No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pershing General Hospital SNF

855 6th Street, Lovelock, NV 89419 · Government - Hospital district · 25 certified beds · (775) 273-2621 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (775) 273-2621 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)$9,258 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,258 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-19)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1020 New River Pkwy Ste 200 · (775) 428-2633 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
325 11th St · (775) 273-1700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
810 Franklin Ave
Park
855 8th St · (775) 273-7500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
885 Grinnel Ave · (775) 979-1318

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-07 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.4%12.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.1%1.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.0%5.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.0%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.7%13.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.7%22.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%89.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.8%15.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.0%17.1%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.421.851.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.691.451.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.06
RN hours/ resident / day
0.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.64
RN hoursweekends
44.8%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 25 beds and averages 24.7 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-17)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the results of a facility reported incident (FRI) abuse investigation were reported to the State Agency (SA) within five days of the initial report for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #6) and an initial FRI report for potential neglect was submitted to the SA within 24 hours of facility staff becoming aware of the allegations for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #5). This deficient practice had the potential to result in an allegation of abuse and/or neglect not being investigated and reported in a timely manner and one or more residents experiencing harm from late or incomplete investigations. Findings include: Resident #6 Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acquired absence of left foot and acquired absence of right leg below knee. A FRI initial report for potential neglect of Resident #6, dated 03/03/2026, documented the resident had attempted to self-transfer and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #9). This deficient practice had the potential to deprive the residents of person-centered care plans and the associated interventions relative to their current health management needs. Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section N0415 (Medications-High-risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication, C. Antidepressant), documented Resident #1 had been administered an antidepressant medication within the prior seven-day look-back period. A physician's order dated 04/22/2024, documented SEROquel oral tablet 25 milligrams (mg), give 25 mg by mouth at bedtime for anxiety, paranoid ideation, agitation related to major depressive disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1) an order was obtained for the application of pressure redistribution/heel protector boots (heel boots) prior to applying heel boots and 2) failed to ensure the heel boots were correctly applied with the potential to cause a pressure injury (PI) or deep tissue injury (DTI) to the resident's heels for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #14). Findings include: Resident #14 Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, and anxiety, foot drop, unspecified foot, and pain in left lower leg. On 04/14/2025 at 1:52 PM, Resident #14 was resting in bed with a pair of heel boots placed under the resident's feet. The heel boots were not fastened to help ensure appropriate placement and the resident's heels were resting on the inner surface of the heel boots and were not positioned over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure initial behavioral health care training was completed timely per facility policy for 1 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #9). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent residents with behavioral health care needs from attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings include Employee #9 Employee #9 was hired as the Minimum Data Set 3.0 Registered Nurse on 02/25/2025. Employee #9's personnel record lacked documented evidence of behavioral health care training. On 04/16/2025 at 11:05 AM, the Human Resources Director confirmed Employee #9's start date of 02/25/2025, and Employee #9 had not yet completed behavioral health care training. The Human Resources Director verbalized all employees were to have completed the training per the facility's policy. On 04/16/2025 at 11:41 AM, the Administrator verbalized not having been aware Employee #9 was required to complete the training. The facility policy titled, Employee Compliance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address side effects and necessary monitoring for a resident with bilateral lower extremity edema for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #5). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to suffer adverse health outcomes because of staff caring for the resident being unaware of the need to monitor for signs of leg swelling. Findings include: Resident #5 Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee. On 10/15/2024 at 11:48 AM, Resident #5 verbalized Resident #5 had swelling in both legs. Resident #5 verbalized Resident #5 was not wearing compression stockings. Resident #5's clinical record lacked documented evidence a care plan had been developed for the resident's diagnosis of bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee and the management of the resident's bilateral leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were revised to include the physician identified behaviors for the administration of a psychotropic medication for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2) and new interventions for the prevention of falls for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #23 and #25). Findings include: Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified and vascular dementia, moderate with mood disturbances. Resident #2's psychotropic physician's orders dated 02/15/2024, documented the following: -Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth in the afternoon for low mood, anxiety, paranoid ideation related to major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. -Cymbalta Oral Capsule Delayed Release Particles 30 mg, give one capsule by mouth two times a day for low mood, anxiety, paranoid ideation related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were initiated post-fall as a result of the root cause analysis of the falls for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #23 and #25). This deficient practice had the potential for a resident to fall with serious injury. Findings include: Resident #23 Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances and major depressive disorder, single episode, severe without psychotic features. On 10/15/2024 at 10:50 AM, Resident #23 recalled having fell off the bed and the resident's knees hurt from the fall. On 10/16/2024 at 2:15 PM, Resident #23 stood up from the resident's bed, physically moved a wheelchair out of the way, walked around the bed from the left side to the right side while bracing self with right hand on the bed, retrieved the resident's walker and ambulated to the bathroom. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and personnel record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had an annual performance evaluation completed timely for 3 of 4 CNAs employed greater than one year, sampled for personnel record review (Employee #3, #8 and #9). Findings include: Employee #3 Employee #3 was hired as the Activity Director/CNA with a start date of 02/08/2018. Employee #3's personnel record documented the CNA had an annual performance evaluation last completed on 05/22/2023. Employee #3's personnel record lacked documented evidence a performance evaluation was completed in May 2024. Employee #8 Employee #8 was hired as a CNA with a start date of 07/20/2022. Employee #8's personnel record documented the CNA had an annual performance evaluation last completed on 04/28/2023. Employee #8's personnel record lacked documented evidence a performance evaluation was completed in April 2024. Employee #9 Employee #9 was hired as a CNA with a start date of 04/17/2013. Employee #9's personnel record documented the CNA had an annual performance evaluation last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure ordered medications were available for 1 of 5 residents observed for medication administration (Resident #6) and have a procedure in place for the safe procurement of drugs and biologicals. Findings include: Resident #6 Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands and abnormal results of other function studies of the eye. Resident #6's October 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Restasis Ophthalmic Emulsion, instill one drop in both eyes two times a day for cataract inflammation. The order date was 09/10/2024. The medication was documented as 9 on the following dates for the 8:00 AM medication pass: -10/11/2024 -10/16/2024 -10/17/2024 The medication was documented as 9 on the following dates for the 8:00 PM medication pass: -10/10/2024 -10/12/2024 -10/13/2024 -10/14/2024 -10/15/2024 -10/16/2024 The MAR chart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure behaviors monitored were associated with the specific condition indicated by the physician for the use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2) and physician ordered psychotropic medications had a specific condition documented for indication of use associated with the diagnoses for 5 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #23, #25, #5, #12, and #24). Findings include: Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified and vascular dementia, moderate with mood disturbances. Resident #2's psychotropic physician's orders, dated 02/15/2024, documented the following: -Seroquel oral tablet 25 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth in the afternoon for low mood, anxiety, paranoid ideation related to major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. -Cymbalta oral capsule delayed release particles 30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with an error rate of less than five percent (%). There were 29 opportunities and two medication errors. The medication error rate was 6.9%. Findings include: Resident #6 Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, unspecified, dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands, and abnormal results of other function studies of the eye. On 10/17/2024 at 8:08 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN) began preparing medications for Resident #6. The RN verbalized the physician ordered Restasis Ophthalmic Emulsion eye drops were not available in the facility and were on order from the pharmacy. The RN verbalized Resident #6's physician ordered medications for the morning medication pass included Metoprolol 12.5 milligrams (mg). The RN compared the bubble pack containing Metoprolol to the physician order on the Medication Administration Record (MAR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration were free from significant medication errors (Resident #6). This deficient practice had the potential to cause worsening of the resident's diagnosed heart failure. Findings include: Resident #6 Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of heart failure, unspecified. Resident #6's MAR documented Metoprolol Tartrate oral tablet 25 milligrams (mg), give one half tablet by mouth two times a day related to heart failure, unspecified and tachycardia unspecified. Nurse to hold medication if blood pressure is lower than 90/50 and/or heart rate is lower than 50. The order date was 09/10/2024. On 10/17/2024 at 8:08 AM, during medication pass observation, a Registered Nurse (RN) began preparing medications for Resident #6. The RN verbalized Resident #6's physician ordered medications for the morning medication pass included Metoprolol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic behavior monitoring was documented on the Behavioral Health (BH) Record for 6 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2, #5, #11, #12, #24, and #25) and records were accurate for 1 of 5 residents observed during medication administration (Resident #6). Findings include: Incomplete Records Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. A physician order dated 02/18/2024, documented behavior monitoring every day and night shift related to major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. Resident #2's October 2024 BH Record documented behavior monitoring every day and night shift