Nevada State Veterans Home - Boulder City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 21.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 167.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) A nutritional assessment was completed when significant weight loss was identified; 2) Interventions were implemented; and 3) A resident was reweighed when significant weight loss was identified, and weight was obtained monthly per policy for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 139). The deficient practices had the potential to lead to further weight loss. Findings include: Resident 139 (R139) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (CKD), anemia, and malignant melanoma of the face. 1) R139's medical records lacked documented evidence nutritional assessments were completed when significant weight loss was identified. R139's Weight Summary documented as follows: -12/02/2024: 145.0 lbs. (Weight loss of 15 lbs.) -10/04/2024: 160.0 lbs. -09/04/2024: 161.0 lbs. -08/02/2024: 147.0 lbs. (Weight loss of 18 lbs.) -07/01/2024: 165.0 lbs. (Weight loss of 12 lbs.) -06/07/2024: 177.0 lbs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for a resident's indwelling catheter, specifically, following the correct Foley size for 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 177). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for catheter-related complications such as urethral trauma and pain.Findings include:Resident 177 (R177) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and chronic Foley catheter use.On 02/10/2026 in the morning, R177 was seated in wheelchair with a covered urinary bag hanging below center of the wheelchair. R177 indicated taking oral antibiotics for a suspected urinary tract infection and had experienced burning and pain to the catheter site the day before. R177 indicated not being certain if the night nurse replaced the catheter but the resident was relieved with the nurse's intervention. The admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure:Prescribed parameters for blood pressure medications were consistently followed and the physician notified of low blood pressure readings for 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident #2); and parameters for administering prescribed pain medication were followed for 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident #134).These deficient practices had the potential to result in the inappropriate administration of blood pressure medication, leading to hypotension, dizziness, or falls, and the inappropriate administration of pain medication, which could have resulted in inadequate pain management.Findings include:Based on record review, observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: Prescribed parameters for blood pressure medications were consistently followed and the physician notified of low blood pressure readings for 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident #2); and parameters for administering prescribed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure an abnormal Hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1C) was communicated to and addressed by a physician for 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 23) and physician orders for quarterly HgbA1C blood test were carried out for 2 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 23 and 104). The deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for diabetes-related complications and delayed treatment. Findings include:Resident 23 (R23) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance and diabetes mellitus. The admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R23 was admitted with an active diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and was not receiving Insulin. A physician order dated 04/30/2025, documented to complete an HgbA1C every three months by night shift on the last day of month. Review of medical record revealed R23's HgbA1C on 05/07/2025 was 7.0 percent (%). A lab interpretation note…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident who had dementia was free from physical restraints for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 6). This deficient practice had the potential to cause diminished physical functioning, increased confusion, psychosocial distress, and a decline in quality of life. Findings include: Resident 6 (R6) R6 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, hearing loss, and major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognitive status. R6 had routinely used a walker. The Nursing Progress Notes for the month of March documented multiple instances when R6 was confused, agitated, and restless. The Psychiatric Evaluation dated 03/25/2025, documented the encounter had been conducted in person. R6's safety had been assessed, and the current risk was deemed low; therefore, a safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician / physician extender, and the resident representative were notified when a resident experienced poor appetite and a significant weight loss for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 139). The deficient practice had the potential for the physician or family to not be aware of a change in a resident's condition which could result in a delay in a resident's plan of care. Findings include: Resident 139 (R139) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (CKD), anemia, and malignant melanoma of the face. R139's census documented received hospice services from 05/16/2024 to 06/11/2024. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed R139 was discharged from hospice services on 07/11/2024. A Physician Order dated 05/16/2024, documented a regular diet, regular texture, and thin consistency. 1) A Care Plan initiated on 05/17/2024 documented R139's diet was provided and served as ordered. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to follow the facility policy on referring residents for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 2 evaluation who acquired a new diagnosis indicative of a mental illness or begin a new psychotropic medication for 3 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 72, 139, and 98). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of not being evaluated for appropriate determination of necessary behavioral health services. Findings include: 1.) Resident 72 (R72) was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, major depressive disorder, and senile degeneration of brain. On 12/03/2024 at 9:11 AM, R72 was observed in the dining room sitting on wheelchair with eyes closed and calm. R72 did not display concerning behaviors or symptoms of distress. A Nevada PASARR Level I Identification Determination dated 08/02/2021, revealed R72 did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised to include current communication practices for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 69). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for inaccurate communication leading to inappropriate care. Findings include: Resident 69 (R69) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, dysarthria following unspecified cerebrovascular Disease, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, and dysphonia. On 12/03/2024 in the morning, the resident was lying in bed with a Dynavox box (a type of communication device) in the room, but it did not appear R69 was using it. R69 was only able to answer yes/no questions. On 12/04/2024 at 9:18 AM the Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) explained R69 had a hard time vocalizing and articulating. The resident's voice was inconsistent and dysarthric (a motor speech disorder in which the muscle used for speech are weak). The SLP stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an omitted dose due to drug unavailability was prevented for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 255). These deficient practices could have the potential to result in adverse health outcomes including delayed healing or ineffective treatment. Findings include: Resident 255 (R255) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including urinary tract infection, polyneuropathy, and chronic pain syndrome. On 12/04/2024 at 8:30 AM, R255 was observed in their room while interacted with a nurse and discussed medications refused and medications to be administered. R255 was alert and oriented and no observation concerns were identified. A Physician Order dated 11/11/2024 documented Zinc Oxide Ointment 10%, apply topically two times a day for excoriation, topical. The morning dose was to be administered at 8:00 AM. On 12/04/2024 at 8:35 AM, the nurse failed to administer Zinc Oxide Ointment 10% as ordered by the physician. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to identify a new skin impairment for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 26). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for worsening skin impairments and diminished quality of life. Findings include: Resident 26 (R26) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage 4 pressure ulcer upon admission. On 12/04/24 at 9:46 AM, R26 stated having a pressure ulcer acquired from another facility but developed one while in the current facility. R26 believed the new pressure ulcer developed because of lying in bed all day and sometimes in excrement for long periods of time. Review of R26's care plan revised on 10/09/2024 identified the following: R26 was at risk for skin breakdown, skin tears, bruising/skin discoloration and pressure ulcers related to impairment of physical mobility post total left hip surgery, refusal to be turned and repositioned, and fragile/sensitive skin. Goals included: Resident will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was communicated to the physician for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 45). The deficient practice had the potential to cause the resident to be administered a higher dose of medication than was necessary. Findings include: Resident 45 (R45) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, and major depressive disorder. On 12/05/2024 at 7:15 AM, the resident was observed lying in bed, eyes closed, no signs and symptoms of pain or distress. A Physician Order dated 07/24/2024, documented Escitalopram Oxalate Oral Tablet 20 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for depression/anxiety. A Psychoactive Medication Consent dated 07/25/2024, documented Escitalopram 20 mg 1 tablet by mouth in the morning, specific target behaviors depression/anxiety. Potential side effects included headache, constipation, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,358 — penalty dated 2024-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV