Atrium Post Acute Care Of Wayne

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 169 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 209 beds and averages 148.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure five residents (Resident (R) 89, 138, 293, 295, and R299) out of 37 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This had the potential to cause the residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Review of R138's admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) section titled Profile, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included aftercare following explanation of hip joint prosthesis. Review of R138's Prog Note tab in the EMR revealed a Physician Note dated 12/05/24, which stated [discharge] in [morning] . [follow up] with [primary medical doctor] as [outpatient] for regular screening and checkup . [discharge] to home. A Nurses Notes, dated 12/06/24 stated Patient picked up by family member via private care. Review of the R138's discharge Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) tracking form within 14 days of a resident's discharge and submit it to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system for one resident out of 37 sampled residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for MDS completion. This failure prevented the transmission and compilation of resident-specific information for payment and quality measure purposes. Findings include: Review of R7's undated admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including clostridium difficile, pressure ulcers of the right and left buttocks, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. Review of R7's Census tab of the EMR revealed the resident discharged on 09/04/24. Review of a Social Service note, dated 09/03/24 and located in the Prog Note tab of the EMR revealed, [R7] requesting discharge home tomorrow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure one out of two resident (Resident (R)4) had an accurate Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) done out of the 37 sampled residents. This failure put R4 at risk of not receiving the services needed. Findings include: Review of R4's admission Record face sheet located under the admission Record tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], from an acute care hospital with diagnoses of Parkinson's, hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, nephropathy, angina pectoris, schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass, bipolar, depression, anxiety, convulsions, and spinal stenosis. Review of R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/10/24, revealed R4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) 15 out of 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were initiated for two out of three residents (Resident (R) 63 and R128) of the 37 sampled residents. Specifically, R63 was on Intravenous (IV) medication and fluids, and R128 had religious and cultural preferences that were not addressed in the care plan. Findings include: 1. Review of R63's admission Record face sheet located in the admission Record tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, pleural effusion, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease stage 2, atrial fibrillation, and acute respiratory failure. Review of R63's admission MDS under the MDS tab in the EMR, with an ARD of 06/25/24 revealed a BIMS of 15 out of 15 which indicated his cognition was intact. Review of the comprehensive care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were revised for one out of three residents (Resident (R91) of the 37 sampled residents. Specifically, R91 had a contracture to the left hand and it was not addressed in the care plan. Findings include: Review of the admission Record face sheet located in the admission Record tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of contracture of the left hand, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, heart failure, hypertension, dysphagia. Review of R91's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/30/24 revealed R91 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero out of 15 which indicated R91 was severely cognitively impaired. R91 had a functional limitation of the range of motion on the left upper extremity. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of the 37 sampled residents (Resident (R)91) who had a contracture to the left hand was provided restorative services. This failure put R91 at risk for worsened contracture. Findings include: Review of the admission Record face sheet located in the admission Record tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of contracture of the left hand, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, heart failure, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of R91's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/30/24 revealed R91 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of zero out of 15 which indicated R91 was severely cognitively impaired. R91 had a functional limitation of the range of motion on the left upper extremity. Review further revealed R91 had received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed while lunch trays were being passed on one of the three floors. This failure puts residents at risk for infections. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control Transmission Precautions-Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 05-2024, revealed the policy was to provide guidance on when to implement enhanced barrier precautions. The policy further revealed the facility was committed to providing a safe and healthy environment for residents to minimize or prevent the spread of disease. The policy revealed clear signage should be on the door or wall by the resident's room indicating the type of precautions. During an observation on 02/18/25 at 12:26 PM on the third-floor unit revealed lunch trays were being passed by staff. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)2 passed a tray to room [ROOM NUMBER] which had signage on the wall that said Enhanced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY NJ00172016 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that the Physician responsible for supervising the care of residents signed and dated monthly physician's orders. This deficient practice was observed for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, 2, 3, and 4) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: 1.According to the admission RECORD (AR), Resident #1 has diagnoses of including but not limited to Toxic Encephalopathy, Megaloblastic Anemia, Urinary Tract Infection, and Malignant Neoplasm of Breast and Ovary. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 01/05/24, showed that Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that Resident #1 had intact cognition and was independent with Activity of Daily Living (ADLs). A review of Resident #1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 03/2024, 02/2024, and 01/2024, revealed that the physician did not sign and date the monthly orders. 2. According to the AR,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-21 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents signed and dated monthly physician's orders. This deficient practice was observed for 18 of 32 residents (Resident # 81, 98, 86, 11, 5, 135, 136, 133, 120, 28, 73, 84, 9, 112, 59, 95, 12, and 66) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: 1. The surveyor reviewed the 9/2022, 10/2022, and 11/2022 Order Summary Reports for Resident #81 which revealed that the physician did not sign and date the monthly orders for these months. 2. The surveyor reviewed the 9/2022, 10/2022, and 11/2022 Order Summary Reports for Resident #98 which revealed that the physician did not sign and date the monthly orders for these months. 3. The surveyor reviewed the 9/2022, 10/2022, and 11/2022 Order Summary Reports for Resident #86 which revealed that the physician did not sign and date the monthly orders for these months. 4. The surveyor reviewed the 9/2022, 10/2022, and 11/2022 Order Summary Reports for Resident #11 which revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-21 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility did not provide written notification of an emergency transfer to the resident, resident representative, and/or the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for 5 of 7 residents reviewed for hospitalization, Residents #98, 86, 76, 69, 135. The findings are as follows: 1.The surveyor reviewed Resident #98's medical record. The Census List indicated the resident was transferred out of the facility on 10/12/22. On 12/05/22 at 1:06 PM the surveyor interviewed the Social Worker (SW) regarding written notification of emergency transfer. The SW provided documentation indicating that the LTCO was notified. However, neither the resident nor the responsible party was notified of the reason for emergency transfer for the 10/12/22 transfer. On 12/05/22 at 12:51 PM the surveyor interviewed the Administrator. The Administrator confirmed neither the resident nor the responsible party was notified in writing of the reason for transfer. 2.The surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$3,418 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $3,418 — penalty dated 2024-02-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $961K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