Valley View Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 16.8 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. On 4/21/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 in the facility activity room. The resident was seated in a chair with their walker next to them. The resident was dressed and groomed, and the surveyor observed no oxygen being used by the resident. On 04/21/25 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor inspected the resident's room and found no oxygen concentrator. On 4/21/25 at 11:20 AM, the reviewed the hybrid medical chart for Resident #3, which revealed the following: A review of the Resident #3's AR documented that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: anemia (low levels of healthy red blood cells), major depressive disorder (persistent depressed mood), anxiety disorder (feelings excessive fear or worry) and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive, degenerative brain disorder that causes memory loss). A review of the Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed, under Section C, a BIMS score of 5 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The AMDS further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0712 — widespread
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 4/21/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 in the facility activity room. The resident was seated in a chair with their walker next to them. The resident was alert and showed no signs of behaviors. The resident was participating in activities with other residents. On 4/21/25 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor reviewed the hybrid (paper and electronic) medical chart for Resident #3 which revealed the following: A review of the Resident #3's admission Record (an admission summary) documented that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: anemia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and Alzheimer's disease. A review of the Annual MDS dated [DATE], revealed under Section C, a BIMS score of 5 out of 15 which indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. A review of the resident's facility Progress Notes (PN) revealed no notes from the resident's primary physician from 11/1/24 until 04/21/25. 4. On 04/21/25 at 12:20 PM, the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of the Nurse Staffing Report it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a required Registered Nurse (RN) was present at the facility 7 days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 5 of 14 days reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Per the Interpretive Guidance §483.35(b) Facilities are responsible for ensuring they have an RN providing services at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. However, per Facility Assessment requirements at F838, §483.70(e), facilities are expected to identify when they may require the services of an RN for more than 8 hours a day based on the acuity level of the resident population. If it is determined the services of an RN are required for more than 8 hours a day. Facilities may choose to have differing tours of duty (e.g. 8 hour- or 12-hour shifts) for their licensed nursing staff. Regardless of the approach, the facility is responsible for ensuring the 8 hours worked by the RN are consecutive within each 24-hour period. Review of the Nurse Staffing Report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Repeat Deficiency Based on observations, interview, review of facility job descriptions, it was determined that the facility failed to employ either a full time Registered Dietitian (RD) or a Dietary Manager (DM) that meets the qualifications to function as a director of food and nutrition services. This deficient practice was evidenced as follow: On 4/21/25 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Food Service Director (FSD #1), who is the FSD from another facility, but is covering for the facility FSD #2 today. FSD #1 revealed they work in a regional FSD capacity but does not come to the facility often. Per FSD #1, FSD #2 does not have any current dietary certifications, ServSafe, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), and/or Certified Food Protection Professional (CFPP). FSD #1 further stated they would expect a FSD to have one or more of those certifications. On 4/22/25 at 9:39 AM, the surveyor interviewed FSD #2 who stated this was their first job as an FSD and was hired on 6/2/24, their ServSafe certification expired on 3/2024, and does not have any further certifications. FSD #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to serve and document residents received a nourishing snack in the evening when there was more than a 14-hour span between dinner and breakfast mealtimes. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 residents (Resident # 1, # 6, #15, and #16), during the 4/22/25 Resident Council group meeting and evidenced by the following: On 4/22/25 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor conducted the resident council meeting with four resident (Resident # 1, # 6, #15, and #16), who were alert and oriented, and selected by the facility to attend the group meeting. All four residents stated that they were not offered or received snacks in the evening. On 4/22/25 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Regional Director of Recreation (RDR) and Director of Activities (DA) who evening snacks are provided by the Dietary Department. On 4/22/25 at 10:58 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Food Service Director (FSD) who stated the Recreation Department provides evening snacks. On 4/22/25 at 11:05 AM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Repeat deficency Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. On 04/21/25 at 09:15 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD#1), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. The clipboard on wall contained the weekly food temperature log, the surveyor observed that no temperatures had been taken for dinner from 4/14/25 through 4/17/25 and 4/19/25. FSD#1 acknowledged the missing temperatures and stated they should have been recorded. 2. On the bread shelf, the surveyor observed a 28 ounce (oz) whole wheat bread with an open date of 4/8/25, without a use by date. Also observed was an open bag of flour tortilla without an open or use by date. FSD #1 stated bread should be kept for three days after opening and the tortilla bag should have been labeled with an open and use by date. 3. On a shelf on the chef preparatory table the surveyor observed a 16oz can of corn starch, a 24oz can of B'gan brand beef…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was a Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) who was physically present and actively involved by providing daily oversight to ensure all policies and procedures were implemented. The evidence was as follows: On 4/21/25 at 9:30 AM, during entrance conference the surveyor met with the facility administrative team that included the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Regional Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (RLNHA). The TC was informed by the facility that the facility LNHA was not at the facility because of a religious holiday. Throughout the survey that lasted from 04/21/25 through 04/24/25, the LNHA was not observed in the building. On 4/24/25 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) book which included signed in log sheets which revealed that the LNHA was not present in 5 of 5 QAPI meetings reviewed. A review of the facility's Administrator Job Description, which was provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of pertinent facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies was reviewed and updated, as necessary, and at least annually. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/21/25 at 09:30 AM, during the entrance conference held with the facility administration, the surveyor requested a copy of the Facility Assessment (FA). On 4/24/25 at 10: 30 AM, the surveyor was reviewing the FA that was provided by Regional Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (RLNHA). The FA was not signed and had a date of 4/25/25 and they were no evidence that the FA was conducted or reviewed prior to the surveyor team entering the building. On 04/24/25 at 10:40 AM, the surveyor interviewed the RLNHA regarding the FA not being signed or dated correctly and no explanation was provided. On 4/24/25 at 10:45 AM, the surveyor requested the last FA for 2024 from the RLNHA and Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) attended the quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings. This was identified for 5 of the 5 QA meetings reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/24/25 at 9:16 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the surveyor with the sign-in sheets for the last five QA meetings and showed the following: on 4/10/2024, 7/17/2024, 10/9/2024, 1/20/2025, and 4/2025 the LNHA failed to attend the QA meeting. On 4/24/25 at 9:45 AM, the DON provided the surveyor with the facility Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan. Under the section titled, Governance and Leadership - Responsibility, the QAPI Committee meets at least quarterly and is composed of the following individuals: Administrator, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, Director of Activities, Director of Social Services, Director of Administrative Manager, and Director of Rehab Services. On 4/24/25 at 11:58 AM, the surveyor interviewed the DON, who stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Repeat Deficiency Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a) provide appropriate care and services of urinary catheter care to prevent urinary tract infections, b) performed hand hygiene after urinary catheter care, c) no Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) or Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage outside the resident's door, and d) no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) accessible observed with 1 of 2 residents reviewed for infection control practices (Resident #4). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/21/25 at 12:17 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 awake and sitting in bed with an indwelling urinary catheter inside the privacy bag (a tube placed inside the bladder to facilitate urine flow) lying on top of the bed. The surveyor observed that there was no TBP sign or use of EBP outside the resident's room, and there was no available PPE. On 4/21/25 at 12:21 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) went to the Resident #4 room after seeing the urinary catheter on top of the bed. The surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $158K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