Mountain View Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 45.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 77.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on recorded review, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for the treatment of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and the physician notified of a change of condition for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 52). The deficient practice had the potential to lead to worsened symptoms of hypoglycemia, hospitalization, or even death.Findings include: Resident 52 (R52) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified diabetic retinopathy without macular edema.A review of R52's weights and vitals summary dated 10/21/2025 through 10/31/2025 documented a blood sugar value of 43 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), a unit for measuring substance concentration (like blood sugar) on 10/29/2025. The summary documenting a warning low of 70.2 mg/dL exceeded.A review of R52's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order for Glucose Gel 15 grams/32 milliliter (GM/ML) (a fast-acting sugar solution used to treat low blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacist's recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was act upon for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 30). The deficient practice had the potential for significant side effects including drowsiness, blurred vision, fatigue, trouble sleeping, and changes in mood. Findings include:Resident 30 (R30) was admitted [DATE], readmitted [DATE], with diagnosis including phantom limb syndrome with pain, major depressive disorder recurrent moderate and dementia unspecified severity with agitation.A physician order dated 10/18/2025, documented Fluoxetine Hydrochloride (HCI) oral capsule 40 milligrams (mg), give one capsule by mouth one time a day, related to major depressive disorder recurrent moderate. Record review revealed R30 had been receiving the same dose of Fluoxetine HCI 40 mg since 08/18/2023.A Medication Regimen Review dated 09/29/2025, documented a recommendation from the consultant pharmacist to consider a trial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%) resulted in a medication error rate of 6.67%. This deficient practice had the potential to put the resident at risk for adverse drug reactions, ineffective treatment, and compromised health outcome.Findings include:On 12/03/2025 at 7:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN4) was observed preparing medications for Resident 61 (R6). LPN4 administered Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) chewable, 1 tablet and Losartan Potassium 50 mg 1 tablet orally to R61. R61 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and essential hypertension.A physician order dated 11/19/2025 indicated, Aspirin Oral Capsule 81 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth once daily for deep venous thrombosis.A physician order dated 11/22/2025 Losartan Potassium 100 mg 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension.On 12/03/2025 at 7:50 AM, the LPN acknowledged the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1) safe and sanitary medication administration practices for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 61) during the medication pass observation, and 2) the Water Management Program included all requirements to prevent the growth and spread of Legionella. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise resident safety by increasing the risk of infection and cross contamination during medication administration, and exposure to waterborne pathogens.Findings include:Resident 61(R61) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). On 12/03/2025 at 7:40 AM, during a medication administration observation a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), retrieved a new bottle of aspirin intended for R61. The LPN used a bare finger to remove a tablet from the container. The inspector directed the LPN to discard the tablet since it was contaminated after being touched with a bare finger. During this process, four aspirin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents' tube feeding (TF) orders were followed and completely delivered as ordered for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 54, 48, and 11). The deficient practice could have led to a potential risk of malnutrition, dehydration, and inadequate caloric intake, compromising residents' health and increasing susceptibility to further medical complications. Findings include: A facility policy titled Enteral Nutrition revised February 2008, documented adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition was provided to residents as ordered. A facility policy revised February 2008 documented the adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition was provided to residents as ordered. Examples of potential benefits from using a feeding tube included addressing malnutrition and dehydration, promoting wound healing, allowing residents to regain strength, and enabling a transition back to oral nutrition. Resident 54…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label, and date open stored food products, and maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. The deficient practice could potentially expose residents to foodborne illnesses. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 8:15 AM, an inspection was conducted in the kitchen with the kitchen manager. The following issues were identified: -The coffee machine and the iced tea dispenser had visible ground coffee residue and appeared dirty. - Two ovens were visibly soiled with substantial accumulations of grease and burned food debris. The kitchen manager indicated the ovens were scheduled to be deeply cleaned and acknowledged the ovens should had been cleaned more often. - Two trays and a cart containing cartons of milk and chocolate milk were visibly soiled with dairy matters. - The kitchen floor, including the food preparation area, under the steam table, stove, and dishwashing area, was visibly soiled with food debris and grease. The kitchen manager admitted the kitchen was cleaned every two weeks and acknowledged it should have been cleaned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) Signage for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) was posted for a resident with a urinary catheter and an unstageable wound, and personal protective equipment (PPE) was available (Resident 82), 2) Gown was used by staff when providing direct care to residents on precautions, and hand hygiene was performed after removing the used gloves (Resident 63); and 3) a policy was in place regarding the reuse of gowns after use. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of cross-contamination, the spread of healthcare-associated infections, and compromise infection control measures. Findings include: 1) Resident 82 (R82) R82 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses including urinary tract infection, acute kidney infection, unstageable pressure ulcer and urinary retention. On 10/30/2024 at 10:45 AM, R82 was in bed with eyes closed, a Foley catheter was covered yet visible from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for the use of an indwelling Foley catheter within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 82). This deficient practice posed potential risks, including increased likelihood of infection, catheter blockage, tissue damage, and inadequate monitoring of urinary output. Findings include: Resident 82 (R82) R82 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses including urinary tract infection, acute kidney infection, unstageable pressure ulcer and urinary retention. On 10/29/224 at 2:08 PM, R82 was in bed with eyes closed. R82 had Foley catheter 18 French (Fr) times (x) 5-10 milliliters (ml) water balloon. Few drops of urine observed in the urinary bag. A Physician order dated 09/26/2024, documented Foley catheter 16 FR x 10 ml water balloon for neurogenic bladder related to urine retention. The Readmit Screener dated 10/13/2024, documented R2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for: 1) fall prevention for a resident at risk for fall (Resident #56), 2) and medication self-administration (Resident #79). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the residents for receiving necessary care to prevent health complications. Findings include: Resident #56 (R56) R56 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including severe sepsis, neurocognitive disorder, history of alcoholism and drug abuse, weight loss, and cerebrovascular accident. Initial fall risk assessment dated [DATE], revealed a score of 12, indicating R56 was at risk for falls. The assessment documented if the total score was 10 or greater, the resident should be considered at a high risk for potential falls and the prevention protocol should be initiated immediately and documented on the care plan. R56 was re-assessed for fall risk on 08/11/2024, scoring 14 (high risk). The fall assessments were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Foley catheter was properly assessed and the correct Foley size was inserted or clarified for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 82). This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of discomfort or pain, or urinary tract injury and complications. Findings include: Resident 82 (R82) R82 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses including urinary tract infection, acute kidney infection, unstageable pressure ulcer and urinary retention. A Physician order dated 09/26/2024, documented Foley catheter 16 FR x 10 ml water balloon for neurogenic bladder related to urine retention. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R82 had indwelling catheter. The Readmit Screener dated 10/13/2024, documented R2 had indwelling/Foley catheter 16 Fr. A Nursing Progress Notes dated 10/15/2024, documented R2's Foley catheter 16 Fr draining and in place related to urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV