No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Artesia Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center, LLC

1402 West Gilchrist Ave, Artesia, NM 88210 · For profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (575) 746-6006 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (575) 746-6006 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1105 Memorial Dr · (575) 746-9848 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
612 N 13th St · (575) 746-6681 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1500 N 1st St · (575) 746-3401 · Call to confirm hours
Park
401 W Logan Ave · (575) 746-3593 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.2%11.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.9%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.7%2.0%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%3.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.7%11.7%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%14.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%5.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.2%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.3%14.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.4%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%86.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.3%22.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%15.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.341.651.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.712.811.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.3%CMS range 24.1–55.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.1–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.1–14.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.361.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.49
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
34.0%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 51.1 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed in advance of what medications they received and understood the reasons, risks, and benefits of the medications for 3 (R #46, R #55, and R #60) of 6 (R #1, R #7, R #9, R #46, R #55 and R #60) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If the residents or their representatives are not informed of the risks and benefits of the medication or treatment alternatives, they are not able to make informed decisions regarding residents' care. The findings are: R#46A. Record review of R #46's physician's orders revealed an order dated 06/06/23 for Melatonin (a supplement), nine milligrams (mg) to be given by mouth at bedtime for insomnia (a common sleep disorder).B. Record review of R #46's medical record revealed no consent form for the use of Melatonin.C. On 02/26/26 at 2:54 pm, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed staff did not obtain the required consent form for the use of Melatonin prior to R #46 using of medication. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and comfortable environment for 11 (R #1, R #4, R #20, R #25, R #28, R #32, R #46, R #50, R #51, R #55, and R #61) of 15 (R #1, R #2, R #4, R #18, R #20, R #25, R #28, R #32, R #42, R #46, R #50, R #51, R #55, R #61, and R #63) residents reviewed when staff failed to:1) Repair broken outlet covers in resident rooms #301 and #305.2) Repair damaged drywall in resident rooms #203, #208, #209, #212, #301, #302 and #305.3) Empty trash timely room [ROOM NUMBER].4) Repair or repaint handrails throughout the building.Failure to maintain the building in a clean and comfortable manner is likely to result in unsafe conditions and prevent residents from enjoying everyday activities. These deficient practices could likely result in residents feeling frustrated, embarrassed, and unimportant. The findings are:Broken/Missing outlet coversA. On 02/22/26 at 12:22 pm, a random observation of residents' rooms revealed:- room [ROOM NUMBER] had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless the medication was medically necessary for 2 (R #55 and R #60) of 3 (R #3, R #55 and R #60) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to ensure psychotropic medications were necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. This deficient practice could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are: R #55A. Record review of R #55's admission record revealed R #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. End stage renal disease (ESRD; chronic irreversible kidney failure),2. Adult failure to thrive (a rapid or gradual, unexplained, and severe decline in physical and/or cognitive function, typically in older adults),3. Anxiety disorder (mental health conditions characterized by persistent,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) for 3 (R #18, R #47, and R #60) of 6 (R #1, R #2, R #18, R #26, R #47, and R #60) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: R #18 A. Record review of R #18's admission record revealed R #18 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; lung disease), 2. Cirrhosis (chronic liver damage leading to scarring and liver failure) of the liver, 3. Critical illness myopathy (diseases…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 3 (R #4 and R #7) of 4 (R #4, R #7, R #26, and R #55) residents reviewed when staff failed to:1. Revise R #4's care plan to:-Include use of a camera in R #4's room,-Include appropriate interventions for falls,-Include the changes in R #4's diet,-Remove the use of oxygen therapy,2. Revise R #7's care plan to remove the use of insulin therapy.These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are:R #4 A. Record review of R #4's admission record revealed R #4 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #4's physician orders revealed: 1. An order dated 02/16/26 for R #4 to be on a regular diet, pureed texture (a texture modified diet that requires no chewing), regular/thin consistency fluids. 2. An order dated 02/14/26 for oxygen at two liters per minute (L/M) via nasal cannula (flexible tube with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data daily at the beginning of the shift that included the following:- Facility name.-The current date.-The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift.1. Registered nurse,2. Licensed practical nurse,3. Certified nurse aides,4. Resident census.The deficient practice has the potential to affect all 51 residents as identified by the census provided by the Manager on Duty (MOD) on 02/22/26 and could likely result in residents and visitors not having the staffing information readily available. The findings are:A. On 02/22/26 at 9:30 am a random observation of the facility revealed the facility's staff data posting was dated 02/21/26.B. On 02/22/26 at 9:40 am, during an interview with the MOD, she confirmed the staff data posting was for 02/21/26 and had not been updated daily.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen (plan to manage a person's medication) was free from unnecessary drugs by ensuring indication of use is based on the residents' current diagnosis for 8 (R #1, R #4, R #7, R #9, R #46, R #55, R #60, and R # 63) of 9 (R #1, R #4, R #6, R #7, R #9, R #46, R #55, R #60,and R #63) residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. This deficient practice cold likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are:R #1 A. Record review of R #1's admission record revealed R #55 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Hypertension (HTN; high blood pressure), 2. Hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), 3. Localized edema (the swelling of a specific body area), 4. Psychoactive substance use (consumption of substances that alter brain function, affecting mood, perception, consciousness, and behavior). B. Record review of R #1's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/18/26 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served under sanitary conditions when staff failed to ensure:1. Staff wore hairnets and beard nets while in the kitchen. 2. Food items were labeled and dated.These deficient practices are likely to affect all 51 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 02/22/26 and are likely to lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if safe food handling practices are not adhered to and food stored properly. The findings are:A. On 02/22/26 at 9:46 am, an observation of the kitchen revealed Dietary Aid (DA) #1 not wearing a beard net (a type of hair net used for facial hair).B. On 02/22/26 at 9:48 am during an interview with Dietary Assistant Manager (DAM), she confirmed that DA #1 was not properly wearing a beard net. She stated her expectation is for all staff to properly wear hairnets and beard nets while in the kitchen or serving food.C. On 02/22/26 at 9:51 am, an observation of the kitchen revealed the following:1. A bag of what appeared to be Tator tots that was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were only liable for services rendered for 1 (R #64) of 4 (R #3, R #8, R #59 and R #64) residents reviewed for discharge when the facility failed to refund the resident or resident representative any and all refunds due the resident within 30 days from the resident's date of discharge. The findings are:A. Record review of R #64's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R #64 was discharged on 10/22/25.B. On 02/26/26 at 12:22 pm, during an interview with the Business Office Manager, she confirmed1. R #64 was owed a refund for October and November of 2025, 2. The facility received payment in November and should not have,3. The facility failed to refund October within 30 days of discharge,4. The refund was mailed to R #64 on 02/20/26, approximately 120 days after discharge.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level I Identification Screen accurately reflected the resident's diagnosis or need for secondary screening for 2 (R #26 and R #31) of 5 (R #18, R #26, R #31, R #45, and R #55) residents reviewed for accuracy of PASARR screening. If the facility does not ensure PASARR screenings are completed accurately, then residents with serious mental illness may not receive required evaluations or specialized services, placing them at risk for unmet mental health needs and a decline in psychosocial well-being.The findings are:R #26A. Record review of R #26's face sheet indicated that R #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses:1. Hemiplegia (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness, reduced muscle strength, or impaired motor control affecting one entire side of the body) following cerebral infarct (stroke)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an accurate, comprehensive care plan for 1 (R #4) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #4, and R #26) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to implement R #4's care plan for falls by utilizing the fall mat. This deficient practice could likely result in proper care not being provided to residents.The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's admission record revealed R #4 was admitted into the facility on [DATE].B. Record review of R #4's care plan, last revised on 03/31/25, revealed an intervention to offer fall mat as indicated.C. On 02/22/26 at 2:26 pm, a random observation of R #4's room, revealed R #4 was lying in bed and the fall mat was located underneath his bed.D. On 02/22/26 at 2:37 pm, during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #2 she confirmed R #4's fall mat was not placed correctly, and that it should be placed on the floor next to his bed.E. On 02/26/26 at 2:54 pm during an interview with the Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care that meets professional standards for 1 (R #42) of 1 (R #42) resident reviewed when the staff failed to follow physician orders. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider. The findings are:Cross Reference 760A. Record review of R #42's physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/24/25 for Losartan (angiotensin(hormone) receptor blocker to treat high blood pressure) 25 milligrams (mg), give half tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. Notify MD (Medical Doctor) for hold orders if SBP (systolic (top number of blood pressure) blood pressure) less than 110 or DBP (diastolic (bottom number) blood pressure) less than 60 or pulse less than 60.B. On 02/25/26 at 8:54 am, during an observation of medication administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 reported a blood pressure reading of 103/61. She then administered the medication outside the prescribed parameters. C. On 02/26/26 at 3:45 pm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality of care when staff failed to implement and follow discharge orders for wound care for 1 (R #60) of 3 (R #1, R #4, and R #60) resident reviewed. These deficient practices could likely result in residents to not getting the treatment needed and/or potentially worsening conditions. The findings are:A. Record review of R #60's admission record revealed R #60 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Schizophrenia (a disorder that affects an individual's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly),2. Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs),3. Bacteremia (presence of bacteria and infectious organisms in the blood stream),4. Syphilis (a sexually transmitted infection [STI]), 5. Pseudomonas (bacteria that occurs in soil or waste),6. Resistant to multiple antibiotics (MDR; occurs when bacteria or fungi evolve to withstand multiple drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively manage pain (use of different techniques and medication to reduce and control the amount of pain a person experiences) for 1 (R #60) of 2 (R #1 and R #60) residents reviewed for pain when the facility failed to:1. Administer medications as per physician's orders.2. Monitor pain.3. Implement a care plan and interventions for pain management.This deficient practice could likely result in residents experiencing unnecessary pain and could compromise their quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of R #60's admission record revealed R #60 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Schizophrenia (a disorder that affects an individual's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly),2. Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs),3. Bacteremia (presence of bacteria and infectious organisms in the blood stream),4. Syphilis (a sexually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain appropriate physician orders prior to installation of bed rails for 1 (R #60) of 2 (R #46 and R #60) residents reviewed for bedrails. This deficient practice could result in the physician and the resident not knowing the needs, risks and benefit of bed rails. The findings are:A. Record review of R #60's admission record revealed R #60 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #60's physician orders revealed no order for the use of bedrails.C. Record review of R #60's bedrail assessment dated [DATE] revealed R #60 does use bedrails to enhance mobility. D. On 02/23/26 at 8:38 am during a random observation of R #60's room revealed quarter size bedrails on the upper right and left sides of bed. E. On 02/23/26 at 8:42 pm during an interview with R #60, he confirmed he uses the bedrails for mobility and repositioning himself. F. On 02/26/26 at 2:54 pm, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 (R #42) of 1 (R #42) residents reviewed for medication administration when they failed to administer medication per physician's orders. This deficient practice could likely lead to the residents having adverse (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result) side effects or not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of the medication. The findings are:A. Record review of R #42's Physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/24/25 for Losartan (angiotensin(hormone) receptor blocker to treat high blood pressure) 25 milligrams (mg); Give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. Notify MD (Medical Doctor) for hold orders if SBP (systolic (top number of blood pressure) blood pressure) less than 110 or DBP (diastolic (bottom number) blood pressure) less than 60 or pulse less than 60.B. Record review of R #42's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2026, revealed staff administered the following:-Losartan, 0.5 (or 1/2) of 25 mg, 02/02/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice services met professional standards for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) residents reviewed for hospice services by:1. Not having a qualifying diagnosis for R #4.2. Not having hospice plans of care for R #4.These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident not receiving the services that she needs. The findings are:A. Record review of R #4's admission record revealed R #4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis:1. Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that damages and destroys nerve cells leading to a decline in abilities and behavioral changes),2. Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment),3. Epilepsy (a seizure disorder),4. Down Syndrome (a genetic condition),B. Record review of R #4's hospice admission order form (a form completed by a hospice nurse to identify diagnosis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (an infection control intervention) when providing personal care to 1 (R #10) of 2 (R #10 and R #23) residents. Failure to utilize enhanced barrier precautions when performing personal care has the potential to spread organisms, diseases, and other health conditions among the residents. The findings are: A. On 02/22/26 at 10:02 am, during a random observation of R #10's room, the door to her room revealed a sign on the door that indicated R #10 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP; an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) when providing care for her.B. On 02/24/26 at 1:27 pm, during an observation and interview of R #10's tube feeding, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 was observed accessing the feeding tube. LPN #1 wore gloves while accessing the tube but did not put on the required gown as per EBP signage on the door. LPN stated he is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency within five working days of an incident for 1 (R #1) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #3 and R #4) residents reviewed for abuse or neglect. If the facility is not submitting the summary of the facility's investigation to the State Survey Agency, then the State Survey Agency is unable to appropriately triage (review) the allegation for further investigation. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's list of reportable incidents revealed an incident for R #1 dated 11/13/25. B. Record review of the facility's five-day report revealed the following: 1. The investigation was completed2. There was no evidence that the results of the investigation was submitted to the state Survey Agency withing 5 working days of the incident. E. On 12/11/25 at 2:02 pm, during an interview with the Administrator (ADM) she confirmed it is the facility's responsibility to submit a five day follow up report with the results of the investigation to the state survey agency. She could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Complete the sign-off sheet and record the measurement of the dishwasher temperatures and sanitizing solutions daily. 2. Complete the sign-off sheet and record the food temperatures daily. 3. Ensure the sanitization logs were signed with the appropriate concentrations of sanitizer and water measured the proper dilution strength after dilution [cleaning solutions are measured in parts per million, (PPM). Greater than 50 PPM is required after diluting the concentrated sanitizing liquid] were completed daily.These failures could potentially affect all 54 residents in the facility who eat food prepared in the kitchen (residents were identified by the census provided by the Administrator on 09/23/25). If the facility fails to adhere to proper sanitization and food temperature monitoring, residents could likely be exposed to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). The findings are:DISHWASHERA. Record review of the facility's policy, Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform residents and the resident representative in writing of a room change prior to the resident changing rooms and include the reason for the room change for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for room change. This deficient practice is likely to result in frustration and confusion for the residents which could lead to mental anguish. The findings are:A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Psychosis (a condition characterized by a loss of contact with reality, often involving symptoms like hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking),2. Dementia (a broad term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life),3. Need for Assistance with Personal Care.B. Record review of R #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 05/27/25 revealed a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility administrator failed to report and thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual assault. This deficient practice could affect all 46 residents residing in the facility according to the daily census provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 06/03/25. If the facility is not thoroughly reporting and investigating allegations of sexual assault, then residents are at a higher risk of being abused, neglected, or mistreated. The findings are: A. Record review of a grievance report dated 05/25/25 revealed staff reported an allegation of possible sexual assault on R #1 from R #2 to the Social Worker (SW). B. On 06/03/25 at 10:03 am during an interview, the SW confirmed she received a grievance from staff on 05/25/25 reporting an allegation of sexual assault on R #1. The SW stated she did report the allegation to the Administrator (ADM) on 05/25/25. C. Record review of the New Mexico Health Care Authority (HCA) complaints intake revealed HCA had not received a report from the facility regarding the allegation of possible resident sexual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an an incident of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for abuse. If the facility fails to report incidents of possible abuse to the State Agency, then the State Agency is unable to ensure residents have a safe environment. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero (significant impairment). B. Record review of a grievance report dated 05/25/25 revealed staff reported an allegation of possible sexual assault on R #1 from R #2. C. Record review of the New Mexico Health Care Authority (HCA) complaints intake revealed HCA had not received a report from the facility regarding the allegation of possible resident sexual abuse for the grievance report dated 05/25/25. D. On 06/03/25 at 9:25 am during an interview, Housekeeper (HK) #1 confirmed she was told by another staff that R #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for allegations of abuse for 1 (R #1) of 1(R #1) resident reviewed for abuse. If the facility is not completing an accurate and thorough investigation for an allegation of abuse and submitting the summary of the facility's investigation to the State Agency, then the State Agency is unable to appropriately triage (review) the allegation for further investigation. The findings are: A. Record review of a grievance report dated 05/25/25 revealed: 1. Staff reported an allegation of possible sexual assault on R #1 from R #2. 2. R #2 denied the allegation and R #1 looked at the SW. 3. The administrator was informed of the allegation. 4. Follow/up Action taken stated Final outcome, no sign of abuse was detected. B. On 06/03/25 at 10:03 am during an interview, the Social Worker (SW) confirmed she received a grievance from staff on 05/25/25. The SW confirmed R #1 cannot communicate verbally and does not have the ability to defend herself if needed. SW stated R #2 denied the allegation and R #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for 4 (R #9, R #28, R #34, and R #152) of 4 (R #9, R #28, R #34, and R #152) residents sampled for environment by not repairing or cleaning the following: 1. Peeling and chipped paint 2. Wall repairs not repainted to match rest of wall 3. Hand rails in 300 hall appeared worn and needed repair/refinishing. 4. The carpet in the 200 hall and 300 hall were stained, worn and faded. 5. The wall near the main entrance by fire alarm had been repaired with plaster but has no paint. 6. The ceiling tiles near nurses station have brown stains covering most of the tile. These deficient practices could likely cause residents to feel like they are not living in a comfortable home-like environment and like they are not valued. The findings are: A. On 03/03/25 10:37 am a random observation of the facility environment revealed the following: 1. Peeling and chipped paint 2. Wall repairs not repainted to match rest of wall 3. Hand rails in 300 hall appeared worn and needed repair/refinishing. 4.