Trenton Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
512 Union Street, Trenton, NJ 08611 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 215 certified beds · (609) 393-8622 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $325,922 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-17)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-03, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-03 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.0% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.9% | 18.8% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 5.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.3% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.9% | 12.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.3% | 8.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.40 | 2.07 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.29 | 1.11 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.4%CMS range 41.1–67.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 8.7–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.6–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.34 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 215 beds and averages 161.7 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #2974086 Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 4/14/26, 4/16/26 and 4/17/26, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of a resident (Resident #3) who was identified as an elopement risk. Resident #3 eloped from the facility on 4/1/26, and was later found in the neighborhood near the facility by the local police. During the survey a finding that constituted an immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified under CFR 483.12(a) (1) for F689. The facility failed to implement interventions to maintain a safe environment with adequate supervision to prevent elopement.On 4/1/26, at approximately 3 PM, Resident #3's assigned nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), observed the resident seated in a wheelchair in the main lobby, near the front door. LPN #1 stated during interview on 4/14/26, that she was aware that Resident #3 was an elopement risk, and that she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determine that the facility failed to ensure standard food safety practices were put in place to prevent food borne illness by ensuring a.) the dish machine and the three-compartment sink were maintained in safe operating conditions in accordance with manufacturer's specifications; b.) adherence to sanitary requirements to ensure all dishware was properly sanitized to prevent potential foodborne illness or potential exposure to hazardous chemicals; and c.) a monitoring system was in place and staff were competent to record the temperature and the chemical concentrations of the sanitizing agent. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 185 residents. On 2/5/26, the surveyor observed breakfast meal trays on two resident nursing units that contained disposable dishware, as well as trays with regular wash ware. Interviews with dietary staff revealed that since 1/28/26, the facility's dish machine had not been operating at the appropriate temperature, so the facility was serving on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 2673152 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to a cognitively impaired resident with a history of being restless and impulsive and a history of falls, who sustained a fracture during an unreported episode of restlessness. On 11/18/25, Resident #114 was grimacing in pain and guarding their left arm. An x-ray revealed an acute non-displaced fracture of the left clavicle (broken collarbone), and it was determined that the facility did not implement care plan interventions prior to the discovery of the fracture when the resident was restless. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #114). The evidence was as follows: A review of the facility's Policy and Protocol for Incident Reporting, last revised 11/2025, indicated the following: The facility is committed to keeping all resident's safe, maintain highest resident function and adhere to Federal and State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT #2620207 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/07/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #2) whose smoking privileges were revoked did not have cigarettes in their possession or smoke in the facility in the presence of oxygen to prevent accidental explosion and fire from unsafe smoking. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents. During an interview with the Nursing Supervisor (NS) on 10/07/2025, she stated that while conducting her rounds on 09/16/2025, at approximately 8:00 P.M., she observed Resident #2 seated in a wheelchair, smoking a cigarette in Resident #1 and Resident #3's room. The NS stated that Resident #2 did not reside in that room; they were talking to Resident #3; and Resident #1, who was present, had oxygen in use. The NS stated that Resident #2 saw her entering the room and immediately tried to put out the cigarette on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2562900 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation on 7/22/25 and 7/23/25, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident (Resident #3) with a known history of illicit drug use with multiple overdoses in the facility who overdosed in the facility on 7/11/25, by: A) monitoring and supervising the resident to ensure illicit drugs were not obtained or used and B.) developing and/or implementing care plan interventions to protect the resident from obtaining illicit drugs and preventing overdoses. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #14). On 7/11/25 at approximately 4:30 PM, the Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor was called to main lobby regarding Resident #3 being found unresponsive with pinpoint pupils by the main elevator. Emergency services (911) were called, and the resident was administered Narcan (a medication to reverse opioid overdose). The resident was transported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ185458 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation on 5/8/25 and 5/9/25, it was determined that the facility failed to: A) ensure the residents' safety by failing to implement interventions to prevent drugs from entering the facility and overdose incidents from occurring while in the facility, B) conduct a thorough investigation into a resident's (Resident #6) drug overdoses, and C) notify the police and the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) of the residents' drug overdoses. 1. On 2/21/25 at approximately 6:30 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) observed Resident #6 slumped in his/her wheelchair. Resident #6's fingertips, lips, and lower half of face were cyanotic (blue), and he/she had loud breathing. The IP stated she administered Narcan to the resident. Approximately three minutes later, the resident responded to the Narcan and was sent to the hospital. On 2/22/25, Resident #6 returned to the facility from the hospital with a diagnosis of an opiate overdose. 2. On 4/1/25, Resident #6 was found sitting in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ185458 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 5/8/25, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) update the care plan (CP) with interventions for a resident (Resident #6) who had multiple drug overdose incidents while at the facility and b.) follow the facility's policy titled Policy on Resident Care Planning. On 2/21/25 at approximately 6:30 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) observed Resident #6 slumped in his/her wheelchair. Resident #6's fingertips, lips, and lower half of face were cyanotic (blue), and he/she had loud breathing. The IP stated she administered Narcan to the resident. Approximately three minutes later, the resident responded to the Narcan and was sent to the hospital. On 2/22/25, Resident #6 returned to the facility from the hospital with a diagnosis of opiate overdose. On 4/1/25, the resident was found sitting in his/her wheelchair unable to be aroused. Multiple attempts were made to arouse the resident, and he/she remained unresponsive. The doctor was notified, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT #297096, 2971506, & 2980872 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 4/15/26, 4/16/26, and 4/17/26, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical record in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice when staff failed to: a) consistently document toileting and bowel & bladder elimination in the Documentation Survey Report v2 (DSR) (Resident #4 and Resident #9) and b) provide documentation that a resident's request for a specific roommate was addressed (Resident #6).This deficient practice was identified for 3 residents of 9 reviewed (Resident #4, Resident #6, & Resident #9) and was evidenced by the following:a). A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease where joint tissues break down over time), morbid obesity, and rhabdomyolysis (the breakdown of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-06 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff were competent to maintain the kitchen in a manner to ensure that appropriate sanitation measures were in place to prevent potential food borne illness or potential exposure from hazardous chemicals. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and was evidenced by the following:On 2/5/26 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor toured the Second-floor nursing unit and observed that all the residents were being served their breakfast meal on disposable dishware with disposable utensils. During an interview with the Nurse on the floor at that time, she stated that that she could not comment why residents were eating on disposable ware and that the surveyor would have to ask the kitchen staff. On 2/5/26 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor toured the Third-floor nursing unit and observed the residents' breakfast meals were also being served on disposable dishware and utensils. The surveyor also noticed that regular meal trays with washable ware were being utilized for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews on 2/5/26, in the presence of the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy curtains in resident rooms to ensure each resident was afforded full visual privacy. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all eight residents who resided in the rooms (4 rooms). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 2/5/26, between 9:00 AM to 10:45AM, the surveyor toured the 5th floor of the facility where eight out of 40 residents were transferred from another facility. In the presence of the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the surveyor observed that there were no privacy curtains for residents in rooms 511A, 514A, 517A, and 519A.On 2/5/26 at 12:55 PM, the surveyor interviewed the LNHA and inquired why those residents did not have privacy curtains in their rooms. The LNHA stated the maintenance staff forgot to install privacy curtains in those rooms.The facility's Administrator was informed of the deficient practice at 3:28 PM during the Life Safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 2/5/26, in the presence of the Maintenance Assistant, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with direct communication system in which residents' calls were received and answered by staff. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 40 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and Resident #2), and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #1 was transferred to the facility on 2/3/26 with diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Sciatica left side, Depression, Parkinson's disease and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for care. Resident #2 was transferred also to the facility on 2/3/26 and had diagnoses of bipolar disorder, hyperkalemia and generalized anxiety disorder. According to the Resident they required minimum assistance with care. On 2/5/26 around 10:10 AM, during the facility tour, Resident #1 asked Surveyor #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that resident personal needs account (PNA) funds were available for distribution the same day as requested by the residents seven days per week. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #31, #40 and #130) who maintained PNA funds and attended a Resident Council (RC) group meeting.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Complaint #2595473On 12/04/25 at 11:04 AM, the surveyor conducted RC with four alert and oriented residents. During the RC meeting, three of three residents stated that they only had access to their money Monday through Friday, and every other weekend. All three residents confirmed there was only one staff member that had access to their PNA money, and she only worked every other weekend. During the weekdays the residents stated that the Activity Director (AD) distributed the PNA money when she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0569 — widespreadNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of pertinent facility provided documents it was determined that the facility failed to a) ensure that within 30 days of a resident's death, the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds were conveyed to the resident's responsible party for 2 of 2 expired residents reviewed (Resident #163 and Resident # 164) Personal Needs Account (PNA) accounts; and b) ensure the resident or resident's responsible party was notified that the funds in their PNA account reached the $2,000 maximum Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or $200 less of the maximum which could jeopardize their eligibility for SSI or Medicaid. This was identified for 5 of 5 (Resident #59, Resident # 68, Resident # 69, Resident # 101, Resident #136 and Resident #165) PNA accounts reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On [DATE] at 10:23 AM, the surveyor reviewed the residents' Funds Listing Report (Personal Needs Account-PNA) as of [DATE] and electronic medical records which revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ 2587050Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment by failing to ensure a) resident rooms, including personal belongings and common areas were kept clean, sanitary, free of pests and ensuring soiled meal trays were removed in a timely manner, b) furniture and resident rooms and common areas were maintained in a clean and homelike manner, and c) resident excrement was cleaned up timely to limit odors. The deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 residents who attended a resident council meeting and observed on 3 of 3 resident units (2nd, 3rd and 4th floor).The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined On 12/2/25, Surveyor #1 conducted an initial tour of the facility on the second floor, and observed the following:At 7:36 AM, the ice machine located in the dining room, had a plastic type ice shoot that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #s NJ 388773, NJ 2573609, NJ 2595473, NJ 263559, NJ 2591993Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that sufficient staff were available at all times to ensure residents maintained their highest practical physical and mental well-being by failing to ensure: a) residents were provided with timely incontinence care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #81 and #135), b) medications were administered per standards of practice (Resident #121) , c) adequate staff were available to clean up resident excrement in a timely manner, and d) the mandatory New Jersey staffing requirements were consistently adhered to. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided on 3 of 3 units and was evidenced by the following: a. Resident #81:On 12/02/25 at 8:02 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #81 in bed. During an interview with the resident, they informed the surveyor that they had not received incontinence care nor had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review of Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) at least every 12 months. The deficient practice was identified for 5 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides reviewed and the deficient practice was evidenced by following: A review of the facility-provided CNA annual performance evaluations revealed that 5 of the 5 CNAs did not have an annual performance evaluation for 2024.On 12/10/25 at 1:11 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing who confirmed that there was no system in place to document performance evaluations for the requested CNAs. The DON and could only provide checklists for the CNAs.On 12/11/25 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Assistant Director of Nursing who Nursing who stated that there is not a person in the facility dedicated to check the competency of the staff providing care.On 12/11/25 at 11:55 AM, the survey team interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator, who acknowledged that the education in the building was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment identified competencies and skill sets that were necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. This deficient practice affected all residents who resided on 3 of 3 resident units and was evidenced by the following: On 12/2/25, during the entrance conference, the facility provided a copy of the Facility Assessment which revealed under Services and Care Provided: Other Special Care Needs: dialysis, chemotherapy, radiation, ostomy care, tracheostomy, ventilator care .On 12/10/25 at 1:11 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing who confirmed that there was no system in place to document the amount of hourly training and/or performance evaluations for the requested CNAs. The DON could only provide checklists for the CNAs without any specifics related to the amount of training. On 12/11/25 at 9:31 AM, the surveyor interviewed the facility Infection Preventionist (IP). When asked if the IP ever completed staff competencies?…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance Program (QAPI) was implemented and sustained during leadership transition and focused on resident outcomes and quality of life to ensure for an ongoing infestation of cockroaches that was documented as observed on the 3rd floor beginning 6/1/24, and affected 3 of 3 resident units.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Refer to 584F, 925F, and 880F The surveyors observed cockroaches during the following observations:- On 12/2/25 at 8:05 AM, Surveyor #1 entered Resident #135's room with two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's) to observe incontinence care. While in the room with the CNAs the surveyor observed a brownish cockroach type bug crawling on the wall. Upon inquiry, the CNA's informed the surveyor that the facility had roaches. -On 12/04/25 at 12:30 PM, Surveyor #2 and #4 observed Resident #31's room. Resident #31 allowed the surveyors to observe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) to limit the potential transmission of bacteria during a facility wide infestation of cockroaches, ensuring clean linens were protected from pests, and ensure water management policies and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems were developed and implemented.The deficient practice affected all residents who resided on 3 of 3 resident units and was evidenced by the following: Reference: Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health- Care Facilities; Recommendations of CDC (Centers for Disease Control) and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee; 2003; Updated July 2019. Refer to F584 and F925Fa. On 12/2/25, Surveyor #1 conducted an initial tour of the facility on the second floor, and observed the following:At 7:49 AM, a food cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # NJ 2587050Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the ice machines were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, and per manufacturers' instructions. The deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 ice machines located on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th floor resident units, and was evidenced by the following: On 12/2/25, Surveyor #1 conducted an initial tour of the facility on the second floor, and observed the following:At 7:36 AM, the ice machine located in the resident dining room, had a plastic type ice chute that was heavily soiled inside with white and black colored substances. The drain cover had a rust like build and the molding around the ice machine was peeling off.On 12/2/25 at 8:45 AM, Surveyor #2, conducted an initial tour of the facility on the third floor and observed the following:The ice machine located in the resident dining room had blackened areas inside the ice chute, and the area also had blackened discolored embedded areas where the ice chute attached to the machine and where a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective pest management program to irradicate an infestation of German cockroaches. The deficient practice occurred on 3 of 3 resident units and was evidenced by the following:Refer to 584F and 880F On 12/2/25 at 8:05 AM, Surveyor #1 entered Resident #135's room with two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's) to observe incontinence care. The bathroom floor was covered with various debris, which included used plastic bags, a broken toilet seat was also observed on the floor. While in the room with the CNAs the surveyor observed a brownish cockroach type bug crawling on the wall. Upon inquiry, the CNA's informed the surveyor that the facility had roaches. The surveyor then asked the CNA's what the protocol was if staff observed cockroaches. The staff informed the surveyor that they would enter their observations into the pest control book which was located at the nurses' station and they would also notify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in ensure annual competency evaluations were completed for Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) and they were educated based on the outcome, and a system was in place to ensure CNAs were provided with at least 12 hours of education per their annual date of employment. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/10/25 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor reviewed the provided in-service education for 5 randomly selected CNAs for the 2024 to 2025 year, which revealed that the in-service education was a sign-off list and did not obtain an hourly audit of education training. On 12/10/25 at 1:11 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing who confirmed that there was no system in place to document the amount of hourly training and/or performance evaluations for the requested CNAs. The DON could only provide checklists for the CNAs without any specifics related to the amount of training. On 12/11/25 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) received at least 12 hours of mandatory in-service training for 5 of 5 CNAs education reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/10/25 at 11:03 AM, the surveyor reviewed the provided in-service education for 5 randomly selected CNAs for the 2024 to 2025 year, which revealed that the in-service education was a sign-off list and did not obtain an hourly audit of education training. On 12/10/25 at 1:11 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing who confirmed that there was no system in place to document the hourly training and/or performance evaluations for the requested CNAs. The DON and could only provide checklists for the CNAs.On 12/10/2025 at 1:15 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Human Resources Director (HRD) who confirmed there were no competencies for the staff, and for the CNA education, there was a trifold bulletin board used with no documentation regarding any hourly training provided to CNAs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #s NJ 388773, NJ 2573609, NJ 2595473, NJ 263559, NJ 2591993Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who were dependent on staff for care were provided with a) routine and appropriate incontinence care and b) provided with care to maintain their fingernails in a clean manner. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (Resident #11, #81 and Resident #135. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/02/25 at 7:50 AM the surveyor observed Resident # 11 lying in bed, the resident was awake and alert and the surveyor further observed that the resident's fingernails were long and jagged with a black substance underneath all of the nails.On 12/04/25 at 8:25 AM, the surveyor again observed Resident #11's fingernails were not cleaned trimmed. During an interview with the surveyor, the resident stated, I would like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #114) reviewed for change in insurance coverage status and remained in the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/09/25 at 9:09 AM, the Social Worker returned 2 of 3 requested beneficiary forms to the surveyor and stated, I don't have Resident #114, they didn't have a beneficiary form completed, as the resident had a guardian. The Social Worker stated that she should have informed the guardian regarding Medicare coverage ending but she did not, and stated, it fell through the cracks. On 12/09/25 at 9:11 AM, the surveyor reviewed the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review (BPNR) forms for Resident #114, provided by the facility. The facility had a change in insurance coverage status and remained in the facility. The resident's last covered day for Medicare Part A Services was 9/15/25. Resident #114's SNF NOMNC form did not have a signature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint Intake NJ #2594199Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation of property was investigated. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #154) reviewed for misappropriation property and was evidenced by the following:On 12/09/25 at 12:00 PM the surveyor reviewed Resident #154's medical record which revealed the following:The diagnoses included but not limited to; Schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar type (mental health disorder), Epilepsy (seizure disorder) and Hemiplegia (loss of voluntary movement on one side). A review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 9/29/25, indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 12/10/25 at 1:21 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding what accommodations were in place to ensure Resident #154's safekeeping of valuables. The DON stated that if a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an accurate ordering and receiving of narcotic medications on the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA Form 222) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation of controlled-dangerous substances (narcotic medications, that due to their high potential for abuse, are tracked with a degree of detail and attention)medications ordered and received for 1 of 6 forms provided, and the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to a resident according to standards of practice (Resident #121). The evidence was as follows: a. On 12/11/2025 at 10:57 AM the surveyor reviewed the facility provided DEA 222 forms which revealed on one of the six provided forms Part 5, had not been completed upon receipt of the medications from the provider pharmacy as instructed on the reverse of the ordering form. The forms were as follows: Order form # 230236684 dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 388773Based on interviews, record reviews and reviews of other facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that staff received behavioral health training to assist them in coping effectively with residents who had maladaptive behavior of being disruptive, cursing and spitting at staff. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for behavior, Resident #157, and was evidenced by the following:A review of a Facility Reportable Event Record (RER). dated 2/13/25 revealed a Narrative: Resident #157 picked up a piece of cake that the aide (Certified Nurse Aide) was going to give to another resident, and the aide explained that the cake was not for Resident #157, and took a bite out of the cake and spit it at the aide, and gestured to hit the aide, who then raised a hand to protect herself. Another aide was present when Resident #157 stated you hit me, the supervisor was called, the police and Crisis.On 12/5/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #2620207Based on interviews and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 10/07/2025 and 10/14/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) ensure that the facility-wide assessment (FA) evaluated its resident population and b.) identified the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services required for residents admitted with a history or current use of, tobacco or drug and alcohol abuse. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and was evidenced by the following:Refer to F689A review of the facility's Facility Assessment provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), indicated that the assessment was completed on 05/03/2025. A further review of the facility's FA did not include any documentation that addressed the resident population that was admitted to the facility with a history or current use of, tobacco or drug and alcohol abuse.During a joint interview with the DON, the Consultant DON, and the Consultant Administrator on 10/14/2025 at 2:14 P.M., the DON stated that the FA was a snapshot of residents that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ185458Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 5/8/25, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the administrative staff failed to ensure resident safety and well-being by failing to A) prevent illicit drugs from entering the facility and drug overdose incidents from occurring, B) ensure a thorough investigation was completed for a staff to resident sexual abuse allegation involving Resident #3 and multiple drug overdoses that occurred in the facility involving Resident #6, and C) ensure that the police and the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) were notified of any drug overdoses that occurred in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of the facility's undated job description titled Administrator revealed under Purpose of Your Job Description, The primary purpose of your position is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standard guidelines, and regulations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #: NJ182907, NJ185458, NJ186028 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 5/7/25, 5/8/25, and 5/9/25 it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) report a to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) on 10/12/24 when Resident #15 was observed to have bruising, swelling and a scratch to her/his face. b.) report to law enforcement when a resident (Resident #2) reported witnessing an alleged sexual abuse between Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) and another resident (Resident #3), and c.) report a staff to resident verbal abuse allegation involving LPN #7 and Resident #1 to the NJDOH in a timely manner. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Abuse, Resident Behavior and Facility Practice. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A.) According to the facility's Grievance/Concern Communication Form, filled out by the Director of Nursing (DON), with an event date of 10/14/24, revealed under Description of concern, This writer met with Resident #15 this date. Nursing reported he/she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ182907, NJ186028 Based on interviews, medical records reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 5/7/25, 5/8/25, and 5/9/25 it was determined that the facility failed to complete thorough investigations when A) Resident #15 was observed to have bruising, swelling and a scratch to her/his face. B) when a resident reported witnessing an alleged sexual abuse between another resident (Resident #3) and the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1). The facility also failed to ensure its policy titled Abuse, Resident Behavior and Facility Practice was implemented for the alleged physical abuse and alleged sexual abuse allegations. 1. On 10/12/24 at approximately 8:30 P.M, the Unit Manager (UM) was notified by LPN #6 that Resident #15 had a scratch on his/her face. LPN #6 reported that Resident #8 left the room that he/she shared with Resident #15 cursing and stating he/she had punched the resident (Resident #15). The DON failed to conduct a thorough investigation. The DON stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint # NJ 185458, NJ179424 Based on observations, interviews, and review of other facility documentation on 5/7/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for the residents. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 units, (floor 2 and floor 4) and was evidenced by the following: During a tour of the 2nd floor unit on 5/7/2025 at 11:08 AM, the surveyor observed the following: 1. Inside 2nd floor Central Bath, sink filled with isolation gown, black pad, wash sponge, and grey basin. 2. Inside 2nd floor Central Bath, shower bed noted to have hair clippings, toilet paper, shaving cream can, a covered razor, a shampoo and a lotion bottle on it. 3. Inside 2nd floor Central Bath, visible water on the floor outside of the shower stall and in the shower stall. 4. Inside 2nd floor Central Bath 1st stall, noted to have a brown hard substance to left outer dividing wall corner where the silver molding is missing. 5. Inside 2nd floor Central Bath 1st stall, brown, green, and black colored substance on bottom left corner of the shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint #NJ184250 Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discharge a resident from the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 18 residents who was discharged without a 30-day discharge notice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to Resident #16's admission Record (AR), the resident was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Polyneuropathy, Bipolar, Chronic PTSD, Frontotemporal Neurodegenerative Disorder, Neuroleptic Induced Parkinsonism. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 1/27/25, Resident #16 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 5/8/25 at 12:26 P.M, during an interview with the Social Worker (SW #2) she stated, Resident #16 had an incident with her/his roommate which led to a physical fight. Resident #16 didn't return back to the facility because it was domestic violence, and the roommate didn't want her/him back. Resident #16's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
C#175920 Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and other pertinent facility documentation on 5/7/2024, 5/8/2024, and 5/9/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a Physician's Order (POs) for a treatment to the Resident's (Resident #5) wound. The facility also failed to follow its policies titled P&P Physician Order and Medication Administration Policy and Protocol. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 18 residents and was evidenced by the following: Reference: The practice of nursing as a Licensed Practical Nurse is defined as performing tasks, and responsibilities within the framework of case finding, reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling, and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a Registered Nurse, or otherwise legally authorized Physician or Dentist. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was as follows: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store, label, and date potentially hazardous foods to prevent food-borne illness; b.) discard potentially hazardous foods past their date of expiration; and c.) maintain storage areas in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/2/24 at 8:49 AM, the surveyor with the Dietary Director (DD) toured the kitchen and observed the following: 1. The handwashing sink had no paper towels. The DD acknowledged there should be paper towels by the sink at all times. 2. In the walk-in refrigerator, one gallon of ranch dressing dated opened 3/30/24. The rim of the bottle, lid, and outside of the container all contained ranch dressing spillage. The DD acknowledged the bottle should have been cleaned after use to prevent bacterial growth. 3. In the walk-in refrigerator, one opened jug of salsa dated received 1/18/24. The was no opened date, and the packaging indicated best within seven to ten days after opening. 