McAuley Hall Health Care Cente

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 69.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) store potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness and, b.) failed to maintain the kitchen environment and equipment in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and potential for the development a food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 8/5/25 at 11:00 AM, in the presence of the Food Services Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following:1. In the food preparation area, the surveyor observed a handwashing sink, which was attached to a stainless-steel food preparation area and there was no partition between the sink and food preparation surface.2. In the walk in refrigerator, the surveyor observed an opened half full apple juice with an open date of 7/23/25. The FSD stated that this juice should have been discarded after 48 hours of it being opened.3. In the food preparation area, the surveyor observed 3 of 12 cook top burners soiled with a thick black grease-like substance,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a high blood pressure medication with parameters (a defined set of conditions) was administered without significant medication error, the physician's order was followed, and adhered to the professional standards of practice. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #39) observed during the medication administration and was evidenced by the following: On 8/6/25 at 8:35 AM, the surveyor observed the Registered Nurse (RN) prepare 9 medications (meds) for Resident #39, which included a physician's order (PO) for metoprolol succinate ER oral tablet extended release 24 hour 25 milligrams (mg) give 0.5 tablet by mouth in the morning related to hypertension. Hold if systolic blood pressure (bp) less than 100; hold if heart rate (hr) less than 60. At 8:52 AM, the RN took the resident's vital signs, the bp was 92/59, and the heart rate was 64. At 8:56 AM, the RN documented a hold on metoprolol succinate ER in the progress notes. The electronic Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-13 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist (IP), Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director (MD), or designee attended the quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings. This was identified for three (3) of the three (3) quarterly QA meetings reviewed. This failure had the potential to affect all 68 residents who currently live in the facility. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the QA meeting sign-in sheets for the last three (3) quarters dated June 30,2023, September 30, 2023, and January 12, 2024. The sign-in sheets for those three (3) quarters revealed no DON signatures to show that the DON was in attendance for June 30, 2023, and January 12, 2024, QA meetings. There were no IP signatures to show that the IP was in attendance for June 30, 2023, QA meeting, and there were no MD signatures to show that the MD or a designee attended the QA meeting on September 30, 2023. On 3/11/24 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) maintain infection control practices to reduce the risk of infection during a pressure ulcer (PU) treatment; b.) follow a physicians order during a PU treatment; c.) follow the recommendations of the wound care center physician; and d.) assess and document the measurements of the PU one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for PU (Resident #39). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/06/24 at 11:13 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #39's door had a stop sign that indicated the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions. After donning the appropriate personal protective equipment required, the surveyor entered Resident #39's room and interviewed the resident. Resident #39 stated that he/she was transferred to the facility approximately four years ago with COVID-19 and developed a PU. Resident #39 stated that he/she had PU treatment two times a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) maintain a system of record keeping of DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) Form-222 (a federal narcotic requisition form used for ordering controlled substances), that ensured drug records were in order, and controlled dangerous substance (narcotics medications), with high potential for abuse were tracked with detail to enable prompt identification of loss or potential diversion of controlled substance; and b.) develop a policy and procedure for narcotic medications which included record keeping of DEA Form-222. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/11/24 at 8:45 AM, in the presence of the Director of Nursing (DON), the surveyor reviewed the facility provided binder that contained the DEA 222 forms. A review of the binder included the following non-executed (blank forms that were not used yet to order controlled substances) DEA 222 forms: Order Form Number:202074228 Order Form Number:202074229 Order Form…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint# NJ154270 Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain: a) the residents' patio in a safe and homelike condition for one (1) of two (2) patios, b) the laundry area in a safe and sanitary condition, and c) a safe and sanitary environment in one (1) of three (3) kitchenettes in accordance with the facility procedures and federal regulations, and were identified during the environment tour of the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. A review of the 4/22/22 at 9:37 AM phone interview of another surveyor with the anonymous resident's Responsible Party (RP) revealed that according to the RP (also known as the caller), the following was the physical environment outside of the facility's building: -ripped screens in a common area, porch area where the residents hang out. -one screen was ripped by the front door. -The paint was coming off the lower panels in the front of the building On 3/06/24 at 9:14 AM, during the first day of the survey, the surveyor observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0944 — pattern
  Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility staff had mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for five (5) of five (5) Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) reviewed for mandatory education. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor requested five (5) random CNA education files for the year 2023. A review of the facility form, Employee Official Inservice Transcript for [facility name redacted] for the 2022 to 2023 revealed the log did not include the mandated QAPI education training. On 3/11/24 at 11:51 AM, during a meeting with the surveyors, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the surveyor discussed the concern regarding the missing in-services for the CNAs. At 01:04 PM, during a meeting with the surveyors, the DON stated they had no policy and/or procedure for the CNA mandatory education. At that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
  Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility staff had the mandatory behavioral health training for five (5) of the five (5) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) reviewed for mandatory education. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor requested five (5) random CNA education files for the year 2023. A review of the facility form, Employee Official Inservice Transcript for [facility name redacted] for 2022 to 2023 revealed the log did not include the mandated behavioral health education training. On 3/11/24 at 11:51 AM, during a meeting with the surveyors, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the surveyor discussed the concern regarding the missing in-services for the CNAs. At 01:04 PM, during a meeting with the surveyors, the DON stated they had no policy and/or procedure for the CNA mandatory education. At that time, the LNHA confirmed that they did not do annual in-service for the behavioral health training. On 3/12/24 at 10:41…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy to ensure a) licensed staff credentials were verified upon hire (Staff #1 and #4) This deficient practice was identified for two (2) of four (4) newly hired staff reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: The surveyors randomly selected five new employee files for license verification which revealed the following: Staff #1, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), with a date of hire of 4/27/22, had a New Jersey Division Consumer Affairs (NJCA) license verification printout for license verification (used to verify the license status of a nurse) which was dated 3/07/24, Staff #4, a Registered Nurse (RN), with a date of hire of 12/08/22, had a NJCA verification print out for license verification which was dated 03/07/24. On 3/11/24 at 01:04 PM, during a meeting with the surveyors, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the surveyor discussed the concern regarding the two newly hired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint# NJ169416 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of Abuse/Neglect to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) in the required timeframe for one (1) of three (3) residents, reviewed for incident/event (Residents #57). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 3/07/24 at 10:16 AM, Resident #57 was not in the room, the room was observed to be clean, the bed was positioned against the wall with the floor mat on the right-hand side of the bed. At 10:16 AM, the surveyor observed the resident in the main dining room where at that time activities were being conducted. The resident was observed sitting at a round table with three (3) other residents. At 01:15 PM, the resident was observed in the main dining room having lunch with two (2) other residents. The surveyor reviewed the hybrid (combination of both paper and electronic) medical record for Resident #57. The admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident had been admitted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