La Vida Llena

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 47.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to ensure: Expired foods were stored in the main kitchen and the serving kitchen. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 46 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 12/15/25 and is likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 12/15/25 at 9:07 am during the initial tour of the main kitchen revealed the following: Smal Refrigerator (Fridge): Two pink drinks in covered cups were marked use by 12/13/25. Large Fridge: One container of salsa had a use by 12/07/25 date. One container of boiled eggs had a use by 12/13/26 date. One individual package of cheese slices had a use by 12/13/25 date. B. On 12/18/25 at 1:52 pm during a follow-up observation of the main kitchen revealed the large fridge had one box of fresh spinach that had a use by date of 12/03/25.C. On 12/18/25 at 2:12 pm during an observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to safeguard clinical record information by leaving Private Health Information (PHI) regarding residents of the 600-nursing unit, where unauthorized people had ability to access it. If the resident's clinical information is not sufficiently safe guarded, resident's PHI is likely to be viewed by unauthorized residents, visitors, and staff. The findings are: A. On 12/17/25 at 9:11 am during an observation of the unit medication cart located by the fireplace in the common room, a white piece of paper with PHI containing resident's names and resident vital signs was visible to all and left unattended. B. On 12/17/25 at 9:12 am during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, she confirmed the unattended white piece of paper contained PHI and was left visible on the medication cart. C. On 12/17/25 at 2:39 pm during an observation, the 600-unit medication cart was left unattended outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] with PHI containing full resident names,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect and promote the resident's rights to dignity, self-determination, and freedom from unnecessary restrictions for 1 (R #34) of 1 (R #34) resident reviewed for restrictive devices, when: R #34, who was documented as cognitively alert and oriented, was placed on a Wanderguard (a wearable elopement-prevention tracking device) without any documentation of unsafe wandering behaviors or elopement attempts. Additionally, there was no evidence that less restrictive interventions were considered or implemented prior to applying the device.If the facility uses unnecessary restrictive measures, such as a placement of a Wanderguard on cognitively intact residents, then residents are likely to be at risk for significant psychosocial harm and restrictions. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Elopement and Hazardous Wandering policy, dated 07/2010, revealed the following: Elopement is a situation in which a resident with impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0637 — pattern
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change in condition (major decline or improvement in the patient's health status) Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) for 2 (R #24 and R #51) of 2 (R #24 and R #51) residents reviewed for hospice care. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents not receiving the appropriate care and services they need. The findings are: R #24: A. Record review of R #24's face sheet revealed R #24 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Aphasia (disorder that results from damage (usually from a stroke or traumatic brain injury) to areas of the brain that are responsible for language),Dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing food or liquid),Dementia (symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities severely enough to interfere with your daily life),Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents from the potential for accidents and hazards for 2 (R #s 2 and 24) of 2 (R #s 2 and 24) residents reviewed for falls when the facility: Used a mechanical transfer device (a device designed to help staff move a resident from one place to another within a room or from one position to another) to transfer R #2, who did not require the use of a mechanical transfer device, which led to a fall. Failed to complete a fall risk assessment as required for R #24. Failed to follow R #24's care plan and provide a fall mat. If the facility is not using fall mats for residents' safety as care planned, completing fall risk assessments as required, and inappropriately using a mechanical transfer device, then this deficient practice could likely result in residents getting injured in avoidable accidents and putting residents at risk of serious injury and serious harm. The findings are: R #2: A. Record review of R #2's face sheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff properly stored and secured medications for all residents residing on the 600 unit when: Medication carts were not secured and left unattended during medication pass. Medications were not stored appropriately with loose medications in the medication cart. Expired medical equipment was stored in the unit medication storage room. If the facility fails to secure medication carts, properly store medications, or remove expired medical equipment, then residents are likely to experience unauthorized access to medications and the use of expired drugs, potentially resulting in injury or illness. The findings are: A. On 12/17/25 at 8:18 am, during an observation of the 600 unit, a medication cart was left unlocked and unattended outside of Room (RM) #608. B. On 12/17/2025 at 8:19 am during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, he confirmed that he left the medication cart unlocked and unattended. RN #1 stated the medication carts should not be left unlocked and unattended. C. On 12/17/25 at 12:48 pm during an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop an accurate comprehensive, person-centered care plan for 1 (R #27) of 1 (R #27) resident reviewed for care planning when the facility staff failed to: Accurately reflect R #27's use of an antiplatelet medication (prevent blood clots by inhibiting the aggregation of platelets, which can help reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes). These deficient practices are likely to result in residents not having their needs met, decreased quality of life, and avoidable decline in physical and psychosocial well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of R #27's face sheet revealed R #27 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD is caused by plaque buildup in the walls of the arteries that supply blood to the heart),Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat that occurs intermittently and resolves on its own or with treatment),Congestive heart failure (the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care that meets professional standards for 2 (R #24 and #42) of 2 (R #24 and #42) residents reviewed when staff failed to: Obtain physician orders to initiate hospice care for R #24.Follow physician orders to administer the correct dose of a diabetic medication for R #42. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider. The findings are: R #24: A. Record review of R #24's face sheet revealed R #24 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Aphasia (disorder that results from damage (usually from a stroke or traumatic brain injury) to areas of the brain that are responsible for language), Dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing food or liquid), Dementia (symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities severely enough to interfere with your daily life), Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affects…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident reviewed for nutrition and weight management when: The facility failed to weigh R #3 monthly as ordered by a physician. This deficient practice is likely to lead to the resident suffering from unplanned weight loss and malnutrition which could exacerbate (make worse) other medical conditions or diseases. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Multiple sclerosis (MS; a chronic progressive disease involving damage to the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, which may cause numbness, impairment of speech and muscular coordination, blurred vision and severe fatigue).B. Record review of R #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 12/08/25 revealed there was not a documented weight (base weight on most…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for 1(R #34) of 1(R #34) resident reviewed for medication errors when: The facility did not administer R #34's medications accurately as ordered. If the facility fails to review and reconcile insulin orders, discontinue prior orders, verify correct dosing parameters, and prevent duplicate orders, then residents are likely to receive incorrect insulin administration and have uncontrolled blood glucose levels, which could potentially lead to serious harm. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Medication Administration Assistance Policy, dated 04/2017, revealed the following: Check the medication order. Ensure proper route, dose time, strength frequency and type,A licensed nurse is to notify the resident's physician immediately of problems with medications. B. Record review of R #34's face sheet revealed R #34 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Type I Diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $45K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM