Venetian Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC
275 John T O'leary Boulevard, South Amboy, NJ 08879 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (732) 721-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $56,441 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-10)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.8% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.0% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.0% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.4% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.8% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.6% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.9% | 12.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.4% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 2.07 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 1.11 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 283 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.5%CMS range 59.9–72.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 7.0–11.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.7–9.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 151.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and prevent worsening of a contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen) for one of four residents (Resident #13) reviewed for position and mobility. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 03/25/24 at 10:28 AM, during the initial tour of the 3rd floor, the surveyor observed Resident #13 in bed. The resident's right hand was closed from the middle finger to the pinky finger and the index finger was pointing out. When asked by the surveyor, Resident #13 stated that they were not able to turn or open his/her right (R) hand/fist or extend his/her R arm. The surveyor observed that there was no a brace on the R arm or that there was nothing placed in the R hand. On 03/26/24 at 1:26 PM, the surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) who stated that if she saw a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of facility policies, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) for recording incidents of infections identified under the facility's IPCP, surveillance, tracking and trending, and the corrective actions taken by the facility. The facility further failed to ensure staff wore the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to one (Resident (R)3) out of one reviewed for proper PPE being donned (put on) out of a total sample of 35 residents. This had the potential for an increase in infections for all the residents of the facility. Findings include: Review of a document titled, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) . National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) . Long Term Care Facility Component Tracking Infections in Long-Term Care Facilities ., dated 01/25, indicated . Surveillance is defined as the ongoing systematic collection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure five of five residents (Resident (R) 116, R21, R114, R121, and R26) out of 35 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Failure to code the MDS correctly could potentially lead to inaccurate federal reimbursements and inaccurate assessment and care planning of the residents.Findings include: Review of the RAI manual, dated 10/2024 and located at Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual | CMS, revealed .It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the MDS items on the assessment, and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT [Interdisciplinary] completing the assessment. As such, nursing homes are responsible for ensuring that all participants in the assessment process have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to offer four of five residents (Resident (R) 21, R26, R114, and R121) reviewed for flu/pneumonia vaccinations out of 35 sample residents and/or their representatives the opportunity for the residents to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards. This practice had the potential to increase the risk for this resident to contract pneumonia.Findings include: Review from the CDC website titled PCV20 or PCV21 Vaccination for Adults 65 Years or Older dated 09/11/24 indicated .Adults [AGE] years of age or older have the option to receive supplemental PCV20 or PCV21 (not both) if they previously completed the pneumococcal vaccine series with both PCV13 and PPSV23 and meet the following criteria.Previously received one dose of PCV13 (but not PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21) at any age, and .Previously received all recommended doses of PPSV23 (including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R 116) out of one reviewed for accommodations of needs, out of a survey sample of 35, was provided and assessed for an appropriate wheelchair. This had the potential for R116 not to be able to propel herself and have to wait for staff assistance.Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion dated 04/20 indicated .Interventions may include therapies, the provision of necessary equipment.based on professional standards of practice consistent with state laws and practice acts. Review of R116's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of R116's EMR titled quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/19/25 indicated the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an open window was covered with a screen for one of 33 Initial Pool residents (Resident (R) 73) whose rooms were observed. This failure had potential to increase pest activity and risk of infection for R73.Findings include: Review of R73's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of R73's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/15/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed he scored an eight out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition. During an observation in R73's room on 09/08/25 at 10:07 AM, R73 was unable to answer most questions and was speaking nonsensically. His room had a heavy urine odor, feces smeared on the wall, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for the use of psychotropic medications for two of five residents (Resident (R) 8 and R10) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 35 residents. For R8, behaviors were not identified for monitoring of medication effectiveness and failed to ensure ongoing assessment for adverse side effects of medication for R10. These failures had the potential to contribute to unnecessary psychotropic medication use and risk for adverse side effects of the medications.Findings include: 1.Review of R8's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including intellectual disabilities, depression, and psychosis. Review of R8's EMR under the Orders tab revealed a physician's order, dated 05/14/24, for aripiprazole [an antipsychotic medication] 7.5 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for psychosis.