No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Preakness Healthcare Center

305 Oldham Road, Wayne, NJ 07470 · Government - County · 406 certified beds · (973) 585-2132 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$15,646 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,646 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-26)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
246 Hamburg Tpke Ste 304 · (973) 538-7700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1762 Ratzer Rd · (973) 389-2081 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
292 Belmont Ave · (973) 938-5677 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.8%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%0.8%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.0%2.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.7%18.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.5%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.9%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.3%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%80.1%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.9%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%8.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.612.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.761.111.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.7%CMS range 32.6–52.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.8–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge33.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.7–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.06
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.53
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.86
RN hoursweekends
23.7%
Total nursing turnover
20.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 406 beds and averages 269.5 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 136 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-22)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint#: NJ00179720 Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the Medical Emergency Response policy for a resident (Resident #2) in respiratory distress. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medical emergency response procedures. The facility also failed to provide the needed emergency transportation services to manage the acute respiratory symptoms of Resident #2, which resulted in the Resident's failure to improve. In addition, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure for the staff to follow to determine the use of emergency or non-emergency transportation services based on residents presenting symptoms. The facility's failure to implement its Medical Emergency Response policy and to develop a policy and procedure for the staff to follow to determine the use of emergency or non-emergency transportation services based on residents presenting symptoms placed Resident #2 and all other residents in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation related to the State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents on 01/08/26, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care to ensure freedom from accidents to a resident (Resident #1) who required two person assistance for care and transfers resulting in the resident sustaining a fractured finger and multiple skin lacerations requiring stitches. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents surveyed.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed the hybrid [paper and electronic] medical record of Resident #1. A review of Resident #1's admission Face Sheet Record (AFSR), an admission record summary, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia [chronic condition causing body pain], muscle weakness, neurocognitive disorder [condition causing decline in mental function], and hypertension. A review of the facility's Investigatory Summary Report and Conclusion (ISC) revealed that according to the Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility on 05/02/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse and follow the facility's Resident Abuse policy. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and was evidenced by the following: A Facility Reported Event (FRE), a document used to report incidents, submitted to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) by the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/15/2025 was reviewed. The FRE revealed that on 04/15/2025 at 4:20 P.M., the facility's Executive Director (ED) listened to a voice message left by Resident #2 at 6:29 A.M., the same day. The voice message was described in the FRE as follows: [She/He] stated that [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1] beat the living hell out of [her/him], she is vicious and dangerous. Review of the facility's INVESTIGATORY SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION, written by the facility's DON about the allegation made by Resident #2 against CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 1/15/25 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Dietary Supervisor (DS#1) and the Registered Dietitian (RD) observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. The surveyor observed in the dry storage room: a dented can of sliced potatoes in the regular rotation of non-dented canned goods; 3 boxes stored above 18 inches (in) from the ceiling, and the following items were observed opened without an open/use by label: one 3 pound (lb.) bag of tri-color pasta, 1 gallon container of white vinegar, one 32 oz (ounces) bottle of imitation vanilla, one 32 oz bottle of green food coloring, three 16 oz containers of chili powder, one 16oz container of ground thyme, one 16 oz container of Italian seasoning, one 16 oz container of oregano, one 16 oz…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure reference checks were completed for 10 out of 10 newly hired staff (Staff #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10) prior to their start date of employment. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed 10 randomly selected new employee files for reference checks for 10 of the 10 new employees revealed the following: A review of Staff #1's file, a Recreation Activity Aide (RA), date of hire (doh) on 10/30/23, showed there were no reference checks in their file. A review of Staff #2's file, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), doh on 1/29/24, showed there were no reference checks in their file. A review of Staff #3's file, a Registered Dietician, doh on 5/28/24, showed there were no reference checks in their file. A review of Staff #4's file, a LPN doh on 5/28/24, showed there were no reference checks in their file. A review of Staff #5's file, a RA, doh on 6/3/24, showed there were no reference checks in their file. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-22 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) in accordance with the federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 17 of 17 system selected residents, Resident #2, #12, #34, #38, #46, #48, #69, #70, #139, #166, #199, #205, #209, #220, #233, #267, and #271) and was evidenced by the following: On 1/21/25 at 9:09 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment task that included the Resident's MDS assessment. The MDS was a comprehensive tool that was federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS within 14 days of the assessment being completed. After transmission of the MDS, a quality measure will be transmitted to enable a facility to monitor the residents decline or progress. On 1/16/25 at 10:21 AM, the surveyor provided the MDS Consultant (MDSC) with the list of seventeen (17) system-selected residents who had not completed an MDS in over 120…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications were administered without error of 5% or more during the medication administration, 4 nurses administered medications to 5 residents. There were 25 opportunities for error, 2 errors were observed which calculated to a medication administration error rate of 8%. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 5 residents, (Resident #55 and Resident #122), that were administered medications by 2 of 5 nurses that were observed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life specifically by ensuring staff able to communicate with the resident in the language that the resident understood and preferred according to plan of care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #158, reviewed for communication. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/17/25 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #158 laying on an air mattress (a specialized mattress) and the resident spoke Spanish. The surveyor also observed that there was no communication board (alternative communication methods designed to overcome communication barriers) at the bedside and the resident's television (TV) was on the English Channel. On 1/17/25 at 9:56 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) asked the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) to help her reposition Resident#158 for the surveyor to observe the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of clinical practice to ensure, a.) a physician's order (PO) for a heel booties 2 of 2 residents, Residents #72 and #158, were followed, and b.) a PO to document weekly vital signs for 1 of 5 residents was followed, Resident #88, reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing a medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident receive care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by developing and implementing a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP), and the resident's choices that included refusal of care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 39 residents, (Resident #262), reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statues, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11 Nursing Board, The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states; The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing a medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the foley urinary catheter drainage bag was stored in a manner to prevent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 1 of 4 residents, Resident #77, reviewed for urinary catheter or UTI. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/17/25 at 9:08 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #77's urinary catheter drainage bag hung from the bed's side rail that was in the up position and not in a privacy bag. The tubing leading to the drainage bag was above the bed. On 1/17/25 at 9:09 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Registered Nurse (RN) after the RN also observed Resident #77's urinary catheter drainage bag. The RN stated that the drainage bag and tubing should be lowered. She added that when she had done rounds that morning the resident was sleeping and had not checked that side of the bed and that the Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) on the night shift probably placed it there after emptying it. The RN then lowered the urinary catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during tracheostomy care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident observed for tracheostomy care, (Resident #92), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/15/25 at 10:46 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #92 in a reclined lounge chair in their room. The resident had a tracheostomy (trach, a surgically made hole through the front of the neck into the trachea (windpipe) with a tube placed through the hole to help the person breathe), which was attached to a ventilation system (a breathing machine that helps or breathes for a person). The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #92. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses that included tracheostomy, anoxia (absence of oxygen), brain damage, and dependence on respirator (ventilator) status. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to; a) complete the Hemodialysis Communication Record (HCR) to include a signature by the facility nurse that acknowledged review of the HCR for 14 of 14 days reviewed; b) document a complete assessment of vital signs and/or disposition of access site post dialysis treatment in the medical record; c) follow a recommendation for a change in medication; and d) had a diet order for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #169. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/15/25 at 10:52 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #169 lying in bed, who stated that they were going to dialysis today and that they had a communication binder (binder for HCRs) that they took with to dialysis. A review of Resident #169's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; dependence on renal dialysis (a state of chronic dependence on a machine and medical professionals to maintain life when the kidneys are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that due to a shortage of staff, the facility failed to a.) honor the resident's shower schedule for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #141 and b.) ensure residents were provided morning care in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents, Residents #141 and #213 of Resident Council group. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/17/25 at 11:01 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident group meeting with five residents who were alert and oriented and were selected by the facility to attend the group meeting. Resident#141 informed the surveyor that two weeks ago, not this past Monday (1/13/25), the resident did not get showered. Resident #141 did not mention the name of the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) who told them that it was because of the shortage of staff which was why the resident did not get a shower. On that same date and time, Resident #141 informed the surveyor that there were concerns with short staff that affected the timeliness of care and caused the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure accurate documentation of the receipt of a controlled substance for 4 of 4 Schedule II controlled substance medications ordered and received by the facility for use as an emergency backup supply, on three Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) 222 Forms (a form used to order controlled substances from a provider) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: 21 CFR 1305.13 Procedure for filling DEA Forms 222. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident did not receive an unnecessary medication for 1 of 7 residents, Resident #43. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor reviewed Resident #43's medical record (MR) and revealed the following: A review of Resident #43's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to acute kidney failure, (when the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should) and urinary tract infection. A review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 1/20/25, reflected that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated that Resident #43 was cognitively intact. A review of the resident's list of medications (meds) reflected a Physician's order (PO) for Ondansetron 4 mg (milligram), 1 tablet (tab) orally every 6 hours as needed (PRN) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly a.) label, dispose and secure medications in 3 of 9 medication carts inspected and b.) store medication for 1 of 4 medication carts inspected according to facility's policy and standard of clinical practice. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # NJ00 181747 Based on interview, medical records (MR) review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 01/14/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan (CP) focus to include behaviors for residents who were on psychoactive medications. The deficient practice was found in 2 of 4 residents, (Resident #1 and #2), reviewed for behavior monitoring and comprehensive care planning and was evidenced by the following: 1.According to the admission Face Sheet Record (AFSR), Resident #1 had diagnoses which included but were not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypothyroidism, Essential Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia. A review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that provides a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capabilities, dated 09/21/2024, under Section C showed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 08 indicating Resident's cognition was moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #: NJ171754 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation on 3/1/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to notify and obtain a physician's order to change the form of a medication from liquid to tablets. The Physician order for this medication could not be filled by the Pharmacy because this medication did not come in liquid form. The facility failed to follow its policy titled Prescribing and Ordering of Medications. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents( Resident #2) reviewed for medication administration, and was evidenced by the following deficient practice: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ157711, NJ159758, NJ162870, NJ162871 Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse / neglect and/or the investigations were submitted to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) within the time limits of the policy and federal regulation for three of seven residents (Resident (R)18, R409, R458) with NJDOH reportable incidents. Findings include: 1. Review of R18's printed Face Sheet showed a facility admission date of 12/19/17, readmission on [DATE], with medical diagnoses (from a printed Diagnosis list) that included acute respiratory failure, multiple sclerosis, polyneuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, and lower extremity embolism and thrombosis. On 09/06/23 at 4:29 PM, a review of a Facility Reported Event (FRE) showed an incident reported by R18 of a nursing assistant using a full body lift without an assist on 03/22/23, however, the report was not sent to the State Agency until 03/24/23. During an interview on 09/06/23 at 6:42 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, document review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. During observation of medication pass, there were eight errors observed out of 29 opportunities, resulting in a 27.59% error rate. This had the potential to place one (Residents (R) 410) at risk of not receiving the full benefit of their medication therapy. Findings include: Observation on 09/08/23 at 12:18 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 prepared medications for R410, which included vitamin B-12 extended release (ER) 1000 micrograms (mcg) one tablet, vitamin D-3 25 mcg one tablet, Depakote 125 milligrams (mg) one tablet, Eliquis 2.5 mg one tablet, Cozaar 25 mg one tablet, Memantine 10 mg one tablet, Oxybutynin 15 mg one tablet at 08:30 AM, and Pot Citrate 10 milliequivalent (mEq) one tablet. After RN1 obtained all the medications needed for R410, he administered the medications. During medication pass, RN1 said that these medications were R410's morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure bed frames and rails, if present, were inspected and serviced per the Manufacturer's Instructions for Use (MIFU) for three of three residents (Resident (R) 18, R140, and R232) to minimize the risks of bed malfunction or resident injury. This failure had the potential to affect 267 of 267 residents who reside at the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of R18's printed Face Sheet showed a facility admission date of 12/19/17, readmission on [DATE], with medical diagnoses (from a printed Diagnosis list) that included acute respiratory failure, multiple sclerosis, polyneuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, and lower extremity embolism and thrombosis. During an interview on 09/04/23 at 12:04 PM, it was noted R18 had bilateral assist bars, or bed rails. When asked about them, R18 stated his wife and he had to fight to get them and thought his wife had to sign something. 