related to major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. The BH record had blank spaces for behavioral monitoring during the day shift on 10/03/2024 and 10/13/2024. Resident #2's clinical record lacked documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) was provided to 13 of 13 residents in need of restorative nursing services (Resident #1, #2, #3, #7, #10, #11, #12, #15, #16, #17, #20, #21, and #23). Findings include: On 04/09/2024 at 2:48 PM, the Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA) verbalized the facility's RNP had not been active since January 2024, when the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) providing restorative nursing care changed job duties due to short staffing. The RNA explained the RNP started back up when the RNA was hired on 04/08/2024. The RNA verbalized the RNA briefly spoke with the Physical Therapist (PT) on 04/08/2024, and referred to the restorative nursing binder for activities to do with the residents. The RNA verbalized the RNA was supposed to document RNP after working with the residents but had not had the opportunity to do so. On 04/09/2024 at 3:01 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized the LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review, and interview, the facility's Abuse Committee, to include the Director of Nursing, failed to understand and identify actual employee to resident verbal and physical abuse had occurred toward a resident for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #3) and 2) the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) in charge of the facility's Restorative Nursing Program (RNP), had the knowledge and skills needed to manage the program. Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, initial encounter, dysphagia, unspecified, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety and quadriplegia, unspecified. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 03/21/2024, and concluded on 03/25/2024, documented a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, interview and document review, the Administrator failed to ensure a Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) was maintained for residents with the potential to participate in the program and failed to ensure the Abuse Committee investigated allegations of employee to resident abuse by applying the current definition of abuse as per 42 CFR Chapter IV, Part 483, Section 12, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. Findings include: Restorative Nursing Program On 04/09/2024 at 2:48 PM, the Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA) verbalized the facility's RNP had not been active since January of 2024, when the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) providing restorative nursing care changed job duties due to short staffing. On 04/09/2024 at 3:01 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized the LPN providing restorative nursing care changed job duties the week of 01/08/2024, due to short staffing. The DON confirmed from 01/08/2024, to 04/08/2024, nursing staff did not provide restorative care. On 04/15/2024 at 4:18 PM, the Administrator verbalized the facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-15 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 10 of 20 facility staff received training on the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Findings include: The following employee records lacked documented evidence QAPI training had been completed: -Employee #2, with a title of Director of Nursing and a start date of 12/05/2023. -Employee #4, with a title of Registered Dietitian and a start date of 06/28/2017. -Employee #8, with a title of Certified Nursing Assistant and a start date of 06/03/2003. -Employee #16, with a title of Certified Nursing Assistant and a start date of 01/23/2024. -Employee #13, with a title of Registered Nurse and a start date of 12/13/2023. -Employee #15, with a title of Licensed Practical Nurse and a start date of 12/20/2021. -Employee #18, with a title of Dietary Aide/Cook and a start date of 11/20/2023. -Employee #19, with a title of Dietary Aide/Cook and a start date of 06/16/2017. -Employee #20, with a title of Housekeeper and a start date of 01/24/2023. -Employee #21, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity was protected when a care plan was updated to include sexual behaviors of the resident, as the facility response to the resident experiencing abuse. A cognitively impaired, non-verbal resident without previously identified behaviors had a care plan initiated as part of their clinical record without evidence or assessment of a change in the resident's baseline, after facility staff observed physical and verbal abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1) toward the resident for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, initial encounter, dysphagia, unspecified, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Guardian gave informed consent prior to placing an air mattress on top of a resident's bariatric bed for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, initial encounter, dysphagia, unspecified, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety and quadriplegia, unspecified. On 04/08/2024 at 11:05 AM, Resident #3 was in a geri-chair next to the bed. The bed was a bariatric bed with an air mattress on the top of the bed. Resident #3's clinical record lacked a care plan addressing the air mattress on the top of the bariatric bed. Resident #3's clinical record lacked documented evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, initial encounter, dysphagia, unspecified, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety and quadriplegia, unspecified. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 03/21/2024, and concluded on 03/25/2024, documented a Dietary Aid (Food Services Supervisor) had overheard a CNA1 tell Resident #3 I told you I would slap you if you did that again. The FRI was unsubstantiated by the facility for failure to prove Resident #3 experienced a negative psychosocial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to implement the facility's Abuse policies regarding identification, investigation, protection and reporting for an allegation of verbal and physical abuse toward a resident by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, initial encounter, dysphagia, unspecified, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety and quadriplegia, unspecified. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 03/21/2024, and concluded on 03/25/2024, documented a Dietary Aid (Food Services Supervisor) had overheard a CNA tell Resident #3 I told you I would slap you if you did that again. The FRI was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a fall resulting in serious bodily injury was reported the State Agency (SA) for 1of 13 sampled residents (Resident #7). Findings include: Resident #7 Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance and wandering in diseases classified elsewhere. A Post Fall Evaluation dated 01/21/2024, documented Resident #7 fell in the facility's dining area. Resident #7 fell backward and struck the back of the resident's head on a door frame. Resident #7 lost consciousness for five seconds and was transferred to the emergency room (ER) for further assessment. On 04/11/2024 at 1:10 PM, the Administrator explained falls resulting in serious bodily injury were required to be reported to the SA. The Administrator verbalized the Administrator's understanding was a fall including the resident striking the resident's head with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide a discharge notification to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 3 discharged residents (Resident #26). Findings include: Resident #26 Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus with other specified complications and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. A Nurse's Note dated 03/03/2024, documented the resident was found to have slurred speech and altered mental status. The resident was transferred to the hospital for consultation. The resident was discharged from the facility on 03/04/2024. Resident #26's clinical record lacked documented evidence a notification of discharge was provided to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman's office. On 04/09/2024 at 10:08 AM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed the MDS RN was responsible for notifying the State Long Term Care Ombudsman's office of discharges. The MDS RN confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment for 3 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #2, #15 and #17). Findings include: Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and vascular dementia, moderate, with mood disturbance. On 04/08/2024 at 1:06 PM, Resident #2 denied having an indwelling catheter in place currently or recently. Resident #2's MDS Section H - Bowel and Bladder, dated 03/11/2024, documented Resident #2 had an indwelling catheter. Resident #2's clinical record lacked any other documented evidence of the presence of an indwelling catheter. On 04/10/2024 at 3:35 PM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #2 did not have an indwelling catheter in place at the time the MDS dated [DATE], was completed and the indwelling catheter was marked in error. Resident #15 Resident #15 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented related to 1) a resident's indwelling catheter (Resident #19), 2) a resident's end-of-life/comfort care (Resident #24), and 3) a resident's air mattress (Resident #3) for 3 of 13 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #19 Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction and schizoaffective disorder, unspecified. A physician's order dated 04/07/2024, documented indwelling catheter. Resident #19's clinical record lacked a care plan related to the presence or care of the resident's indwelling catheter. On 04/10/2024 at 3:31 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator verbalized catheters and catheter care should be included in a resident's care plan when the resident had an indwelling catheter. The MDS Coordinator explained the care plan would include interventions such as signs and symptoms to monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for insulin therapy for 2 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #9 and #13). Findings include: Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. A physician's order dated 10/10/2023, documented NovoLOG Insulin FlexPen subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/milliliters (ml), (Insulin Aspart). Inject as per sliding scale subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime related to type II diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications: - if blood sugar was between 150 - 200, inject two units; - 201 - 250 = four units; - 251 - 300 = six units; - 301 - 350 = eight units; - 351 - 400 = ten units; - 401 - 450 = 12 units. Give insulin as directed and call provider. Resident #9's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated February 2024, documented the resident's blood sugar was over 400 on the following dates:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess an air mattress for entrapment and restraint for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, initial encounter, dysphagia, unspecified, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety and quadriplegia, unspecified. On 04/08/2024 at 11:05 AM, Resident #3 was in a geri-chair next to the bed. The bed was a bariatric bed with an air mattress on the top of the bed. Resident #3's clinical record lacked a care plan addressing the air mattress on the top of the bariatric bed. Resident #3's clinical record lacked documented evidence the risk and benefits were explained to the resident's Guardian and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1) a resident with an indwelling catheter had orders in place for ongoing care of the catheter, 2) catheter care provided to a resident was documented in the resident's clinical record, and 3) a care plan was developed and implemented related to an indwelling catheter for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #19). Findings include: Resident #19 Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction and schizoaffective disorder, unspecified. Resident #19's admission Record documented on 04/04/2024, the onset of the diagnoses of other symptoms and signs involving the genitourinary system and retention of urine, unspecified. A physician's order dated 04/07/2024, documented indwelling catheter. On 04/10/2024 at 3:11 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) verbalized the catheter care CNAs provided to residents included emptying the catheter bag, recording…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1) a multidose vial was discarded by the use by date, 2) discontinued medications were disposed of timely and 3) the temperature of a refrigerator containing medications was logged daily for 1 of 1 sampled medication rooms. Findings include: Multidose Vial On 04/09/2024 at 4:23 PM, during an inspection of the medication storage room in the presence of a Registered Nurse (RN), a vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative, diluted aplisol 5 tuberculin units (TU)/0.1 milliliters (ml) was located in a