Fort Bayard Medical Center
41 Fort Bayard Road, Santa Clara, NM 88026 · Government - State · 200 certified beds · (575) 537-8604 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $83,501 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.4% | 11.3% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 10.6% | 0.9% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.7% | 2.0% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.5% | 11.7% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.5% | 14.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 98.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.2% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.5% | 14.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.2% | 86.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 11.2% | 22.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.9% | 15.7% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 1.65 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.13 | 2.81 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 39% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.9%CMS range 42.5–63.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 6.6–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.5–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 127.0 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 73 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.39 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.83 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.38 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quality of care for 1 (R #4) of 3 (R #3, R #4, and R #5) residents reviewed for diabetes (chronic condition that happens from persistently high blood sugar levels) when staff did not administer diabetic medications to R #4 upon admission to the facility and did not monitor the resident's blood glucose when exhibiting symptoms of high blood sugar. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #4 being admitted to the hospital for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA; a serious complication of diabetes that can be life-threatening. Occurs when blood sugar is very high, and ketones [acids your body makes when it's using fat instead of sugar for energy] build up in the body, causing symptoms of increased thirst, frequent urination, weakness and fatigue) and could likely result in other diabetic residents not starting their diabetes medications leading to complications, DKA, and potentially death. The findings are: A. Record review of R #4's admission record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2024-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from accidents for 1 (R #21) of 3 (R #21, R #22, & R #23) residents reviewed for falls, when staff failed to: 1. Identify the cause of R #21's onset of fatigue and weakness. 2. Evaluate R #21's ability to safely use a wheelchair independently. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #21 falling multiple times and sustaining an intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding in the skull or brain tissue). The findings are: A. Record review of R #21's face sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #21's care plan, dated 12/26/23, revealed the following: 1. R #21 had a functional abilities deficit (decreased capability to engage in one's surroundings and carry out desired physical and mental activities). a. R #21 was independent but may require supervision with ambulation (ability to walk without the need for any assistance). She may require greater assistance at times. b. R #21 may use a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 (R #13) of 1 (R #13) resident reviewed for neglect when staff failed to stay with the resident until she felt comfortable. This deficient practice could likely create a feeling of frustration, anxiety, and disappointment. The findings are:A. Record review of the Facility's Initial Incident Report dated 03/11/26, revealed R #13 needed her portable oxygen tank to be refilled. CNA #8 filled R #13's oxygen tank and returned it to R #13. R #13 stated that the oxygen was not working properly. R #13 stated that CNA #8 left without ensuring that the oxygen was working properly. B. Record review of R #13's admission record, no date, revealed R #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. C. Record review of R #13's nursing progress notes, dated 04/05/26, revealed R #13 passed away on 04/05/26. D. On 04/08/26 at 11:39 AM, during an interview, CNA #8 stated R #13 had pushed her call light because she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-17 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit direct care staffing information to the federal agency overseeing certification for long term care facilities for February 10, 2025, through February 22, 2025. This has the potential to affect all 117 residents in the facility, (residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 09/15/25). This deficient practice could likely result in inaccurate direct care staffing information for residents/facility. The findings are: A. Record review of Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (report from the data base of the federal agency overseeing certification for long term care facilities) dated February 10, 2025, through February 22, 2025, revealed there was no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours, or 24 hour licensed nurse coverage. B. On 09/19/2025 at 10:41 AM, during an interview, the Staffing Scheduler (SS) stated there was RN coverage and 24 hour licensed nursing coverage. SS stated he did not know why the PBJ did not document the correct staffing. C. On 09/25/25 at 11:16 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 3 (R #1, R #21, and R #87) of 5 (R #1, R #21, R #35, R #51 and R #87) residents sampled for dignity, when the staff failed to: 1. Refer to residents in a dignified manner to R #1 and R #87. 2. Maintain a calm and kind tone, avoid interrupting, or condescension for R #1, R #21, and R #87. These deficient practices could likely to result in residents feeling embarrassed, angry, and that their feelings and preferences are unimportant to the facility staff. The findings are:Dignified manner R #1 A. On 09/17/25 at 1:56 PM, during an interview, R #1 stated staff is rude and are smart asses. R #1 said staff don't address them correctly. R #1 stated staff will say, Hey you, [last name]. R #1 stated he has asked to be called Mr. [last name], and they do not do it. R #1 said he has addressed in resident council and has told staff on his unit that staff are not addressing him the way he wants to be addressed. R #87 B. On 09/17/23 at 1:58 PM, during an interview, R #87 said staff do not address…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — patternProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from involuntary seclusion (separation of a resident from other residents) for 1 (R #101) of 1 (R #101) resident sampled for elopement (an act or instance of leaving a safe area or safe premises, done by a person with a mental disorder or cognitive impairment) risk, when staff failed to implement and document the following: 1. The clinical criteria (rules or standards on which a decision or judgment is made to determine medical necessity) met for placement of R #101 in the secured/locked area by the R #101's physician along with information provided by members of the interdisciplinary team (IDT team members from different disciplines working collaboratively, with a common purpose, to set goals, make decisions and share resources and responsibilities). 