2. Review of R140's printed Face Sheet showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure six of six Certified Nurse Aides (CNA), two of two Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and two of two Registered Nurse's (RN) reviewed had received behavioral health training to care for residents diagnosed with mental health illnesses indicated as admittable in the facility assessment. This failure had the potential for direct care staff to lack current knowledge to work with the unique challenges mental health illnesses present. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, reviewed 01/09/23, showed: .Preakness Healthcare Center accepts residents with the following diseases/conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities or combinations of these conditions that require complex medical care and management. Under the category of Psychiatric/Mood Disorders stated: If not a danger to self or others: Psychosis, Impaired Cognition, Mental Disorder, Depression, Bipolar, Schizophrenia, PTSD, Anxiety, Behavior that Needs Interventions . Review of the facility completed Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident (R) 218) of 34 sampled residents were treated with respect and dignity by providing care in a manner to enhance R218's quality of life. Findings include: During an interview with R218 on 09/04/23 at 10:50 AM, she said that on the night shift back in the summer, she had to be changed because she had a bowel movement (BM) in her incontinent brief. R218 said that staff took 30 minutes to answer the call light. R218 said that this made her feel like shit. R218 said that she does not like to sit in her own urine and/or feces. She said that mainly on the 3-11 shift staff do not ask her if she is wet and/or do not offer to change her throughout the shift until 8:30 PM when the staff lay her down for the night. R218 said that this makes her feel not good. R218 said that she would like to be changed more often. Continued interview revealed R218 said this past Friday (09/01/23), an agency nurse worked on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that tube feeding poles were maintained in a sanitary manner for three (Residents (R) 51, R160 and R203) of 34 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R51's facility provided Face Sheet revealed that R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including dysphagia, anoxic brain damage, and dysphagia. Review of facility provided Physician Orders for September 2023 revealed R51 was to receive Diabetisource AC 1000 milliliters (ML)/day via gastrostomy (g-tube) using at 75 ml/hour (hr), to start at 6:00 PM until total volume infused. During the initial tour of the facility on 09/05/23 between 10:30 AM-12:00 PM, revealed the tube feeding pole had an unknown cream-colored substance all over the pole. During an observation on 09/06/23 at 09:10 AM, 12:17 PM and 2:30 PM, R51's tube feeding pole had unknown cream-colored unknown substance all over the pole. During an observation on 09/08/23 at 1:00 PM, R51's tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRI), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a thorough investigation was conducted regarding staff-to-resident abuse allegations involving one (Resident (R) 409) of 34 sampled residents. There was no evidence that the facility interviewed other current residents regarding the allegations. Findings include: 1. During an interview with R218 on 09/04/23 at 10:50 AM, R218 said that she witnessed agency staff grab R409's arm to go to the bathroom. R218 said that she let staff know but does not know the staff's name. R218 said that it happened a couple of days ago on the night shift. Review of R409's facility provided Face Sheet revealed R409 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including dementia, anxiety, and depression. Review of R409's facility provided Progress Note dated 08/14/23 revealed New admission day one hard of hearing (HOH) with periods of confusion. Ambulatory via rollator with slow movements.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide to the resident and/or their representative, a written notice of the reason for transfer for two (Residents (R) 191 and R98) of three residents transferred to the hospital and provided that notice to the Ombudsman. Findings include: 1.Review of R191's paper chart revealed an admission date of 12/30/22 with diagnoses including dementia, depression, and schizophrenia. R191 experienced a change in condition on 08/12/23 and was transferred to the hospital. The paper record lacked evidence the facility provided the resident and/or representative, in writing, of the reason R#191 was transferred to the hospital. The record also lacked evidence the Ombudsman was notified of R#191's transfer. 2. Review of R98's paper chart revealed an admission date of 03/09/23 with diagnoses including diabetes, respiratory failure, and dependence on a ventilator for respiratory support. R98 was transferred to the hospital for a change in condition on 04/05/23. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide to the resident and/or their representative, a bed hold policy to two (Residents (R) 191 and R98) of three residents transferred to the hospital. Findings include: 1.Review of R191's paper chart revealed an admission date of 12/30/22 with diagnoses including dementia, depression, and schizophrenia. R191 experienced a change in condition on 08/12/23 and was transferred to the hospital. The paper record lacked evidence the facility provided the facility's bed hold policy. 2. Review of R98's paper chart revealed an admission date of 03/09/23 with diagnoses including diabetes, respiratory failure, and dependence on a ventilator for respiratory support. R98 was transferred to the hospital for a change in condition on 04/05/23. The paper record lacked evidence the facility provided R98 and/or representative the bed hold policy. R98 was readmitted [DATE]. R98 was transferred to the hospital for a change in condition on 05/02/23. The paper record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that three of three residents (Resident (R) 18, R140, and R232) and/or Resident Representative (RR) reviewed for bed rail use had documented safety assessment for the use of bed rails and were advised of the risks and/or benefits of rail use. This failure had the potential for residents with bed rails to be uninformed of the risk of severe injury and/or death associated with bed rail use. Findings include: 1. Review of R18's printed Face Sheet showed a facility admission date of 12/19/17, readmission on [DATE], with medical diagnoses (from a printed Diagnosis list) that included acute respiratory failure, multiple