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR; a screening to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) assessment was accurate for 3 (R #9, R #30, and R #45) of 4 (R #9, R #14, R #30, and R #45) residents reviewed for PASRR accuracy. This deficient practice is likely to result in the residents not receiving the services they need. The findings are: Should S/S be D, 3 residents and each had on PASRR assessment R #9 A. Record review of R #9's admission Record revealed R #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Anxiety (feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), 2. Down Syndrome (a genetic condition caused by the presence of an extra copy of chromosome, affects development, leading to intellectual disability and delays, and certain physical traits), unspecified, 3. Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified, 4. Repeated falls, 5. Need for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 (R #9) of 3 (R #6, R #9, and R #30) residents reviewed for falls when staff failed to complete a post-fall neurological evaluations (neurocheck; a brief neurological assessment performed by staff repeatedly to monitor a resident's neurological status). This deficient practice is likely to put residents at risk of unsafe situations. The findings are: A. Record review of R #9's admission Record revealed R #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: 1. Anxiety (feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), 2. Down Syndrome (a genetic condition caused by the presence of an extra copy of chromosome, affects development, leading to intellectual disability and delays, and certain physical traits), unspecified, 3. Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified, 4. Repeated falls, 5. Need for assistance with personal care. B. Record review of R #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a foley catheter (a thin, sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) had an order that demonstrated that a catheter was necessary, what type of catheter was needed, and how to care for the catheter for 1 (R #9) of 2 (R #9 and R #30) residents reviewed for catheter use. This deficient practice could likely result in an increased and unnecessary risk of infections for residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #9's admission Record revealed R #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: 1. Anxiety (feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), 2. Down Syndrome (a genetic condition caused by the presence of an extra copy of chromosome, affects development, leading to intellectual disability and delays, and certain physical traits), unspecified, 3. Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified, 4. Repeated falls, 5. Need for assistance with personal care. B. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent (%) when staff performed three medication errors out of 29 opportunities for 1 (R #28) of 9 (R #2, R #4, R #12, R #17, R #20, R #22, R #25, R #28, R #152) residents reviewed during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 10.34%. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents receiving the incorrect medication, not receiving the desired therapeutic effect, and exposing the resident to a higher risk of side effects. The findings are: A. On 03/05/25 at 9:40 am, during an observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, obtained vital signs (measurements, specifically pulse rate, temperature, respiration rate, and blood pressure, that indicate the state of a patient's essential body functions) for R #28, blood pressure was 121/75 (121; systolic number: maximum pressure during contraction of heart, 75; diastolic number: minimum pressure at the end of hearth contraction) and a pulse (rhythmic throbbing of blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 (R #28) of 1 (R #28) residents reviewed for medication administration when they failed to administer medication per physician's orders. This deficient practice could likely lead to the residents having adverse (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result) side effects, or not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of the medication. The findings are: A. Record review of R #28's Physician's orders revealed the following: - Metoprolol (beta-blocker used to treat chest pain (angina), heart failure, and high blood pressure) ER (extended release) Start date 12/10/24. Metoprolol succinate (beta-blocker used to treat chest pain (angina), heart failure, and high blood pressure) ER (extended release), oral tablet, extended release 24-hour, 50 mg (milligram; dose of medication); Give 50 mg by mouth one time a day for hypertension (high blood pressure). Hold if pulse is below 60 and notify provider, hold if BP (blood pressure) is less than 140/90. -Amlodipine Besylate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to assure medications were secured and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, visitors, and residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 14 residents residing on the 200 hall as identified on the resident census provided by the Administrator on 05/14/25. Improperly stored medications could result in a resident, staff member, or visitor taking the medications not prescribed to them. The findings are: A. On 05/14/25 at 8:10 am a random observation of the 200 hall revealed a medication cart near room [ROOM NUMBER], had seven boxes of wound gel on top of the cart. Staff were not present in the area near the cart. B. On 05/14/25 at 8:14 am, during an interview with Director of Staff Development (DSD), she stated the wound gel should have been placed in the medication storage room and not left on top of the cart unattended.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure their binding arbitration agreement (contract where parties agree to resolve disputes through a neutral third party instead of court) explicitly (in a clear and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion or doubt) grants the resident and/or representative the right to rescind (to cancel) the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing the agreement for the 20 (R #3, R #5, R #7, R #8, R #10, R #11, R #13, R #15, R #17, R #18, R #19, R #20, R #23, R #24, R #25, R #28, R #30, R #32, R #35, and R #37) of 49 (R #1-R #49) This is not clear only 20 residents of the 49 residents binging arbitration agreement did not include a provision for the resident's and/or resident's representative ability to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days and was not signed? Please provide evidence The census was 49, it's 49 total residents. Only 20 of those 49 residents agreed to sign the arbitration agreement. That's why I had it like this to start- Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure their binding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their binding arbitration agreement (a clause within a contract where parties agree to resolve disputes through arbitration (arbitration; formal out -of-court method of resolving disputes) and waive their right to a trial and agree to accept the arbitrator's decision as final) included a provision for convenient venue (a location in which to carry out arbitration proceedings which should be agreed upon and suitable for both parties) selection. Failure to include this provision in the agreement could likely result in residents who choose to seek arbitration experiencing frustration and difficulty deterring (discourage or prevent from acting on) them from exercising their rights for the 20 (R #3, R #5, R #7, R #8, R #10, R #11, R #13, R #15, R #17, R #18, R #19, R #20, R #23, R #24, R #25, R #28, R #30, R #32, R #35, and R #37) of 49 (R #1- R #49) residents that have signed the agreement as identified by the list the Administrator (ADM) provided on 03/5/25. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's binging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention practices when staff did not clean the blood pressure cuff and vital sign equipment prior to and after taking vital signs for 3 (R #22, R #28, and R #152) of 3 (R #22, R #28, and R #152) residents. This deficient practice could likely result in the spread of infectious agents (viruses and bacteria) between the residents. The findings are: A. On 03/05/25 at 9:42 am, during an observation of Nurse #1 revealed the following: 1. Nurse #1 did not clean the blood pressure cuff and vital sign equipment prior to taking vital signs for R #22. 2. Nurse #1 then took vital signs on R #28 without cleaning the blood pressure cuff and vital sign equipment. 3. Nurse #1 then took vital signs on R #152 without cleaning the blood pressure cuff and vital sign equipment. B. On 03/05/25 at 10:18 am, during an interview with Nurse #1, he stated he should have cleaned off all vital sign equipment before taking R #22's vitals and in between each resident afterwards. C. On 03/05/25 at 10:45 am, during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the hallway in the 200 hall was accessible for residents. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 14 residents residing on the 200 hall as identified on the resident census provided by the Administrator on 05/14/25. This deficient practice could likely result in residents living in an unsafe environment, could increase their risk for injuries, and decrease their quality of life. The findings are: A. On 05/14/25 at 8:10 am a random observation of the 200 hall revealed the following: 1. A medication cart on the left side of the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. A housekeeping cart on the right side of the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER], 3. A housekeeping cart on the left side of the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER], 4. A mechanical lift on the right side of the hallway near rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. B. On 05/14/25 at 8:30 am during an interview with Housekeeper (HK) #1, she confirmed there were objects on both sides of the hallway blocking the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's current advance directive (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and life saving care) was available in the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and/or available in physical form for the facility staff for 1 (R #45) of 2 (R #3 and R #45) residents reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice is likely to cause confusion and delay potentially life saving procedures. The findings are: A. Record review of R #45's face sheet revealed R #45 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #45's physician orders dated [DATE], revealed R #45 was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- a person has decided not to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempted on them if their heart or breathing stops) for her advanced directive code status. C. Record review of R #45's EHR revealed the record did not contain a valid advanced directive form. The New Mexico medical orders for scope of treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment for 2 (R #9 and R #30) of 5 (R #2, R #4, R #9, R #30, and R #44) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' preferences and care needs not being met. The findings are: R #9 A. Record review of R #9's admission Record revealed R #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: 1. Anxiety (feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), 2. Down Syndrome (a genetic condition caused by the presence of an extra copy of chromosome, affects development, leading to intellectual disability and delays, and certain physical traits), unspecified, 3. Neuromuscular (dysfunction of bladder), unspecified, 4. Repeated falls, 5. Need for assistance with personal care. B. Record review of R #9's electronic health record (EHR) revealed a change of condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 2 (R #3 and R #45) of 3 (R #3, R #14 and R #45) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: R #3 A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed R #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: 1. Pain in right hip, 2. History of falling, 3. Pain in right knee, 4. Muscle weakness (generalized), 5. Difficulty in walking, 6. Lack of coordination. B. On 03/04/25 at 10:06 am, during an observation of R #3's bed, revealed grab bars on each side of the bed C. Record review of R #3's care plan dated 12/18/24, revealed R #3 did not have a care plan for the use of grab bars. D. On 03/04/25 at 10:06 am, during an interview, R #3 stated she was aware she had grab bars on each side of the bed and used the garb bars to help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 2 (R #3 and R #4) of 5 (R #3, R #4, R #21, R #23, and R #36) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated. The findings are: R #3 A. Record review of R #3's admission Record revealed R #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #3's care plan dated 12/18/24, revealed R #3 is at risk for abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage (the loss of blood from the circulatory system) due to anticoagulant (medication used to prevent and treat blood clots in blood vessels and the heart) use related to daily use of Plavix (a medicine used to prevent problems caused by blood clots). C. Record review of R #3's electronic health record (EHR), revealed a physician order for Plavix dated 12/18/24 and was discontinued 01/11/25. D. Record review of R #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and safe environment. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 44 residents living in the facility as listed on the Resident Census provided by the Administrator on 04/24/24. Failure to maintain a safe and clean environment is likely to prevent residents from enjoying everyday outdoor activities. The findings are: A. On 04/24/24 at 1:06 pm, a random observation of the facility's courtyard area revealed - A black office chair on wheels on the sidewalk with bird feces on it. -The sidewalk, which served as the walking path for residents, was 75 percent covered with bird feces, pecans, and pecan shells and made the sidewalk impassable for residents. -The lid on the trash can could not be closed due to the trash can was full with empty cigarette boxes. -The grass was approximately 8 to 10 inches tall in some areas of the courtyard. - Items, such as used napkins, a coffee cup, cigarette box wrappers, and used tissues, were on the ground throughout the courtyard. - A garden hose stretched across the sidewalk,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep all 44 residents residing in the facility free from the potential for accidents or hazards by placing mothballs (a solid chemical in the form of a ball that is normally used to control moths, silverfish, and other pests that like wool and other natural fiber materials) in the courtyard area. This deficient practice could likely result in new or worsening health issues for the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS; a document that contains information on the potential hazards and procedures of working with a chemical) book revealed a naphthalene (the main chemical found in mothballs) sheet which listed short-term or long-term side effects could be caused if inhaled or absorbed through the skin. B. On 04/24/24 at 12:59 pm during an interview with R #2, he stated he saw mothballs in the courtyard area a few weeks back when he would go outside to smoke. R #2 said the mothballs had a strong odor. C. On 04/24/24 at 1:06 pm, during an interview with R #3, he stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed when staff did not discuss plans for removing the cats from the facility grounds prior to placing mothballs in the courtyard area. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents feeling that their feelings and preferences are unimportant. The findings are: A. On 04/24/24 at 1:50 pm during an interview, R #1 stated that she saw mothballs in the courtyard, and she picked some of them up to throw them away. R #1 further stated she was not informed of the facility's attempt to remove the cats prior to the mothballs being placed in the courtyard. R #1 started to cry and said, I was scared for my cats. She stated she did not understand why the facility would want to remove the cats, because she had an agreement with the facility allowing her to keep three cats. R #1 stated she met with the Ombudsman (a person who investigates, reports on, and helps settle complaints for residents in nursing homes) and the previous administrator, and they made an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 48 residents living in the facility as identified by the census provided by the Adminisstrator on 03/11/24. The findings are: A. During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 03/14/24 at 3:42 pm, he confirmed the facility did not designate a registered nurse to serve as DON on a full-time basis. He stated there are three nurses that share the DON duties. The ADON stated, We meet together collaboratively and figure out what needs to be done. The ADON stated the staff normally call him or the Director of Staff Development when they need a DON. The ADON stated he told facility staff to call him, since his home is close to the facility and he can have a quick response time. B. During an interview on 03/14/24 at 4:04 pm, the MDS Director stated three nurses shared the duties of DON. The MDS Director stated the three nurses that share DON duties are herself, the ADON, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store medications and supplies for all 48 residents, as identified by the matrix provided by the Administrator on 03/11/24, when staff failed to ensure the expired supplies and medications were not stored in the supply room. The deficient practice could likely result in all residents receiving medication that are expired or the use of supplies that are expired. The findings are: A. On 03/11/24 at 1:30 pm, an observation of the Medication Supply room revealed: 1. Four and a half boxes of On Guard Blood Collection Set expired on 12/31/22. 2. Benadryl, 25 mg, unopened box expired on 01/24. B. On 03/11/24 at 2:00 pm during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 confirmed the lab kits and medication were expired. C. On 03/14/24 at 9:30 am and 1:45 pm during an interview, the Central Supply Clerk (CSC) confirmed the medication and supplies were expired. The CSC stated it was expected staff would remove expired medications or supplies from the storage unit. The CSC stated the medication and supply storage room were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions when staff failed to: 1. Use proper handling techniques of drinks and bowls while distributing meals to residents in the dining room. 2. Have food at the proper temperature on the food steam table prior to serving. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 48 residents listed on the resident's census list provided by the Administrator on 03/11/24 and could likely lead to food borne illnesses in residents if safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: Findings for proper food handling techniques A. On 03/11/2024 at 5:14 pm during an observation of the dinner meal served in the dining room, receptionist #1 put her thumb in the bowl prior to serving the meal to the resident. B. On 03/11/24 at 5:21 pm during an observation of the dinner meal in the dining room, the Administrator handled a cup of cranberry juice by the rim of the cup while distributing the drink to the resident. C. On 03/14/24 at 3:40 pm during an interview with the Assist Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment that was clean, in good condition, and free from ceiling and wall debris for 1 resident occupied room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) in the facility. Failure to maintain the resident room in a clean and comfortable manner is likely to prevent residents living in a comfortable, homelike environment. The findings are: A. On 03/13/24 at 2:45 pm during an observation in room [ROOM NUMBER], on the wall next to the closet had a scrape which measured 3 inches by 5 inches, a chipped area which measured 1 inch by 1 inch, and exposed drywall. Further observation revealed scuff marks along the wall close to the bathroom, and the ceiling tiles were worn and broken, which created a hole in the ceiling. B. On 03/14/24 at 2:00 pm during an interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), he stated he was in the process of patching and painting the walls, and replacing the ceiling tiles. The MD stated the walls and ceilings in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for 1 (R #28) of 1 (R #28) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving an accurate assessment which could result in residents receiving less than optimal care and treatment. The findings are: A. On 03/11/24 at 2:33 PM, during an interview and observation with R #28, she stated she had glasses. R #28 picked up her glasses from her tray. B. Record review of R #28's medical appointments revealed R #28 had an optometrist (eye doctor) appointment on 08/23/23. Further record review revealed the resident had her vision checked and received a new prescription. C. On 03/13/24 at 11:46 am, during an interview with Social Worker (SW), she stated R #28 received the new glasses a few weeks after appointment on 08/23/23. D. Record review of R #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment, dated 01/27/24, revealed the resident did not use glasses. E. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 (R #7 and R #28) of 2 (R #7 and R #28) residents reviewed for care plans. If the facility is not updating the care plan to reflect the residents' current care areas and treatment, then the facility may not be providing the appropriate care and treatment to meet the needs of the residents. The findings are: R #7 A. On 03/11/24 at 1:55 pm during an interview with R #7, she stated she had several urinary tract infections (UTIs) recently. B. Record review of the care plan for R #7, dated 03/13/24, revealed the following: - The care plan included information regarding the resident's UTIs through 08/04/23, but it did not include information on her last two diagnosed UTIs, dated 10/29/23 and 01/30/24. - R #7 took Macrobid, an antibiotic medication used to treat bladder infections. C. Record review of R #7's physician orders revealed the following: -A discontinued order, dated 08/16/23 for Macrobid Oral Capsule 100 milligrams (mg) (Nitrofurantoin Monohyd Macro). -A current order, dated 02/19/24, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate Baseline Care Plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 3 (R #6, R #38, and R #46) of 4 (R #6, R #35, R # 38, and R #46) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in a decline in the residents' condition due to staff not being aware of the care resident's need. The findings are: R #6 A. Record review of R #6's face sheet revealed she was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #6's Care Plan, dated 12/04/23, revealed staff did not develop a baseline care plan which included the resident's advanced directives within 48 hours of admission. R # 38 C. Record review of R #38's face sheet revealed she was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE]. D. Record review of R #38's Care Plan, dated 07/24/23, revealed staff did not develop a baseline care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents with wounds had the correct documentation and monitoring in accordance with the professional standards of practice for 1 (R #46) of 1 (R #46) residents reviewed for pressure injury (localized damage to the skin/tissue occurs due to pressure). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents having worsened conditions. The finds are: A. Record Review of R #46's skin/wound notes, revealed the following: - On 02/14/24, a wound stage 4 (These sores extend below the subcutaneous fat into your deep tissues, including muscle, tendons, and ligaments) to the coccyx (tailbone) which measured 1.7 centimeters (cm) by 1.1 cm by 3.5 cm, with copious serious drainage (type of fluid that comes out of a wound with tissue damage) noted. The wound had undermining (occurs when significant erosion occurs underneath the outwardly visible wound edges resulting in more extensive damage beneath the skin surface) located at 8 to 3 o'clock (a clock face is used to explain where the undermining is located in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ARTESIA HEALTHCARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/16/2019
GOLDBLATT, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/16/2019
KIGHT, LEAHIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/19/1989

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$312K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 10%Other / private 19%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $312K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$408per resident / day
operating cost
$12,396per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$342per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Mexico
$9,125/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,633/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,950/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325128. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next