refrigerator. The vial was inside the manufacturer box, 11/28 was written on the box. The box contained the following instruction: Once entered, vial should be discarded after 30 days. The RN confirmed the date written on the box was 11/28 and the vial should have been discarded prior to 04/09/2024. On 04/10/2024 at 10:05 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained the expectation of nursing staff when a multidose vial was opened was to write the date opened on the vial. The vial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review the facility failed to assist a resident in obtaining dental services after a resident experienced bleeding gums for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #10). Findings include: Resident #10 Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of cerebellar stroke syndrome. On 04/08/2024 at 2:36 PM, Resident #10's Guardian explained the resident had dental issues in the past and there was supposed to be a follow-up appointment but the Guardian did not know if a dental appointment was made. A physician's order dated 11/22/2021, documented the facility may arrange for podiatry, dental, psychiatric, audiology and vision consultations as needed. A care plan initiated 04/07/2023, and revised 10/12/2023, documented the resident had oral/dental health problems related to poor oral hygiene, needing supervision with oral care, and history of cavities. The care plan documented an intervention to coordinate arrangements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident's allergy restrictions were accommodated related to lactose intolerance for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #17). Findings include: Resident #17 Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of lactose intolerance, unspecified. On 04/08/2024 at 10:28 AM, Resident #17 verbalized the resident could not eat cheese because the resident was lactose intolerant. The resident explained the resident sometimes received cheese with the resident's meals and the resident was served eggs with cheese on top for the resident's breakfast on the morning of 04/08/2024. Resident #17's physician's orders documented the following: -Order date 05/31/2023, resident to dairy-free products as a replacement for whole milk. -Order date 02/18/2024, regular diet, regular texture, thin consistency, related to lactose intolerance, unspecified. Resident #17's comprehensive care plan initiated 08/10/2023, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's clinical record was complete when an Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment was not completed for a resident upon discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 resident selected for Resident Assessment (Resident #22) and care provided related to a resident's indwelling catheter was documented in the resident's clinical record for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #19). Findings include: Resident #22 Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. A Transfer/Discharge Report documented Resident #22 was discharged from the facility on 11/20/2023. Resident #22's clinical record lacked a discharge MDS assessment. On 04/09/2024 at 9:26 AM, the MDS Coordinator verbalized the facility was required to complete MDS assessments upon a resident's entry to the facility, with any changes in condition, and upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, personnel record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure infection control training was provided timely to 1 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #9). Findings include: Employee #9 Employee #9 was hired as the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator on 08/16/2021. Employee #9's personnel record documented infection control training was last completed on 01/25/2023. The employee's personnel record lacked documented evidence infection control training had been completed for 2024. On 04/15/2024 at 3:17 PM, the Human Resources (HR) Generalist verbalized infection control training was required to be completed upon hire and annually. The HR Generalist confirmed Employee #9 had not completed infection control training timely. The facility policy titled Long-Term Care Staff Continuing Education, reviewed 04/13/2023, documented all permanent nursing department employees shall receive infection control educational programs yearly.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity when residents felt bother, annoyed, or harassed by other residents' comments and behaviors for 2 of 15 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) residents (Resident #2 and #3). Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications and acquired absence of right leg above knee. Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. FRI #NV00069712 documented on 10/23/23, Resident #1 was in the dining room getting coffee when Resident #2 walked by and stated you guys need to get Resident #1 black glasses, so I don't have to see them looking at me. A staff member encouraged Resident #1 to keep walking. Within hearing of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a non-verbal resident was not verbally abused by a staff member for 1 of 15 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) residents (Resident #12). Findings include: Resident #12 Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, sequela, quadriplegia, unspecified, paraplegia, unspecified, and aphasia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. FRI #NV00070158 dated 01/03/24, documented Resident #12 was receiving a beverage in the dining room on the morning of 12/28/23, when a Dietary Aide (DA) overheard a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1) say shut the (expletive) up to the resident. The DA reported the incident to the Dietary Manager on 01/03/24, and an investigation was initiated. Resident #12's clinical record lacked any documentation of the incident. Resident #12's Minimum Data Set 3.0 Assessment (MDS), Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was completed and submitted timely to the State Agency (SA) for allegations of abuse for 1 of 15 FRIs. Findings include: FRI #NV00069839 with the allegation of resident to resident abuse was submitted to the SA on 11/14/23. The allegation was made on 11/12/23. On 02/28/24 at 4:19 PM, the Chief Nursing Officer confirmed the FRI was submitted late and outside of the required timeframes. On 2/28/24 at 2:41 PM, the Administrator verbalized allegations of abuse and neglect were to be reported to the SA within two hours if bodily harm occurred, 24 hours for all other allegations of abuse and neglect, and the final report was to be submitted within five working days of the