2. Whether placement in the secured/locked area was the least restrictive approach that was reasonable to protect R #101 and assure her health and safety. 3. The IDT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) was accurate for 3 (R #4, R #59, and R #101) of 4 (R #4, R #21, R #59, and R #101) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). This deficient practice could likely result in the facility not having an accurate assessment of the residents' needs. The findings are: R #4 A. Record review of R #4's admission documents, no date, revealed R#4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #4's physician's order dated 06/18/25 and discontinued on 09/11/25, revealed an order to wrap R #4's left ankle with gauze and bandages. C. Record review of R #4's wound care measurement dated 08/12/25, revealed R #4 had a stage three (3) pressure ulcer (a full-thickness skin loss that extends into the subcutaneous tissue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revisions occurred for 7 (R #2, R #5, R #7, R #13, R #17, R #21, and R #59) of 21 (R #2, R #3, R #4, R #5 R #7, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #17, R #21, R #22, R #33, R #49, R #59, R #71, R #74, R #75, R #87, R #101, R #104, and R #123) residents when the staff failed to revise the care plan with the most current resident information. This deficient practice could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: R #2 A. On 09/16/25 at 11:38 AM, during an interview, R #2 stated she has a catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) because she can't go to the bathroom on her own. B. Record review of R #2's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assist a resident in gaining access to vision services when staff failed to make appointments and arrange for transportation to the appointment for 1 (R #59) of 4 (R #2, R #9, R #59 and R #112) residents reviewed for vision and hearing. This deficient practice could likely result in residents losing some independence if they cannot see adequately or lead to an increase in the risk of missing early signs of serious eye diseases which could compromise their quality of life. The findings are: A. On 09/16/25 at 12:04 PM, during an interview, R #59 said he needed new bifocals (eyeglasses with two distinct optical powers correcting vision at both long and short distances) because he was having difficulty reading some materials. B. Record review of R #59's Progress notes revealed the following: 1. Clinical admission note dated 01/24/25: resident wears glasses. 2. Encounter note dated 03/28/25: R #59 would like to be seen by an ophthalmologist (branch of medicine that deals with the diagnosis, treatment, and surgery of eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for Foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for 1 (R #2) of 4 (R #2, R #3, R #11 and R #123) residents reviewed for catheter use when staff failed the to do the following: 1. Ensure R #2 has a clinical condition that demonstrates catheterization (the action or process of inserting a catheter into a body cavity) was necessary. 2. Ensure R #2 was assessed for the removal of the catheter as soon as possible. 3. Ensure R #2 received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible. These deficient practices could likely result in residents getting infections and having the Foley catheter longer than needed. The findings are: A. On 09/16/25 at 11:38 AM during an interview, R #2 stated she has had the catheter for a long time. R #2 said she has had urinary tract infections (UTI an infection of the urinary system, which includes the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra). R #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store medications in the treatment cart for all 19 residents (residents were identified by the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 09/15/25) randomly sampled, when staff failed to secure the medication carts on the East Unit 100 hall. This deficient practice could likely result in residents obtaining medication not prescribed to them and residents having adverse side effects. The findings are: A. On 09/15/25 at 2:15 PM, during observation of the East Unit 100 hall, the treatment cart was unlocked. The following medications were in the treatment cart: 1. Arthritis hot ointment (fast-acting relief from minor aches, pains, and stiffness associated with arthritis). 2. Muscle rub cream (relief of minor aches and pains in muscles and joints). 3. Hibiclens skin cleanser (pre-surgical preparation, wound care, hand hygiene, and daily skin cleansing in both hospital and home settings). 4. Nystop ointment (used to treat fungal skin infections caused by the yeast). 5. Calmoseptine ointment (multi-purpose moisture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to: 1. Ensure R #21's nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) was labeled with the date that it was changed. 2. Have a system of surveillance with data analysis to properly identify possible communicable diseases and infections. This failure could potentially affect all (15) residents who had infections (residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the DON on 09/15/25). If the facility fails to maintain an effective infection control program, then infections could spread to residents throughout the facility, resulting in illness. The findings are: R #21 A. On 09/15/25 at 2:20 PM, during an observation of R #21's room, R #21 wore a nasal cannula attached to the oxygen tank. The nasal cannula was not dated with a date that indicated a date the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented a comprehensive Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP, a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use). This failed practice has the potential to affect the following: 1. All eight (8) residents in the facility that were taking antibiotics. Residents identified using the list of residents taking antibiotics provided by the Administrator on 09/24/25. 2. R #59 who was taking antibiotics from 9/08/25 through 09/20/25. This deficient practice could likely result in the inappropriate use of antibiotics and lead to resistance of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO; a germ that is resistant to many antibiotics). The findings are: Antibiotic Monitoring A. Record review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship policy, dated 09/27/22, revealed the facility did not have a proper and adequate ASP that included: 1. Protocols to monitor/review response to antibiotics, and laboratory results when available, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 2Number of residents cited: 2S483.10(f) Self-DeterminationThe resident has the right to, and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, including but not limited to the rights specified in paragraphs (f)(1) through (11) of this section.S483.10(f)(1) The resident has a right to choose activities, schedules (including sleeping and waking times), health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interests, assessments, and plan of care and other applicable provisions of this part.S483.10(f)(2) The resident has a right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident.S483.10(f)(3) The resident has a right to interact with members of the community and participate in community activities both inside and outside the facility.S483.10(f)(8) The resident has a right to participate in other activities, including social, religious, and community activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of records, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications and properly manage psychotropic medications for two (R #5 and R #101) of 5 (R #4, R#5, R #10, R #22, and R #101) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications when staff failed to ensure psychotropic medications for R #5 and R #101 were prescribed to treat a specific psychiatric diagnosis (mental illness, symptoms or condition that greatly disturbs your thinking, moods, and/or behavior). These deficient practices could likely result in residents receiving medications without a medical reason and being at a higher risk of adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result). The findings are: R #5 A. Record review of R #5's admission documents, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #5 had the following diagnoses: a. Alzheimer's Disease with late onset (a progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and the ability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update a resident care plan to reflect changes in the resident's treatments or interventions for 1 (R #3) of 2 (R #3 and R #101) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy. This inaccuracy has the potential of harm to a resident if the medical record does not provide correct indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into and left in the bladder to drain urine) information for staff to respond to the resident needs if the catheter had already been removed. The findings are: A. On 09/16/25 at 1:57 PM, during an interview, R #3 stated her indwelling catheter was removed about 1 month ago. B. Record review of R #3's PCP (primary care physician) orders dated 8/16/25 revealed R #3's indwelling catheter was to be removed. C. Record review of R #3's current care plan dated 09/18/25 indicated that R #3 has an indwelling catheter. D. On 09/18/25 at 11:10 AM during an interview, the nurse supervisor #1 verified R #3's indwelling catheter was listed on the care plan. She stated R #3 does not have an indwelling catheter, and this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice (established guidelines and expectations that ensure the delivery of high-quality care to residents) for 2 (R #4 and R #10) of 7 (R #4, R #5, R #10, R #21, R #22, R #59, and R #101) residents reviewed for medication regimen and pressure injuries when staff failed to: 1. Follow facility protocols when a new wound was identified for R #4. 2. Monitor for adverse effects of antipsychotic medication for R #10. If the facility is not identifying new wounds and following facility protocols for newly developed wounds and monitoring for adverse effects of antipsychotic medications, then residents are likely to experience adverse effects, worsening of their condition, and potential complications from not recognizing changes in the resident's condition. The findings are: R #4 A. Record review of R #4's admission documents, no date, revealed R#4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with maximum practicable independence for 1 (R #10) of 2 (R #10 and R #112) residents reviewed for mobility and rehabilitation (specialized care provided to help residents recover from injuries, surgeries, or illnesses. These services typically include Physical therapy: Aims to restore mobility and strength. Occupational therapy: Assists residents in performing daily tasks independently. Speech therapy: Addresses communication and swallowing difficulties) and restorative (person-centered nursing care that is designed to improve or maintain the functional ability of residents, so they can achieve their highest level of well-being possible) services. This deficient practice is likely to result in a decrease in the resident's functional mobility. The findings are: A. On 09/15/25 at 10:40, during an interview and observation, R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively manage pain (use of different techniques and medication to reduce and control the amount of pain a person experiences) for 1 (R #129) of 2 (R #59 and R #129) residents reviewed for pain when the facility failed to administer medications as per physician's orders and notify the provider when residents have uncontrolled pain. This deficient practice could likely result in residents experiencing unnecessary pain and could compromise their quality of life. The findings are: A. Record review of R #129's admission Record (no date) revealed the following: 1. R #129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. R #129's diagnoses include the following: a. Displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur (broken bone on the bony protrusions in the area where the hip and thigh meet). b. Pain in left hip. B. Record review of R #129's physician's orders revealed the following: 1. An order dated 09/11/25, acetaminophen extended release (ER,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis (clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) treatment for 1 (R #87) of 2 (R #22 and R #87) residents reviewed for dialysis care. This deficient practice could likely result in the facility being unaware of the residents' condition, potential complications and residents may not receive the appropriate monitoring and care. The findings are: A. On 09/15/25 at 12:50 PM during an interview with R #87, he stated he is assessed before leaving for dialysis. He leaves no later than 5:30 AM on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, and he is usually assessed upon return between 11:00 and 11:30 AM. He stated there have been instances where he is not checked when he comes back and he has also received his medications late upon returning. B. Record review of R #87's admission Record (no date) revealed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents obtained dental services for 1 (R #2) of 2 (R #2 and R #59) residents sampled for dental services, when staff failed to ensure R #2 received routine dental care to include an annual inspection of the mouth for signs of disease, dental cleaning, fillings, or minor partial or full denture adjustments. This deficient practice could likely cause the resident unnecessary pain, embarrassment over the condition/appearance of teeth, and potential dental or oral complications. The findings are:A. Record review of R #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/03/24. B. On 09/16/25 at 11:33 AM during an interview, R #2 said she needed to see a dentist because she has a lot of teeth that need to be replaced. C. On 09/18/25 at 10:54 AM, during an interview, the Unit Manager (UM) stated R #2 had not been to the dentist since she was admitted to the facility. The UM stated R #2 was waiting to get approved for Medicaid to cover the cost. The UM confirmed that R #2 had been approved for Medicaid and that an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #101) of 4 (R #4, R #21, R #59, and R #101) residents reviewed for pressure injury and involuntary seclusion when staff failed to do the following: 1. Accurately document R #101's skin assessments. 