No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bergen New Bridge Medical Center

230 E Ridgewood Ave, Paramus, NJ 07652 · Non profit - Corporation · 574 certified beds · (201) 967-4000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (201) 967-4000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (16% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1250 E Ridgewood Ave · (201) 689-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1200 E Ridgewood Ave Ste 302 · (201) 445-8300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Lidl US0.5 mi
751 RT-17 · (844) 747-5435 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1100 E Ridgewood Ave, Ridgewood , 07450, United States · (201) 336-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.4%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%2.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.2%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.4%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.5%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%5.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.4%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.1%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.4%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.9%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.212.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.431.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.9%CMS range 24.8–54.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.6–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 4.0–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.08
RN hours/ resident / day
0.37
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.96
RN hoursweekends
15.8%
Total nursing turnover
13.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 574 beds and averages 347.4 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 227 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 16% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-16)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2023-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C #NJ159085 C #NJ158716 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the facility post fall procedure to ensure appropriate care was provided and there was no delay in treatment and ensure: a.) a supervisor was notified, b.) a physical assessment was completed and documented, c.) the physician was notified, and d.) the fall incident was documented in the medical record. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 34 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #168) who had a history of falls, including a fall with a shoulder fracture on 11/30/21, and who sustained an unwitnessed fall when a noise was heard in Resident #168's room on 01/22/23 at 10:35 PM, and the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) found Resident #168 lying on the floor and transferred the resident back into bed. On 01/23/23 at 2:10 AM, Resident #168 complained of pain (approximately 4 hours later) and stated he/she had fallen out of bed and had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 2665060 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined on 11/18/25, that the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) flow sheets were complete and accurate. this deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for resident accuracy (Resident #1, and Resident #2).The findings were as followed: 1.A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; pneumonia and urinary tract infection. A review of Resident #1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/28/25, revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 of 15, indicating that the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A review of Resident #1's care plan with an original date of 5/5/25 revealed that the resident needed assistance with self care and mobility due to non-ambulatory status and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to; a) sanitize and air-dry steam table pans correctly to prevent microbial growth, b) follow labeling requirements on food products and use-by dates, and c) maintain food and supply storage. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/8/25 at 9:45 AM, in the presence of the Operations Managers (OM #1 and # 2) and Executive Administrator (EA), the surveyor observed the following: 1. In the dishwashing area, the surveyor observed 42 steam table pans wet nested as they were stacked with pooling water between them. The surveyor interviewed the Food Service Worker (FSW), who stated, In the morning we stack the pans. The FSW could not explain why there was water between the pans. At this time, the surveyor also interviewed the OM # 1 and # 2, who stated The pans need to be air dried. 2. At 9:55 AM, in the dish washing area, the surveyor observed the three-compartment sink and the Food Service Director (FSD) used a test strip to check the chemical in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ # 169798 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the devices used to identify call bell notifications were functioning properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in Unit 8-7. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/12/25 at 1:33 PM, the surveyor upon exit from the elevator, the surveyor observed unit 8-7's call light system machine in the nursing station had a red button on with no audible sounds. There were five staff in the nursing station including the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM). Afterward, the surveyor went to left wing side of Unit 8-7. While the surveyor in the hallway, the surveyor heard one resident yelling for a nurse in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (RR#709). The light on top of the door for RR#709 was on with no audible sounds. There was no staff responded to RR#709's call light. On 5/12/25 at 1:40 PM, the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident or their representative in advance of treatment risks and benefits, options, and alternatives to a resident receiving antipsychotic medications. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #213), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/8/25 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #213 walking in the hallway towards the activity room. On 5/12/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in the day/activity room sitting on a chair with other residents, non-verbal, and no behaviors observed. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #213, and revealed: A review of the face sheet (admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included but was not limited to; Alzheimer's (progressive disease that affects memory, thinking and behavior), dementia (declining memory and thinking skills), major depressive disorder (MDD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 3 of 32 residents (Residents #20, #83, and #228) call bells were within reach and able to use to accommodate residents' needs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/8/25 at 1:09 PM, Surveyor #1 (S#1) observed Resident #20 in their room and observed that the call bell was not visible. The resident stated that they did not know where the call bell was located. On 5/12/25 at 10:20 AM, Surveyor #2 (S#2) interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA#1), who cared for Resident #20, who stated that the resident should have the call bell in reach for use. 2. On 5/8/25 at 12:20 PM, S#1 observed Resident #228 awake and alert in their bed. The surveyor observed that the call bell was not visible. The resident stated that they did not know anything about a call bell and that they would call out to the staff for help. On 5/12/25 at 10:48 AM, S#2 observed Resident #228 in bed, and observed the call bell hanging off the wall, behind the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain the residents' living environment in a clean, sanitary, and homelike manner for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #132), and 1 unsampled resident (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]). The deficient practice is evidenced by the following. 1. On 5/8/25 at 11:10 AM, the upon initial tour of the 6th floor, the surveyor observed that inside of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (RR#606), there was damage to residents' wall with paint chipped off in five areas, across from the residents' bed. The surveyor also observed damage to the cove base near the residents' closet. The surveyor also observed a 1 inch sized break in the floor tile, also near the resident's closet. 