No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Boulder City Hospital SNF

901 Adams Blvd., Boulder City, NV 89005 · Non profit - Corporation · 47 certified beds · (702) 293-4111 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (702) 293-4111 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 12 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
895 Adams Blvd · (702) 293-0406 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
800 Buchanan Blvd · (702) 293-6705 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1008 Nevada Hwy · (702) 293-7592 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1500 Sandra Dr · (702) 293-3626 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.0%12.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%5.1%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%2.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.9%13.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.8%22.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.6%89.6%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%5.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.5%15.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.0%17.1%17.1%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.541.851.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.001.451.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.91
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
64.0%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 33.7 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.07 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-23)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure an adequate pull string was attached to the emergency call light located in a resident's bathroom. The deficient practice had the potential to compromise resident safety and well-being in an emergency. Findings include: On 05/22/25 at 03:25 PM, an observation of the emergency call light in room [ROOM NUMBER], did not have a proper pull string (a cord which activated the device which was mounted to the wall). On 05/22/25 at 03:50 PM, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) observed the emergency call light and stated the emergency call light did not have an adequate pull string to call for assistance. The LPN verbalized a resident would not be able to use the call light easily. On 05/22/25 at 03:52 PM, the Director of Nursing verbalized an emergency call light pull string must be long enough for a resident to reach in case of an emergency. On 05/22/25 at 03:53 PM, the Risk Manager stated the emergency call system should have a pull…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure employees completed mandatory dementia training, for one of 10 sampled employees (Employee 9). The deficient practice had the potential to result in an employee being unprepared to respond appropriately to the altered mentation of residents with dementia. Findings include: On 05/22/2025, at 8:52 AM, 10 employee files were reviewed with the Director of Human Resources. Employee 9 (E9) was hired on 11/15/2024 for the position of Certified Nurse Assistant. On 05/22/2025, in the morning, the Director of Human Resources revealed mandatory dementia training was to be completed within 30 days after hire. The Director of Human Resources reported the purpose of the dementia training was to prepare employees to respond appropriately to residents with altered mentation. The Director of Human Resources verbalized E9's file lacked documented evidence dementia training had been completed. The facility policy and procedure title Mandatory Training (New Hires), dated 08/30/2018, indicated the facility provided all new hires with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-07 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were transmitted timely for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment (Residents 11, 28, 27, 3, and 9). The deficient practice had the potential to impact resident care by also delaying the resident care plan. Findings include: The facility policy titled Assessments Periodic for Minimum Data Set (revised 10/25/2021) documented periodic assessments were conducted by the MDS Coordinator. The results of the assessments were used to create resident care plans and calculate resource utilization grouping categories used by regulators, payers, and surveyors. The facility MDS data from the resident assessment indicated data was more than 120 days for Residents 11, 28, 27, 3, and 9. The State MDS Coordinator documented in June 2023, there was a 20% late submission for residents at the facility. On 06/07/2024 in the afternoon, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator indicated working remotely and only coming to the facility when there was a technical issue with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-07 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the quarterly payroll based journal (PBJ) data was submitted to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The deficient practice prevented CMS from analyzing staffing patterns and populate the staffing component of the Nursing Home Compare website. A review of the facility Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting System (CASPER) report revealed the facility failed to submit staffing data for the first quarter of 2024. On 06/04/24 at 1:28 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator indicated being the person responsible for submitting the PBJ data and was aware the PBJ data was not submitted for the first quarter of the 2024 fiscal year. The MDS Coordinator explained being at facility once a week and was not in the facility when it was due. The MDS coordinator verbalized most of work was done remotely however, was unable to access information from remote workstation and was planning on completing the next day however became ill. The MDS coordinator revealed being the only one at the facility with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level two referral was completed for 1 of 15 sampled residents (Resident 35). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident of concern and other residents of necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: Resident 35 (R35) R35 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. On 06/04/2024 in the morning, R35 was up in a wheelchair and stated had been at the facility for about 3 months. A PASARR level one document dated 01/12/2024, indicated R35 did not have dementia, mental illness (MI), intellectual disability (ID), mental retardation (MR), or any related condition (RC) and was deemed appropriate for nursing facility placement. The admission diagnoses from an acute care facility dated 01/26/2024, documented R35 had no cognitive deficits or diagnoses. The acute care facility physician progress note dated 01/28/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to follow or clarify physician order regarding a suprapubic catheter size prior to insertion. The deficient practice had the potential to result in discomfort or inadequate drainage of the bladder. Findings include: Resident 31(R31) R31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive uropathy and severe neurocognitive deficit. On 06/04/2024 at 9:15 AM, resident was sitting in bed awake and alert. Resident indicated staff recently changed catheter. On observation the resident had suprapubic catheter inserted on right side abdomen. Dressing was soiled with yellow tinged fluid. On 06/07/2024 at 10:00 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated all wound and any care treatments such as catheter care would be documented in the treatment book at the nurse's station. The treatment book would contain the most recent order for resident care. The treatment administration record for R31 indicated an order to change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure stored foods were labeled and dated and food items were discarded prior to the expiration date. This deficient practice posed a potential risk to safety and health standards which could lead to contamination, inadequate storage, and place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings include: On 06/04/2024 at 8:15 AM, an open bag of chicken tenders was stored in the walk-in freezer without a label as to what is in the bag or a date as to when the bag was opened. The Dietary Manager explained the open bagged item should have been dated as to when the bag was opened and labeled before placing the opened bag back in the freezer. The Dietary Manager had the staff label and date the bag during the survey. The Dietary Manager was able to determine when the bag was opened by the menu details. On 06/04/2024 at 8:17 AM, a container of cottage cheese was stored in the walk-in refrigerator with an expiration date of 05/31/2024. The Dietary Manager explained the item should have been discarded. The Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure admission and weekly skin assessments were completed in accordance with the facility's wound care protocol for 3 of 12 sampled residents (Residents #17, #23 and #32). The failure resulted in a delay in treatment interventions which potentially placed the residents at risk for worsened or infected wounds. Findings include: Resident #17 (R17) R17 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and chronic debility. On 04/18/2023 at 9:35 AM, R17 laid awake and alert in a bariatric specialty mattress. The resident reported being a longtime resident of the facility but recently returned from the hospital. The resident indicated having a stage three pressure ulcer in the sacral area which was identified and treated by hospital staff. The resident indicated no one in the facility had examined the resident's pressure ulcer since R17's readmission on the evening of 04/17/2023, nor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was obtained for the insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line, and care orders were transcribed for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 32). The failure to obtain a physician's order before inserting the PICC line and to manage the PICC line insertion site could potentially lead to serious medical complications for the resident which may include infections, bleeding, nerve damage, or life-threatening events. Findings include: R32 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia and debility. The Brief Interview of Mental Status dated 02/23/2023, documented a score of 6/15, which means R32's cognitive status was severely impaired. The Informed Consent for Procedure Administration of Anesthetic and/or the Rendering of Other Medical Services dated 04/07/2023, documented the procedure Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Line was consented to by a family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Oxygen (O2) orders were followed and parameters were clarified for 2 out of 12 sampled residents (Residents 32 and 9). The failure to follow O2 orders and clarify parameters could have potentially led to serious health complications, such as hypoxia (O2 deficiency) and hyperoxia (excess O2 supply), organ damage, cognitive impairment, and death. Findings include: A facility policy titled Procedure for Administering Oxygen by Cannula revised 05/21/2023, documented to verify the order. Adjust the flowmeter as ordered. Resident 9 (R9) R9 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident and myocardial infarction. The Brief Interview of Mental Status dated 03/13/2023, documented a score of 15/15, indicating R9's cognitive status was intact. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R9 was receiving Oxygen therapy. On 04/18/2023 at 09:55 AM, R9 was lying in bed with the head of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation which was approved and signed by a physician for a resident's psychiatric evaluation was carried out for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #23). The failure potentially delayed a re-evaluation of the resident's medication regimen which was essential in maintaining the highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being of the resident. Findings include: Resident #23 (R23) R23 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. A Pharmacy note to attending physician or prescriber dated 03/07/2023, documented Resident #23 is receiving multiple psychotropic agents and due for psychiatric follow up. The document contained a physician/prescriber response dated 03/21/2023 which read, Agreed. Psychiatric consult pending. The medical record lacked documented evidence the physician order for psychiatric consult was entered into R23's medical record and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was a documented indication for use for psychotropic medications orders for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #23). The failure potentially placed the resident at risk for receiving unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #23 (R23) R23 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. The Psychotropics/Antipsychotics Use policy revised 09/02/2015, documented the resident's entire medication regimen would be managed and monitored to achieve the following goals: to achieve the highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being in collaboration with the attending physician and facility staff. Each resident would receive only those medications, in doses and for the duration clinically indicated to treat the resident's assessed conditions. Prior to initiating an antipsychotic medication, the physician would complete the antipsychotic diagnosis form and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295046. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next