The Neighborhood in Rio Rancho
900 Loma Colorado Blvd NE, Rio Rancho, NM 87124 · Non profit - Corporation · 48 certified beds · (505) 994-2296 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-17)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (82%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 28.2% | 11.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 0.9% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.0% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.4% | 11.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.0% | 14.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.4% | 98.7% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.0% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.5% | 14.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.2% | 86.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.1% | 22.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.7% | 15.7% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.5%CMS range 47.7–70.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 5.6–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 3.9–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 38.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.01 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on video observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an employee to resident abuse for 1 (R #9) of 3 (R #9, #10 and #11) residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice likely resulted in psychosocial harm based upon the reasonable person concept to the resident related to fear of physical harm and mistrust of the caretaker she was dependent on for all of her care. The findings are: Past Non-ComplianceCompliance Date: 11/18/25 A. Record review of R #9's face sheet revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: Cerebral infraction due to embolism (an area of dead tissue in the brain resulting from a blockage or narrowing in the arteries supplying blood and oxygen to the brain) or (stroke),Type II diabetes mellitus (DM2 is a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin),Vascular Dementia (a blockage of the blood supply to the brain. It is manifested with decline of memory and cognitive functions),Parkinson's (a disorder of the central…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (R #1) of 4 (R #1, #2, #3, and #4) residents were free from physical and mental abuse, when: The facility failed to ensure a safe environment by not preventing a physical and verbal altercation between two staff members that occurred on the bed in R #1's room, resulting in R #1 witnessing the altercation and becoming fearful. If the facility fails to provide an environment free from abuse, then residents are at risk for physical injury and psychological harm. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed an admission date of 01/28/26 and included the following diagnoses: Displaced fracture of greater trochanter of right femur (a serious injury where the bone connecting the hip joint to the thigh bone is broken, causing the two pieces to be misaligned). Unspecified fall. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; lung disease). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2; a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin).Hypertension (HTN; high blood pressure). Pulmonary embolism with acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: - Complete necessary assessments, -Open a risk management report, -Create interventions for a fall, and-Use two staff when using the Hoyer lift (equipment used to move residents who have limited mobility). for 2 (R #1 and R #9) of 2 (R #1 and R #9) residents reviewed for falls. Failure to provide fall prevention interventions and facility staff using the Hoyer lift with only one person are likely to cause accidents, injuring the resident. The findings are: Findings for Fall Assessment R #1: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #1 indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), -Dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease), -Frontal lobe and executive function deficit from cerebral infarction (responsible for higher cognitive functions including language, memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to capture an accurate and consistent weight for 1 (R #1) of (R #1) residents reviewed for weight loss. This deficient practice potentially created a delay in R #1 receiving a nutritional supplement due to missing and inaccurate weights, which likely contributed to weight loss. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she had dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease), frontal lobe and executive function deficit from cerebral infarction (is responsible for higher cognitive functions including language, memory, problem solving, and judgment), hypertension (high blood pressure), cardiac pacemaker ) small, battery-operated device that helps regulate the heart's rhythm by sending electrical impulses to stimulate heartbeats). R #1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have accurate and complete medical records for 2 (R #1 and R #11) of 3 (R #1 and R #9 and R #11) residents reviewed for showers, falls, and nutrition. This deficient practice could likely cause: - confusion on the resident's status if the history and physical was not accurately documented, -residents to go without fall interventions in place because there was no documentation of the fall, -residents could potentially suffer weight loss without appropriate interventions due to inaccurate meal intake documentation. The findings are: Inaccurate description on History and Physical: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet indicated R #1 was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: -Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), -Dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease), -Frontal lobe and executive function deficit from cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the guardian of a change in condition for 1 (R #3) of 2 (R #3 and R #9) residents reviewed for weight loss. This deficient practice is likely to cause residents to go without needed interventions, if the guardian of the resident is unaware of the change in condition. The findings are: A. Record review of R #3's face sheet revealed she was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Osteoarthritis (chronic degeneration of the joint cartilage), -Bi-polar (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), -Type II diabetes (a disease in which the body cannot make or properly use insulin), - Atherosclerosis of native arteries (hardening of your arteries from plaque building up gradually inside them, plaque buildup limits blood flow causing complications like a heart attack or stroke), - Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:- Staff entering the second-floor kitchen during meal service wore required hair restraints, which had the potential to affect 19 out of 19 residents on the second floor.This deficient practice increased the risk of food contamination which could lead to foodborne illness.The findings are: A. Record review of Facility Uniform Dining Services Policy, last revised November 2024, revealed hair must be pulled up and contained in a hair net, visor, and/or cap if it is long. B. On 08/11/2025 at 12:24 PM, observation revealed an Activities Staff member entered the kitchen without a hairnet to grab a wash rag. The staff member exited kitchen to clean a table and then re-entered kitchen without hairnet at 12:25pm to return the wash rag. Further observation revealed the Activities Staff member walked past the food that staff was serving to the residents. C. On 08/13/2025 at 10:00 AM, during an interview, the Activities staff member stated she did not wear a hairnet either time she entered the kitchen.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care for (R #19 and #46) of 2 (R #19 and #46) residents when staff failed to:- Obtain and enter wound care orders for the resident's wounds.- Put away a resident's fall mat after the resident got out of bed. If the facility fails to obtain and enter orders for wound care, then residents may not receive the care needed to improve their wounds. If staff fail to put away a resident's fall mat after they get out of bed, then the resident may not be able to access their bed or other areas of their room. The findings are: R #46A. Record review of R #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 08/14/25, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses:- Major joint replacement,-Fracture of the right femur (long bone that connects the hip to the knee),-Type II diabetes (DM2; a disease in which the body cannot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete when staff failed to document resident weights into the residents' medical record for 2 (R #45 and #46) of 2 (R #45 and #46) residents. If staff do not document necessary resident information into the medical records, then the resident may not receive the services needed to maintain or achieve optimum health. The findings are: R #45A. Record review of R #45's face sheet revealed an admission date of 08/07/25 with the following diagnoses:- Fracture (break) of the left lower leg,-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; lung disease),- Hypertension (high blood pressure).B. Record review of R #45's physician orders, dated 08/08/25, indicated an order for daily weights, starting on admission for 3 days and then weekly for 4 weeks. C. Record review of R #45's weights revealed staff documented one weight for R #45 on 08/10/25. R #46D. Record review of R #46's face sheet revealed an admission date of 08/08/25 with the following diagnoses:-Fracture of the right femur (break in the long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete an annual performance/competency review for 1 (Certified Nurse Assistants - CNA #5) of 5 (CNAs #2, #3, #4, #5 and #10) CNAs. If staff do not receive 12 performance/competency reviews annually, then they may not maintain the competencies necessary to perform daily tasks of providing care and services to meet the needs of all residents. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's staffing competencies from August 2024 to August 2025 revealed the facility did not perform staffing competencies on a yearly basis for CNA #5. The facility conducted staffing competency on hire only. B. On 08/11/25 at 10:30 am, during an interview, the Administrator stated they did not currently have a Nurse Educator, and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was in charge of the CNA competencies. C. On 08/13/25 11:30 am, during an interview, CNA #5 stated she did not have competencies completed, and she could not remember doing them when she was hired. D. On 08/14/25 at 12:20 pm, during an interview, the Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to schedule an annual appointment for dental services for one (R #6) of one (R #6) residents. This deficient practice could likely result in an increased risk of developing serious dental issues like tooth loss and infection, which can require extensive treatment. The findings are:A. Record review of the facility's Dental Services & Oral Screening Policy, dated February 2023, revealed the following:- Each resident will be offered the opportunity to receive an annual oral screening by the contracted facility dentist.- Residents will be assisted, when necessary or if requested, in making routine and annual appointments and with arranging transportation to and from dental location.- The resident will have the right to select the dental care provider of their choice. The facility will inform the resident as to how the dental care provider can be contacted.- Facility staff will track when resident annual exam is due and notify family and/or the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident. If the facility is not ensuring the call light is within residents' reach, then residents may be unable to request immediate assistance when needed.The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Call Lights Policy, dated October 2024, revealed staff were instructed to place the call light within easy reach of the resident while in bed or a chair. B. On 08/11/25 at 11:27 am, observation revealed R #4's call light hung out of R #4's reach while the resident lay in bed watching TV. C. On 08/13/25 at 9:39 am, during an interview, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 stated call lights should be within residents' reach. She stated R #4 needed the call light to request assistance when needed. D. On 08/13/25 at 11:50 am, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated he expected all staff to check R #4's call light when they went into the resident's room. The DON stated if a call light hung off R #4's bed, then staff should pick…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent to provide nursing and related services. This deficient practice could affect all 53 residents in the facility (residents were identified by Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on [DATE]). This deficient practice could likely result in CNA's (Certified Nurse Assistant) and RN's (registered nurses) working with residents without adequate knowledge to do so; likely resulting in injury or inappropriate care being provided to the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility's Agency Use Policy (policy and procedures for using nursing staff who are contracted through a third-party agency) revised on 02/2023, revealed the facility will ask the agency to fax to the facility the completed LN (Licensed Nurse) competency evaluation on each individual. In addition, the verification of licensure and/or certification and background check results for all agency staff must be given/faxed to the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0571 — patternLimit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that they did not impose a charge against the personal funds for items or services already being billed for (R #1 and R #3) of 3 (R #1, R #3 and R #4) residents reviewed when staff billed the residents instead of billing the hospice agency for supplies and medications. This deficient practice is likely to cause undue financial strain for the residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's medical orders revealed an order dated 10/08/23 to admit R #1 to hospice effective 10/08/23. C. Record review of R #1's billing statements from the facility revealed the following: 1. A charge dated 06/01/24 for an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that delivers concentrated oxygen to a person via cannula (a medical device/plastic tube that delivers oxygen to a person through their nostrils) for $75.00, 2. A charge dated 07/01/24 for an oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney (POA; legal authorization for a designated person to make decisions about another person's property, finances, and/or medical care) for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #5) residents when injuries or incidents occurred. If the facility is not notifying the resident's POA when the resident has an injuries or incident occur, then the POA is not able to make decisions related to treatment and advocate for the resident's care. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's admission Record revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: 1. Chronic heart failure, 2. Anxiety (feelings of fear or apprehension) disorder due to known physiological condition, 3. Insomnia (disorder where a person has persistent difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or quality of sleep), unspecified, 4. Adjustment disorder (emotional or behavioral reaction to a stressful event or change in a person's lift) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 3 (R #2, R #3 and R #5 ) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #3, and R #5) residents reviewed when staff failed to update care plans to include hospice care or fall protocol . This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed. The findings are: R #2 A. Record review of R #2's admission record revealed R #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] after a hospital stay with the following diagnoses: 1. Hemiplegia (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and Hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following cerbral (brain) infarction (condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain tissue damage) affecting left non-dominant side. 2. Atherosclerotic heart disease (condition where the coronary arteries, which supply blood to the heart, become narrowed or blocked due to the buildup of plaque…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure hospice services met professional standards for 2 (R #3 and R #5) of 3 (R #1, R #3, and R #5) residents reviewed for hospice services by: 1. Not having an order for hospice services for R #5 2. Not having a qualifying diagnosis for R #3. 3. Not having hospice plans of care for R #3 and R #5. 4. Not communicating with hospice regarding a change in condition for R #3. These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident not receiving the services that she needs. The findings are: R #3 A. Record review of R #3's admission record revealed R #3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: 1. Atherosclerotic heart disease (condition where the coronary arteries, which supply blood to the heart, become narrowed or blocked due to the buildup of plaque [fatty deposits]). 2. Chronic atrial fibrillation (heart rhythm disorder where the upper chambers of the heartbeat irregularly and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the assessment was accurate for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents' preferences and care needs not being met accurately. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's admission record revealed R #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after a hospital stay with the following diagnoses: 1. Hemiplegia (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and Hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following cerbral (brain) infarction (condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain tissue damage) affecting left non-dominant side. 2. Atherosclerotic heart disease (a condition where the coronary arteries, which supply blood to the heart, become narrowed or blocked due to the buildup of plaque [fatty deposits]). 3. Altered mental status, unspecified. 4. Strange and inexplicable behavior. 5.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed for falls when the facility failed to ensure proper use of mechanical lift (a device designed to help staff move a resident from one place to another within a room or from one position to another) which resulted in R #1 falling and sustaining injuries that required treatment at the hospital. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: 1. Acute kidney failure, 2. Inclusion body myositis (a progressive muscle disease that causes muscle inflammation, weakness, and atrophy), 3. Permanent atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat despite previous attempts to restore normal heart rhythm), 4. Muscle weakness, generalized. 