Harbour View Senior Living Corp

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who did not have a Pressure Ulcer (PU) upon admission and who was identified at risk of developing a PU, received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent PUs. Resident #7 developed a facility acquired unstageable sacral wound identified by the Certified Nursing Aide and deep tissue injuries to bilateral heels identified during wound consultation (both four days after admission). In addition, the facility failed to ensure treatments were ordered at the time of identification. The resident's wounds worsened, developed a wound in another site, and had undergone a surgical debridement (a medical procedure that involves removing dead or infected tissue from a wound). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for pressure ulcers.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), April 13, 2016, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) received a performance review for 5 of 5 CNA files reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/18/25 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) the annual education, competencies and performance reviews for five randomly selected CNAs.The facility provided a copy for each of the five CNAs which contained Nursing Assistant Clinical Skills Checklist and Competency forms and in-service education sign in sheets for education topics. The facility did not provide performance reviews for the five CNAs. On 8/19/25 at 1:59 PM, the surveyor asked the DON if the CNA performance evaluations were available. The DON stated that she could not locate them and if they were not with the Human Resources Department, they may not be in the building.On 8/19/25 2:15 PM, the survey team met with the DON and LNHA for concerns. The surveyor notified the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that the required staff attended the quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings for 4 of 6 (Medical Director) and 2 of 6 (Infection Preventionist) quarterly QA meetings according to the regulation and facility's practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/18/25 at 1:56 PM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) reviewed the provided Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) binder and revealed: On 3/28/24 QAPI meeting, the facility management signed the attendance sheet that included the Medical Director (MD), Licensed Nursing Home Administrator #1 (LNHA#1), Director of Nursing #1 (DON#1), and Infection Preventionist #1 (IP#1). On 6/24/24 QAPI meeting, the MD, LNHA#1 and IP#2 signed the attendance sheet. The DON did not sign and there was no report from the DON.For June-August 2024 QAPI meeting, dated 8/29/24, LNHA#1, DON#1, and IP#2 signed the attendance sheet. The MD did not sign.For December 2024 (September-November) QAPI meeting, dated 12/18/24 LNHA#1, DON#1, and IP#2 signed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate COVID testing according to standards of clinical practice, facility's policy and procedure, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 10 of 16 facility staff (6 Certified Nursing Aides, 1 Registered Nurse, and 3 Licensed Practical Nurse) reviewed for COVID-19 testing. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:According to the CDC guidelines, Interim Guidance for Managing Healthcare Personnel with SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Exposure to SARS-CoV-2, March 18, 2024,.For this guidance an exposure of 15 minutes or more is considered prolonged. This could refer to a single 15-minute exposure to one infected individual or several briefer exposures to one or more infected individuals adding up to at least 15 minutes during a 24-hour period.For this guidance it is defined as: a) being within 6 feet of a person with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or b) having…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to offer and administer resident a pneumococcal vaccine. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #5, #7, #52, and #62) reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 8/19/2025 at 12:00 PM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) reviewed Resident #5's hybrid medical record. A review of Resident #5's admission Record or face sheet (AR, an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; Schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that is marked by a mix of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression, mania and a milder form of mania called hypomania), heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and anemia (a condition in which the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin, a protein found in red blood cells, to carry oxygen all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) received at least twelve hours of mandatory in-service training for 5 of 5 CNAs education reviewed.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/18/25 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor requested, from the Director of Nursing (DON), employee files consisting of but not limited to staffing, competencies, and educational in-services for five randomly selected CNAs. The DON stated that the Infection Preventionist/Licensed Practical Nurse (IP/LPN) was responsible for all the staff education.On 8/19/25, the surveyor reviewed the facility provided in-service education for five randomly selected CNAs, which revealed the following:Five of five Nursing Assistant Clinical Skills Checklist and Competency evaluations had no hours listed as education and did not include topics such as Abuse Prevention. Eight in-service education attendance sheets with dates including 1/28/25, 2/5/25, 3/3/25, 4/8/25, 5/13/25, 6/3/25, 8/1/25, and 8/4/25. Each sheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 4 Resident Rooms (Rooms 7,11, and 29) and 1 of 2 shower rooms. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 8/18/25 at 10:38 AM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) with the Housekeeping Director (HD) toured the [NAME] unit and did random tour of the unit rooms. Both S#1 and the HD went inside Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (RR#11). Upon entry, on the right side the closet was unable to fully closed, and the HD moved the clothes inside the closet and stated that there were too much residents' clothes inside the closet that was why it was not closing well. Both S#1 and the HD observed the toilet room with no paper towel. The 1st bed's dresser second to the last drawer was uneven and the HD opened the drawer and stated that there were overflowing clothes that was why it was uneven and unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in accordance with the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual and facility policy for 2 of 17 (Residents #57 and #62) residents reviewed for comprehensive resident assessments. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), RAI manual, Version 3.0, last revised in October 2024, indicated in Chapter 2, pages 2-8 revealed: .admission refers to the date a person enters the facility and is admitted as a resident. A day begins at 12:00 AM and ends at 11:59 PM regardless of whether admission occurs at 12:00 AM or 11:59 PM, this date is considered the 1st day of admission .Under Chapter 2, Section 2.6-Required OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] Assessments for the MDS revealed:.MDS Completion Date (Item Z0500B) No Later Than. 14th calendar day of the resident's admission (admission date + 13 calendar days) .The admission assessment is a comprehensive assessment for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, within the appropriate timeframe and in accordance with federal guidelines for 3 of 17 residents (Residents #4, #5, and #19), reviewed for resident assessments. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), RAI manual, Version 3.0, last revised in October 2024, indicated in Chapter 2, Section 2.6-Required OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] Assessments for the MDS revealed: .The admission assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a new resident and, under some circumstances, a returning resident that must be completed by the end of day 14, counting the date of admission to the nursing home as day 1if.this is the resident's first time in this facility, OR.the resident has been admitted to this facility and was discharged return not anticipated, OR.the resident has been admitted to this facility and was discharged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to; a.) ensure the care plan was updated and monitored the behavior episodes for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5), b.) ensure rationale for the discontinuation of medication was documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #62), reviewed for unnecessary medications, and c.) follow a physician's order for 3 of 17 residents (Residents #5, #24, and #31) reviewed, in accordance with standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey stated, The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policies and procedures with regard to tube feeding for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,674 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $28,674 — penalty dated 2025-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