sclerosis, polyneuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, and lower extremity embolism and thrombosis. During an interview on 09/04/23 at 12:04 PM, it was noted R18 had bilateral assist bars, or bed rails. When asked about them, R18 stated his wife and he had to fight to get them and thought his wife had to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a manner that prevented cross-contamination for one (Resident (R) 410) of 34 sampled residents. Findings include: During an observation on 09/08/23 at 12:18 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1, without performing hand hygiene, prepared medications for R410, which included vitamin B-12 extended release (ER) 1000 micrograms (mcg) one tablet, vitamin D-3 25 mcg one tablet, Depakote 125 milligrams (mg) one tablet, Eliquis 2.5 mg one tablet, Cozaar 25 mg one tablet, Memantine 10 mg one tablet, Oxybutynin 15 mg one tablet at 08:30 AM, and Pot Citrate 10 milliequivalent (mEq) one tablet. After RN1 obtained all the medications needed for R410, he administered the medications. R410 did not swallow Pot Citrate, vitamin B-12 ER and vitamin D-3 pills. At 12:30 PM, RN1 placed on a pair of gloves, and had R410 spit the medications in his gloved left hand, while cleaning R410's mouth with a 4x4 gauze square with his gloved right-hand. Then he threw the gauze square into the trash,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents signed and dated monthly physician's orders and resident's lab results. This deficient practice continued over numerous months for 2 of 35 residents reviewed, Resident #54 and #153 residing on two different facility units. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/7/21 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #54 seated in a wheelchair with eyes closed. The surveyor approached the resident for an interview, but the resident was not alert or oriented. The surveyor was unable to interview Resident #54. The surveyor reviewed the admission Record Face sheet (one-page summary of important information about a resident) for Resident # 54. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Hypertension, Anxiety, Depression,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure in person physician visits were conducted in and documented at required intervals. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 35 residents, Resident #54, #153 reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 7/7/21 at 10:47 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #54 seated in a wheelchair with eyes closed. The surveyor approached the resident for an interview, but the resident was not alert or oriented. The surveyor was unable to interview Resident #54. The surveyor reviewed the admission Record Face sheet (one-page summary of important information about a resident) for Resident # 54. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Hypertension, Anxiety, Depression, Dysphagia, Peg (feeding tube) Placement, Mood Disorders, and Hyponatremia. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) utilize disposable dining ware for a resident on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) in accordance with facility policy; and, b.) practice appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for infection control to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. This was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for TBP (Resident #12). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the U.S. CDC guidelines Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated February 23, 2021, included 2. Recommended infection prevention and control (IPC) practices when caring for a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2: Personal Protective Equipment-HCP who enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-01-22 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the prior year's Federal and State of New Jersey (State) inspection results and post the location of those results in an area that was readily accessible to residents, families, and the public. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. On 1/16/25 at 8:29 AM, the surveyor observed a binder in the reception desk for Licensure Reports (survey results) which the Security Staff (SS) confirmed that the survey results were for date 8/12/21. On 1/16/25 at 11:08 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON), who stated that the facility's most recent Federal and State surveys were from 2023. He further stated that it was the facility's practice that the survey results should be at the reception desk by SS and that the 2023 survey results should always be available to residents, staff, and visitors. At that time, the surveyor notified the DON of the above findings and concerns. The DON stated that he was not sure why the survey results that were posted was from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-09-08 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing staffing hours were included in the prominently displayed nurse staffing for residents, visitors, and/or staff. This failure could affect the knowledge of the availability of staff to care for the 50 residents, their family members, or their representatives. Findings include: During an observation of the nursing staff posting on 09/08/23 at 11:45 AM, the 09/08/23 day shift posting was observed in a locked glass case next to the elevator. The posting included the census, the number of the different types of nursing staff, and the total number of hours for each category. During an interview on 09/08/23 at 11:45 AM regarding who was responsible for changing the posting, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated [Name] does it. and proceeded to contact her to come to the elevators. During an interview on 09/08/23 at 11:48 AM regarding who was responsible for changing the posting, the Nursing Secretary Assistant (NSA) responded that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,646 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,646 — penalty dated 2024-11-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COUNTY OF PASSAIC DEPARTMENT OF FINANCEOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2017
WILLIAMSON, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2004
CORRADO, LUCINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2006

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$35.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-68.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 3%Other / private 8%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$608per resident / day
operating cost
$18,491per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$361per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315361. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next