2. On 5/8/25 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor observed that inside Resident #132's room, there were 11 areas of chipped off paint on wall near bathroom. The surveyor also observed damage to the cove base near the resident's closet and damage to wall, exposing sheetrock near closet as well. Lastly,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely revision of the individualized comprehensive care plan and implementation of interventions created by the occupational therapist to stimulate functional performance and prevent further decline. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for limited range of motion, Resident #25 and was evidenced by the following: On 5/8/25 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), walking into Resident #25's room, and stated she was there to provide morning care to the resident. On 5/8/25 at 10:36 AM, the surveyor observed the same CNA exited Resident #25 room. The surveyor observed the resident awake, alert, in bed, with closed fist on both hands. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #25. A review of Resident #25's face sheet (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included unspecified injury and skull fractures. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the necessary respiratory care and services of residents that were receiving oxygen, according to the standard of clinical practice and facility's policy and procedure, specifically a.) the sterile water bottle utilized for humidification of oxygen was dated for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #80), and b.) that respiratory equipment were stored in accordance with infection control measures for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #124). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/13/25 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #80 lying in bed with oxygen (O2) being administered at 2 LPM (liters per minute) via nasal cannula (NC) tubing. The surveyor observed that the O2 being administered was being humidified by an attached bottle of sterile water and the bottle was not dated. On 5/13/25 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed ensure a high blood pressure medication with parameters (defined set of conditions) was administered without significant medication error, the physician's order was followed, adhered to the professional standards of practice and the facility policy of medication administration. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #81), administered by 1 of 4 nurses observed during the medication administration and was evidenced by the following: On 5/12/25 at 10:06 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepare 8 medications (meds) for Resident #81, which included a physician's order (PO) for metoprolol tartrate 25 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet (tab) orally three times a day at 8:00 AM, 2:00 PM (6 hours apart), and 10:00 PM for hypertension (high blood pressure). Hold if systolic blood pressure (bp) less than 110; hold if heart rate less than 55. To be taken with food or milk. Give medication (med) without regard to meals. At 10:29 AM, the LPN confirmed she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain written consent for the administration of an influenza (flu) vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #213, reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/8/25 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #213 walking in the hallway towards the activity room, appears well groomed. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #213. A review of the Resident's face sheet (admission summary) revealed diagnosis which included but was not limited to Alzheimer's (progressive disease that affects memory, thinking and behavior) and dementia (declining memory and thinking skills. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, revealed the resident as rarely understood. According to the Resident's immunization electronic record, the resident received the flu vaccine on 10/2/24, and the pneumococcal vaccine on 11/6/19, with no consents found in the medical record. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined, the facility failed to a.) transcribe a Physician's Order (PO) for a resident's multivitamin from 1/30/23 through 3/29/23 for (Resident #330); b.) obtained a PO for a dietary supplement from 11/1/22 through 2/6/23 for (Resident #90). This was idenified for two (2) of thirty-six (36) residents reviewed for professional standards of practice; and c.) obtain a re-weight on 11/2/22, 12/5/22 and 1/19/23, after a significant change of weight for one (1) of seven (7) residents, (Resident #90) reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safety measures were consistently followed for a resident who required a two- person transfer with a mechanical lift. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #5) and was evidenced by the following: On 03/29/23 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor conducted a tour of the Unit-8 Korean Unit and observed a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) exit a resident room and enter another resident room across the hall where a Recreation Aide (RA) was visiting a resident. The CNA then stated to the RA, Can you stand by me? The surveyor observed both staff then enter the resident room across the hallway (Resident #5) and then closed the door. The RA exited the closed door at 10:30 AM (three minutes later) and the surveyor interviewed the RA at that time. The RA stated the CNA used the [mechanical lift] to transfer Resident #5 from the bed to a recliner chair. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident care equipment and personal items clean and sanitary for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/23/21 at 10:45 AM during the initial tour of unit 11-2, the surveyor observed Resident #30 in the bed with eyes closed. There was a tube feeding (TF) pole and feeding pump at the bedside providing the resident with nutritional support. The surveyor observed the base of the TF pole had a heavily soiled coating of dried tan colored substance and the floor under the TF pump was soiled with the same dried substance observed at the base. The TF pump was soiled with dried tan colored substance droplets that were sticky to the touch, and there was also a dried light tan colored film on the entire surface of the TF pump. The over bed table was soiled with splatter of dried white and tan colored substance. There was a suction machine on the over bed table that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to store a controlled substance in a manner that would decrease the possibility of loss or drug diversion. This deficient practice was found in 1 of 27 medication carts inspected (cart #2 on Unit 11-5) and was evidenced by the following: On 3/24/21 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor inspected medication cart #2 (1 of 2 medication carts) on Unit 11-5 in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) assigned to that cart. Upon inspection of the top drawer of the cart the surveyor observed 1 Tramadol 50 mg pill (an opioid analgesic/controlled substance) in its unit dose packaging under a container that held an opened vial of insulin. The surveyor asked the LPN if she noticed the pill was there when she took possession of the medication cart that morning. She stated she did not notice it. The surveyor checked the compartment that held the controlled substances. The compartment was locked. The surveyor and the LPN counted the controlled substances in the compartment and compared them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DUMAY, SERGEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2017
LEMOND, KARINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2021
PICINIC, ELENAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/29/2021
IADAROLA, RALPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/17/2020
RAGUSEO, MAUROIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2017
RICHARDSON, KATHRYNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2017
VISCONI, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2017
BERGEN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITYOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2017
KYUNGHEE-EDEN LONG TERM CARE, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
RASA GROUP C/O PHARMA CAREOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
TENDER TOUCH REHAB SERVICESOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315017. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next