5. Other reduced mobility. B. Record review of R #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 10/18/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure patient care equipment was in safe operating condition for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents reviewed. This deficient practice likely resulted in a Hoyer sling (a specialized fabric that connects onto the mechanical lift and supports a person's weight when transferring from one position to another using a mechanical lift) breaking and causing R #1 to fall and sustain injuries. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's face sheet revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: 1. Acute kidney failure, 2. Inclusion body myositis (a progressive muscle disease that causes muscle inflammation, weakness, and atrophy), 3. Permanent atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat despite previous attempts to restore normal heart rhythm), 4. Muscle weakness, generalized. 5. Other reduced mobility. B. Record review of R #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards when staff stored expired food in the facility's walk-in refrigerator. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact all 47 residents listed on the census provided by the Director of Nursing on 05/20/24. If the facility fails to adhere to safe food storage practices, residents could likely to be exposed to foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). The findings are: A. On 05/20/24 at 9:52 AM during an observation of the facility's walk-in refrigerator, three packages of tofu had an expiration date of 05/18/24. B. On 05/20/24 at 9:52 AM during an interview, the facility's chef stated staff should throw out the expired tofu and not store it in the walk-in refrigerator. C. On 05/23/24 at 1:02 PM during an interview, the facility's Director of Dining Services stated staff used the food stored in the walk-in refrigerator for the facility's residents, and the kitchen staff should check the refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality of care when they did not provide wound care for 1 (R #17) of 1 (R #17) residents review for skin conditions. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident not receiving appropriate and timely wound care resulting in discomfort and infection. The findings are: Findings for R #17 A. Record review of R # 17's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to: - Malignant melanoma (skin cancer) of skin of breast, - History of unspecified open wound of right front wall of thorax (area of the body situated between the neck and the stomach) without penetration into thoracic cavity, - Surgical removal of right breast and nipple. B. Review of R #17's Medication Administration Record (MAR), revealed the following: 1. Wound Care for wound on right breast: a. Cleanse with cleaning agent. b. Pat Dry. c. Apply antibiotic ointment. d. RN will apply dry dressing, cover with 4 by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the medication carts did not contain loose medications. 2. Ensure expired supplies were not kept with unexpired supplies in the medication room. 3. Fentanyl patches were destroyed immediately after removal and not stored in the medication cart. These deficient practices are likely to result in all 31 residents of the 200 and 300 halls, as identified on the census list provided by the facility Administrator on [DATE], receiving expired medication, having expired medical supplies used in their treatments, and in the mishandling or misuse of narcotic drugs. The findings are: Findings for loose medications found in medication carts. A. On [DATE] am at 9:10 am, during observation of the 300 hall medication cart, one white, circular tablet was loose under the medication cards (vertical cardboard and foil cards pre-filled with prescription medications for easy storage and dispensing) in the drawer of the cart. B. On [DATE] at 9:26 am, during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated for 1 (R #28) of 1 (R #28) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not understanding and implementing the most appropriate interventions and treatments for the resident. The findings are: A. Record review of R #28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R #28 was admitted to hospice services on 01/17/24 and received these services. B. Record review of R #28's care plan, reviewed on 04/24/24, revealed the care plan did not contain information about hospice services. C. On 05/22/24 at 2:34 PM during an interview, the facility's Social Services Director (SSD) stated R #28's care plan did not include hospice services, and staff should have updated the resident's care plan to include hospice services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Repeat deficiency. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality when staff failed to notify the Pharmacist and the Director of Nursing (DON) of a morphine spill and a missing fentanyl patch for 2 (R #1 and #13) of 2 (R #1 and #13) residents reviewed for medications. This deficient practice could cause a resident to not receive the pain medication that was prescribed and could also cause confusion when reconciling medications. The findings are: R #1 A. Record review of the physician orders for R #1 indicated an order for a fentanyl patch, 25 micrograms (mcg), every 72 hour; amount: one patch transdermal (absorbed through skin into bloodstream). Special Instructions: Apply transdermal patch onto lower back once every 72 hours. Start date 09/13/23. B. Record review of R #1's nursing progress notes, dated 01/21/24, indicated the writer applied a new fentanyl patch to the resident's right shoulder with protective cover and dated it. The writer and the other Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on staff did not find the old patch. C. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for 1 (R #30) of 1 (R #30) resident reviewed for respiratory care by not changing the oxygen tubing. This deficient practice could likely lead to respiratory infections by the oxygen tubing becoming clogged due to condensation (a process where water vapor becomes liquid) or becoming dirty, leading to the reduced oxygen flow. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet indicated R #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident had a diagnosis of pneumonia on 02/22/24 and on 03/06/24. B. Record review of the physician orders for R #30, dated 06/07/23, revealed an order for oxygen, 1 to 4 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (thin tube that supplies oxygen through your nose), as needed (PRN) to maintain oxygen saturation (the amount of oxygen in the blood) above 90 percent (%). Further review revealed the orders did not indicate how often staff should change the resident's oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the power of attorney (POA; a designation given to an agent to handle financial or medical acts on someone else's behalf) and the Nurse Practitioner (NP) of a fall for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice could likely cause a breakdown in resident care if the NP is not notified of all falls and the family is left feeling uninformed and frustrated about their loved ones care. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #1 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review revealed the resident's POA was Family Member #3. B. Record review of the nursing progress note for R #1, dated 11/07/23 at 3:53 pm, revealed the nurse reported R #1 fell in the dining room while playing Bingo. The nurse stated she checked R #1. R #1 did not hit his head and did not complain of any pain. The resident's range of motion (the extent or limit to which a apart of the body can be moved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice could likely cause staff to administer a medication to a resident when the medication is not necessary. The findings are: A. Record review of R #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 03/01/2024, revealed the following: - The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; - The resident was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (a neurodegenerative disorder that affects the brain and worsens over time as cells in the brain that produce dopamine stop working or die). B. Record review of R #2's Hospice admission Orders, dated 03/23/24, revealed an order for morphine sulfate, 20 milligrams (mg)/millilters (ml), 0.25 ml by mouth every four hours as needed for pain or shortness of breath. C. Record review of R #2's medical record revealed a physician order,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide behavioral health treatment for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for insomnia. This deficient practice could likely cause a resident to have increased agitation, restlessness, and falls. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #1 revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia (a condition where the patient experiences the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) with agitation and schizophrenia (thoughts or experiences that seem out of touch with reality, disorganized speech or behavior, and decreased participation in daily activities). Further review revealed R #1 discharged the facility on 11/21/23. B. Record review of the nursing progress notes for R #1 revealed the following: 1. On 10/30/23, staff documented staff monitored the resident frequently throughout the night. The resident slept for few hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for the use of psychotropic medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents continuing to exhibiting behaviors of agitation that are not remedied. The findings are: A. Record review of the face sheet for R #1 revealed R #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia (a condition where the patient experiences the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) with agitation and schizophrenia (thoughts or experiences that seem out of touch with reality, disorganized speech or behavior, and decreased participation in daily activities). Further review revealed R #1 discharged the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #1's nursing progress notes revealed the following: 1. On [DATE], staff documented staff monitored the resident frequently throughout the night. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident furnature was in operable working condition when they continued to use a broken recliner for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, 2, 3) residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice could likely result in an injury if the reclining chairs are not in good operable condition. The findings are: A. On 03/29/24 at 11:32 am, during an observation of the recliners near the nurse's station, one recliner was broken. The foot rest was not attached to the mechanism that extended to raise and support the feet. B. On 03/29/24 at 11:35 am and 04/02/24 at 11:30 am, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there were recliners in the memory care unit for the residents to use. She said the foot rest on one of the recliners did not lock when in the elevated position, and the foot rest would fall from the elevated position. The DON stated staff would place a foot stool under the foot rest so it would stay in the elevated position while a resident sat in the chair. The DON confirmed the broken recliner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store foods under sanitary conditions by not: 1. Ensuring food items in the refrigerator and freezer were properly labeled and dated. 2. Ensuring food items in the refrigerator are properly covered. 3. Ensuring vent over mixing machine was free of debris and debris was not falling on items below These deficient practices are likely to affect all 55 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 01/30/23, and are likely to lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to. The findings are: A. On 01/30/23 at 9:50 am during the initial tour of facility kitchen the following was observed in freezers and kitchen refrigerators: 1. 1 box of Patuxent Farms 10.5 pounds chicken left open to air 2. 1 plastic storage bag of sausages not labeled or dated 3. 1 box [NAME] Spunkmeyer Sugar Frozen Cookie Dough 20 pounds left open to air 4. 