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R)7) reviewed for a hospital transfer out of a total sample of 35 was provided with a written transfer notice. This failure has the potential to affect all residents by not having knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired.Findings include: Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, R7 was admitted to the facility 07/28/24. Review of the Progress Notes located in the Progress Notes tab of the EMR revealed on 07/15/24, .Seen by MD [Medical Doctor]. Order rec'd [received] and carried out to send to [hospital name] for surgical wound debridement eval and treat. Review of the Progress Notes located in the Progress Notes tab of the EMR, revealed on 07/16/25, .Called ER [emergency room] Department for a status update. Patient was admitted . Admitting diagnosis Acute Osteomyelitis [bone infection] .Review of the EMR did not show documentation that R7 and/or her representative was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), Level II Determination recommendations were developed and implemented for one of four residents (Resident (R) 73) reviewed for PASARR out of a total sample of 35 residents. This failure had the potential to lead to continued or worsening behavioral symptoms without intervention.Findings include: Review of R73's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of R73's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/15/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed he scored eight out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderately impaired cognition. R73 experienced delusions and exhibited behaviors of rejection of care daily.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive plan of care with measurable goals and plans for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident (R)116 and R56) reviewed for care plans. The failure had the potential for the residents to have unmet care needs.Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 03/22 indicated .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.Care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. 1.Review of R116's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R116's EMR titled admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident (R) 12) received antibiotic eye medication as ordered and failed to notify the physician of missed doses of the medication out of a total sample of 35 residents. This failure had the potential to delay healing or contribute to worsening infection and pain.Findings include: Review of R12's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including encephalopathy, sepsis, and dementia. Review of R12's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/03/25 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she was rarely/never able to make herself understood and had severely impaired cognition. Review of R12's Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR), dated September 2025 and located under the Orders tab of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention measures were in place for two residents out of four reviewed (Resident (R) 116 and R3) for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 35 residents. This had the potential for the residents to develop pressure ulcers and/or worsen current pressure ulcers.Findings include: Review of the RAI manual, dated 10/2024 and located at Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual | CMS, revealed .The items in this section document the risk, presence, appearance, and change of pressure ulcers/injuries. This section also notes other skin ulcers, wounds, or lesions, and documents some treatment categories related to skin injury or avoiding injury. It is important to recognize and evaluate each resident's risk factors and to identify and evaluate all areas at risk of constant pressure. A complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place for one of one resident (Resident (R) 56) out of two residents reviewed for range of motion (ROM) out of a total sample of 35 residents. This had the potential for the residents contracture to worsen. Findings include: Review of R56's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed she was admitted to the facility 05/02/22 and had diagnoses including dementia, contracture, muscle weakness, and osteoarthritis. Review of R56's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/20/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she was rarely/never able to make herself understood and severely impaired cognition. R56 did not have limited ROM. Review of R56's Care Plan, dated 06/27/25 and located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, revealed she was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living. The Care Plan did not address R56'shand contracture or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care per standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident (R)142) reviewed for respiratory care out of a total sample of 35 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment (Ambu-bag) was accessible. The failure had the potential for the resident to have respiratory issues and unmet care needs.Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Tracheostomy Care dated 06/25/25 failed to address the importance of an Ambu-bag to be stored by a resident, who has a trach, at bedside. Review of R142's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R142's EMR titled Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab dated 09/06/25 indicated the resident had a tracheostomy related to respiratory failure and that the resident required emergency equipment at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the consultant pharmacist medication reviews for one resident (Resident (R7) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications in a total sample of 35 residents. This failure placed the resident at risk of receiving unnecessary medications.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR), dated July 2025, revealed, .A licensed pharmacist reviews the medication regiment of each resident at least monthly.The purpose of the MRR is to promote positive outcomes while minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication.Upon receiving the MRR, the attending physician reviews and responds to the report. The physician documents in the resident's medical record that the pharmacist's recommendations have been reviewed and what (if any) actions were taken to address them.If the physician does not provide a timely or adequate response, or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for three residents (Residents (R)7, R64, and R70) out of total sample of 35 residents reviewed. This failure had the potential for the resident's health status not be accurate, complete, and possibly create unmet care needs.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated July 2017 revealed, .Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. 1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R7 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included major depressive disorder. Review of the 04/22/25 Comprehensive Care Plan located in the Care Plan tab of the EMR revealed, I use anti-psychotic medication [a class of medications used to treat psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a potential allegation of physical abuse by staff was reported timely to the Director of Nursing (DON) and to the State Survey Agency (SSA) when a resident sustained an injury during a transfer from the wheelchair to the bed for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for abuse out of 22 sample residents. This failure increased the risk of other vulnerable residents being physically abused.Review of R2's undated admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/07/25, located in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was three out of 15 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS revealed she required substantial/maximal assistance with chair/bed-to-chair transfers and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident during an investigation of a potential allegation of physical abuse by staff when a resident sustained an injury during a transfer from the wheelchair to the bed by two nursing aides for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for abuse out of 22 sample residents. This failure increased the risk of other vulnerable residents being physically abused.Review of R2's undated admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R2 was admitted to the facility in 04/15.Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/07/25, located in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was three out of 15 which indicated he/she was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS revealed he/she required substantial/maximal assistance with chair/bed-to-chair transfers and had impairment on both sides of the lower extremities.Review of the facility's Reportable Event…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to prevent an injury during an improper transfer for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for abuse out of 22 sample residents. This failure increased the risk of residents experiencing injuries during transfers.Review of R2's undated admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R2 was admitted to the facility in 04/15.Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/07/25, located in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was three out of 15 which indicated he/she was severely cognitively impaired. The MDS revealed he/she required substantial/maximal assistance with chair/bed-to-chair transfers and had impairment on both sides of the lower extremities.Review of R2's Care Plan, dated 07/22/15 and located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab, revealed a focus of R2 wanting to assist with surface to surface transfers and requiring extensive assistance with surface transfers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff received ordered medications from the pharmacy for residents for one out of 22 sample residents (Resident (R) 16). This failure had the potential for residents not to receive their ordered medications and could result in negative outcomes. Review of the facility's policy titled Accepting Delivery of Medications, revised November 2022, revealed Policy Statement 1. All staff follow a consistent procedure in accepting medications. 2. Any errors noted in receiving medications are brought to the attention of the pharmacist and director of nursing services. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. A nurse accepts each medication delivery. 2. Before signing to accept the delivery, the nurse reconciles the medications in the package with the delivery ticket/order receipt. Review of R16's undated admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed she was admitted on 08/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff stored medications not administered to residents in the locked medication cart not at bedside for one out of 22 sampled residents (Resident (R) 16) observed during the medication administration. This failure had the potential for wandering residents to self-administer other residents' medications. Review of R16's undated admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed he/she was admitted in 08/24 with a diagnosis of epilepsy. Review of R16's Physician's Orders, dated 08/13/25 and located in the EMR under the Orders tab, revealed an order for polyethylene glycol 3350 powder give 17 grams by mouth one time a day for constipation mix with 6-8 ounces (oz.) of water or juice and an order for Phenobarbital oral elixir 20 milligrams (MG)/5 milliliters (ML) give 11.3 ML by mouth every 12 hours for seizures. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) 4's Medication Administration Competency, dated 08/13/25, revealed she completed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff perform hand hygiene after serving and assisting residents with setting up their meals for one out of 22 sample residents (Resident (R) 22) observed during the lunch meal. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination and spread germs to vulnerable residents. During an observation on the fourth floor in the common area on 08/19/25 at 12:19 PM, Recreation Aide (RA) 2 placed R21's meal tray on the table, removed the plate cover, lids on the cups, and then used the fork to cut up the food without performing hand hygiene afterward. Next, RA2 walked to the food cart and picked up another food tray and placed it in front of R22. During an interview on 08/19/25 at 12:23 PM, RA2 confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene after setting up R21's food tray and stated she was not told to sanitize or wash her hands after setting up the food trays for the residents, but it would be an infection control issue. During an interview on 08/19/25 at 12:49 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: 186850 Based on interviews and medical record review (MR) and other pertinent facility documentation on 6/4/25, it was determined that facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #4). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR) Resident #4 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to: Visual Loss, Presence of Artificial Eye, Unspecified Hearing Loss, and Anxiety Disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 3/30/25, revealed that Resident #4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that Resident #4 was cognitively intact, and was Supervision/Touch assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), independent with transfers and continent of bowel and bladder. During an interview with the Surveyor on 6/4/25 at 12:30 P.M., Resident #4 stated that they were not able to remember the date or the exact time but stated that sometime after supper that someone came in the room and pulled down their pants.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-10 · tag F0922 — failed to maintain the building's systems — widespreadHave enough backup water supply for essential areas of the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the designated emergency supply of water needed for residents in the event of a loss of normal water supply. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/25/24 at 09:00 AM, the survey team entered the facility and was made aware by the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) that the facility was licensed for 180 beds and the facility census was 123 (the number of residents who currently resided at the facility). On 03/25/24 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the facility's Food Service Director (FSD) and the Regional FSD. During the initial tour, the surveyor was escorted to a storage room which contained the emergency water and food supply. In the presence of the surveyor and the facility's FSD, the regional FSD stated that he had 22 cases of emergency water which contained 6 gallons of water per case. He stated that there was a total of 132 gallons of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to complete weekly skin evaluations for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #5, #49 and #86) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.On 03/25/24 at 11:10 AM, during initial tour of the 4th floor, the surveyor observed Resident #5 in bed. The surveyor attempted to interview the resident but he/she was unable to answer the surveyor's questions. A review of Resident #5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and Epilepsy, (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures) Unspecified, Not Intractable, without Status Epilepticus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure that a.) staff followed a Physician Orders (PO) for the administration of an insulin medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #96) reviewed for the management of insulin, b.) medications were observed as accurately and timely administered to one (1) of five (5) residents, (Resident #54) reviewed for medication administration, and c.) to ensure an accurate inventory of controlled medications (narcotic medications) dispensed from the facility's automated medication dispensing system (AMDS) located on the 2nd floor nursing unit. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care to a resident who required extensive assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for ADL care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/25/24 at 10:28 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #13 in bed, with his/her right hand from middle finger to pinky finger closed into a fist and the index finger pointing out with an elongated thickened non-smooth nail. The surveyor was not able to observe the resident's right hand nails from the middle finger to pinky finger. Resident #13's left hand had long nails on the thumb, index finger and the pinky finger. The third and fourth fingernails had jagged appearance. The surveyor reviewed the medical records for Resident #13. A review of the admission Record face sheet reflected Resident #13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of other relevant facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain and carry out an order to discontinue a Peripheral Intravenous line (IV [In a vein]) and to maintain the site according to professional standards of practice. The deficient practice was identified for one of one residents (Resident #326) reviewed for IV therapy. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/26/24 at 11:43 AM, the surveyor observed the resident's left forearm (region of the upper limb between the elbow and the wrist) with an IV line in place. The IV line was covered by a transparent dressing. The tape holding the dressing to the skin was peeling off. The surveyor noted the IV line was not dated or initialed. There were no medications or fluids infusing through the IV line during this observation. A review of the admission record (an admission summary) revealed that the Resident #326 was admitted to the facility with the follow diagnoses, which included but not limited to; Urinary tract infection (UTI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ #159787 Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safe and appetizing temperatures of foods served to the residents. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 residents interviewed during the Resident Council meeting and confirmed during the lunchtime meal service on 04/05/24 for 1 of 3 nursing units (2nd Floor unit) tested for food temperatures and was evidenced by the following: On 03/27/24 at 10:51 AM, the surveyor met with five residents for a resident council meeting. Three out of five residents resided on the 3rd floor. Two out of five residents resided on the 4th floor. Five of five residents agreed that the food trays were not warm. On 04/05/24 at 11:14 AM, the surveyor calibrated a state issued digital thermometer via the ice bath method to 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the presence of the survey team. On 04/05/24 at 12:24 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch truck arrive to the 2nd floor. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) met the food truck. A regular diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure foods were provided in accordance with physician's orders and resident preferences identified in their plan of care. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #114 and #120). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/27/24 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #114 seated in a wheelchair at a table in the dining area drinking water. On 3/28/24 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor observed the resident's lunch tray. The meal ticket indicated the tray items should have included four ounces (oz.) of red bean chili, a creamy peanut butter and jelly sandwich, a ½ cup of Fortified mashed potatoes, a ½ cup of green peas, one piece of cornbread, six oz. chicken orzo soup, one serving of a low-sugar house shake, ½ cup of fruit cup, one vanilla ice cream, a four oz. cranberry juice, eight oz. of whole milk and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility staff interviews and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control and was qualified by certification and experience for 1 of 1 staff member reviewed in accordance with the facility job description, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and New Jersey State guidelines. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: State of New Jersey Department of Health Executive Directive No 20-026-1 dated October 20, 2020, revealed the following: ii. Required Core Practices for Infection Prevention and Control: Facilities are required to have one or more individuals with training in infection prevention and control employed or contracted on a full-time basis or part-time basis to provide on-site management of the Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) program. The requirements of this Directive may be fulfilled by: a. An individual certified by the Certification Board of Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to complete weekly weights and consistently monitor a resident with a history of weight loss. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for nutrition and was evidenced by the following: On 09/19/22 at 12:37 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #15 sitting up in bed with a lunch tray positioned on the overbed table. The resident was pleasantly confused and was observed feeding self without difficulty. The surveyor observed that the resident ate approximately 25% of the lunch meal. When interviewed, the resident stated the meal was alright and that he/she did not want anything else to eat. According to the admission Record, Resident #15 was admitted with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) document the size and type of resident's tracheostomy tube on the resident's Care Plan (CP) and b.) obtain a physician order for oxygen and include oxygen use and care on a CP. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #89 and #120) reviewed for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Cerebral Infarction (stroke, Infarction refers to death of tissue), aphasia (comprehension and communication (reading, speaking, or writing)) disorder resulting from damage or injury to the specific area in the brain), tracheostomy (a hole that surgeons make through the front of the neck and into the windpipe for artificial airway), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). The annual Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor and manage a resident's pain consistent with professional standards of practice or develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 4 residents who exhibited signs and symptoms of pain, Resident # 55. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Title 45, Chapter 11, Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist: Reference New Jersey Statutes, Title 45, Chapter 11, Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) coordinate medication administration times and accuchecks (blood sugar monitoring) with scheduled renal dialysis days, b.) identify and monitor the dialysis access site, c.) consistently maintain ongoing complete communication notes between the facility and the dialysis center, and d.) implement a person-centered care plan for a resident on renal dialysis. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #107) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: On 09/16/22 at 10:25 AM during initial facility tour, Resident #107 was not in the room. The surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who was outside in the hallway and indicated that she was assigned to Resident # 107 today however the resident was out to dialysis. The LPN stated that the resident went out to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from approximately 5:00 AM and returned to the facility at approximately 10:00 AM or 11:00 AM in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice by not clarifying medication orders in timely manner for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #127) reviewed for tube feeding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/19/22 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #127 in bed with the head of bed elevated. The resident had no facial grimacing and showed no signs or symptoms of distress or discomfort. According to the admission Record, Resident #127 was admitted with diagnoses which included but were not limited to acute respiratory failure, dysphagia (difficulties swallowing), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech) and gastrostomy status (surgical operation for making an opening in the stomach) (peg tube.) Review of Resident #127's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 09/02/22, indicated the resident had a feeding tube and that the resident received 51% or more of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner designed to prevent foodborne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/16/22 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and Ambassador of Dietary Services (ADS), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. A food service worker (FSW) was observed walking in the kitchen with a blue baseball cap with hair sticking out the back. When interviewed, the FSD stated the FSW's hair should be covered. 2. A stack of uncovered coffee filters was stored directly on the shelf and a second stack of uncovered coffee filters was stored in a bin containing coffee packets. When interviewed, the FSD stated the stacks of coffee filters should be stored in plastic. 