incident. The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition, last revised 08/25/23, documented the abuse investigation team would report suspected abuse via the Facility Reported Incident form for all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to 1) ensure an allegation of employee to resident verbal abuse was thoroughly investigated and documented for 1 of 15 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) residents (Resident #12) and 2) report investigation results within five working days of the for 2 of 15 FRIs (NV00070209 and NV00070124). Findings include: Employee to Resident Altercation Resident #12 Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, sequela, quadriplegia, unspecified, paraplegia, unspecified, and aphasia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease. FRI #NV00070158 dated 01/03/24, documented Resident #12 was receiving a beverage in the dining room on the morning of 12/28/23, when a Dietary Aide (DA) overheard a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) say shut the (expletive) up to the resident. The DA reported the incident to the Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented related to 1) post-traumatic stress disorder and psychotic disorder with hallucinations for 1 of 15 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) investigated residents (Resident #14), 2) following an investigation for employee to resident verbal abuse for 1 of 15 FRI investigated residents (Resident #12), and 3) inappropriate behaviors for 2 of 15 FRI investgated residents (Resident #1 and #4). Findings include: Resident #14 Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic, altered mental status, unspecified, and psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition. Resident #14's physician order dated 04/18/23, documented the following: Cymbalta oral capsule delayed release particles 60 milligrams (mg), give one capsule by mouth one time a day for anxiety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse and harassment by another resident and prevent further abuse and harassment for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #6) and ensure a resident was not verbally and physically abused by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) when providing peri-care for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #20). Findings include: Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain etiology. Resident #2's Communication Note dated 10/09/23, documented by an Activities Aide, documented after a Resident Council meeting, Resident #2 went into the activity office for a personal conversation. Resident #2 started crying because after the Resident Council meeting, Resident #6 balled out Resident #2 for not telling the truth regarding meals being served in a timely manner. During the conversation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to submit an initial Facility Incident Report to the State Agency within two hours for 1 of 1 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI). Findings include: On 10/18/23 at 3:40 PM, CNA1 confirmed witnessing CNA2 forcefully rolling a resident in bed to provide morning peri-care. CNA1 did notified the Director of Nursing of the incident until the afternoon of 08/24/23. The facility's documented timeline indicated the Social Worker received the allegation of employee to resident abuse on 08/24/23 at 3:30 PM. An initial FRI #NV00069288 was submitted to the State Survey Agency on 08/24/23 at 8:38 PM, with the allegation of employee to resident abuse, three hours late. On 10/19/23 at 10:59 AM, the Administrator verbalized the Administrator was part of the facility Abuse Prevention Team (Abuse Investigation Team). The Administrator confirmed the initial report for alleged employee to resident abuse was not reported to the State Agency within the two-hour required timeframe. The facility policy titled Reporting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed following employee to resident abuse for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #20). The failure had the potential to delay implementation of appropriate resident care interventions. Findings include: Resident #20 Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, contracture of muscle and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology. An initial Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 08/24/23, documented an employee to resident abuse on 08/24/23, at 3:30 PM. The FRI documented a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) witnessed another CNA forcefully push Resident #20 to the edge of the bed to provide peri-care. Resident #20 met with the Social Worker alleging employee to resident abuse. Resident #20's Comprehensive Care Plan lacked a care plan related to the employee to resident abuse. On 10/19/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-04-15 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment was transmitted timely and at any point in the subsequent five months for one discharged resident reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #22). Findings include: Resident #22 Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. A Transfer/Discharge Report documented Resident #22 was discharged from the facility on 11/20/2023. Resident #22's clinical record lacked a discharge MDS assessment. On 04/09/2024 at 9:26 AM, the MDS Coordinator verbalized the facility was required to complete MDS assessments upon a resident's entry to the facility, with any changes in condition, and upon discharge from the facility. The MDS Coordinator explained the MDS Coordinator was required to submit a final validation report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,258 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,258 — penalty dated 2023-10-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PERSHING GENERAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 05/07/1984
BENDURE, TEDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
CHADOCK, BRANDONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2022
SAYLES, SONDRAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2024
TUELLER, DANAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
CARRUTH, MARCIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/08/2025
MOCK, DEBORAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2011
REITZ, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 02/05/2025
VANGUILDER, KAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/26/2013
BROYLES, LYNNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
STIEHL, RAYLENEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295000. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next