 15 or PCV20) at least one year after the most recent PPSV23. 1. On 02/1/24 at 9:55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to serve all residents seated at a table their lunch trays in a timely manner for one (1) of five (5) tables observed, involving a total of four residents (Residents #90, #91, #133, and #148) reviewed for Resident Rights. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/31/24 at 12:11 PM, the surveyor observed the 4 East dining area having three Certified Nursing Aides (CNA), one (1) nurse, and 18 residents during lunch. There were five tables located in the 4 East dining area with residents seated for lunch. The 1st lunch truck was already in the process of being distributed at the time of the observation. On 1/31/24 at 12:12 PM, the surveyor observed table one, located near the wall with a total of 4 residents seated at the table. At table one there were two residents seated that had their lunch served at the time of the observation and two residents were already eating. At this time, the surveyor observed Table two with four residents seated. Resident # 90 seated at Table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident or resident's representative were offered the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive (AD), a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will be made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate to them. This deficient practice was noted to 1 of 39 residents reviewed for AD, Resident #77. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/5/24 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #77 lying in bed with eyes closed. The surveyor reviewed Resident #77's hybrid medical records. The admission Record reflected that Resident #77 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to Dementia, Hypertension, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, and Anxiety Disorder. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 1/15/24 reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an injury of unknown origin in accordance with federal and state requirements for reporting such injury to the state agency. The deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for falls (Resident #185) and was evidenced by the following: Reference: According to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) definition: Injuries of unknown source - An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when all of the following criteria are met: The source of the injury was not observed by any person; and The source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury (e.g., the injury is located in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma) or the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time or the incidence of injuries over time. On 01/29/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of a fall incident for one (1) of five (5) residents, (Resident #149) reviewed for falls. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/30/24 at 12:56 PM, the surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) for investigations and incidents/accident records of Resident #149, and the DON stated that she would get back to the surveyor. On that same date at 02:02 PM, the surveyor observed the resident laying on the bed, awake, nonverbal, and the tube feeding (a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth, are unable to swallow safely) was off. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (a combination of paper-based and electronic health records that primarily involves tracking and storing a resident's health records in several formats and places) medical records of Resident #149 as follows: The admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in accordance with federal guidelines for three (3) of 38 residents, Residents #77, #145, and #242, reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessment coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 02/05/24 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #77 lying in bed with eyes closed. The surveyor reviewed Resident #77's hybrid medical (combination of paper and electronic) records. The admission Record (AR, admission summary) reflected that Resident #77 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), type II diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. The surveyor reviewed the most recent MDS assessment dated [DATE] under Section O0250. Influenza Vaccine (IV) which reflected that Resident #242 received the IV on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) medication was administered in accordance with manufacturer's cautionary specifications and professional standards of clinical practice for one (1) of three (3) nurses administered medications to one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #69, observed during medication administration and b) care and services were followed for resident who was at risk for wandering for one (1) of two (2) residents, (Resident #55) reviewed for elopement according to physician's order, assessment and standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey state: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide wound care in accordance with the facility's policy and professional standards of clinical practice for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed and observed for wound care observation, Resident #56. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines Hand Hygiene Recommendations, Guidance for Healthcare Providers (HCP) for Hand Hygiene and COVID-19, page last reviewed 01/08/2021 included that the HCP should perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with the residents, before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient, after touching a patient or the patient's immediate environment, after contact with blood, body fluids or contaminated surfaces, and immediately after glove removal. In addition, wear gloves, according to Standard Precautions, when it can be anticipated that contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials, mucous membranes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the urinary output of resident's with indwelling catheters (IC) were monitored to ensure patency to further prevent any infections. This deficient practice was noted to two (2) of two (2) resident's reviewed with IC, Resident #242 and Resident #266. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 01/31/24 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #242 in the room lying in bed. The surveyor reviewed Resident #242's hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical records. The resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but not limited to cerebral Infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles (lipids) in the blood). A review of the quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a) a non-certified Nurse Aide (NA) did not continue to work as an NA after the specified 120 days for one (1) of three (3) NAs reviewed during the Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing task (NA #1) and b) there was a delineated policy and/or program in place for the hiring, staffing, and assignments of non-certified NAs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: State of New Jersey Department of Health memo dated April 21, 2023 sent to Nursing Homes included the following: On February 27, 2023, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that all nurse aide emergency training waivers will terminate at the end of the Federal Public Health Emergency (PHE). The PHE is expected to end on May 11, 2023. At that time, all Temporary Nurse Aides (TNAs) hired prior to the end of the PHE and who have enrolled in a NATCEP (Long Term Care Facilities Training and Competency Evaluation Program) program and completed the first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the 24-hour staffing report was posted in a prominent place within the facility and readily accessible to the residents and the visitors. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/29/24 at 9:18 AM, the survey team entered the facility and observed that there was no Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report (NHRCSR) posted at the entrance area or elevator area. On 1/30/24 at 9:25 AM, after the surveyor did not observe a NHRCSR posted, the surveyor interviewed the Security staff in the front lobby regarding the posting of the NHRCSR. The Security staff stated that the Administration staff usually place the posting on the bulletin board that was behind the wall near the elevators. The Security staff confirmed that there was no NHRCSR posted on the bulletin board. On 1/30/24 at 9:31 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Staffing Coordinator (SC) regarding the posting of the NHRCSR. The SC stated that she usually posted the NHRCSR in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure, a) labeling of medication with an expiration date, b) expired medication was removed from active inventory, c) beyond use date was in accordance with standard of practice, and d) discontinued medications were removed from active inventory. The deficient practice was identified for two (2) of six (6) medication carts, and (one) 1 of three (3) medication rooms and was evidenced by the following: Reference: USP Compounding Standards and Beyond-Use-Dates (BUDs; the date or time after which a compounded sterile preparation may not be stored or transported and is calculated from the date and time of compounding). According to the revised <795> -Non-preserved aqueous had a BUD of 14 days. 1) On 01/31/23 at 9:58 AM, in the presence of the Registered Nurse #1 (RN#1), the surveyor began the inspection of Cart A on the west wing of the fifth floor. The surveyor observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ 167957 REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safe and appetizing temperatures of hot foods served to the residents. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident complaint, Resident #107, and confirmed during the lunchtime meal service on 01/31/24 for one (1) of three (3) nursing units tested for food temperatures and was evidenced by the following: A review of a complaint in-take form indicated the food is not received on time. 1. On 01/29/24 at 10:41 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #107 sitting on his/her bed. The resident was pleasant and stated, the food is bad here. At 12:05 PM, the surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA #1) who stated there were four of them assigned to the west side of the fourth floor, at that time. The surveyor visually saw four CNA's adjacent to the dining area. At 12:12 PM, the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the garbage compactor and dumpster free of garbage and debris. On 1/29/24 at 9:56 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and a Federal Surveyor toured the kitchen and the designated garbage area observing the following: There was garbage debris that included food, cups, bottles, gloves, paper products, and brown paper bags, surrounding the garbage compactor and dumpster. The FSD stated that the area should have been cleaned by the maintenance and dietary departments. On 2/5/24 at 1:23 PM, the surveyor informed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) of the debris findings. The LNHA clarified that the garbage disposal area is shared with another facility on the same property but admitted that the facility maintenance department is responsible for keeping the area clean and free of debris. On 2/6/24 at 12:54 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint NJ#162723, 162811 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of 38 residents reviewed (Residents #470 and #269). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 02/05/24 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) about where Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) documented resident care. The LPN showed the surveyor an ADL [Activities of Daily Living] binder at the nurses station. The ADL binder consisted of monthly forms which the CNAs would document CNA and ADL care for residents. The LPN stated the CNAs used to document electronically but now it was paper based. The LPN could not recall exactly when the change occurred and stated sometime last year. On 02/05/24 at 12:25 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed hybrid (paper and electronic) medical records of Resident #470. The admission Record (AR, admission summary) reflected that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents conducted face to face visits at least once every sixty days and wrote progress notes to address nutritional issues for a resident with weight loss for one (1) of 10 residents, Resident #77 reviewed for nutrition, and was evidenced by the following: On 02/05/24 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #77 lying in bed with eyes closed. The surveyor reviewed Resident #77's hybrid (both paper and electronic) medical records. The admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #77 was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses which included but not limited to dementia; hypertension (elevated blood pressure), type II diabetes mellitus; and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 01/15/24 reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score 03 of 15 indicating that the resident had severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) properly handle and store potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent the potential development of food borne illness, b.) maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent microbial growth and cross contamination, and c.) maintain adequate infection control practices during the meal service in the kitchen. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 09/10/21 from 9:04 AM - 11:07 AM the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following: 1. The FSD had visible facial hair that was not restrained. The FSD acknowledged he was not wearing a beard restraint and stated that he should have covered his facial hair. The FSD stated it was important to wear hairnets to prevent contamination of the food. 2. The foot pedal trash can that was located at handwashing sink #3 did not contian…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-28 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who were admitted into a newly created behavioral unit received a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) assessment, prior to admission, to determine the appropriateness of long term care (LTC) placement. This deficient practice occurred for 25 of 33 unsampled residents reviewed for PASRR and was evidenced by the following: On 09/10/21 at 10:05 AM, the surveyor conducted the facility entrance conference with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator (LHNA). The LHNA stated there were 33 residents who were transferred from the temporary boarding home which was located on the the 6th floor, and now resided on the 5th floor East unit (5E) . The LHNA stated the residents were transferred in June, 2021 and the facility was working with another [State agency] (Agency #1) regarding the residents. The DON stated the 5E was considered a behavioral unit without aggression and it was a locked unit. On 09/14/21 at 12:10 PM, the surveyor interviewed the social worker (SW)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #000148010 Complaint #000147748 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to: a.) provide nursing and related services to ensure the residents safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments, individual plans of care and in accordance with the facility assessment, and b.) meet minimum staffing requirements. This deficient practice was identified on 3 of 3 nursing units, during interviews conducted with 2 of 10 residents (Resident #27 & Resident #57) who attended a resident council meeting, for 2 of 40 residents reviewed, (Resident #215 & Resident #240) for care concerns related to staffing and during a meal observation. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F688 & F692, & NJAC 8:39-5.1(a) The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/10/21 at 10:02 AM, during tour, the surveyor observed Resident #240 sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the necessary services to maintain a resident's highest functional level were provided by failing to: a.) implement interventions designed by the Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA) to promote mobility, positioning, and strength training exercises and b.) ensure the proper equipment was obtained and utilized for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #240) reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/10/21 at 10:02 AM, during tour, the surveyor observed Resident #240 sitting upright in a bariatric bed (a bed for people who are overweight or obese). The resident agreed to be interviewed at this time and stated he/she had been in the facility for six weeks and had met with a rehabilitation therapist only twice since admission. The resident stated that he/she had not been out of bed and was not provided with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a.) resident re-weights were obtained per facility policy, and b.) a significant unplanned weight loss of 15.9% (18.8 pounds over a 16 day period) was identified and addressed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #215) for weight loss and was evidenced by the following: On 09/15/21 at 9:57 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #215 was seated on the side of the bed and appeared very thin. At that time, the surveyor interviewed Resident #215 and the resident stated that he/she weighed 130 pounds prior to hospitalization and now he/she weighed 100 pounds. During the interview, the resident's physician entered the room. At that time the surveyor interviewed the physician who stated that he was aware that Resident #215 had lost weight from the admission from the fifth-floor nursing unit and the weight when the resident was transferred to the third-floor nursing unit. The physician did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) post a cautionary and safety sign to indicate the use of oxygen (O2), and b.) accurately sign the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the administration of oxygen per a physician order. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed, (Resident #144 & Resident #157) for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following: 1. The admission Record (AR) indicated that Resident #157 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure (the heart fails to pump blood well - CHF) and stage 5 chronic kidney disease (the kidneys are close to failure - CKD). The five-day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool dated 08/4/21, indicated that Resident #157 was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). On 09/10/21 at 9:38 AM, during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to serve hot and cold foods at an acceptable temperature for the residents. This deficient practice was identified for 10 of 10 residents who attended a Resident Council group meeting, and on 1 of 3 nursing units during the lunch meal service. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 09/14/21 at 10:36 AM, the surveyors conducted a group meeting with ten residents who regularly attended the facility resident council meetings. Ten out of ten residents indicated the food was always cold. 2. On 09/16/21 two surveyors conducted a test tray with the Assistant Food Service Director (AFSD) and Food Service Director (FSD) which resulted in the following: At 11:53 the Surveyor #1 exited the kitchen with the test tray and the AFSD. At 11:57 AM Surveyor #2 observed a blank food service temperature log for the lunch meal, with the FSD. At that time, the FSD audibly sighed and had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control protocol to prevent the spread of infection during a wound care treatment observation. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #215) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/15/21 at 9:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #215 seated on the bed. Resident #215 had a pressure relieving device attached to the bed. The surveyor interviewed, Resident #215 at that time and the resident stated he/she had a wound on his/her buttocks that was cared for by the staff. The surveyor reviewed Resident #215's medical record which revealed the following information: Resident #215 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and an unstageable pressure sore (full thickness tissue loss and is covered by necrotic tissue or eschar) to the sacrum. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment tool, dated 07/26/21, revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-02-06 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification of the emergency transfer to the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #149), reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (a combination of paper, scanned, and computer-generated records) medical records of Resident #149. The admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy status (alternate means of feeding through the stomach), heart failure, chronic kidney disease (a disease characterized by progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys), bipolar disorder (causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania or hypomania) and lows (depression), and anxiety disorder. A review of the New Jersey Universal Transfer Form (a form that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-02-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure facility-wide implementation of the Antibiotic Stewardship program, which included a system for routine feedback reports and tracking measures of outcome surveillance related to antibiotic use was followed, as per facility policy and national standards. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/31/24 at 01:12 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated the Infection Preventionist (IP) was responsible for Antibiotic (ABT)Stewardship. The DON further explained the newly hired IP was still in training and that the facility was in contact with the previous IP who left approximately two weeks ago. The DON stated the facility had access to the former IP's reports and antibiotic tracking documentation. The surveyor requested for the DON to provide the facility's antibiotic stewardship policy, reports, and documentation. On 02/01/24 at 9:40 AM, the DON informed the surveyor she was still gathering the requested documents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$88,556 in federal fines across 14 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $3,882 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $9,527 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-06 for 28 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BIDER, RIFKAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST45%since 10/24/2017
KLEIMAN, RIVKAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST55%since 10/24/2017
KLEIMAN, BORUCHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/24/2017
KLEIMAN, TZVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/24/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$27.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.4M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 4%Other / private 11%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$273per resident / day
operating cost
$8,309per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$278per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315458. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next