No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lutheran Social Ministries Cranes Mill

459 Passaic Avenue, West Caldwell, NJ 07006 · Non profit - Corporation · 56 certified beds · (973) 276-3018 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (973) 276-3018 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Feb 20211 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
556 Passaic Ave · (973) 808-2273 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
560 Passaic Ave · (973) 575-0003 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ShopRite0.4 mi
540 Passaic Ave · (973) 575-1770 · Call to confirm hours
Park
551 Passaic Ave · (862) 702-3820 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
31 Fairfield Ave · (973) 226-5723

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%2.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.1%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%5.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.2%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.9%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.2%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.1%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.4%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.982.071.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.801.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 218 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.86U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.37hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.43hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.86 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.1%CMS range 60.0–71.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 9.1–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.6–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.89
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.91
RN hoursweekends
25.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 39.5 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.91 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-14)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2021-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) prevent an avoidable facility-acquired Stage III (full thickness tissue loss) pressure ulcer to the sacrum for a resident assessed to be at mild risk for developing a pressure ulcer, b.) re-assess the resident for pressure ulcer risk upon development of the wound, c.) appropriately assess including a suspected stage of the pressure ulcer in a timely manner to prevent worsening, d.) ensure the accountability for off-loading the sacral pressure ulcer in accordance with the Wound Consultant recommendations, e.) ensure all staff that provide direct care to the resident had knowledge of the presence of the pressure ulcer to prevent the wound from worsening, f.) a comprehensive care plan was updated upon the development of the wound, g.) perform wound care to the pressure ulcer in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice, and h.) ensure the accountability and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure a.) stored narcotic medication was maintained with the safety tamper resistant seal (Resident #4), identified for 1 of 1 medication cart inspected, b.) ensure an accurate ordering and receiving of narcotic medications on the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA Form-222) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation, identified for 7 of 9 provided DEA Form-222, and c.) medication was properly disposed after falling onto the bed, observed during medication pass observation. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 3/11/25 at 9:29 AM, the surveyor and the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) began the narcotic medication inspection, which was stored in a mounted, double locked portion of the medication cart (narcotic box), assigned to the 2500 hall. At 9:32 AM, in the presence of LPN, the surveyor reviewed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide physical privacy during a pressure ulcer treatment for 1 (Resident #21) of 9 residents reviewed for privacy and dignity. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. On 3/7/25 at 10:42 AM the surveyor observed Resident #21 awake and alert in bed. The resident had a private duty companion seated at the bedside. A review of the electronic medical record revealed the following information. The 1/27/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was admitted with a full thickness sacral pressure ulcer. The Resident Medical Profile included a 2/14/25 physician's order for nursing to cleanse the right sacrum with normal saline solution, pack with Iodoform packing strips, cover with dry gauze and foam dressing once daily. The surveyor approached Resident #21's room on 3/11/25 at 1:08 PM to observe the resident's pressure ulcer treatment which had been prearranged with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices to prevent or reduce the spread of infection during a pressure ulcer treatment for 1 (Resident #21) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. The surveyor observed Resident #21 awake and alert in bed on 3/7/25 at 10:42 AM . The resident had a private duty companion seated at the bedside. A review of the electronic medical record revealed the following information. The 1/27/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was admitted with a full thickness sacral pressure ulcer. The Resident Medical Profile included a 2/14/25 physician's order for nursing to cleanse the right sacrum with normal saline solution, pack with Iodoform packing strips, cover with dry gauze and foam dressing once daily. The surveyor observed the resident's pressure ulcer treatment on 3/11/25 at 1:08 PM. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) sanitized the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to revise their pneumococcal vaccine policy to reflect current pneumococcal vaccination guidelines. This failure increased the risk for residents to not be vaccinated per current guidelines and contract pneumonia. Findings include: During an interview on 08/22/23 at 12:28 PM, the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) stated that the facility only offers the PCV13 and was not familiar with the most current CDC recommendations for the pneumococcal vaccines. During an interview on 08/22/23 at 2:37 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility does have access to the PCV20 [Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines]. During an interview on 08/22/23 at 2:58 PM, the Administrator stated the pneumococcal policies were a work in progress and needed to be updated as the regulations change. Review of a policy provided by the facility titled Pneumococcal (Pneumonia) Vaccination Program for Residents/Participants, dated 01/18/18, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain oxygen supplies in a manner that was consistent with infection control protocols and professional standards of practice. This was found with 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident # 26. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/23/23 at 9:23 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #26 in bed, awake. The resident was receiving oxygen through a nasal cannula (plastic prongs inserted into the nostrils to deliver oxygen) that was connected to an oxygen concentrator with oxygen tubing. The oxygen concentrator was set to deliver oxygen to the resident at a rate of 2 liters per minute. The tubing that delivered the oxygen from the concentrator was dated 12/20/22. On 1/24/23 at 12:17 PM, the surveyor went to the resident's room but the resident wasn't there. The resident was in Physical Therapy (PT). The resident's Private Aide was in the resident's room and said the resident would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure a.) expired narcotic medications were removed from active inventory b.) dispensed and received medication from the pharmacy were reconciled for accuracy which resulted in the wrong dosage stocked in the active inventory for one of one of the electronic emergency (backup) machine observed, and c.) proper disposal of medication during medication administration observation for one of two nurses. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/24/23 at 9:34 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) stated every nurse had their own log on for the backup machine and the pharmacy provider [name redacted] performed their own count weekly. The medications that were not at PAR level (minimum and maximum quantity limits that was set for a certain medication) were sent with the regular delivery and marked nurse supervisor, back up replacement. When the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication administration without significant error when the surveyor observed two nurses administer 25 doses to six residents. The deficient practice was identified for one of six residents, Resident #245 as evidenced by the following: On 1/25/23 at 9:25 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) preparing medications for Resident #245 in the following order: Docusate 100 milligram (mg), 1 tablet Eliquis 5 mg, 1 tablet (a blood thinner, used to lower the risk of strokes and blood clots in people with an irregular heartbeat known as Atrial Fibrillation) Furosemide 20mg, 1 tablet Sertraline 100 mg, 1 tablet Vitamin C 1000mg, 1 tablet Bupropion 100mg, 1 tablet Eliquis 5 mg, 1 tablet mg On 1/25/23 at 9:33 AM, the LPN confirmed she had seven medications in the unit dose cups and stated she was ready to administer the medication to Resident #245. The LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) failed to sanitize and air dry steam table pans in a manner to prevent microbial growth and b.) failed to maintain the kitchen environment and equipment in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and potential for the development a food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/23/23 at 10:30 AM, in the presence of the Registered Dietitian, General Manager (GM) and the [NAME] President of Culinary Services, the surveyor observed the following: 1. In the food preparation area, on metal dishware drying shelving unit, the surveyor observed five half sized steam table pans and eight quarter sized pans which were stacked with water between them. 2. On a shelf in the dairy walk in fridge the surveyor observed a half empty bag of salami with an open date of 1/10/23 and the GM stated that this item should be discarded after 5 days. 3. In the dry storage area, the surveyor observed a random sampling of dented cans…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate measures to prevent and control the spread of infection for failure to properly wear personal protective equipment (PPE) while entering a resident's room who was on droplet precautions. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: On 1/24/23 at 12:20 PM, the surveyor observed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) at the door of a resident who was on transmission-based droplet precautions. The CNA donned (put on) a disposable gown and had a KN95 mask on her face and no eye protection or gloves. The CNA took the resident's lunch tray, opened the door and entered the resident's room. The CNA then closed the door and approximately one minute later she opened the resident's door, removed her gown and washed her hands. At 12:25 PM, the surveyor interviewed the CNA, who stated that she should have worn an N95 mask and eye protection in addition to the gown. She stated that she put gloves after entering the residents room. The CNA stated that she did not wear eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-02-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to: a.) thoroughly investigate the development of a facility-acquired full-thickness tissue loss pressure ulcer, and b.) initiate an investigation for a large bruise that developed on a resident's arm in accordance with their abuse and neglect policy. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident #10 and #12), and was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the facility's Abuse Policy revised 4/1/19 included the following: The investigation is the process used to try to determine what happened. The designated facility personnel will begin the investigation immediately. The information gathered is given to administration .The investigation will include: Who was involved; Residents' statements; For non-verbal residents, cognitively impaired residents or residents who refused to be interviewed, attempt to interview the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification to the beneficiary of the potential liability charges for services not covered, when the resident was discharged from Medicare Part A services with benefit days remaining. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for beneficiary notice reviews (Resident #4), and was evidenced by the following: On 2/23/21 at 1:57 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #4 sitting in a chair in his/her room. The surveyor interviewed the resident who stated that he/she recently received a bill from the facility for [dollar amount redacted] and that he/she did not know what the bill was for, as it was not itemized. The resident showed the surveyor the bill which was dated for Balance Forward services through 12/31/20. The resident further stated that he/she was admitted to the attached Assisted Living section and then had a fall which resulted in a hospitalization and the resident was subsequently admitted to the facility for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred using a two-person assist when operating a mechanical lift in accordance with the facility policy to prevent accidents and injuries. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #12). The evidence was as follows: On 2/17/21 at 11:17 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #12 in a private room sitting upright in a high-back wheelchair with a mechanical lift pad under his/her body. There was a soft gel cushion to the seat of the resident's wheelchair. The resident was wearing bilateral geri-sleeves (an arm sock used to prevent skin tears) to the arms. The surveyor attempted to interview the resident but the resident did not verbally respond to the surveyor. On 2/22/21 at 10:14 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) routinely assigned to Resident #12. The CNA informed the surveyor that the resident was alert but was unable to follow commands or verbally respond in a coherent manner. The CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LUTHERAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES OF NEW JERSEY, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/13/1995
BARTHOLOMEW, TRACIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
FRANKENFIELD, COLLEENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/06/2014
GEWECKE, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
HACISKI, RAFAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2019
NOBLE, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2018
RUNNE, JUHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2018
SINGER, RONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2022
STEINBRONN, ANTHONYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
RICHMAN, JEANNINEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/24/2020
SHAKER, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
GAROZZO, BRENDENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/18/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 27%Other / private 73%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$2,047per resident / day
operating cost
$62,242per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,804per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315457. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next