2. Ensure R #101's medical record contained the results of preadmission screening. These deficient practices have the potential to negatively impact the care staff provide to meet residents' needs due to missing or inaccurate records and resident information. The findings are: A. Record review of R #101's admission documents, no date, revealed R #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. On 09/16/2025 at 8:25 AM, during an interview, R #101's family member (FM) stated that R #101 had a pressure ulcer on her butt. R #101's FM stated R #101 had the pressure ulcer since before she was admitted to the facility. C. Record review of R #101's physician's order dated 04/22/25, revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical records contained documentation each resident received or was offered pneumococcal (a bacteria that causes pneumonia infection of the respiratory tract) and influenza (an acute respiratory infection caused by influenza viruses) immunizations for 2 (R #59 and R #101) of 5 (R #4, R #11, R #59, R #87, and R #101) residents reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice could likely lead to residents contracting respiratory infections and could result in the spread of infection to other residents. The findings are: R #59 A. Record review of R #59's admission documents, no date, revealed R #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #59's entire medical record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #59 did not receive the pneumococcal vaccination. 2. Staff did not document whether R #59 received education about the pneumococcal vaccination. 3. Staff did not document whether R #59 refused the pneumococcal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical record contained documentation each resident received or was offered covid-19 (an acute respiratory infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) immunization for 1 (R #59) of 5 (R #4, R #11, R #59, R #87, and R #101) residents reviewed for immunizations. This deficient practice could likely lead to residents contracting respiratory infections and could result in the spread of infection to other residents. The findings are: A. Record review of R #59's admission documents, no date, revealed R #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #59's entire medical record, no date, revealed the following: 1. R #59 did not receive the covid-19 vaccination. 2. Staff did not document whether R #59 received education about the covid-19 vaccination. 3. Staff did not document whether R #59 refused the covid-19 vaccination. C. On 09/22/2025 at 12:47 PM, during an interview, the Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report all injuries of unknown origin and the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency for 1 (R #21) of 3 (R #19, R #20, and R #21) residents reviewed for falls. If the facility fails to report injuries of unknown origin and the results of investigations within five (5) business days to the State Agency, then the State Agency is unable to ensure residents have a safe environment. The findings are:A. Record review of R #21's admission documents, no date revealed R #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of the facility's incident log, no date, revealed R #21 had an injury of unknown origin on the following dates:1. 06/22/25, bruise on chin measuring 5cm x 2 cm.2. 06/25/25, large scratch 51cm x .1 cm from shoulder to hip and skin tears to knees.3. 06/28/25, skin tear (possibly self-inflicted) to right shin 5.5cm x 2.5 cm. C. Record review of R #21's progress notes, multiple dates, revealed the following:1. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed in advance of what medications they received and understood the reasons, risks, and benefits of the medications for 1 (R #17) of 3 (R #16, R #17, and R #18) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If the residents or their representatives are not informed of the risks and benefits of the medication or treatment alternatives, they are not able to make informed decisions regarding residents' care. The findings are:A. Record review of R #17's admission documents, no date revealed R #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #17's physician order, dated 06/28/25, revealed an order for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety disorders) 0.5 mg, on Mondays and Thursdays (shower days) for anxiety/agitation. C. Record review of R #17's entire medical record, no date revealed staff did not document a consent to take Lorazepam. D. On 07/10/25 at 2:17 PM, during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception. Are used to treat a variety of conditions including anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia) unless the medication was medically necessary for 2 (R #17 and R #18) of 3 (R #16, R #17, and R #18) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to ensure: 1. Psychotropic medications for R #17 were prescribed to treat a specific psychiatric diagnosis (mental illness, symptoms or condition that greatly disturbs your thinking, moods, and/or behavior). 2. Psychotropic medications ordered to be given as needed (PRN) for R #18 were not prescribed for longer than 14 days without a rationale from the provider for why the medication was needed for longer than 14 days. These deficient practices could likely result in residents receiving medications without a medical reason and being at a higher risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 (R #18) of 3 (R #16, R #17, and R #18) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact on the care staff provided to meet residents' needs due to missing or inaccurate records and resident information.The findings are:A. Record review of R #18's admission documents, no date, revealed the following:1. R #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. With the following diagnoses: a. Unspecified dementia (a general term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances. b. Insomnia (a common sleep disorder characterized by persistent difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or waking up too early, despite having adequate opportunities for sleep). B. Record review of R #18's provider progress note, dated 05/04/25, revealed R #18 had a diagnosis of Moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM 08/09/24 Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints unless being used to treat a specific medical condition (indication or characteristic of a medical, physical or psychological condition) as identified through an assessment for 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #8) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #8) reviewed for physical restraints. This deficient practice could likely result in physical restraints being used for staff convenience; unnecessarily preventing residents from freedom, movement, and/or activity. The findings are: A. Record review of a complaint dated 12/24/24, an anonymous staff member revealed the facility had removed alarms for residents after the last survey and then they started using bed alarms again for residents without conducting an assessment or having a physician's order. R #1 B. On 01/23/25 at 5:14 PM, during an observation of R #1, revealed R #1 had an alarm attached to her wheelchair. C. On 01/23/25 at 5:14 PM, during an interview, CNA #1 confirmed R #1 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #8) residents reviewed for care plans when they failed to revise the care plan with the most current resident information. This deficient practice could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: A On 01/23/25 at 5:14 PM an observation of R #1 revealed R #1 had an alarm attached to her wheelchair. B. On 01/23/25 at 5:14 PM, during an interview with CNA # 1, revealed the following: 1. CNA #1 stated R #1 did not have any alarms because they had been discontinued. 