Belle Care Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
439 Bellevue Avenue, Trenton, NJ 08618 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (609) 396-2646 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603, F0604) — most recent Jun 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (75) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,571 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.2% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.4% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.4% | 12.1% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.0% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.8% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.0% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.3% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.2% | 12.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.3% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.2% | 8.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.24 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.11 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.0–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 99.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
75 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ #: 159451; 159783 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of the resident's quality of life. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Resident Rights (Resident #60). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/17/24 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #60 in their room watching television. Resident #60 stated that they did not like to spend time in their room because their roommate (Resident #71) urinated on the floor, causing the room to become smelly and unpleasant. When asked if the facility was aware of this behavior, Resident #60 confirmed. On 6/20/24 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor was on the Second Floor nursing unit and smelled a strong odor of urine while approaching Resident #60's room. The surveyor entered the room to discover the floor by Resident #60's bed was wet and sticky in addition to puddles of wetness observed on the bed. Upon exiting the room, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-26 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Justice Involved Residents (JIRs) were treated in a dignified and respectful manner by physically restraining, secluding the resident from participating in group activities, community dining, communicating with visitors, leaving the room at will, and retaining and using of personal possessions. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 JIR (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was secluded by Corrections Officers (CO) from the Correctional Facility (CF). Resident #1 was observed being secluded to their room, guarded by two COs, and they were not permitted to participate in group activities and community dining. Resident #1 stated they were not allowed to leave their room; have visitors unless scheduled and approved by the CF; could not choose their own clothes having to wear an orange jumpsuit that made them feel embarrassed; participate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice including to; participate in group activities, community dining, serving meals in a dignified manner, freely communicate with visitors, leave room at will, be free from physical restraints, and wear clothing of choice for Justice Involved Residents (JIR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 JIRs (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was secluded by Corrections Officers (CO) from the Correctional Facility (CF). Resident #1 was observed being secluded to their room, guarded by two COs, and they Resident #1 was not permitted to participate in group activities and community dining. Resident #1 stated that they were not allowed to leave their room; have visitors unless scheduled and approved by the CF; could not choose their own clothes having to wear an orange…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-26 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from abuse including the involuntary seclusion and use of physical restraints for a Justice Involved Resident (JIR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 JIR (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was secluded by Corrections Officers (CO) from the Correctional Facility (CF). Resident #1 was observed being secluded to their room, guarded by two COs; Resident #1 was not permitted to participate in group activities and community dining. Resident #1 stated hey were not allowed to leave their room; have visitors unless scheduled and approved by the CF; could not choose their own clothes having to wear an orange jumpsuit that made them feel embarrassed; participate in activities; eat all meals in their room on disposable ware; not allowed use the telephone; and had no privacy which the resident reported feeling lonely and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from abuse including the use of physical restraints imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience for a Justice Involved Resident (JIR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 JIR (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility, and was secluded by Corrections Officers (CO) from the Correctional Facility (CF). Resident #1 was observed being secluded to their room, guarded by two COs, and Resident #1 was not permitted to participate in group activities and community dining. Resident #1 stated that they were not allowed to leave their room; have visitors unless scheduled and approved by the CF; participate in activities; eat all meals in their room on disposable ware; not allowed use the telephone; and had no privacy which the resident reported feeling lonely and depressed being in a room twenty-four hours a day seven days a week with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff implemented facility policies and procedures to ensure a.) residents were provided with care and services to achieve their highest practical wellbeing and b.) their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program was being implemented to ensure sustainability with previously cited deficiencies. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 2 nursing units, and was evidenced by the following: Refer F600, F610, F641, F725, F756, F761, F838, F865, F881, F882 A review of the Administrator's job description provided by the facility revealed the following: Administrator is responsible for planning and is accountable for all activities and departments at [name redacted] subject to rules and regulations promulgated by government agencies to ensure proper health care services to residents. The Administrator administers, directs, and coordinates all activities of the facility to assure that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ Complaint #166562 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who was on one-to-one (1:1) monitoring by staff was constantly monitored by staff to ensure the resident was free from neglect when they sustained bruising to both ears and a lower spine fracture from an unwitnessed fall. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #254), and was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility's One-to-One Observation policy and procedure, dated revised January 2024, included the aim of one-to-one nursing is to provide continuous observation for an individual patient for a period of time during acute physical or mental illness .Primary Physician/Nurse Practitioner shall be notified about the change in patient's condition and order will be obtained for continuous 1:1 observation until further evaluation. Resident/patient's care plan will be initiated and/or updated with resident centered interventions . On 6/17/24 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor requested from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of Nursing Staffing Report sheets and facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 7 days a week for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 10 of 42 days reviewed 09/21/2025 through 12/27/2025. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the Nurse Staffing Reports completed by the facility for the week of 09/21/2025 through 12/27/2025, revealed the facility had no RN coverage for all shifts on 10/03/2025, 11/24/2025, 12/16/2025, 12/17/2025, 12/18/2025, 12/22/2025, 12/24/2025, 12/25/2025 and 12/26/2025. During an interview on 01/02/2026 at 11:50 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the DON stated that if a licensed nurse is unavailable, she will cover, and if an RN cannot work 8 consecutive hours, another RN, regional staff, or agency staff (last used 08/2025) will be contacted. The LNHA noted that there have been instances of no RNs documented in the nursing reports. A review of a facility policy dated 10/15/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/29/2025 from 09:30 AM until 09:55 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen, the surveyor, in the presence of the Director of Dining (DOD) observed the following:1. In the walk-in refrigerator, a covered pie had no label and was not dated. The DOD acknowledged it should be dated and the item was removed. 