Meadowview Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 120.3 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ163798, NJ166210 Based on interviews, medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 7/31/23 and 8/1/23, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged staff-to-resident physical and verbal abuse allegation that involved the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #2) and Resident #2. The facility also failed to ensure its policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property was implemented during the alleged abuse allegation. On 4/23/23 at approximately 8:00 P.M., Resident #2 reported to a family member that CNA #2 had grabbed the resident by the wrist and was rough and had called him/her fat during care. Resident #2's daughter reported the abuse allegation to the Registered Nurse/Evening Supervisor (RN/ES) that same day , however, CNA #2 continued to provide direct resident care for the rest of the shift on 4/23/23. The CNA also provided direct resident care on 4/24/23. On 4/25/23, CNA #2 was in-serviced by the Director of Nursing (DON) about abuse on that day. The facility' failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ163793, NJ166210 Reference F610 Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation during the on-site investigation on 8/7/23 and 8/8/23, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator failed to ensure that the policies and procedures under the Abuse, Mistreatment, exploitation, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property was implemented when Resident #2's family member reported he/she was grabbed by their wrist and shoved over their bed and called fat by the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #2) on 4/23/23. The Administrator failed to report this incident along with an investigation to the New Jersey Department of Health. The Administrator also failed to ensure that all residents were free from abuse and a likelihood of harm when an alleged abuse allegation was made. The alleged CNA #2 continue to provide direct patient care after the allegation through the investigation period which was concluded on 4/25/23. The facility's failure to thoroughly investigate and follow its policies and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ186394 Based on interviews, review of the medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff provided safe transfers with a two person assist from chair to bed when on 05/08/2025, a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) transferred a resident (Resident #1) with a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift used to transfer) with no additional staff, and the resident complained of pain with noted bruising to the inner thigh and a swollen knee, that an x-ray identified that the resident sustained a fracture of the distal femoral shaft (thigh bone). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards (Resident #1), and was evidenced by the following: A review of an incident report for Bruise dated 05/09/2025 at 5:30 AM, revealed that around 5:30 AM, the assigned CNA reported to this supervisor that she found bruises on the resident's right leg. Upon assessment, the resident was seen with a bruise measuring nine centimeters by four centimeters (9 cm x 4 cm) on the back of their right lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner designed to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/24/2025 from 09:43 to 10:09 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Manager (FSM), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. On the wall next to the solo standup solo freezer, a wall mounted knife container contained two knives with wooden handles. The wooden handles of the knives were exposed to the surveyor. They appeared to be old and had fine cracks in the handles on visual inspection, which would allow bacteria to remain in the wooden handles.When interviewed the FSM stated, Ok. I know that. The FSM removed the wooden knives from the wall monted knife container/holder. 2. The high temperature dish machine was observed to be in use and actively washing dishware on 02/24/2025 at 10:01 AM. The surveyor asked the FSM to provide the surveyor the dish machine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the required beneficiary notices for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification, (Resident #92). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/27/2025 at 8:38 AM, the surveyor reviewed the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review (SNFBPNR) completed by the facility for Resident #92 as follows: A review of the SNFBPNR for Resident #92 indicated a Medicare Part A start date of 11/27/2024 and last covered day was 01/10/2025 and Resident #92 remained in the facility. A further review of the SNFBPNR revealed under 1. Was a SNFABN, Form CMS-10055 provided to the resident? No was checked. If no explain why the form was not provided: was handwritten stayed in the facility. Under 2. Was a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (CMS 10123) provided to the resident? There was nothing marked to indicate whether the resident received the NOMNC or not. During an interview with the surveyor on 02/27/2025 at 9:23 AM, Social Worker (SW #1),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, medical record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized comprehensive care plan for a resident on antidepressant medication (medication used to treat clinical depression). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #12) and was evidenced by the following: On 02/24/2025 at 10:16 AM, during the initial tour, Resident #12 was identified as being on antidepressant medication. A review of Resident #12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) on 2/24/2025 at 2:01 PM, revealed the following: A review of the admission Record reflected the resident had diagnoses that included history of falling and depression. A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 1/7/2025, revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. A further review of the MDS reflected use of antidepressant for Depression. A review of the Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to update a resident care plan, specifically for newly identified wounds, for 1 of 30 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans, (Resident #63). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 02/24/2025 at 11:00 AM, Resident #63 was observed lying in bed with air mattress in place on the bed and bilateral heel booties in place. A review of the EMR on 02/24/2025 at 11:37 AM, revealed the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #63 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Palliative Care, Alzheimer's disease, and pressure ulcer left buttock stage 4. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/22/2025 revealed under section M Resident #63 had the following wounds; 1 stage 2, 1 stage 4 and 4 unstageable (Unstageable pressure ulcers are wounds that the bottom of the sore is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), and review of other facility documents it was determined that the facility 1.) failed to perform a reweigh for a resident with greater than 5% weight loss in 30 day period for 1 of 3 residents investigated for nutrition (Resident #50) and 2.) failed to follow an order for wound vac dressing change for 1 (Resident #351) of 1 resident investigated for skin conditions. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the electronic medical record (EMR), and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently apply a hand splint as recommended by therapy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion (Resident #1), and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour on 02/24/2025 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 awake, non-verbal, lying in bed, with his/her right hand clenched in a fist position and pulled up toward the chest. There was no splint or hand roll in place at that time. The resident was cognitively impaired and was unable to provide health history or answer questions. On 2/25/25 at 1:23 PM, surveyor observed Resident #1 with no splint on right hand. On 2/26/25 at 9:29 AM, surveyor observed Resident #1 with no splint on right hand. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) on 02/24/2025, revealed the following: Resident #1 had a medical diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure there was a physician order for the use of a Foley catheter and care plan, b.) ensure a resident with a catheter had the catheter bag in a privacy bag for dignity, and c.) failed to ensure a catheter bag did not come in contact with the floor to prevention possible contamination. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 Residents reviewed for catheter use (Resident #6, Resident # 17, and Resident #348) and was evidenced by the following: On 02/25/2025 at 12:57 PM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #17 lying in bed with their catheter bag hanging from the bed frame. The catheter bag was not in a privacy bag and was visible from the hallway. On 02/25/2025 at 03:14 PM, a review of the EMR revealed the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) administer oxygen therapy according to the physician's order, b.) ensure respiratory tubing, and nasal cannula were stored properly, and c.) obtain physician order for oxygen administration. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #75 and #349) reviewed for respiratory care according to the standard of clinical practice, and the facility's policy and procedure. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) Upon initial tour of the facility on 02/24/2025 at 10:19 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #75 using oxygen through a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator that provides extra oxygen to those who have difficulty breathing. However, the oxygen tubing was not labeled. Additionally, another nasal cannula was found resting on the seat of the resident's wheelchair, connected to a portable oxygen tank that was also unlabeled and exposed to the environment. On 02/25/2025 at 10:56 AM, Surveyor #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled drugs to prevent loss or diversion. This deficiency was identified for 2 of 4 medication carts inspected. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 02/26/2025 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor inspected F-Hall medication cart in the presence of the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager #1 (RN/UM #1). A review of the shift-to-shift Narcotic Record Controlled Count Sign Sheet (NRCCSS), which is used in healthcare settings to track the administration and accountability of controlled substances, revealed missing signatures for the following dates and shifts: 2/01/2025 for the outgoing nurse (7:00 AM - 3:00 PM), and 2/09/2025, for both the incoming and outgoing nurses (11:00 PM - 7:00 AM). On 02/26/2025 at 11:38 AM, the surveyor inspected E-Hall medication cart in the presence of the RN/UM #1. A review of the shift-to-shift NRCCSS revealed missing signatures on the following dates and shifts: 02/05/2025 for both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow through on recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) during their monthly medication review regimen (MRR) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident # 66) and was evidenced by the following: During the Initial Tour of the facility on 02/24/2025 at 10:57 AM, Resident #66 was observed in a high back wheelchair in his/her room clean and groomed. Resident requested and received a cup of coffee. A review of the EMR on 02/24/2025 at 10:00 AM, revealed the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #66 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbances. According to the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 12/22/2024 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 6/15 MDS which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2025-06-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