4. In the walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) perform hand hygiene during and after medication administration; b.) perform hand hygiene before and after serving residents meals; and c.) maintain enhanced barrier precautions to maintain infection control standards. This deficient practice was identified on 2 of 3 nursing units (Second and Third Floor), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/8/24 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor observed Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (UM/LPN #1) perform tracheostomy (a small surgical opening that is made through the front of the neck into the windpipe) care on Resident #47 and observed the following: UM/LPN #1 performed hand hygiene with soap and water lathering outside the flow of running water for thirteen seconds and put on a pair of gloves. UM/LPN #1 then cleaned the bedside table and removed the pair of gloves, and performed hand hygiene with soap and water lathering outside the flow of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the smoking policy was followed to screen and assess a resident for the ability to safely smoke cigarettes. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #127) and was evidenced by the following: On 4/30/24 at 10:18 AM, during the entrance conference, the facility provided a Smoking Policy and Procedure and the Smoking Schedule which revealed that Resident #127 was listed as smoking during shift #1 from 9:00 AM-9:10 AM, 10:30 AM-10:40 AM, 2:00 PM-2:10 PM, 5:00 PM-5:10 AM. On 5/2/24 at 8:40 AM, Resident #127 was observed self-propelling from the designated smoking area onto the elevator. On 5/2/24 at 8:59 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed the most recent signed Smoking assessment dated [DATE] indicated 1. Is Resident a Smoker, and No was checked off. A review of the admission Record for Resident #127 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe and appetizing temperatures of food for 3 of 4 entree meals observed on 1 of 3 nursing units (Third Floor). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/3/24 at 10:07 AM, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council meeting which included four residents (Resident #13, #27, #46, and #48). Resident #46 stated lunch and dinner were served cold and in takeout containers and not on hot plates since February of 2024. On 5/8/24 at 11:32 AM, the surveyor informed the Dietary Director (DD) they wanted to observe the lunch meal for the day including food temperatures. The surveyor asked the [NAME] to calibrate two thermometers in their presence; which the [NAME] completed using an ice bath, and the thermometers reached 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 5/8/24 at 11:33 AM, the surveyor observed the [NAME] using one of the thermometers calibrated to 32 F and took the following temperatures for the lunch meal: Barbecue chicken 178 F Scalloped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) inform and offer educational material regarding advance directives (written instruction including but not limited to living will, medication restrictions, and treatment restriction for the provision of healthcare when an individual is incapacitated) with a resident's legal representative, and b.) ensure life-sustaining treatment wishes were reviewed with the residents or their representatives and documented consistently within the medical record. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #96 and #62) reviewed for advance care planning and directives and was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] at 9:12 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #96 in a recliner chair in the 3rd unit day room. The surveyor attempted to talk to the resident, but the resident did not respond. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #96. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a Care Plan (CP) intervention for a resident with an actual fall. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for falls and was evidenced by the following: On 4/5/22 at 9:12 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #96 in a recliner chair in the 3rd floor day room. The surveyor attempted to interview the resident, but the resident did not respond. On 4/6/22 at 8:52 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #96 awake lying in bed. The bed was in the low position, there was a foot cushion at the foot board, a perimeter cover (a mattress cover used for fall prevention) on the mattress, but no floor mats. The surveyor noted there were no floor mats in the room. On 4/11/22 at 8:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #96 awake and calm lying in bed. The bed was in the low position and there were no floor mats down by either side of the bed or in the room at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise the Care Plan (CP) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #112) reviewed for falls and 1 of 1 resident (Resident #31) reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 3/31/22 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #112 in his/her room in bed with the head of the bed elevated and knees bent with call bell within reach. The surveyor attempted to interview the resident, and the resident shook their head yes to surveyor, however resident did not respond verbally to the surveyor's questions. On 4/1/22 at 12:17 PM, the surveyor observed the resident in bed, dressed in socks on their feet, head of bed elevated and knees bent. Again, the surveyor attempted to interview the resident, but the resident did not respond to surveyor's greetings, only shook their head. The surveyor observed a high back wheelchair in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Peridex (a prescribed germicidal mouthwash) was administered and documented in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 27 (Resident #39) sampled residents reviewed for medication management and was evidenced by the following: On 4/1/22 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #39 lying in bed asleep. At that time, the surveyor observed a graduated unit dose cup (used to administer medications) containing a light blue liquid on the resident's bedside table. At that time, the surveyor was unable to locate the nurse assigned to Resident #39. On 4/1/22 at 10:02 AM, the surveyor observed an ancillary staff walk through the hallway who informed the surveyor that she would call the unit manager (UM) to the resident's room. At that time, the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) walked into Resident #39's room and stated she was unable to identify the light blue liquid in the graduated unit dose cup but would look at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-14 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an adaptive cup was provided to a resident during meal service. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #62) reviewed for nutrition and the evidence was as follows: On 3/31/22 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #62 seated in a wheelchair using their feet to propel themselves to the Nurse's Station. The resident then asked the nurse at the Nurse's Station to change their lunch meal to pork roll, French fries, and ginger ale. The surveyor observed both of the resident's hands appeared to be contracted. On 3/31/22 at 12:17 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #62 in their room with their lunch tray. The resident's pork roll and French fries were on a scoop dish (adaptive dish with raised sides to aide in feeding) and the resident was using a standard fork and knife to cut the pork roll. There was also a can of ginger ale, a foam cup of coffee, a foam cup of iced tea, and a small carton of milk. There was no observed adaptive equipment for liquids.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment and store/maintain food items to prevent microbial growth. This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 4/13/22 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) conducted a follow-up kitchen tour and observed the following: 1. In the three compartment sink, the sink designated as the sanitizing sink, a black residue in the drain and a brown discoloration in the corner of the the sink. The FSD used a clean paper towel to wipe off the black residue in the drain which transferred onto the paper towel. The FSD stated the sanitizing chemical does that to stainless steel of the sink. The FSD further stated the three compartment sink was cleaned after every shift, and then he stated twice a day. The FSD confirmed there were no documentation for the sink cleaning. 2. At 11:31 AM, the surveyor observed an uncovered large multi-gallon garbage receptacle (trash can) without a lid which was halfway full of various trash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-14 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to track and securely document the COVID-19 vaccination status for all staff, both direct facility hires and contracted hires/outside vendors. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) QSO-22-07 ALL, dated 12/28/21, included the following: Within 30 days after issuance of this memorandum 2, if a facility demonstrates that: Policies and procedures are developed and implemented for ensuring all facility staff, regardless of clinical responsibility or patient or resident contact are vaccinated for COVID-19; and 100% of staff have received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, or have a pending request for, or have been granted qualifying exemption, or identified as having a temporary delay as recommended by the CDC, the facility is compliant under the rule; or Less than 100% of all staff have received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, or have a pending request for, or have been granted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-04-14 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the required Notice to Medicare Provider Non-coverage (NOMNC) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #382 and #383) reviewed for change notifications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/5/22 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed three residents (Resident #79, #382, and #383) who were discharged from the Medicare Part A stay with benefit days remaining within the past six months and should have received Beneficiary Notices. Resident #382 was admitted to the facility in December 2021. The last documented covered day of Medicare Part A service coverage was 2/12/22 from a voluntary discharge when benefit days were not exhausted. The facility did not present the resident with the required NOMNC form to notify them their right to an expedited review of a service termination. Resident #383 was admitted to the facility in December of 2021. The last documented covered day of Medicare Part A service coverage was 2/3/22 from a facility initiated discharge when benefit days were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$325,922 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $157,635 — penalty dated 2026-04-17
- $168,287 — penalty dated 2025-12-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-23 for 76 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABRAMCZYK, JACOB | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 48% | since 03/15/2024 |
| ABRAMCZYK, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 03/15/2024 |
| ABRAMCZYK, NAFTOLI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 18% | since 03/15/2024 |
| SHAPIRO, BRADLEY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 18% | since 07/25/2024 |
| SHAPIRO, SIMA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/15/2024 |
| FINN, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/25/2024 |
| FRIEDMAN, BENTZLON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/25/2024 |
| PATEL, SHODHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/25/2024 |
| ABRAMCZYK, MACHLA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2025 |
| ABRAMCZYK, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2025 |
| MARTIN FRIEDMAN CPA PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/25/2024 |
| TTYY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/15/2024 |
| WATERS EDGE PROPCO LCC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/15/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315324. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.