The NM Behavioral Health Institute at Las Vegas

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 107.4 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-08-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 1 (R #79) of 1 (R #79) resident reviewed when the facility staff failed to recognize the difference between horseplay and unwanted touching and harassment between a staff and resident. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #79 increase of isolation and fear of further abuse. The findings are: A. On 08/19/24 at 2:47 pm, during an interview with R #79, she stated. One of the activities persons kicked me in the ass (buttocks). They (staff) thought she was messing around. I did not think she was messing around, she kicked me. That's not funny. They sent her home for a couple of days. I felt bad because she [Activities Assistant (AA) #1] might have a ton of bills to pay or whatever. This happened on August first. I told (name of Registered Nurse #1). After that I kind of just stayed in my room because I didn't want to see her [AA #1] or do activities when she is there. She might do it again. I don't want to cause trouble and they will make me leave here (facility). R #79 further stated that she has…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespread
  Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation confirming 2 (NA #1 and NA #3) of 5 (NA #1, NA #3, NA #4, and NA #5) Nurse Aides had completed a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) or a Competency Evaluation Program (CEP) within four months of being employed at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility. Residents are likely to experience substandard care because of the use of untrained or unqualified aides providing direct care to residents. The findings are: NA #1:A. Record review of NA #1's personnel record revealed the following:1. NA #1's is a current employee with a hire date of [DATE]. NA #1's date of Certified Nurse Aide Training was completed on [DATE].3. NA #1 is not certified and has not taken her certification test as of [DATE].NA #3:B. Record review of NA #3's personnel record revealed the following:1. NA #3's is a current employee with an original hire date of [DATE], rehire on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility's Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON) failed to administer the facility when they knew/should have known and prevented the following deficient practices which occurred in the facility: 1. Not ensuring staff were trained and/or competent before providing care to residents. 2. Allowing untrained and uncertified nurse aides to train other nurse aides. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility according to the daily census provided by the Admissions Coordinator (AC) on [DATE] and could lead to residents not maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and social well-being. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's progress notes for R #12 revealed on [DATE] R #12 had fallen out of mechanical lift sling while being transferred by Nurse Aide (NA) #1 and NA #2. R #12 landed on the floor and was lying on his back, left leg was under bed, right leg propped on bed, and laceration (a wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 1 (R #29) of 3 (R #1, R #29, and R #32) residents reviewed when staff failed to update a care plan after a resident was diagnosed with dementia. This deficient practice could result in residents' care and needs not being addressed. The findings are:A. Record review of R #29's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].B. Record review of R #29's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 10/09/25, revealed the following:1. R #29's most recent admission or reentry to this facility was on 05/13/22.2. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; a screening for cognitive impairment) was not conducted because the resident is rarely or never understood.3. R #29's active diagnoses include a diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (a variety of dementia types that are not caused by Alzheimer's disease which is a type mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the annual performance review for the certified nursing assistants (CNAs) was completed for 1 (CNA #2) of 5 (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, CNA #4, and CNA #5) CNAs reviewed. This could lead to residents not receiving the care and services as described on the care plan. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Personnel Records revealed CNA #2's hire date of 05/18/13. The most recent annual performance evaluation for CNA #2 was dated 10/29/24. B. On 12/12/25 at 11:43 am during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) could not confirm if CNA #2 had an annual performance evaluation completed since 10/29/24 and stated, [Name of city where this facility's Human Resources office is located] keeps up with the evaluations, they are sent to me when it is time for the employees to sign the yearly evaluation. She stated that she does expect the evaluations to be completed every 12 months.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interviews, the facility failed to properly store medications in the facility by making sure:-Medications in bubble wraps are not compromised (not opened or punctured and secured in the original packaging from the pharmacy). -All medical supplies are not expired.These deficient practices are likely to result in expired medications and medical supplies being used in resident care resulting in residents being at risk of possible infections and not receiving the full benefits of medication.The findings are:A. On 12/10/25 at 9:07 am during an observation of the medication cart, in the locked unit, revealed the following:-A medication bubble card labeled with the name of R #70 and containing Clonazepam (a prescribed medication used to manage anxiety) 1 mg (milligrams). The bubble pack labeled number 1 had a small green pill in the bubble. The bubble had been opened.- A 25g (gauge refers to the size of the hole in a needle) needle with an expiration date of 09/10/25.B. On 12/10/25 at 9:07 am, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing prior to the transfer or discharge for 1 (R #104) of 3 (R #29, R #104, and R #106) residents reviewed for transfers and discharges. This deficient practice could lead to residents' representatives being unaware of the residents' health status. The findings are:A. Record review of R #104's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 09/04/25, revealed the following: 1. R #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:- Epilepsy (a seizure disorder),- Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), - Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV; a virus that attacks the body's immune system),- Personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI; injury to the brain caused by an outside force, usually…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) assessment for 2 (R #19 and R #32) of 4 (R #8, R #15, R #19, and R #32) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' preferences and care needs not being met. The findings are:R #19 A. Record review of R #19's admission Record revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration), unspecified, 2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a condition that results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), 3. Essential (primary) hypertension (HTN; high blood pressure). B. Record review of R #19's progress notes revealed the following: 1. On 09/05/25 at 7:45 am, facility staff found R #19 asleep in a chair in the activity room. When staff woke R #19 up and assisted her to get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 2 (R #1 and R #19) of 3 (R #1, R #19, and R #29) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: 1. Chronic viral hepatitis C (inflammation of the liver), 2. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; lung disease), 3. Dependence on supplemental oxygen, 4. Personal history of traumatic brain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 (R #32) of 1 (R #32) resident reviewed who was identified as having a hearing impairment and utilizing a hearing aid. This deficient practice could likely result in staff being unaware of the current and actual needs of the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #32's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].B. Record review of R #32's health record revealed R #32 had an appointment for hearing aid fitting dated 06/29/23.C. Record review of R #32's care plan dated 11/29/25 revealed the care plan did not contain any information on R #32's hearing aid use.D. Record review of R #32's annual MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the following:-Section B0200: Moderate difficulty (hearing), speaker has to increase volume and speak distinctly.-Section B0300: No hearing aid or other hearing appliance used.E. On 12/08/25 at 10:11 am during an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care that meets professional standards for 1 (R #11) of 1 (R #11) resident when the staff failed to follow physician order for derma saver palm pillow (a pillow to keep fingernails from digging into palms) to R #11's right hand. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not maintaining their optimal health as planned by their medical provider. The findings are: A. Record review of R #11's face sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, but not limited to:-Cerebrovascular accident (or CVA, is a medical term that refers to types of strokes), TIA (A transient ischemic attack is a short period of symptoms similar to those of a stroke), or stroke (can occur when blood flow to the brain is blocked or there is sudden bleeding in the brain).-Quadriplegia (a symptom of paralysis that affects all a person's limbs and body from the neck down).B. Record review of the care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,353 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $18,353 — penalty dated 2024-08-23
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-25 for 9 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NM