Farmington Wellness & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 514 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 213 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 38.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.14 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.19 to 1.03 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 16 residents observed during a random dining observation when the facility did not serve breakfast at the same time to all the residents seated at the same dining table. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling frustrated and disappointed. The findings are:A. On 05/05/26 at 7:16 am, a breakfast observation in the dining room revealed the following:1. Two residents sat at the same table waiting for breakfast to be served:a. The first resident was served their meal at 7:37 am and the second resident watched the first resident ate their meal.b. The second resident was served their meal at 7:53 am. 2. Four residents sat at the same table waiting for breakfast to be served:a. The first resident was served their meal at 7:35 am and the other three residents watched as the first resident ate their meal.b. The second resident was served their meal at 7:39 am and the other two residents watched as the first and second residents ate their meals.c. The third resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create accurate baseline care plans (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 4 (R #7, R #18, R #38, and R #39) of 7 (R #3, R #5, R #6, R #7, R #18, R #38, and R #39) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care upon admission and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition. The findings are: R #18 A. Record review of R #18's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Major depressive disorder (a common and debilitating mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by ensuring medications have an adequate indication of use and ensuring indication of use is based off of the residents' current diagnosis 2 (R #3 and R #18) of 5 (R #3, R#5, R #6, R #18, and R #40) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes. The findings are:R #3 A. Record review of R #3's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Major depressive disorder (a common and debilitating mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest or pleasure in activities),2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar),3. End stage renal disease (ESRD; chronic irreversible kidney failure),4. Morbid obesity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions when staff:1. Prepared food and plated the food without wearing a beard restraint.2. Got ice from the ice machine without wearing a hair restraint.3. Failed to sanitize hands while consistently touching the apron he was wearing while plating the food.4. Plated the food while the paper meal ticket was on the plate.This deficient practice is likely to affect all 32 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 05/04/26 and is likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly. A. On 05/05/26 at 11:08 am, an interview and observation of the kitchen revealed the following:1. The cook was not wearing a beard restraint while cooking and plating food.2. The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed the cook should be wearing a beard restraint.3. The receptionist did not wear a hair restraint and entered the kitchen, opened the ice machine, and filled a container full of ice.4. The cook wore a black apron that had what appeared to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1(R #56) of 2 (R #6 and R #56) when staff failed to: 1. Ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn during wound care.2. Ensure proper hand hygiene practices are followed during wound care. 3. Ensure good infection control practices when staff wiped hands on pants during wound care.If the facility fails to maintain an effective infection control program, then infections could spread to residents throughout the facility, resulting in illness. The findings are: A. On 05/04/26 at 1:16 pm, during an observation of wound care for R # 56:1. Enhance Barrier Precaution sign was noted outside R #56's door with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) hanging on the outside R #56's door.2. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 did not put on required gown prior to dressing change.3. LPN #1 applied sanitizer to hands,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a written Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to 1 (R #20) of 3 (R #20, R #60, and R #61) residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. If residents or their representatives are not provided with the beneficiary notices, then they may not make an informed decision about the services provided to them and could likely result in a decline in health and function. The findings are:A. Record review of R #20's admission Record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE].B. Record review of R #20's End of Part A MDS assessment (an assessment that is required when a resident's Medicare Part A stay ends but they remain in the facility), dated 04/01/26, revealed R #20's end date for his most recent Medicare stay was on 03/23/26.C. On 05/07/26 at 2:40 pm, during an interview, the Administrator (ADM) stated the facility has no evidence of R #20 receiving a NOMNC for the stay that ended on 03/23/26. The ADM stated his expectation was for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to safeguard resident's medical record information for 1 (R #59) of 3 (R #3, R #15, and R #59) residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality of records when the staff left Private Health Information (PHI) in plain view on a computer screen, where unauthorized people had ability to access it. This deficient practice could likely lead to residents feeling embarrassed and ashamed. The findings are:A. On 05/08/26 at 8:13 am, during an observation of the unit medication cart located on the west hall, revealed an unattended computer screen with R #59's name, vital sign [body temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate (rate of breathing), oxygen saturation (amount of oxygen in the blood), and blood pressure] information, and information pertaining to his medications on and facing the hall.B. On 05/08/26 at 8:36 am, during an interview, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, stated the unattended computer screen contained PHI and was left visible on the medication cart. LPN #1 stated she should have locked the computer screen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate, comprehensive care plan within seven days of the completion of the comprehensive assessment for 1 (R #39) of 3 (R #3, R #5, and R #39) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not getting the most appropriate interventions and treatments needed. The findings are:A. Record review of R #39's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Inflammatory disorders of scrotum (conditions that cause swelling, pain, or tenderness to the scrotum due to infection, trauma, or other causes),2. Peripheral vascular disease (PVD; poor circulation),3. Essential hypertension (HTN; high blood pressure),4. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; A digestive disease in which stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining),5. Esophageal obstruction (a blockage in the esophagus that prevents food and liquids from passing normally from the throat to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (R #7) of 3 (R #3, R #15, and R #40) residents reviewed for nutrition and weight management when the facility failed to:1. Assist R #7 with her meal as required.2. Notify the physician of R #7's 12.5% (percent) weight loss.These deficient practices could likely lead to residents suffering from malnutrition which could exacerbate (make worse) other medical conditions. The findings are:A. Record review of R #7's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:1. Fracture of the neck (part of the bone that connects to its shaft or long portion of the bone) of the left femur (thigh bone),2. Essential (primary) hypertension (HTN: high blood pressure),3. Lobar pneumonia (an acute bacterial infection that affects one or more lobes of the lung),4. Age-related osteoporosis (bones become extremely porous and are subject to fracture and slow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to properly store medical supplies and medications when staff failed to ensure:Ensure the medication and supply room was locked and secured,Failed to dispose of expired blood collection tubes.These deficient practices are likely to affect all 32 residents residing in the facility according to the census provided by the Administrator on [DATE] and could result in resident having unauthorized access to medications, supplies and inaccurate lab results by using expired blood collection tubes. The findings are: A. On [DATE] at 12:00 pm, during a random observation of the west hall, revealed the medical storage room was found unlocked.B. On [DATE] at 12:09 pm, during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), she stated the medical room door should be locked. She stated it does not meet her expectations because residents should not have access to anything in the room.C. On [DATE] at 1:50 pm, during an observation of the [NAME] Hall medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $247K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NM