Rose Garden Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 337 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 114.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 2561976Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from neglect after an aphasic, cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1), was left unattended on the outside patio in the heat and sun from approximately 12:50 PM until approximately 3:30 PM on 7/3/25 (two hours and forty minutes). Resident #1 was sent to the hospital, was diagnosed with heatstroke and sustained second degree burns. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents, (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect.On 7/3/25 at approximately 12:50 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) transported Resident #1 (who was cognitively impaired and required maximal staff assistance with mobility), in a wheelchair to the outside patio on the second floor. CNA #1 did not communicate to other facility staff that Resident #1 was outside on the patio. Resident #1's assigned CNA (CNA #2) nor did any other staff did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure that washed utensils were dried in a manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and potential for the development of food-borne illness; b.) maintain the kitchen equipment in a sanitary manner to prevent microbial growth; c.) store, label and date potentially hazardous foods to prevent food borne illness; and d.) ensure bottled drinking water supply was stored in a sanitary manner at least six inches from the floor. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 9/11/2025 at 9:08 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD) and observed the following:1. Near the washing area, dinner knives, forks, and teaspoons contained in perforated plastic flatware containers being air-dried by a standing fan with dust build-up at the back grills. The FSD stated that the fan was cleaned the previous night. 2. Manual can opener blue plastic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of medical record and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) provide residents with appropriate products for hand hygiene during mealtime identified in 2 of 3 dining room observations (1st floor Tea [NAME] and the Main dining rooms) and b.) implement and maintain a resident with stage 3 pressure ulcer wound on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in nursing homes identified in 1 of 1 resident (Resident #114) reviewed for pressure ulcer, to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of infection control practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: Use personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately, including gloves and gown. Wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or the patient's environment. Donning PPE upon room entry and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of electronic medical records (EMR) and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to document non-pharmacological interventions to manage a resident's behavior prior to administration of psychotropic medications. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following:Review of the resident Face Sheet (admission summary) indicated that Resident #37 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but was not limited to dementia with other behavior disturbance, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism and hypertension.Review of the quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) an assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care dated 8/15/25, indicated that Resident #37 had short and long-term memory deficits and was severely impaired with decision making. The MDS also indicated that the resident required moderate assistance with activities of daily living and exhibited no behaviors.On 9/11/2025 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code a resident's oxygen (O2) administration on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #9) reviewed and was evidenced by the following:Review of the Face Sheet (admission summary) indicated that Resident #9 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but was not limited to pneumonia (respiratory infection) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care dated 8/15/25 indicated that Resident #9 scored an 8/15 on the Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated moderate impairment of cognition. The MDS also reflected that Resident #9 required moderate assistance with all aspect of activities of daily living. The MDS did not reflect that the resident was being administered O2.On 9/11/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (CPCCP) for pain that was consistent with professional standards of practice and included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical needs. This deficiency was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #129) reviewed for pain.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/11/2025 at 10:42 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #129 in their bedroom, lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated to approximately 45 degrees. The resident reported having undergone surgery on their lower right leg on 09/04/2025, including a skin graft (a medical procedure where healthy skin is removed from one area of the body and replaced to another area) for a painful wound in that area. The resident stated that he/she had received pain medication at approximately 6:00 a.m. and were planning to ask the nurse for additional medication for their lower right leg later. According…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise a resident's Interdisciplinary Care Plan (ICP) to accurately reflect the care for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #2) and was evidenced by the following: Review of the Face Sheet (admission summary) indicated that Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, heart failure and diabetes mellites (DM).Review of the quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) an assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care dated 8/4/2025, indicated that Resident #2 had a score of 8/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS reflected that the resident required maximum assistance with activities of daily living.On 9/11/2025 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 sitting in the dayroom. The resident was very pleasant and well dressed. The surveyor observed that the resident had edema…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of possible hazards. This deficiency was identified in 1 of 2 residents (Resident #128) reviewed for accidents.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 09/15/2025 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's accident investigation for Resident #128's near-fall incident that occurred on 10/11/2024. The identified contributing factor was a broken right halo bar (a safety and mobility device attached to the resident's bed) that failed to lock into place. Measure to prevent recurrence was notifying the maintenance department. On 09/15/2024 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's Housekeeping and Maintenance Request Forms for the period of 09/2024-10/2024. Logs showed two work requests for loose halo bars submitted by nursing: one on 09/25/2024 and another on 10/18/2025. However, there was no maintenance request submitted or completed on 10/11/2024 for Resident #128's halo bar following the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of electronic medical records (EMR) and other pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to document the administration of oxygen (O2) and failed to document the administration of O2 on the resident's Interdisciplinary Care Plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) develop an individualized comprehensive assessment and Care Plan (CP) with resident specific interventions to address dementia care, and b.) follow the facility policy for dementia care. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #37, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dementia care and was evidenced by the following:Review of the resident Face Sheet (admission summary) indicated that Resident #37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia with other behavior disturbance, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism and hypertension.Review of the quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) an assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care dated 8/15/2025, indicated that Resident #37 had short and long-term memory deficits and was severely impaired with decision making. The MDS also indicated that the resident required moderate assistance with activities of daily living and did not exhibit behaviors.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0868 — isolated
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) was present for quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings, and b.) included as a member of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee. This deficient practice was identified by the following: On 09/15/2025 at 12:35 PM, the surveyor interviewed the IP who stated that she had worked at the facility for the past two and a half years in her current role and had never attended a QAPI meeting. She reported that she provided infection control information to the Director of Nursing (DON), who presented it during the QAPI meetings. On 09/17/2025 at 10:14 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Assistant Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (ALNHA) who stated that the IP did not attend QAPI meetings and was not a member of the QAA committee. The Director of Nursing (DON) presents infection control information during the QAPI meetings. On 09/16/2025 at 12:02 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's 2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