2. CNA #1 then made an observation of R #1 and stated R #1 had a wheelchair alarm. C. On 01/24/25 at 12:06 PM, during an interview, RN # 1 confirmed that the alarm attached to R #1's wheelchair was actually a seat belt alarm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-09 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data on a daily basis for all 105 residents in the facility (residents were identified by the census list provided by the Administrator on 08/05/24), when staff failed to: 1) Post Staffing Information that included the following: a. Facility name. b. The current date. c. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: i. Registered nurses. ii. Licensed practical nurses. iii. Certified nurse aides. iv. Resident census. 2) Retain 18 months of staff posting records. These deficient practices could cause residents anxiety not knowing what staff are working. The findings are: A. On 08/08/24 3:45 PM, during an interview with Administrator, he stated the facility does not post resident census numbers or staffing numbers. The administrator stated the units will write which staff are working per shift on a whiteboard inside each unit. B. On 08/09/24 at 9:22 AM, during an observation of Unit C, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review of the facilities Legionella Water Management Program policy and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when they failed to have a water management program to minimize the risk of Legionella [a bacteria that can grow in parts of building water systems that are continually wet (e.g., pipes, faucets, water storage tanks, decorative fountains) and cause a serious type of pneumonia], and other opportunistic pathogens (bacteria that do not usually cause diseases in healthy people but may become extremely injurious to unhealthy individuals) in the building's water system. This failure could potentially affect all (105) residents who live in the facility (residents were identified by the Resident Matrix provided by the Administrator on 08/05/24). If the facility fails to maintain an effective infection control program, then infections could spread to residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to treat resident with dignity when staff failed to: 1. Provide nondisposable cutlery and dishware to all 75 residents, who did not use adaptive equipment were not on enteral feeding tube (a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth) (residents were identified by the adaptive equipment list provided by the Administrator on 08/13/24 and the resident matrix provided by the Administrator on 08/05/24), and 2. Let R #98 self-determine (choice) her use of a belt alarm (an alarm for a wheelchair). These deficient practices could likely cause residents to feel anxious or depressed and like they are not valued. The findings are: Use of Disposable Dishware and Cutlery A. On 08/06/24 at 12:28 PM, during an observation of the D Unit's lunch service, the residents were served meals on disposable plates and given disposable cups for drinks. B. On 08/06/24 at 12:30 PM, during an observation, residents in the memory care main dining area, residents ate with disposable plates,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment with comfortable sound levels for 3 (R #73, R #86, and R #99) of 3 (R #73, R #86, and R #99) residents reviewed for homelike environment. This deficient practice could likely cause residents to feel anxious or depressed and feel that they are not valued. The findings are: A. On 08/06/24 at 9:48 AM, during an observation of the D Unit, a loud sound could be heard down the hall, five doors away from the room where the sound was coming from. B. On 08/06/24 at 9:50 AM, during an interview with CNA #21, stated the following 1. The loud sound was a bathroom door alarm. 2. The bathroom alarms are set off when the bathroom door is opened and will turn off when the door is closed so they know when someone who is a fall risk goes into the bathroom. 3. Every new resident gets a bed, chair, and bathroom door alarm until the staff assesses the resident for fall risk. C. On 08/06/24 at 9:54 AM, during an interview with Unit Manager #21, confirmed the following: 1. Bed alarms, chair alarms, and bathroom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to keep residents free from physical restraints for 5 (R #30, R #34, R #45, R #82 and R #98) of 5 (R #30, R #34, R #45, R #82 and R #98) residents reviewed for physical restraints, when staff used the following: 1. Wheelchair alarms on R #30, R #82, and R #98 2. Bed alarms on R #30, R #34, R #82, and R #98 3. Bathroom alarms on R #30, R #45, and R #98 These deficient practices could likely result in physical restraints being used for discipline or staff convenience; unnecessarily preventing residents from freedom, movement, or activity. The findings are: A. On 08/06/24 at 9:50 AM, during an interview with CNA #21, he revealed that every newly admitted resident gets a bed, chair, and bathroom door alarm until the resident is assessed for fall risk. B. On 08/06/24 at 9:54 AM, during an interview with Unit Manager #21, confirmed the following: 1. Every resident who is admitted gets a chair alarm, bed alarm, and bathroom door alarm. 2. Nursing, therapy, and the physicians assess the resident for the need for alarms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident was assessed for risk of entrapment (state of being stuck or caught on bed rail) from bed rails for 1 (R #35) of 1 (R #35) resident reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice has the potential to cause serious injury by becoming trapped between the mattress and bed rail. The findings are: R #35 A. Record review of R #35's admission record revealed she was admitted to facility on 10/21/14. B. On 08/07/24 at 11:32 AM, during an observation of R #35's bed, the bed had bilateral half side rails. C. Record review of R #35's nursing progress note dated 09/15/2015 (document provided by the facility) revealed the following: 1. R #35 bed has two half side rails. 2. R #35's side rails are not considered restraints as [Name of R #35] is in comatose (being in a coma, unconscious or unable to communicate for a prolonged or indefinite period) condition with no voluntary movement. D. Record review of R #35's medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's recommendations were reviewed and implemented by the physician or that the physician provided a rationale for not following the consultant pharmacist's recommendation for 2 (R #31 and R #50) of 5 (R #31, R #44, R #50, R #51, and R #82) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely result in residents receiving medications that are no longer necessary and may cause unnecessary drug interactions (changes to medication action caused by being combined with other foods, beverages, or drugs) or adverse side effects (unwanted, undesirable effects from medication). The findings are: R #31 A. Record review of the pharmacy's Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber for R #31, dated 06/29/24, revealed: 1. R #31 was currently receiving omeprazole (used to treat certain conditions where there is too much acid in the stomach) 20 mg every day. 2. Please evaluate continued need for this medication . 3. The Note To Attending Physician/Prescriber did not include any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Residents did not receive psychotropic medications (antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications, stimulants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers) unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific psychiatric diagnosis and was documented in the medical record, and 2) Have the consent of resident/representative for psychotropic medications for 2 (R #31 and R # 44) of 5 (R #31, R #44, R #50, R #51, and R #82) residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. These deficient practices could likely result in residents receiving medications without a medical reason and being at a higher risk of adverse side effects (unwanted, harmful, or abnormal result). The findings are: R #31 A. Record review of R #31's medical record, no date, revealed following diagnoses: 1. Unspecified psychosis (commonly used if there is inadequate information to make the diagnosis of a specific psychotic disorder) not due to a substance or known physiological condition. 2. Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review of the CMS-10055 Form and interview, the facility failed to inform residents when changes in coverage were made to items and services covered by Medicare and/or by Medicaid for 1 (R #9) of 3 (R #9, R #31, and R #256) residents reviewed for beneficiary notices when staff failed to provide R #9 with Form CMS-10055- Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) of Non-Coverage [form used to inform the beneficiary (resident) about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with the beneficiary accepting financial liability for those services.] This deficient practice can likely confuse the resident or their representative as to what services they receive or do not have financial coverage for under Medicare and/or Medicaid. The findings are: R #9 A. Record review of the CMS-10055 form for R #9's revealed the form was not completed or given to R #9 prior to services ending on 07/15/24. B. On 08/07/24 at 4:15 PM, during an interview with the Office Manager (OM), she stated R #9's beneficiary notification was not completed because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to provide effective and person-centered care immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 1 (R #103) of 2 (R #103 and R #104) residents reviewed for baseline care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission. The findings are: A. Record review of R #103's admission record no date revealed R #103 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. B. Record review of R #103's physician's order revealed an order date 05/13/24, Do Not Resuscitate (DNR; a legally recognized order signed by a physician at a patient's request, stating the resident does not want…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan revision occurred for 6 (R #30, R #34, R #35, R #45, R #82, and R #98) of 6 (R #30, R #34, R #35, R #45, R #82, and R #98) residents reviewed for care plans, when they failed to: 1. Update R #30, R #34, R #45, R #82, and R #98's care plans for intervention for the wheelchair, bed, and bathroom alarms. 2. Update R #35's care plan for removal of bed alarm. These deficient practices could likely result in the care plan not being updated with the most current resident conditions and appropriate interventions, staff being unaware of changes in care provided, and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: R #30 A. On 08/06/24 at 3:08 PM, during an observation of R #30's room, R #30 had an alarm on her wheelchair, bed, and bathroom door. B. Record review of R #30's care plan dated 10/11/23 revealed the care plan did not contain any interventions for wheelchair, bed, and bathroom door alarms. R #34 C. On 08/06/24 at 11:57 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 (R #14) of 2 (R #25 and R #62) residents sampled for nutrition, when staff failed to follow protocols for identifying weight loss when R #14 had severe weight loss. This deficient practice could likely result in residents losing weight without the facility being aware causing physical and mental health issues. The findings are: A. Record review of R #14's medical record revealed the following diagnoses: 1. Tourette's Disorder (a disorder that involves repetitive movements or unwanted sounds (tics) that can't be easily controlled). 2. Paranoid Schizophrenia (a type of schizophrenia accompanied by paranoia. Delusions and hallucinations are the two symptoms). 3. Major Depressive Disorder (A mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). 4. Hyperlipidemia (A condition in which there are high levels of fat particles (lipids) in the blood) 5.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0661 — patternEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed a discharge summary that included a recapitulation (a summary describing the resident's course of treatment while residing in the facility) and a reconciliation of all medication at the time of discharge for 3 (R #1, R #2 and R #3) of 3 (R #1, R #2 and R #3) residents sampled for discharge from the facility. This deficient practice could likely lead to the receiving facility, community agency, or family member not knowing what the current care needs and/or current medications are for the resident. The findings are: R#1 A. Record review of R #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: 1. Resident was discharged from the facility on 03/28/24. 2. The Recapitulation of Stay form, effective date 03/28/24, was not completed until 04/02/24 (five days after the resident's discharge) and did not contain R #1's discharge medication list. R #2 B. Record review of R #2's EMR revealed: 1. Resident was discharged from the facility on 02/20/24 with home health services. 2. A discharge medication list was in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-11 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents have a written, signed, and dated progress note from the provider (physician or nurse practitioner) at each visit for 3 (R #2, R #4 and R #5) of 3 (R #2, R #4 and R #5) residents reviewed for physician's visits. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident's needs not being met due to facility staff being unaware of resident's status related to lack of written, signed, and dated progress notes at the time of the visit. A. Record review of R #2's progress notes revealed: 1. Nurse Practitioner (NP) note: New patient encounter, effective date 01/26/24. The NP did not sign the note until 01/28/24. B. Record review of R #4's progress notes revealed: 1. Medical Doctor (MD) note: Progress note, effective date 03/03/24. The MD did not sign the note until 03/06/24. C. Record review of R #5's progress notes revealed: 1. Medical Doctor note: Chronic Care Management, effective date 05/31/24. The MD did not sign the note until 06/03/24. D. On 06/11/24 at 4:39 PM, during an interview with the Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an effective discharge plan for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for discharge planning (the process of transitioning a resident from one level of care to the next), when staff failed to: 1) Involve R #1's Insurance Case Manager (ICM) in obtaining services through Mi Via (a self-directed waiver program for individuals with diagnosed intellectual and developmental disabilities), 2) Obtain services through Mi Via for R #1 (that he had prior to admission) and was brought up by family during a meeting on 11/09/23 prior to discharge on [DATE]. This deficient practice is likely to result in complicated or unsafe transitions from the facility to the residents' post-discharge settings. The findings are: A. Record review of R #1's admission Record, no date, revealed R #1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged to a private residence on 03/28/24. B. Record review of R #1's progress notes revealed: 1. Social Worker's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for all 99 residents in the facility, based on the resident census provided by the Administrator on 05/22/23; by not following the menu. These deficient practices are likely to result in resident weight loss, frustration, and not meeting their nutritional needs. The findings are: A. On 05/23/23 at 12:46 pm, during observation of the lunch service, there was no bread or rolls being served. B. Record review of the facility weekly menu dated Monday, May 24, 2023 revealed, Lunch: Teriyaki chicken, garden rice, salad greens with berries, bread or roll and margarine, and peach pie. C. On 05/24/23 at 12:33 pm, during observation of a sample lunch tray, it was observed that there was no bread or roll and margarine. D. On 06/01/23 at 3:48 pm, during an interview with the Dietary Manager, she stated that if bread or roll and margarine are on the menu, residents should be getting it unless they are on a special diet.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-01 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a qualified, trained or certified Infection Preventionist (IP) affecting all 98 residents in the facility (residents were identified by the facility census provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/22/23). This deficient practice could likely result in residents being at greater risk of infectious disease. The findings are: The findings are: A. Record review of the [name of facility] Key Personnel (undated) revealed that the IP status is Vacant. B. On 06/01/23 4:21 PM during an interview, the DON confirmed the facility does not have a certified IP and revealed that the DON, ADON and a LPN are sharing the tasks as the acting IP and no one has the specialized training.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-01 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident/resident's representative(s) of the transfer in writing for 1 (R #82) of 1 (R #82) resident sampled for hospitalizations when they failed to: 1. Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understand. 2. A statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; 3. The name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; These deficient practices could likely result in the resident and/or their representative not knowing the reason for a transfer, and their rights to advocate and make informed decision regarding their healthcare. The findings are: A. Record review of R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-01 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies the bed hold policy at the time of the transfer for 1 (R #82) of 1 (R #82) resident sampled for hospitalizations when they failed to provide documentation of written Bed Hold Policy notice R #82. This deficient practice could likely result in the resident and/or their representative being unaware of the resident being able to return to their previous room or the next available room upon return from the hospital. The findings are: A. Record review of R #82's Discharge summary revealed R #82 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for stroke symptoms. B. No documentation of Bed Hold Policy being provided to R #82. C. On 05/25/23 at 3:12 PM, during an interview with R #82 she said that she was not provided any papers when she left the facility. D. On 06/01/23 at 4:22 PM, during an interview with the DON, she said that there was no documentation that written notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-01 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate, effective, person-centered Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of admission for 2 (R #95 and R #98) of 2 (R #95, R #98) residents sampled for baseline care plans. If resident's Baseline Care Plans are not accurate, residents are not likely to get the care and services needed. The findings are: R #95 A. Record review of R #95's admission Record/Face Sheet revealed: 1. admission date 02/28/2023 2. admission diagnoses: a. OTHER ACUTE OSTEOMYELITIS (an acute or chronic inflammatory process involving the bone) of the RIGHT ANKLE AND FOOT b. PRESSURE ULCER STAGE 4 (Full thickness skin loss with extensive destruction; tissue necrosis; or damage to muscle, bone, or supporting structure such as tendon, or joint capsule) OF RIGHT HEEL and OF LEFT HIP c. PRESSURE ULCER STAGE 3 (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed) OF SACRAL REGION (Sacrum) d. SACROILIITIS (pain in one or both sacroiliac joints: where the lower spine and pelvis meet) e. UNSPECIFIED…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 4 (R #3, R #39, R #74 and R #79) of 6 (R #3, R #39, R #40, R #43, R #74 and R #79) residents reviewed for care plans: 1. Failing to include the primary diagnosis in the care plan for R #3 2. Not implementing the notification to the provider of R #39's severe bruising, or tiny red or purple spots on skin. 3. Not developing a care plan for R #74 and R #79's code status (the type of emergent treatment a person would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop). Failure to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan is likely to result in staff's failure to understand and implement the needs and treatments for residents to achieve their highest level of well-being. The findings are: R #3 A. Record review of R #3's admission record (undated) revealed: Principal diagnosis: Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar type (mental health disorder that can include hallucinations or delusions, with periods of heightened emotion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 (R #58 and R #99) of 3 (R #27, R #58 and R #99) residents reviewed for care plans when they failed to: 1. Update R #58's care plan for Lorazepam 2. Update R #99's care plan to show that he was placed on palliative care (comfort care for the terminally ill and their families). These deficient practices could likely result in staff being unaware of changes in care being provided and residents not receiving the care related to changes in their health status or healthcare