2. In the walk-in freezer, bagged frozen waffles, bagged frozen fish, frozen hamburger patties and an opened package of bacon had no label and were not dated. The DOD stated the waffles, fish, hamburger patties, and the bacon should be dated. The items were removed.3.In the refrigerator, an opened wrapped package of shredded cheese not dated. The DOD stated that it should be dated. 4. In the refrigerator, a single halved tomato wrapped in clear plastic wrap with no label and not dated. The DOD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide immediate access to records and requested information necessary to conduct the survey.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/29/2025 at 9:00 AM, the survey team entered the facility and was greeted by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) who was instructed by the Survey Team Coordinator to provide an alphabetical roster of residents and a roster by room number, the Facility Matrix for admissions in the last 30 days, and a list of residents who smoke.On the same date at 9:56 AM, no facility staff member brought any of the requested documents except an alphabetical list of the residents. On 12/29/2025 at 10:01 AM, the Survey Team Coordinator spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) via the ADON's cellular phone. At that time, the DON said she was on vacation last week and was not expecting a survey.On 12/29/2025 at 10:36 AM, the entrance conference began with the arrival of the DON and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-05 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staffing data submitted to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) through the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system was accurate and complete for 1 of 2 PBJ Staffing Data Reports reviewed under the Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staff Task.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:The facility reported on the AAS-11 (Daily Nursing Staff Report) that no Registered Nurse (RN) services were available on 10/03/2025, 11/24/2025, 12/16/2025, 12/17/2025, 12/18/2025, 12/22/2025, 12/25/2025, and 12/26/2025.A review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report (CASPER Report 1705D) for Fiscal Year Quarter 1, 2025 (October 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025) revealed that the facility had not triggered No RN Hours for the dates identified on the AAS-11.On 1/02/2026 at 11:45 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Human Resource Manager (HRM) confirmed there were 24-hour periods without a registered nurse as indicated on the state staffing form (AAS-11). When the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and sanitary environment for 2 of 2 units, the 1st and 2nd floor units, reviewed for environment.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/29/2025 at 9:45 AM, on the 2nd floor in Bedroom [ROOM NUMBER], surveyor # 1 observed a fall mat positioned next to a resident's bed that contained multiple brown debris spots. On 12/29/2025 at 10:00 AM, on the 2nd floor in Bedroom [ROOM NUMBER], surveyor # 1 observed unfinished spackling on the wall behind the headboard of the B bed. Three holes were observed in the wall near the dresser. A fall mat was present on the right side of the bed with multiple areas of white debris. The floor on the left side of the bed contained a plastic fork, a knife, a paper cup, and multiple areas of brown debris and food. The bathroom contained a drop ceiling that was brown-stained and bulging. On 12/30/2025 at 9:55 AM, on the 2nd…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-05 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations on 12/31/2025 and 01 02/2026 in the presence of the facility's Corporate Regional Maintenance (CRM) and Maintenance Director (MD), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on both sides, This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 101 Residents who reside in the facility and is evidenced by the following:During the building tour on 01/02/2026 in the presence of the facility's CRM and MD at approximately 9:50 AM, the surveyor observed on the ground floor corridor next to the elevator and lobby area had no evidence of hand rails on both sides of the corridor.The surveyor measured and recorded the following sections of wall with no evidence of hand rails,1) One 3' section of wall with no hand rail.2) One 10' section of wall with no hand rail.3) One 7'-6 section of wall with no hand rail.4) One approximately 18 foot section of wall with no hand rail.The CRM and MD confirmed the findings at the times of observations.NJAC 8:39-31.2 ( e ).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure newly hired employees were properly screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation and failed to implement policies and procedures related to pre-employment screening. Specifically, the facility did not complete required license verifications, reference checks, or criminal background checks prior to the start of employment. This deficient practice was identified in 53 of 160 employee files reviewed (Employees #1 through # 53).The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/30/2025 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor requested that the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Human Resources Director (HRD) provide personnel files for all employees hired since the last annual recertification survey in 06/2024, regardless of current employment status. The requested documentation included the department of hire, date of hire, license verification, reference checks, criminal background checks, and pre-employment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # 366635Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of a resident-to-resident altercation to the Department of Health (State Agency) within the required 24-hour time frame. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 8 residents (Resident # 113 and 114) reviewed under Abuse.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of the facility's AAS-45 (official report that a nursing home must send to the state government whenever an accident or incident happens to a resident) revealed that a resident-to-resident altercation occurred on 11/27/2024.A review of the AAS-45 revealed the form indicated that no injuries were reported because of the altercation.A review of the AAS-45 revealed the facility indicated the event was called into the Department of Health on 11/28/2024.A review of the AAS-45 revealed that the section for the date of the report was 12/12/2024.A review of the NJ Department of Health Intake Information sheet revealed the Department received the intake via E-Mail on 12/13/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # 366660Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of abuse by failing to document witness statements regarding the specific events of an alleged incident and instead focused on the character of the staff member involved. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 8 residents (Resident # 112).The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 6/10/2025, Resident # 112 reported to the New Jersey Department of Health that on 5/02/2025, a nurse refused to give the resident needed supplies to perform their own care, kicked an oxygen concentrator, and refused to send the resident to the hospital.A review of Resident # 112's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed under Care Plan that the resident had a focus of Behavior issues secondary to anxiety disorder as evidenced by: Calling 911, exaggerating events, Screaming to the point of exhaustion, yelling causing distress to self and others, extreme responses to ordinary stimuli or minor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication observations conducted from 12/30/2025 to 01/02/2026, the surveyors observed four nurses administer medications to ten residents. There were 29 opportunities, and 3 errors observed, which resulted in a medication error rate of 10.34%. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 10 residents, administered by 1 of 4 nurses. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/30/2025 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 1 begin to administer medications for resident #63. LPN # 1 emptied 1 tablet of potassium chloride (a supplement used to treat or prevent low blood potassium) 10 milliequivalents from the medication card into a medication cup. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Potassium Chloride tab 10MEQ ER, Give 1 tablet orally one time a day every 2 days, at 8:00 AM. Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 58 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored in an orderly manner. The facility failed to label opened multi-dose insulin vials with an open or expiration date and failed to maintain a medication cart free from loose, scattered medication. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 medication carts inspected under the Medication Storage and Labeling task.The deficient practice was evidenced by:On 12/30/2025 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor inspected the 2 High - Side, 2nd Floor medication cart in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 1.While inspecting the top drawer of the cart, the surveyor observed a multi-dose vial of Lantus insulin (long-acting insulin) prescribed to an unsampled resident.The vial was in a clear, plastic bag and was observed to be opened but was not labeled with an opened date or an expiration date.The surveyor also observed a multi-dose vial of Humulin 70/30 insulin in the same drawer that did not have an expiration date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the garbage containers closed and provide an area free of garbage and debris for 3 of 3 garbage containers. This deficient practice was evidenced by:On 12/30/2025 at 12:15 PM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Director of Dining (DOD), observed the facility's outdoor trash disposal area. The surveyor observed three garbage containers (GC) situated side by side along the exterior fence. The three GCs had an open lid and contained trash that was exposed to the elements. The area surrounding the three GCs was littered with debris, including but not limited to disposable gloves, plastic bags, and cardboard boxes. On 01/02/2026 at 10:53 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Director of Maintenance (DOM) stated that both housekeeping and the maintenance departments are responsible for keeping the dumpster area clean. The DOM stated the GCs should be shut and the area surrounding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control practices were implemented to prevent the transmission of infection, related to handling of an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Urinary Catheter. (Resident # 11)The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the unit on 12/29/2025 at 09:52 AM, Resident #11 was in bed with an indwelling catheter. The catheter drainage bag was in contact with the floor with no privacy bag.A review of Resident # 11's admissions record revealed that, Resident # 11 was admitted with but not limited to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (enlarged prostate), and Obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition where urine flow is blocked.A review of the Resident #11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed under section H that the resident had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ182273 Based on observation, interview, review of the medical records, and pertinent facility documents on 4/21/25 and 4/24/25, it was determined that the facility's nursing staff failed to: a.) sign on the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) that the medications were administered according to the physician's orders, and b.) administer medication according to the physician's order. The facility also failed to follow their policy titled Medication Administration. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5) reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # NJ178109 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 4/21/25 and 4/24/25, it was determined that the facility failed to submit the facility's investigation to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) in a timely manner for a resident-to-resident incident that occurred. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Abuse Policy. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident # 2 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Depression, Anxiety, and Bipolar Disorder. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 02/27/25, Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. 2. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident # 8 was admitted to the facility in October 2019 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Major Depressive Disorder, constipation, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to address the recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #34, Resident #80, Resident #60, and Resident #61) and was previously cited during the facility's last standard survey on 10/20/22. The evidence was as follows: Refer F865 1. On 6/19/24 at 1:27 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) the CP's recommendations for Resident #34 from March 2024 until present. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #34 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to unspecified dementia with behavior disturbance and bipolar disorder (a type of mental illness). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 3/30/24, reflected that the resident had severe cognitive deficits and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility-wide assessment identified the required services and procedures necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all residents prior to admission of registered sex offenders and residents admitted from the correctional facility. This deficient practice was previously identified and cited during the facility's last standard survey on 10/20/22, and was evidenced by the following: Refer F865 During entrance conference on 6/17/24 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) a copy of the facility's assessment. During initial tour on 6/17/24 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #26 observed in bed asleep. The surveyor observed that both the resident and their unsampled roommate were both incarcerated with four Corrections Officers (CO) present in the room. On 6/24/24 at 1:03 PM, the surveyor asked the LNHA and Maintenance Director if the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program was being implemented to ensure sustainability with previously cited deficiencies and b.) sources of quantitative data was being analyzed to identify quality deficiencies and evaluate program effectiveness. The facility was cited during last standard survey on 10/20/22, and was evidenced by the following: Refer F641, F756, F761, F838, and F881 During entrance conference on 6/17/24 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) a copy of the facility's QAPI program plan and the last three quarterly sign-in sheets. On 6/18/24 at 11:52 AM, the surveyor requested from the LNHA a copy of the facility's QAPI program plan and last three quarterly sign-in sheets. On 6/19/24 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor received a copy of the last three quarterly sign-in sheets for the facility's QAPI program, but no policy was provided.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) implement a facility-wide system to monitor antibiotic use specifically according to the facility's antibiotic stewardship program and b.) monitor antibiotic use and conduct surveillance from January 2024 through June 2024. This deficient practice was cited during the facility's last standard survey on 10/20/22, and was evidenced by the following: Refer F865 According to the U.S. CDC Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Home, page last reviewed June 11, 2020, included, Tracking and Reporting Antibiotic Use and Outcomes Nursing homes monitor both antibiotic use practices and outcomes related to antibiotics in order to guide practice changes and track the impact of new interventions. Data on adherence to antibiotic prescribing policies and antibiotic use are shared with clinicians and nurses to maintain awareness about the progress being made in antibiotic stewardship. Process measures: Tracking how and why antibiotics are prescribed Perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the required Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) forms prior to discharge from Medicare Part A services. This deficient practice was identified for for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications (Resident #28, #55, and #82), and was evidenced by the following: On 6/25/24 at 9:18 AM, the surveyor reviewed three residents (#28, #55, #82) who were discharged from their Medicare Part A stay with benefit days remaining within the past six months and should have received Beneficiary Notices. Resident #28 had a last documented covered day of Medicare Part A service coverage date of 4/12/24, from a facility-initiated discharge when benefit days were not exhausted. The facility did not have the resident or resident representative sign the required NOMNC form to notify them of the termination of insurance. The ABN form was also unsigned and dated 6/12/24 (two months after discharge), and only included rehabilitation (rehab)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, review of facility policy, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to a.) complete criminal background checks on employees prior to employment; b.) to complete reference checks on employees before their start date; and c.) to complete license checks on employees prior to their start date. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 10 employees reviewed for new hires (Employee #9 and Employee #10), and was evidenced by the following: A review of facility's undated Abuse Policy included in the section titled Screening Components that it is the policy of this facility to screen employees and volunteers prior to working with residents. Screening components include verification of references, certification and verification of license and criminal background check .Employee Screening and Training a. Before new employees are permitted to work with residents, references provided by the prospective employee will be verified as well as appropriate board registrations and certifications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's status in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to evaluate resident's care needs. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 35 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments (Resident #29, #60, #73, #80, and #96), and was previously cited during the facility's last standard survey on 10/20/22. The evidence was as follows: Refer F865 1. On 6/17/24 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #29 sitting on their bed. The surveyor attempted to interview the resident, but the resident was unable to verbally be understood. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #29. A review of the admission Record face sheet (admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to schizophrenia, A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 5/11/24, reflected a brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) administer multiple medications on multiple dates and times on a timely basis in November of 2022, and b.) ensure a discontinued physician's order was removed from active orders in accordance with professional standards of practices. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration times (Resident #32, #43, #60, and #250) and 1 of 24 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice (Resident #60). Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Justice Involved Resident (JIR) was provided since admission activities of their choice designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 JIR (Resident #1) reviewed. The findings were as follows: Reference: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) updated Guideline to Surveyors on Federal Requirements for Providing services to Justice Involved individuals, revised 12/23/2016 S & C 16-21-ALL documented Skilled Nursing Facilities must permit residents to have autonomy and choice to the maximum extent practicable regarding how they wish to live their everyday lives and receive care with the same rights as nursing home residents. A review of the facility's Resident Rights dated revised 1/3/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents were provided with care to achieve their highest practical wellbeing by failing to ensure a.) incontinence care was provided for 2 out of 7 residents observed during incontinence rounds (Resident #32 and Resident #147) and b.) medications were administered according to physician's orders for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration timing (Resident #32, #43, #60, and #250). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer F658 and F677 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #147 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but not limited to chronic respiratory failure and tracheostomy (hole in the windpipe to facilitate breathing). The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 4/10/24, reflected that Resident #147 had moderate cognitive deficits…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards by not ensuring a.) the accurate documentation of medication administration during the 6/18/24 medication administration observation for ten residents by 1 of 2 nurses; b.) accurate documentation of the administration of a medication (Depakote) according to physician's orders from 6/11/24 until surveyor inquiry; c.) accurate inventory documentation of a controlled medication (methadone) administered on 6/17/24; d.) maintain accurate documentation for signing the controlled drug shift-to-shift inventory counts of the controlled medications on the morning shift of 6/18/24 by 1 of 2 nurses observed during the medication administration observation and an additional six shifts in June for one 1 of 2 medication carts inspected; and e.) accountability of the narcotic shift count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy and accurately account for and document the administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the morning medication administration observation on 6/18/24, the surveyor observed two (2) nurses administer medications to three (3) residents. There were 29 opportunities, and three (3) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 10.3%. The deficient practices were identified for 2 of 3 residents, (Resident #51 and #5), that were administered medications by 2 of 2 nurses that were observed. The facility was previously cited for this during their last standard survey. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/18/24 at 8:28 AM, during the morning medication administration pass, the surveyor, observed the Registered Nurse (RN #1) preparing nine (9) medications for Resident #51 which included a 200 milligram (MG) tablet of lamotrigine (Lamictal). RN #1 stated that the medication card of Lamictal 200 MG tablets for Resident #51 was empty, and that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly store medications, b.) maintain clean and sanitary medication storage areas, and c.) properly label opened multidose medications. This was observed in 2 of 2 observed medication carts on 2 of 2 nursing units and was previously cited during the facility's last standard survey on [DATE]. The evidence was as follows: Refer F865 On [DATE] at 10:44 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], which was occupied by four residents, a box of sodium chloride (NaCl) inhalation solution individual vials (medication used to treat lung disease) stored unsecured and in the open, on top of a table next to the room door. On [DATE] at 11:45 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Registered Nurse (RN), reviewed the First Floor nursing unit's high side nursing medication cart, and observed the following: 32 unidentifiable loose pills of various…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to serve residents a nourishing snack when there was more than a fourteen-hour span of time between the dinner and breakfast mealtimes. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 7 residents during the Resident Council meeting (Resident #23, #55, #61, #74, and #79), and was evidenced by the following: On 6/19/24 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the District Operations (Regional Food Service Director; Regional FSD) observed labeled snacks in the reach-in refrigerator in the kitchen. The Regional FSD stated that the facility supplied approximately seventy-five snacks in total for three snack times a day for residents. The Regional FSD continued that not all residents received snacks; some had physician ordered snacks that were sent up at a certain time and labeled, and then the facility provided a few additional sandwiches if a resident wanted. The Regional FSD confirmed there was not enough snacks for every resident, and not every resident received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) change respiratory equipment tubing in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #80); b.) ensure that infection control standards were followed during medication pass for 1 of 2 nurses observed during medication administration; and c.) ensure staff maintained appropriate nail length to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 2 unit managers. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 2 nursing units, and was evidenced by the following: 1. During the initial tour of the Second Floor nursing unit on 6/17/24 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #80 lying in bed. Resident #80 was receiving humidified oxygen at 3 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula (tubing that delivered oxygen through the nose). The surveyor observed the nasal cannula tubing with a piece of clear tape attached to the tubing dated 6/5/24. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #80. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to hire a designated Infection Preventionist (IP) who worked at least part-time and had completed specialized training in infection control and prevention. The deficient practice was identified and evidenced by the following: Refer F880; F881; and F883 During entrance conference on 6/17/24 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor asked the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) who the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) was, and the DON stated the facility's previous IP left about two or three months ago and the position was vacant. The DON stated herself, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and the two unit managers reviewed immunizations, antibiotic stewardship, and infection control issues. At that time the surveyor requested a copy of the infection control certifications as well as the date the IP stopped working. On 6/18/24 at 11:42 AM, the surveyor requested from the LNHA a copy of the infection control certifications and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #159783 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to to maintain the residents' environment, equipment, and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner that included clean linens and privacy curtains. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 nursing units observed for the facility environment task. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During entrance conference on 6/17/24 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor asked what the resident census in the facility was, and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) in the presence of the Director of Nursing (DON) stated 94 residents. On 6/17/24 at 10:42 AM, during initial tour of the Second Floor nursing unit, the surveyor observed that the clean linen cart located near Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] did not contain any towels. On 6/19/24 at 11:16 AM, the surveyor toured the Second Floor nursing unit and observed no clean towels in the clean linen cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) consistent with the resident's history of sex offenses. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for care planning (Resident #73), and was evidenced by the following: On 6/19/24 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #73 in their room. On 6/20/24 at 11:23 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Registered Nurse (RN) who stated an ICCP was a picture of the resident and explained what needed to be done or expected for the resident. The RN confirmed that a resident's behavior or ongoing behavior patterns should be identified on the ICCP. On 6/25/24 at 9:43 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding Resident #73's needs, and the DON identified Resident #73 as a registered sex offender. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #73. A review of the Order Summary Report revealed that Resident #73 was admitted to the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to revise an individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) in a timely manner for a resident whose orthotic was discontinued. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident #60), and was evidenced by the following: On 6/17/24 at 10:27 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #60 in their room watching television. The resident was not observed wearing any orthotics to lower extremities. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #60. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included, but not limited to hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one entire side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left dominant side, candidiasis (fungal infection) of skin and nail, and bipolar disorder. A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ 159451 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) incontinence care was provided for 2 out of 7 residents observed during incontinence rounds (Resident #32 and Resident #147) and b.) nail care was provided during activities of daily living (ADLs) for residents 2 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #60 and Resident #73). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer F725 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #147 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but not limited to chronic respiratory failure and tracheostomy (hole in the windpipe to facilitate breathing). The comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 4/10/24, reflected that Resident #147 had moderate cognitive deficits and was dependent on staff for hygiene. Resident #147's individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) reflected that the resident required total dependence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain a physician's order for pressure reducing devices and b.) implement the individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) intervention to use a pressure reducing device on a resident's bed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury(Resident #9), and was evidenced by the following: On 6/17/24 at 10:54 AM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #9 lying in bed. The resident was on a regular mattress which was placed atop a deflated low air loss mattress/pressure reducing mattress, which was connected to an air pump that was not plugged into the power outlet or turned on. On 6/19/24 at 11:01 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #9's bed which contained a regular mattress covered with bed linens placed on top of a a deflated low air loss mattress. The resident was not present at the time of observation. On 6/19/24 at 11:05 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Unit Manager/Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor an enteral tube feeding administration pump to ensure the total volume administered was in accordance with physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #32), and was evidenced by the following: On 6/17/24 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #32 lying in bed awake with a tube feeding pump (TF; a tube feeding surgically inserted into the stomach) was located on a pole near their bed. There was no nutritional formula being administered at this time. When asked by the surveyor if they received tube feedings daily, Resident #32 shook their head indicating yes. On 6/19/24 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #32 lying in bed awake with the TF pump administering Jevity 1.5 (nutritional formula) at a rate of 70 milliliters (mL) an hour with a total volume infused thus far of 464 mL. The Jevity 1.5 bottle was labeled as hung on 6/18/24 at 7:30 PM. On 6/19/24 at 12:30 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring for the use of psychoactive medications. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unneccessray medications (Resident #34, #60, #61, and #80), and was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #34 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included unspecified dementia with behavior disturbance and bipolar disorder (a type of mental illness). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 3/30/24, reflected that the resident had severe cognitive deficits and had behaviors directed toward others. The MDS also reflected that the resident was dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs) and was on psychoactive medications. On 6/17/24 at 10:06 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #34 in bed sleeping. The surveyor also observed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) maintain multiuse food-contact surface cutting board in a manner to prevent microbial growth; and b.) maintain storage and preparation areas in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/19/24 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor conducted a kitchen tour with the Regional District Operations (RDO) and observed the following: 1. In the walk-in freezer, the vinyl strip curtains located in the entrance to the freezer, there were only two curtain strips. These curtains protect the inside of the freezer from outside dust particles as well as keep the cold air from escaping the freezer when the door was opened. There was also ice accumulation around the door frame. The RDO acknowledged the freezer needed vinyl curtains and there should not be ice around the door frame. The RDO stated the vinyl curtains maintained the freezer temperature and the ice was a result of the temperature changing in the freezer. 2. At 9:30 AM, the Food Service Director (FSD) joined the tour, and they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their policy to a.) ensure all eligible residents were educated on the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal immunization and b.) document in the medical record the residents' education and refusal of the pneumococcal immunization. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #76 and Resident #87), and was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the admission Record, Resident #87 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus (a disease of inadequate control of blood levels of glucose), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure (heart muscle does not pump blood as well as it should), and stroke (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply). A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 3/18/24, reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #159451; 159539; 159783; 162168 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident environment, equipment, and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 nursing units (First and Second Floor) and was evidenced by the following: On 6/19/24 at 9:09 AM, the surveyor observed in the hallway by Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] a wheelchair with brown matter that resembled fecal matter, smeared across the seat cushion and down the leg of the wheelchair onto the wheels. On 6/20/24 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor observed on the Second Floor nursing unit a strong urine odor while approaching Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor entered the room to discover the floor by Bed B was wet and sticky. In addition, puddles of wetness was observed on the bed. On 6/20/24 at 11:41 AM, the surveyor requested that Registered Nurse (RN #1) walk with them to Resident room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ Complaint #166769 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who received daily pain management a.) received their pain medications as order and b.) ensure the resident's pain was being assessed and monitored every shift. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain management (Resident #97), and was evidenced by the following: On 6/20/24 at 9:23 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed medical record for Resident #97. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of left and right [male/female] breast (breast cancer); malignant pleural effusion (a condition that occurs when cancer cells cause abnormal amount of fluid to build up between lung and chest cavity); chest pain; and heart failure. A review of the individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ Complaint #168809 Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a discharged resident with a copy of their medical records within a timely manner of the written request. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medical records (Resident #252), and was evidenced by the following: According to the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary), Resident #252 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses kidney failure. The face sheet did not include the resident's discharge date . A review of the electronic Admissions record revealed Resident #252 was discharged from the facility in July of 2022. On 6/19/24 at 12:09 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Medical Records personnel who stated residents and authorized personnel can request medical records. Once the Medical Records personnel received the authorization, she printed out the medical records and had the nurses review to ensure they were complete and accurate. At that time the surveyor provided the Medical Records personnel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ #162168 Based on interviews, review of the closed medical records, and pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's family after a change of condition. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #247), and was evidenced by the following: A review of the closed medical record for Resident #247 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in 2019 and discharged from the facility in 2023. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/3/23, indicated that the resident had unclear speech and usually understood with diagnoses which included hypertension, depression, bipolar, and schizophrenia. A review of the Progress Notes included a Nurses Note (NN) dated 11/13/22, that the resident was noted sitting on the floor in their bathroom with no injuries. Vital signs were obtained, and the resident attempted to stand up from their wheelchair without assistance, and slipped on their feces that they spread around their bathroom. The nurse noted that they left a message…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NJ Complaint #166562 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) initiate an investigation at the time of an injury of unknown origin was discovered on 8/13/23; and b.) complete a thorough investigation of how a resident on one-to-one (1:1) monitoring by staff had an unwitnessed fall. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #254), and was evidenced by the following: A review of the facility's One-to-One Observation policy and procedure dated revised January 2024, included the aim of one-to-one nursing is to provide continuous observation for an individual patient for a period of time during acute physical or mental illness .Primary Physician/Nurse Practitioner shall be notified about the change in patient's condition and order will be obtained for continuous 1:1 observation until further evaluation. Resident/patient's care plan will be initiated and/or updated with resident centered interventions . On 6/17/24 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ #163249; 168809 Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate, complete, and easily accessible medical record. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 35 residents' medical records reviewed (Resident #97, #248, and #252), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 6/17/24 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) a copy of the investigation for the reportable event to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) for Resident #248 reported on 4/3/23. On 6/18/24, the surveyor was provided with a copy of the form submitted to the NJDOH, but was not provided with the investigation. The surveyor requested a copy of the investigation. A review of the investigation reported to the NJDOH included an Investigation Summary dated 4/3/23, that Resident #248 on 4/3/23 at approximately 1:00 PM was observed by the nurse to be lethargic sitting in their wheelchair. The nurse immediately performed a sternal rub…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-20 · tag F0638 — widespreadAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) complete and submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, in a timely manner for 16 of 27 residents (Resident #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #14, #16, #17, #21, #27, #31, #35, #36, and #37) reviewed for system selected MDS over 120 days for late submissions b.) complete a Quarterly MDS in a timely manner for three (3) of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #45, #57, and #63). This deficient practice was evidenced by: a.) On 10/14/22 at 10:36 AM, surveyor #1 interviewed the Regional Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS/RMC) regarding late, non-completed MDS assessments. The surveyor provided the RMC with a list of resident MDS assessments that were late or not submitted and the MDS/RMC stated that she would email the surveyor information regarding the late assessments and why the assessments were not completed or transmitted timely. She stated she would investigate the issue. On 10/17/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-20 · tag F0640 — widespreadEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to electronically submit the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment tool, within 14 days after completion as required. This deficient practice was identified for 22 of 27 residents (Residents #1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #14, #16, #17, #21, #23, #27, #30, #31, #33, #35, #36, and #37) reviewed for MDS record over 120 days . This was evidenced by the following: On 10/14/22 at 10:36 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Regional Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS/RMC) regarding late, non-completed MDS assessments. The surveyor provided the MDS/RMC with a list of resident MDS assessments that were late or not submitted and the MDS/RMC stated that she would email the surveyor information regarding the late assessments and why the assessments were not completed or transmitted timely. She stated she would investigate the issue. On 10/17/22 at 10:06 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS/RMC who stated that she had been an MDS coordinator for 12 years. The MDS/RMC stated that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical restraints which included the use of full side rails to both sides of a cognitively impaired, dependent resident's bed. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for Restraints, (Resident #63) and was evidenced by the following: On 10/06/22 at 11:06 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #63 lying in bed asleep with full metal side rails in place on both sides of the resident's bed. On 10/07/22 at 9:48 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #63 lying in bed asleep. The right side of the resident's bed was positioned tightly up against the wall. The left full side rail was pulled up and a full-sized bumper pad covered the entire length of the side rail. On 10/07/22 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #63's paper chart which failed to contain documented evidence of a physician's order for bilateral full side rails, a consent for side rails,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) complete the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool that accurately reflected the resident's status) in a timely manner for six (6) of 27 residents (Residents #9, #10, #11, #23, #30, and #33) reviewed for system selected MDS over 120 days for late submissions to CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) and b.) complete the Comprehensive MDS in a timely manner for four (4) of 19 residents (Resident #22, #216, #217 and #266) reviewed. This deficient practice was identified by the following: a.) On 10/14/22 at 10:36 AM, surveyor #1 interviewed the Regional Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS/RMC) regarding late, non-completed MDS assessments. The surveyor provided the MDS/RMC with a list of resident MDS assessments that were late or not submitted and the MDS/RMC stated that she would email the surveyor information regarding the late assessments and why the assessments were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete and update a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) to include all psychiatric diagnoses to ensure the resident was referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for level II PASARR evaluation and determination. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #35) reviewed for level II PASARR and was evidenced by the following: According to the Resident Face Sheet, Resident #35 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) and assessment tool to manage the residents care, indicated that Resident #35 had both a short term and long-term memory problem, was inattentive and had disorganized thinking. The MDS also reflected that the resident required extensive assistance with all aspect of activities of daily living and indicated that the resident had the diagnoses of anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a hand splint for a resident with decreased range of motion related to a right hand contracture (shortening and hardening of muscles and tendons that often leads to deformity and rigidity of joints) in accordance with therapy recommendations and physician's orders. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for limited range of motion, (resident #63) and was evidenced by the following: On 10/06/22 at 11:06 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #63 lying in bed asleep. The resident's right wrist was contracted (an abnormal, often permanent shortening, as of muscle or scar tissue, that results in distortion or deformity, especially of a joint of the body) and the resident did not wear any type of support device to hold his/her hand upright. On 10/07/22 at 9:46 AM, Resident #63 was observed lying in bed asleep. The surveyor observed a hand splint that was hung on a hook on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) identify and monitor the dialysis access site, b.) consistently maintain ongoing complete communication notes between the facility and the dialysis center and, c.) follow physician ordered fluid restriction, and d.) update the care plan to include the dialysis access site and fluid restriction for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #116) reviewed for dialysis and was evidenced by the following: On 10/06/22 at 10:27 AM during tour, Resident # 116 was observed in bed. The resident stated that he/she goes to dialysis and his/her access site was in the chest area. The resident could not explain to surveyor what days he/she went to dialysis, what time he/she went or what the name of the dialysis center was. The resident was not a good historian and could not be interviewed regarding a detailed history. The surveyor did not observe any liquids or cups at the resident's bedside. The resident Face Sheet (FS) indicated that Resident # 116 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility to respond to comments and recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, (Resident #57) and was evidenced by the following: On 10/07/22 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #57 which failed to contain specific CP recommendations. The surveyor requested to view the CP reviews and recommendations that were provided to the facility. The surveyor received and reviewed Resident #57's CP Summary Report which revealed that the CP made a recommendation directed to Nursing on 01/25/22, 02/09/22, 03/15/22, and 04/25/22 to separate Calcium from Iron by two hours as Antacids (calcium etc.) should not be given at the same time as Iron or it will reduce the absorption. When replotting, please make sure Calcium is plotted at meal times. Further review of the Summary Report revealed that on 05/12/22, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly handle and store potentially hazardous foods in a manner that is intended to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses and b.) maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a manner to prevent microbial growth and cross contamination. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 10/06/22 from 09:49 AM until 10:47 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and observed the following: 1. In the walk-in freezer, there were five sealed ten pound frozen logs of ground beef with manufacturer marked best before or freeze by [DATE] with no received or use by date. There were two sealed ten pound frozen tan and white packages of meat, that the CDM identified as pork loins, with no label and no received or use by dates. There was one tied large clear plastic bag that contained frozen tan meat, that the CDM identified as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility-wide assessment identified the required services and procedures necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all residents prior to the admission of registered sex offenders and residents admitted from the correctional facility. On 10/06/22 from 10:07 AM to 10:43 AM, the surveyor conducted the entrance conference with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the Director of Nursing (DON), and Regional Nurse #1 and requested a copy of the Facility Assessment. On 10/13/22 at 01:03 PM, after multiple requests the LNHA provided the Facility Assessment to the surveyor. At that time, the surveyor reviewed the Facility Assessment which revealed in the Person (names/titles) involved in completing assessment section the LNHA had crossed out the previous LNHA and wrote in blue ink his name and initials. In the Date(s) of assessment or update section it was dated 03/08/21 and the LNHA wrote in blue ink the date 06/30/22 and his initials in blue ink. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program was being implemented, and sources of quantitative data was being analyzed to identify quality deficiencies and evaluate program effectiveness. This deficient practice was identified during the standard survey, and was evidenced by the following: On 10/14/22 at 09:45 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with only one (1) quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meeting from 08/29/22, which reflected the following: -QAPI Meeting Minutes: The COVID-19 (a contagious respiratory infection) outbreak in the month of August. It further reflected they discussed infection control precautions related to COVID-19. The QAPI Meeting Minutes for August did not reveal other topics were discussed. On 10/17/22 at 08:43 AM, the surveyor inquired additional information regarding the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) quarterly meetings. On 10/17/22 at 10:01 AM, the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards and procedures to address the risk of infection transmission by failing to: a.) perform proper hand hygiene and perform a wound treatment in a safe and sanitary manner for one (1) of one (1) nurse observed providing a wound care treatment to one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #57); b.) maintain and store Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and non-sterile resident care equipment in a safe and sanitary manner; and, c.) follow appropriate hand hygiene practices for one (1) of two (2) nurses who administered medications to two (2) of six (6) residents (Resident #4, and #5) during the medication pass. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/06/22 at 11:26 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #57 who was seated in a wheelchair in the dining room prior to meal service. The resident was pleasant when interviewed and voiced no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document and clarify a resident's life-sustaining treatment preferences on physician's orders for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #47) reviewed for advanced directives. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to Resident #47's Resident Face Sheet the resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but were not limited to; depression, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and convulsions. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool for managing the resident's care dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had a good long-term memory, poor short-term memory and reflected that the resident required extensive to total care with all aspect of activities of daily living. The surveyor reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change in status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool utilized to facilitate the management of care. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #266) reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Version 3.0 Chapter 2 Assessment for the RAI pages 2-23 of CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) guidelines, updated October 2019 included, An SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed hospice provider) or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The ARD [Assessment Reference Date] must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which can be the same or later than the date of the hospice election statement, but not earlier than). An SCSA must be performed regardless of whether an assessment was recently conducted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #266) reviewed for hospice and for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for restraints (Resident #63). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/06/22 at 10:50 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor interviewed Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (ALPN #1) who stated Resident #266 was the only resident on hospice at the facility. On 10/06/22 at 11:06 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #266 lying in bed. Resident #266 was non-verbal but acknowledged the surveyor by nodding his/her head. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #266. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) included that the resident was admitted to the facility in July of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise the resident Care Plan (CP) to include goals and interventions for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #266) reviewed for hospice care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/06/22 at 10:50 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor interviewed Agency Licensed Practical Nurse (ALPN #1) who stated Resident #266 was the only resident on hospice at the facility. On 10/06/22 at 11:06 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #266 lying in bed. Resident #266 was non-verbal but acknowledged the surveyor by nodding his/her head. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #266. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) included that the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2022, with diagnoses which included: hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice by ensuring a.) that staff did not utilize personal equipment, a personal blood pressure (BP) monitor for resident care and b.) that staff obtained vital signs prior to administering a medication and hold a medication used to treat hypotension (low BP) in accordance with the physician's order (PO). This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of two (2) Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) observed during medication administration. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more. During the medication administration observation performed on 10/13/22 and 10/14/22, the surveyor observed two (2) nurses administer medication to six (6) residents. There were 28 opportunities, and two (2) errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 7.14%. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of six (6) residents, (Resident #268), that were administered medications by one (1) of two (2) nurses. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/13/22 at 08:22 AM, the surveyor conducted the medication administration task and observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) reviewing the electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for Resident #268. At that time, the surveyor observed Resident #268 self-propelling in the wheelchair towards LPN#1 and the medication cart located in the hallway. LPN #1 proceeded to remove the following medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately dated when opened and implement a comprehensive policy to address dating medication after opening. This was observed for one (1) of two (2) medication carts reviewed during the medication storage and labeling task. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] from 09:11 AM to 09:25 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1), observed the following within the first-floor on medication cart one (1): -One (1) opened and undated box of insulin Humalog 100 unit/milliliter (ml) was located inside a plastic bag for unsampled Resident #1. LPN #1 confirmed that the insulin was opened and that it did not have an opened date written on the plastic bag, the box, or the bottle. At that time, LPN #1 acknowledged the insulin should have been dated once the medication was opened and that the resident was just readmitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) attended the quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings. This was identified for one (1) of two (2) QA meetings reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/12/22 at 12:30 PM, the LNHA provided a list of the QA committee which revealed that the Medical Director (MD), the LNHA, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Director of Social Worker (DSW) attendance was mandatory at the quarterly meetings. On 10/14/22 at 09:45 AM, the LNHA provided the surveyor with only one (1) quarterly QA meeting sign-in sheet for 08/29/22 which reflected the following: -The DON, the Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist (LPN/IP), the DSW, the Registered Dietitian (RD), the Director of Activities (DA), the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM), the Registered Nurse/Acting Unit Manager (RN/AUM), and the Admissions Coordinator (AC) were in attendance. It further reflected that the LNHA and the MD did not sign the attendance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure full implementation of the antibiotic stewardship program including ongoing monitoring and use of a nationally recognized surveillance criteria prior to consulting the prescriber. This deficient practice was identified for One (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for antibiotic stewardship, (Resident #11) and was evidenced by the following: On 10/11/22 at 11:34 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist (LPN/IP) who stated that she had worked in the role since May of 2022 and did not have previous IP experience. On 10/14/22 at 11:21 AM, the surveyor interviewed the LPN/IP who stated that she utilized a Monthly Antibiotic Summary form that she placed on the front of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the nurses to complete when they initiated an antibiotic. The LPN/IP stated that the nurse phoned the physician and reported resident signs and symptoms of possible infection and if an antibiotic was ordered the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that mitigation measures were followed to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19, a contagious respiratory infection. This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of three (3) unvaccinated staff, and was evidenced by the following: On 10/06/22 at 09:07 AM, the survey team was greeted by the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) who stated that there were three COVID-19 positive residents at the facility. He clarified that two of the residents were positive upon admission and one resident tested positive at the facility. He stated that staff were expected to wear a surgical mask throughout the facility and were required to wear full Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, protective clothing or equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause injuries or illness) which included an N-95 mask (filters at least 95% of airborne particles), surgical mask, eye protection, gown and gloves when they entered the area designated for COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,571 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $10,814 — penalty dated 2024-06-26
- $16,757 — penalty dated 2024-06-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BERKOWITZ, CHESKEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 12/29/2021 |
| LEIFER, JOEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 12/29/2021 |
| ORGEL, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/29/2021 |
| ORNSTEIN, MARTON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/29/2021 |
| RUBENSTEIN, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/29/2021 |
| ZUPNICK, JOEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 12/29/2021 |
| PERLOW, JOSEPH | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/29/2021 |
| STERN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/29/2021 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315124. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.