2- 6 count hoagie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 2 (R #'s 48 and 53) of 2 (R #48 and 53) resident's New Mexico Medical Orders For Scope of Treatment (MOST) reviewed was completed to reflect medical interventions (Advanced Directives-legal documents that allow you to spell out your decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time). This deficient practice is likely to affect residents' fulfillment of their end-of-life medical care choices and could result in unnecessary suffering for the resident. The findings are: Findings for R #48: A. Record review of R #48's face sheet revealed R #48 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of the New Mexico Medical Orders For Scope of Treatment (MOST) form in R #48's electronic medical chart was signed by Physician on 09/28/22, however, no information was identified in the following sections: Medical interventions and Artificially Administered Hydration/Nutrition. Findings for R #53: C. Record review of R #53's face sheet revealed R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-03 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that 2 of (R #32 and 37), of 2 (R #32 and 37) resident's reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate and reflected the resident's status. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and treatment they need. The findings are: Findings for R#32 A. Review of record of R #32's MDS revealed a discharge MDS assessment was not completed and sent out timely. R #32 expired on [DATE]. Last MDS (quarterly) completed was on [DATE]. Findings for R# 37 B. Review of record of R #37's MDS revealed a discharge MDS assessment was not completed and sent out timely. R #37 was discharged to Independent Living Facility on [DATE]. Last MDS completed was an admission MDS on [DATE] C. On [DATE] at 9:18 AM during an interview with MDS Coordinator/Case Manager she confirmed there was no discharge MDS assessment completed for R #32 or R #37 sent out and there should have been.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances for 1( R #5) of 1(R #5) resident reviewed. This deficient practice is likely to result in the issue continuing and resident's rights not being honored. The findings are: A. On 01/31/23 at 12:02 PM during an interview with R #5, R #5 stated. Three weeks ago my phone cord and the adapter went missing and I told the nurses. It's bright colors and they said they were looking for it. R #5 was asked if they had returned her phone cord or adapter. She stated she had not heard anything more about it and it was not replaced. B. On 02/03/23 at 11:58 AM during an interview with the SSD (Social Services Director), he stated. They (staff, residents) fill out a grievance usually, sometimes families don't do that. We will go buy it or reimburse the family. I don't why the families don't do the grievance. She chose to have it (the price of the phone charger) taken out of her bill. SSD further stated, there should have been a grievance or nursing note filled out and there wasn't one.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's belongs will be safeguarded from loss for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) resident reviewed for personal property when they failed to follow up on an missing item that had been reported to staff. This deficient practice is likely to result in unaccounted property with no resolve for the resident and family regarding the loss resulting in frustration and not feeling heard. The findings are: A. On 01/31/23 at 12:02 PM during an interview with R #5, R #5 stated. Three weeks ago my phone cord and the adapter went missing and I told the nurses. It's bright colors and they said they were looking for it. R #5 was asked if they had returned her phone cord or adapter. She stated she had not heard anything more about it and it was not replaced. B. On 02/02/23 at 4:50 PM during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, she stated. I heard that she (R #5) lost her phone charger. It was a nice long one. We turned it (the issue of the missing phone cord) into Nurse [name of RN (Registered Nurse) #1], and they give it to [name of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report and provide follow up report within 5 working days from the date of the incidents to the State Survey Agency, for 1 (R's #160) of 1 (R's #160) residents reviewed for incidents. If the facility fails to report incidents to the State Agency, then the State Agency will be unable to assure residents a safe and hazard free environment. A. On 02/01/23 at 4:05 PM during an interview with R #160's granddaughter she stated, that one of the Certified Nurse Aides provided a shower for her grandmother and wrapped a wound on her leg in toilet paper and paper towels and it had stuck to the wound. She (R #160) had to be taken to [name of local hospital] emergency room to get the toilet paper out and get the wound cleaned. B. Record review of [name of local hospital notes] dated 03/21/22 revealed: Open wound of left lower extremity, .Wounds do not appear acutely infected. Distalmost (furthest from the origin) wound appears to have suffered from some minor trauma and has some minor ecchymosis (discoloration of the skin resulting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the enteral tube feeding [a device utilized to provide liquid nutrition and medications, via a tube into the stomach or intestine] nutritional supplement bottle for 1 (R #214) of 1 (R #214) resident reviewed, was labeled and dated to reflect when the feeding was started. The findings are: A. Record review of R #214's care plan dated 01/27/23 revealed: Problem: 1. Clear liquid diet and Tube feeding due to Cancer of tongue with graft. 2. Hospital discharge diagnosis of severe malnutrition. 3. Skin Alteration with increased Nutrient Needs related to Peptic Ulcer (lesion in the lining of the digestive tract) on admit to follow. a. Stable weight b. Tolerance of TF (total fat) and wound healing. c. Tolerance of PO (by mouth) intake with progression as able per Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) Progress to PO intake as SLP determines. Approach: 1. Provide TF per order and suggest increase to 35 milliliters (unit of measurement) per hour of TF 1.5 kilocalories/milliliters and continue same Fluid flush of 150…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-11-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTINEZ, JENNIFER | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 10/27/2022 |
| BROECKER, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/16/2020 |
| TRIGG, MARIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/21/2022 |
| JULIAN, ANGELES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/02/2020 |
| HAVERLAND CARTER LIFESTYLE GROUP OPERATING,LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/16/2015 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $37K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 325130. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.