No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Shore Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

231 Warner Street, Toms River, NJ 08755 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 149 certified beds · (732) 942-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0610) — cited Nov 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$197,170 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0610), cited Nov 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $197,170 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-26)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
2360 Lakewood Rd · (732) 719-7788 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.2 mi
220 Rte 70 · (732) 942-9469 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ShopRite0.4 mi
2598 RT-70 · (732) 657-0099 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Eleanor Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.5%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%0.8%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.2%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%2.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.5%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.0%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.2%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.3%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.4%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.5%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.572.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.471.111.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.2%CMS range 29.1–50.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.4–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.6–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
28.9%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 139.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-14)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#: NJ00179177, NJ00179069 Based on interviews, medical records reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 11/11/2024, 11/12/2024, and 11/22/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an allegation of Resident-to-Resident sexual abuse between two residents, a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1), who wanders and requires frequent monitoring and Resident #4, who has moderate cognitive impairment. On 9/24/2024 at 8:35 p.m., the License Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) received a grievance by email written by Resident #1's family member, which included an alleged allegation of sexual interaction between Resident #1 and Resident #4. The LNHA forwarded the email to the Social Worker (SW) with instructions to write a Grievance. However, the grievance was not addressed, and an investigation was never initiated into the allegation. The facility's failure to address the grievance and investigate the sexual abuse allegation and follow its policies titled Abuse, Neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #3007960Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #144), who was dependent on staff for transfers, was safely and properly transferred with two staff members via a mechanical lift. On 5/4/26, the resident was transferred by one staff member from their bed to a shower chair, which resulted in the resident sustaining a left upper extremity humeral fracture (a fracture of the left upper arm). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #144) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: On 6/23/26 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LHNA) a copy of the Facility Reportable Event (FRE) submitted to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) for Resident #144.On 6/23/26 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the FRE provided by the LHNA. The report documented that on 5/4/26 at 11:15 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #11) was assisting Resident #144 with a shower and observed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: 374226Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 12/30/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and services necessary to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being, in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to properly assess, acknowledge pain, monitor, notify provider, and implement appropriate interventions for an identified unwitnessed fall and femur fracture.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1), as evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ# 184886Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documentation on 8/19/25 and 8/20/25, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge (d/c) planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals to return to the community. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 6), reviewed for community discharge. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:During a tour on 8/20/25 at 9:30AM, Resident #6 was observed sitting up in bed watching television.On 8/20/25 at 9:40AM, Surveyor interviewed Resident #6 in the presence of their family member. Resident #6 stated that on their day of discharge, he/she was told that an Uber was going to pick them up and transport them to a local hotel. Resident #6 stated that the Uber (a type of transportation service) dropped them off in the middle of the parking lot. He/she further stated, they walked into the hotel to check, and he/she was told they needed to pay $50 in ordered to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY REPEAT DEFICIENCY Complaint #: NJ185836; NJ186066 Based on observations, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility was maintained to provide the residents with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified on 3 of 3 nursing units, and was evidenced by the following: On 5/8/25 from 9:40 AM to 10:40 AM, the surveyor toured the Second-floor nursing unit and observed the following: 1. In Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall paper was peeling off the wall behind the door. 2. In Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, the bathroom ceiling tiles were cracked, the grab bar (bar affixed to the wall for safety) on the left side of the toilet was coming off the wall, the paint was peeling from the left side of the sink and the right side of the soap dispenser, the paint was peeling on the inside of the bathroom door and there were black marks on the lower section of the door. Above Bed-A in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ185836, NJ186066 Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff, as well as himself, implemented the facility's Quality of Life - Homelike Environment policy and procedures to ensure the safety and well-being of all residents by providing a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 nursing units, and was evidenced by the following: Refer F 584 A review of the facility's undated Administrator Job Description included the purpose of your position is to direct day-to-day function of the Facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing facilities to assure that the highest degree of quality of care can be provided to our residents at all times. Delegation of Authority: As Administrator you are delegated the administrative authority,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike setting. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 units, and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 2/5/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor entered the facility and observed the lobby floor to be dirty with scuff marks and discolored tiles. The elevator floors were also observed to be dirty and discolored and the walls of elevators were observed to be soiled. On 2/5/25 at 9:15 AM, during initial tour of the Third-floor nursing unit, the surveyor observed the following environmental issues: In Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-A, the floor was observed to be soiled and sticky with liquid spills on the floor. The unsampled resident's trash was overflowing and there was trash on the floor under the bed. In Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] A and B, the surveyor observed that the resident's clothes drawers were broken; peeling Formica on the dresser; no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness and b.) maintain kitchen equipment in a clean and sanitary manner as evidenced by the following: On 2/5/25 at 9:26 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following: 1. In the walk-in freezer, one opened box of raviolis and one opened box of chicken breasts in the manufacturer's box. Both products were in bags that were not sealed closed exposing the contents to air with ice crystals. Neither products were labeled with an opened or use by dates. The FSD was unable to say when the packages were opened. 2. The steam table with one main water well and six pan capacity had white murky water with sediment of food particles on the bottom and green food particles floating on the top of the water. The FSD stated the steam table water was drained and changed daily at the end of the day, and she acknowledged that it had not been done yet. The FSD could not provide work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a) label opened multidose medication; b) properly dispose of expired medications; and c) properly store medical supplies. This deficient practice was observed on 2 of 3 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed for medication storage and labeling, and was evidenced by the following: On 2/10/25 at 11:11 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), observed the following on the Third-floor high side nursing unit's medication cart: Fourteen individual, single use vials of ipratropium bromide/albuterol sulfate inhalation solution (a medication used to treat lung disease) 0.5 milligrams (mg) /3 mg per 3 milliliter (ml) in an opened foil pouch with a hand-written opened date of 1/2/24. The medication's foil pouch had manufacturer's instructions printed on it which indicated that the medication was to be used within two weeks of the pouch being opened. At that time, LPN #1 acknowledged the opened date and confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' dining experience was provided in a manner to promote dignity and respect of the residents. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 3 dining rooms on 2/13/25, and was evidenced by the following: On 2/13/25 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch meal on the Third-floor nursing unit in the dayroom/dining room. On each of the 14 residents, the staff served the cold beverages composed of milk and cranberry juice in disposable plastic cups. During an interview with the survey team on 2/14/25 at 11:00 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) did not refute the identified concerns for dignity in using disposable plastic cups for the memory care residents. A review of the facility provided Assistance with Meals policy dated revised March 2022, included meal assistance to residents with attention to safety, comfort and dignity . The policy did not include the use of non-disposable dinnerware. NJAC 8:39-4.1(a)12

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the medication cart was secured during medication administration in accordance with professional standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents observed during medication administration (Resident #89), and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 2/10/25 at 8:17 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) parked the Second-floor low-side medication cart outside the door of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a) obtain physician's orders for care of oxygen tubing and b) develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving oxygen therapy. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen (Resident #95), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/5/25 at 12:07 PM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed an oxygen concentrator (a device that enriches air with oxygen by removing nitrogen) in Resident #95's room with nasal oxygen tubing (small flexible tube with two prongs that delivers oxygen into the nose) connected. The tubing went from the oxygen concentrator onto the resident's bed, under the pillow, and hung off the opposite side of the bed. At that time, the resident informed the surveyor that they removed the oxygen. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses that included but were not limited to; chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and pertinent record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of the narcotic shift count logs were completed in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 3 medication carts, and was evidenced by the following: On 2/10/25 at 11:11 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), observed the Third-floor high side nursing unit's medication cart. A review of the medication cart's narcotic logbook revealed a pre-signed outgoing nurse signature for the shift-to-shift narcotic count Narcotic Bingo Card Count Sheet for the 2/10/25 3:00 PM- 11:00 PM shift. At that time, LPN #1 confirmed that she had pre-signed the log and that the log should have been signed in the presence of the incoming nurse by both herself and the incoming nurse at the same time after a narcotic count was completed. On 2/10/25 at 11:41 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of LPN #2, observed the Second-floor low side nursing unit's medication cart. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly to prevent rodents and pests. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 2/5/25 at 9:32 AM, the surveyor toured the facility grounds and loading dock area with the Food Service Director (FSD). The surveyor observed the following. 1. The grassy side yard, which the First-floor residents looked at from their windows, was filled with construction debris, pallets that were broken and thrown around, plastic wrap in the trees, Styrofoam panels, and paper litter in the tree line that ran along neighborhood fences. 2. Along the black top driveway and grassy area, there were cigarette butts (too numerous to count) thrown on the ground. There was a cigarette receptacle lying on its side in the grass. 3. Behind a short brick wall, there were construction debris, metal benches, milk cartons, and tarps thrown haphazardly. 4. Behind a large blue storage trailer shed, there were orange milk crates thrown, construction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices during medication administration to prevent the potential spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents observed during medication administration (Resident #96), and was evidenced by the following: Reference: Hand hygiene should be performed immediately before touching a patient; before performing an aseptic task such as placing an indwelling device or handling invasive medical devices; before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient; after touching a patient or patient's surroundings; after contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces; immediately after glove removal. CDC recommendations for Hand Hygiene: Updated February 27, 2024:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ 182687 Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was provided a lock to prevent loss/theft of items. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 28 residents reviewed for resident rights (Resident #132), and was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Face Sheet revealed that Resident #132 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: anxiety disorder, emphysema, and tracheostomy (a tube placed in a surgical hole through the neck to the windpipe). A review of the Minimum Data Sheet (MDS), an assessment tool, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was independent for activities of daily living (ADL). During an interview with Resident #132 on 2/12/25 at 10:00 AM, the resident stated that when they were moved to a new room, they requested a lock to be placed on the closet door to prevent other residents from going into their closet and drawers. The resident further stated that at times, they woke up in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#: NJ00179177, NJ 00179069 Based on interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/11/2024, 11/12/2024, and 11/22/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to implement its policy titled Grievance Policy and Procedure and the Social Worker Job description after a resident family member made an allegation of sexual abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents, Resident #1, and was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Altered Mental Status, Unspecified Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 9/27/2024, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0/15, which indicated that the Resident's cognition was severely impaired. The MDS also showed Resident #1 needed partial to moderate assistance and one-person physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C#:NJ 00179177, NJ 00179069 Based on interviews, Medical Record (MR) review, and review of pertinent facility documentation on 11/11/2024, 11/12/2024 and 11/11/2024, it was determined that the facility's Administration failed to ensure a thorough and complete investigation was completed for an allegation of Resident-to-Resident sexual abuse and follow its Abuse and Neglect, Investigating and Reporting, the Abuse Prevention Program Policy, the Grievance Policy and Procedure, and the Administrator's Job Description. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4) and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Altered Mental Status, Unspecified Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 9/27/2024, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0/15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store and label potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness, b.) failed to sanitize and air-dry cookware in a manner to prevent microbial growth, and c.) maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/26/23 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. Dietary Aide #1 was observed with hair hanging outside of her hair net by each ear. The surveyor asked the FSD about the observation and the expectation of hair restraint use. The FSD acknowledged hair should be restrained and stated it happens, sometimes hair will come out of the hairnet and that Dietary Aide #1 would usually fix her hairnet. The surveyor interviewed Dietary Aide #1, about the expectation of hair restraint use. Dietary Aide #1 acknowledged all hair should be covered by the hairnet and stated she would fix her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Complaint # NJ 150832 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #193) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Face Sheet, Resident #193 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 12/15/21, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of the resident's Progress Note, written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, dated 12/25/21 at 10:42 PM, revealed, at 9 pm this writer received a call from [Sergeant Name] from [Sheriff's Office] was made aware that [Resident #193's family member] was there with [Resident #193] making claims that [he/she] was being abused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Complaint # NJ 150832 Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #193) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Face Sheet, Resident #193 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 12/15/2021, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, which indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of the resident's Progress Note, written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, dated 12/25/21 at 10:42 PM, revealed, at 9 pm this writer received a call from [Sergeant Name] from [Sheriff's Office] was made aware that [Resident #193's family member] was there with [Resident #193] making claims that [he/she] was being abused and being forced to take medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, review of the medical record and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) provide a snack bag to send with the resident on scheduled dialysis (the clinical purification of blood, as a substitute for normal kidney function) days and b.) coordinate medication administration times with scheduled dialysis days. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #48) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: On 04/28/23 at 12:23 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #48 lying in bed awake. When interviewed, the resident stated that he/she went to dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 5:30 AM. The resident explained that since the dialysis schedule changed from 10:30 AM to 5:30 AM, the facility failed to consistently send a snack such as a peanut butter and jelly sandwich to be eaten at the dialysis center and the resident had to resort to snacks brought in by family members such as goldfish crackers. The resident stated that he/she also had not received any medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3.) On 05/05/23 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor accompanied the Environmental Service Director (ESD) to a storage area the facility referred to as the nursery where additional linens were stored. The Administrator joined and entered the storage area with the surveyor and the ESD. At that time, the surveyor observed six cardboard boxes directly on the floor. One box contained sealed paper towels, two boxes contained resident clothing, and three sealed boxes contained linen. The ESD Services stated the boxes should be off the floor and on pallets so they could clean the area underneath. During an interview with the surveyor on 05/05/23 at 11:29 AM, the IP stated storage of the boxes should not be directly on the floor in case the boxes get wet or dirty. Review of an undated policy titled, Receipt and Storage of Supplies and Equipment, included but was not limited to; It shall be the Purchasing Agent's responsibility to assure that proper storage procedures are maintained. Review of an undated policy titled,Storage Areas, Environmental Services included but was not limited to; Housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain consent from a resident representative prior to administering a Pneumococcal vaccination for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #134) reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/01/23 at 9:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #134 sitting in the day room during a music activity. According to the admission Face Sheet, Resident #134 had diagnoses which included, but were not to, dementia and metabolic encephalopathy. Further review of the admission Face Sheet indicated the resident's son as the only next of kin and emergency contact. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 01/11/23, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of, 6, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired, and that the resident sometimes understands - responds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to a.) document medication administered according to standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #109), and b.) follow a physician's order as written for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 69) reviewed for medications. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 05/02/23 at 8:19 AM, the surveyor observed LPN #7 as she prepared 13 medications and administered them to Resident #109. At 8:33 AM, after Resident #109's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received supplemental oxygen as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #13) reviewed for respiratory care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 04/26/23 at 10:22 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 in bed wearing a nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen). The surveyor observed that the nasal cannula was connected to an oxygen concentrator that was set to 3 liters per minute (LPM) of oxygen. On 05/01/23 at 09:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed with their eyes closed. The surveyor observed that the resident was wearing the nasal cannula and that the oxygen concentrator was set to 3 LPM. On 05/01/23 at 11:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #13 lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated, wearing the nasal cannula and that their oxygen concentrator was set to 3 LPM. The surveyor observed that the resident was leaning towards her right side and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ 151993 Based on interviews and review of the closed medical record, it was determined that the facility physician failed to have a face to face visit for a resident who was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #192) reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practiced was evidenced by the following: Review of Resident #192's Face Sheet revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2021 with diagnosis which included but were not limited to: COVID-19, acute renal (kidney) failure and anxiety disorder. Review Resident #192's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 01/14/21, revealed that the resident's memory was described as OK and the resident had no memory impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed that the resident was independent with bed mobility, and required supervision and setup help only for transfers and for ambulation. Review of Resident #192's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that facility failed to provide social services for a resident with severe cognitive impairment. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 vulnerable residents (Resident #134) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: On 05/01/23 at 9:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #134 sitting in the day room during a music activity. According to the admission Face Sheet, Resident #134 had diagnoses which included, but were not to, dementia and metabolic encephalopathy. Further review of the admission Face Sheet indicated the resident's son as the only next of kin (NOK) and emergency contact. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 04/11/23, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of, 6, which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. Further review of the MDS included the resident sometimes understands - responds adequately to simple, direct communication only. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #NJ 150149 Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure meals were served at safe and appetizing temperatures. This deficient practice was on one (1) of three (3) nursing units (the third floor), during the lunch meal service on 5/3/23 and was evidenced by the following: On 5/3/23 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council Meeting with five (5) alert and oriented residents in which 5 of 5 residents (Resident #29, #40, #89, #90, and #91) at the meeting stated that the food was cold. They stated that the food was cold and old, and they never have received a hot piece of pizza or a burger. The residents further stated that the trays were on open food carts. On 5/3/23 at 11:44 AM, the surveyor arrived in the kitchen, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) to observe the serving of the lunch meal for the day including food temperatures. The FSD calibrated the food thermometer to 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the presence of the surveyor using the ice bath method. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #NJ 147719, Complaint #NJ 150149 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's dietary preferences were honored for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for food concerns (Resident #85) This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/03/23 at 1:31 PM, during lunch mealtime, the surveyor observed Resident #85 sitting at the bedside. Resident #85 was alert, oriented, and able to make needs known. A lunch tray was on the resident's bedside table. Resident #85 stated they could not eat what was on the lunch tray. Resident #85 removed the insulated dome and the plate contained sloppy joe which had sauce and peas and carrots. Resident #85 stated they had preferences listed on the meal ticket and always received something they shouldn't. The meal ticket observed on the tray for the resident, listed no gravy/sauce and resident was to have peanut butter and jelly sandwich with the meal. There was no peanut butter and jelly sandwich observed. Resident #85 stated they had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to report to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) an allegation of staff to resident abuse that occurred on 3/20/21. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #26) and was evidenced by the following: On 3/23/21 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor interviewed a Resident Advocate who stated that Resident #26 was involved in a verbal altercation with an Agency Nurse on Saturday (3/20/21). The Resident Advocate noted that the police were called to the facility regarding this incident by Resident #26. The Resident Advocate stated that the Nursing Supervisor/Registered Nurse (NS/RN) informed the nurse to leave the facility and not return. The Resident Advocate was unsure of the nurse's name because she was an Agency Nurse, but confirmed that the nurse had not been back to the facility since the incident. On 3/23/21 at 11:34 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #26, who stated that on Saturday, 3/20/21, there was an Agency Nurse who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff to resident abuse that occurred on 3/20/21. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #26) and was evidenced by the following: On 3/23/21 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor interviewed a Resident Advocate who stated that Resident #26 had a verbal altercation with an Agency Nurse on Saturday (3/20/21). The Resident Advocate noted that the police were called to the facility regarding this incident by Resident #26. The Resident Advocate stated that the Agency Nurse had to leave the facility and was told to not return, so the Nursing Supervisor/Registered Nurse (NS/RN) had to care for her assigned residents. The Resident Advocate was unsure of the nurse's name because she was an Agency staff member. On 3/23/21 at 11:34 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #26, who stated that on Saturday, 3/20/21, there was an Agency Nurse who worked the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift that came into his/her room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined the facility staff members failed to a.) don (apply) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to enter the rooms of residents on Transmission-based precautions (TBP); and, b.) maintain appropriate infection control practices regarding a housekeeping cart. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 52 (Resident #59, #27 and #29) for Persons Under Investigation (PUI) / non-ill unit and, 1 of 2 active nursing units (Second Floor). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1) On 3/24/21 at 1:24 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #59's room on PUI hall. Resident #59's room was observed with a stop see nurse sign - on Transmission Based Precautions, and how to don and doff (remove) PPE sign; a PPE bin in front of the door with PPE gowns, gloves, face shields, respirator masks and surgical masks. The surveyor observed Resident #59 self-propelling around the room in a wheelchair with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$197,170 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $17,542 — penalty dated 2026-06-26
  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2026-01-05
  • $36,052 — penalty dated 2025-05-08
  • $34,457 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
  • $100,009 — penalty dated 2024-11-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ABRAMCZYK, JACOBIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST31%since 08/03/2021
ABRAMCZYK, JOSEPHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST21%since 08/03/2021
ABRAMCZYK, NAFTOLIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 08/03/2021
SHAPIRO, SIMAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 08/03/2021
ENGELSON, DANIELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/03/2021

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.3M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 9%Medicare 8%Other / private 83%

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$289per resident / day
operating cost
$8,792per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315454. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next