decisions. The findings are: R #58 A. Record review of R #58's face sheet (undated) revealed an admission date of 10/16/18 B. Record review of R #58's Medical Records revealed: 1. An order for Lorazepam dated 05/18/2023 (treats anxiety and sleeping problems) C. Record review of R #58's Care Plan dated 05/16/23 revealed: 1. No care plan for Lorazepam. D. On 06/01/23 at 04:44 PM during an interview, the DON confirmed that R #58's care plan was not updated to reflect the use of Lorazepam. R #99 E. Record review of R #99's Nurse's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care (breathing support) consistent with professional standards for 1 (R #27) of 3 (R #27, R #34 and R #43) residents reviewed for respiratory care when the facility failed to monitor R #27's oxygen levels. If the facility fails to monitor the residents oxygen levels they may fail to provide the resident with supplemental oxygen (administered of oxygen to maintain oxygen levels above 90%) as needed. The finding are: A. On 05/23/23 at 10:21 AM, during an observation and interview, R #27 was lying down in bed, resident did not have her oxygen on and stated, I've been so tired. I use my oxygen, but I don't know I'm just so tired. I need to take a nap. B. Record review of R #27's Physician's orders revealed: Order Date 07/15/22: O2 (oxygen) AT 1-10 LPM (liters per minute) VIA NC (given by nasal cannula/tubing) /FM (facemask) PRN (as needed) DYSPNEA (shortness of breath)/RESPIRATORY DISTRESS (difficulty breathing) MAY TITRATE (change number level of oxygen being given) TO KEEP SATS (oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards of food service safety by not ensuring food/food products are discarded by their expiration dates, and ensuring food items in the refrigerator were sealed after opening. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 99 residents in the facility, as identified by the resident census provided by the Administrator on 05/22/23, who eat food prepared in the kitchen. If the facility fails to adhere to safe food handling practices, residents are likely to be exposed to foodborne illnesses and become sick. The findings are: A. On 05/22/23 at 1:12 PM, during observation of the kitchen revealed: 1. The following spices were expired: a. 1 container of Poultry Seasoning opened 01/01/21 b. 1 container Ground [NAME] opened 11/30/21 c. 1 container Allspice opened 5/22/22 d. 1 container Fennel seeds, no open date (expiration date is determined by date product is open). e. 1 container Fajita Marinade opened 11/1/22 f. 1 container of Caraway Seed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documents in resident records were complete and accurate for 4 (R #6, R #9, R #40 and R #43) of 8 (R #3, R #6, R #9, R #27, R #34, R #40, R #43 and R #57) residents reviewed for advanced directives (legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health when they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves due to illness or incapacity). This deficient practice could likely result in staff not knowing a resident's medical intervention wishes and could result in delay of care, or going against a resident's wishes. The findings are: R #6 A. Record review of R #6's Medical Orders For Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) dated 05/06/21 noted: 1. Section G: Designation of alternative decision maker was blank. 2. Section H: Signature of patient or surrogate (person who is legally responsible to make healthcare decisions for the patient/resident when they cannot make decisions for themselves) signature line was blank. B. Review of R #6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-01 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 8 staff (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, CMA #1, RN #1, RN #2, RN #3 and RN #4) of 10 staff (CNA #1, CNA #2 CNA #3, NA (Nurse Assistant) #1, CMA #1, LPN #1, RN #1, RN #2, RN #3 and RN #4) had annual training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation and dementia (group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function) management. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents in the facility, as identified by the resident census provided by the Administrator on 05/22/23. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the services that they require to provide the optimal quality of care and quality of life. The findings are: A. Review of the trainings for CNA #1 revealed Annual Resident Abuse Prevention & Reporting was last completed 02/01/22. CNA #1 was not enrolled in the course for 2023. CNA #1 was enrolled in 2022 Annual Dealing with Dementia scheduled date 01/10/22, but had not completed it; and was not enrolled in the dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was given the right to maintain and improve their self-esteem and self-worth by not being given a choice to remain at an activity being held by the facility; and not respecting a resident's choices for 1 (R #65) of 1 (R #65) resident reviewed for Resident Rights. This deficient practice is likely to negatively impact resident's self-esteem and self-worth. The findings are: A. On 05/23/23 at 9:54 am, during an observation of a scheduled resident activity in main dining room of [name of unit], R #65 was removed from the scheduled activity byCNA #2 without being asked, and was not told where he was being taken to. B. On 05/23/23 at 10:00 am, during an interview with CNA #2, when asked about R #65's removal from the activity, CNA #2 said R #65 was having a new wheelchair delivered at that time. CNA #2 acknowledged she should have asked R #65 if he wanted to leave the activity and explained to him why he was being taken from the activity. C. On 05/23/23 at 12:07 pm, during an interview with R…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #65) of 1 (R #65) resident reviewed for food and drink were provided food prepared in a form designed to meet the resident's needs. This deficient practice is likely to negatively impact a resident's nutritional intake and result in weight loss. The findings are: A. On 05/25/23 at 1:03 pm, during an observation of [name of unit] dining room, R #65 was leaning over his plate, having difficulty eating a sandwich provided by CNA #1. B. Record review of R #65's meal ticket slip indicated to cut food into bite-size pieces. C. On 05/25/23 at 1:05 pm, during an interview with CNA #1, she verified that R #65's meal ticket slip indicated that his food was to be cut into bite-size pieces and R #65's sandwich was cut in half. D. On 05/25/23 at 1:08 pm, during an interview with the DON, when asked about why R #65 had been given a sandwich for lunch that was cut in half, but did not match his meal ticket instructions to be cut into bite-sized pieces, DON said the sandwich should have been cut into smaller…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$83,501 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $83,501 — penalty dated 2024-06-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-13 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAYS, SHERRI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2018 |
| HAMILTON, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NM
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Mexico Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 325120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.