Roosevelt Care Center At Old Bridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 426 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 194 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 163.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, review of facility policy and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the facility failed to ensure four residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded regarding dialysis (Resident (R) 6 and R135), weight loss (R14) and restorative nursing program (R8) out of 33 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to affect the care planning and provision of needed services.Findings include: 1.a. Review of the admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnoses of end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis with an onset date of 10/01/24. Review of Nurses Notes, dated 07/26/25, 07/29/25, and 07/31/25, and located in the EMR under the Progress Notes tab revealed R6 was picked up by stretcher for dialysis and returned via stretcher following dialysis on those days. Review of R6's Order Summary Report, dated 08/01/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility was able to provide emergency basic life support immediately when needed, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), to any resident requiring such care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel in accordance with related physicians orders and the resident's advance directives for three of five residents (Resident (R) R14, R184, and R187) reviewed for code status out of 36 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to cause basic life support needs to go unmet for residents who resided in the facility.Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Communication of Code Status, dated February 2023, indicated, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information. 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to installation of bedrails, obtain physician's order for bedrail, and care plan the bedrail for one of two residents reviewed for bedrails (Resident (R) 112) of 30 sampled residents. The lack of alternative bedrail measures, orders, and care plan could lead to potential safety concerns related to bed rail use for residents with bed rails. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enablers updated 10/19 indicated An enabler limits a person's normal freedom of movement and can only be used after appropriate clinical assessment and requires voluntary agreement with the user. Items that constitute an enable include, but are not limited to, bedrails, tray tables, chair that patient cannot move out of independently. The use of enablers is a clinical decision by the inter-disciplinary team (IDT), and is made in partnership with the patient and family/[whanau] following an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to honor known food preferences for one of three residents (Resident (R) 187) reviewed for food choices out of 43 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to cause nutritional needs to go unmet for residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dining and Food Preferences, revised 10/2022, indicated, Policy Statement: Individual dining, food, and beverage preferences arc identified for all residents/patients. 2. The Dining Services Director, or designee, will interview the resident or resident representative to complete a Food Preference Interview within 72 hours of admission. The purpose of this interview will be to identify individual preferences for dining location, meal times, including times outside of the routine schedule, food and beverage preferences. 4. Food allergies, food intolerance, food dislikes, and food and fluid preferences will be entered into the resident profile in the menu management…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report an Injury of Unknown origin to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH), for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #138), reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/19/24 at 11:27 AM, during initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #138 sitting with staff, in the main activity area. The resident was wearing a black helmet. On 08/21/24 at 09:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic Medical Record (eMR) for Resident #138 which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Unspecified and Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 05/07/24, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of two (2), indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Further review revealed, the resident did not have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure heel booties (minimize the risk of pressure damage to heels) were consistently applied to prevent skin breakdown. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #89, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for position and mobility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/19/24 at 12:14 PM, during initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #89 sitting in a reclining chair in the main activity area. The resident was wearing blue socks with their heels resting on the footrest. On 08/19/24 at 12:31 PM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #89 which revealed the following: A review of the admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: unspecified dementia and anxiety disorder. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 06/16/24, revealed the resident was unable to be interviewed for Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area remained free of garbage to prevent the harborage of pests and rodents on three of three days for which observations were made during the survey. This had the potential to affect staff, visitors, and all 167 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 12/05/22 at 09:55 AM, the outside dumpster area revealed two dumpsters next to each other. Dumpster 1 had a lid broken off at the hinge on one side and the other side was propped up and open with a mound of garbage bags. Dumpster 2 had a lid that was open and had four garbage bags in it. Two gloves, a spoon, two plastic knives, a grape and other garbage was noted on the ground around the dumpsters. During an observation on 12/06/22 at 08:37 AM, Dumpster 1 was full and overflowing with garbage bags. One lid remained completely broken off, while the other was unable to close due to it resting on piled garbage bags. Dumpster 2's bin was a quarter full and both lids were open. During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to assure that three (Resident (R) 80, R92, and R22) of 36 sampled residents were treated in a respectful and dignified manner during dining. Staff stood over the residents while feeding them their meals, rather than sitting at the resident's eye level, maintaining face-to-face contact. In addition, staff failed to refer to an unidentified resident with dignity. Staff referred to a resident by the level of assistance they need, rather than in a person-centered manner. Findings include: 1. Review of R80's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R80 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia. Review of R80's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/21/22, revealed the resident required supervision during meals. Per this MDS, the resident was severely cognitively impaired,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure four (Resident (R) R557, R133, R5, and R43) of five residents reviewed for catheter use received appropriate catheter care. Specifically, R557 had no order to indicate the size of the condom catheter needed to prevent leakage. R133 had two conflicting orders for catheter sizes. R5's catheter tubing was in contact with the floor, and R143's catheter tubing was not anchored as ordered. These failures had the potential to lead to increased urinary tract infections, pulling of the catheter tubing, or use of the wrong size catheter. Findings include: 1. Review of R557's undated admission Record, located in Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R557 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Review of R557's 12/06/22 Active Orders, found in the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed orders for Texas (condom) catheter care every shift and to document Texas…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assure that one (Resident (R) 408) of 36 sampled residents did not self-administer medication without first being assessed to determine whether the self-administration of medication by the resident was clinically appropriate. This failure resulted in R408 receiving an extra dose of her prescribed medication. Findings include: Review of R408's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R408's diagnoses included heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiomyopathy, and hypertension. Review of R408's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) located in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a date of 12/05/22 located in the Assessment tab of the EMR, revealed R408 scored a 15/15, which indicated R408 was cognitively intact. Review of R408's Clinical Physician Orders located in the Orders tab of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $250K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