3. A stack of uncovered plastic lids was stored directly on the shelf and a second stack of uncovered plastic lids was stored directly on the shelf behind the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) utilize an infection assessment tool for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #124, #127, #487, and #488) prescribed antibiotic medications in the facility, and b.) monitor and review actual antibiotic use according to the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Review of the Antibiotic Stewardship Meeting Minutes, dated 07/26/22, provided by the Infection Preventionist (IP), revealed a section titled Discussion with the following listed below it: Antibiotic Stewardship Program Goals, Antibiotic Use Reports, Antibiotic Resistance Reports, Newly Diagnosed Infection Report, C Difficile Report (Outcome Measure Review), and Antibiotic Prescription Review. However, the only documents attached to the meeting minutes were Infection Control Logs of the residents who were on antibiotics during the month of July 2022. There were no reviews or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool used to facility the management of care, to identify that the resident was on renal dialysis. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #107) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: On 09/16/22 at 10:25 AM during initial facility tour, Resident #107 was not in the room. The surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who was assigned to Resident # 107. The LPN stated that the resident went out to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from approximately 5:00 AM and returned to the facility at approximately 10:00 AM or 11:00 AM in the morning. Review of the admission Record reflected that Resident #107 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, end stage renal (kidney) disease (ESRD). Review of the admission Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently revise and/or update resident care plans for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for pain. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/16/22 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #58 in bed with the head of the bed elevated. When interviewed at that time, Resident #58 stated that he/she was always in pain. According to the admission Record, Resident #58 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, aftercare following explantation (revision) of knee joint prosthesis, infection, and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee, and pain in the left knee. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 08/03/22, revealed staff identified Resident #58 as cognitively intact, with range of motion impairment on one side of the lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot) and the resident received scheduled pain medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently document in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board The nurse practice act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff delivered meal trays to the correct residents. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents observed during lunch meal services (Resident #34 and #36) and was evidenced by the following: On 09/19/22 at 12:27 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #36 lying in bed with his/her lunch meal tray on the overbed table. Resident #36 stated they had finished their partially eaten lunch and needed assistance to bring the Styrofoam cup filled with water closer. On 09/19/22 at 12:29 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #36's roommate, Resident #34, walking around in the room. Resident #34 used a walker and walked towards the meal tray on the overbed table. The surveyor tried to get the attention of Resident #34, but the resident did not acknowledge the surveyor. At that time, the surveyor observed the meal ticket for Resident #34 was for Resident #36. On 09/19/22 at 12:49 PM, the surveyor brought the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) into the room the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag (urine collection bag) was stored in a way to prevent the spread of infection. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for the use of indwelling urinary catheters (Resident #56) and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #56 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to: encounter for attention to other openings of urinary tract. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 07/29/2022 , revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15/15 which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident had a urinary indwelling catheter. On 09/16/22 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #56's drainage bag hanging from the bed in a privacy bag and the catheter piece used to empty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a) identify that medications were not scheduled to accommodate a resident's dialysis schedule during the monthly CP medication review and b.) act on or respond to recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner . This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for medication regimen review (MRR) (Residents #107 and #583) and was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 09/16/22 at 10:25 AM during initial facility tour, Resident #107 was not in the room. The surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #2) who was outside in the hallway and indicated that she was providing care for Resident #107 today who was out to dialysis. The surveyor was unable to interview the resident currently. The LPN #2 stated that the resident goes out to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from approximately 5:00 AM and returned to the facility at approximately 10:00 AM or 11:00 AM in the morning. The LPN #2 further stated that the resident had an AV shunt (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$56,441 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $56,441 — penalty dated 2024-04-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACOBS, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 03/12/2008 |
| JACOBS, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 03/12/2008 |
| JACOBS, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 03/12/2008 |
| JACOBS, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 03/12/2008 |
| KATZ, BATCHEVA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 03/12/2008 |
| AWAD, SALLY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/22/2017 |
| METTERNICH, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/17/2017 |
| JACOBS, HYMAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2014 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315518. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.