Wingfield Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Cente
2350 Wingfield Hills Rd, Sparks, NV 89436 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (775) 335-8275 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $75,670 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-14)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 12.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 5.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 2.0% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.2% | 13.5% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.1% | 22.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 89.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.1% | 15.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.9% | 17.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.0% | 80.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.3% | 23.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.7% | 9.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.63 | 1.85 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.29 | 1.45 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 291 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.5%CMS range 45.7–60.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 8.0–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 84.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 77.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 5.4–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a bed bound resident with a pressure ulcer was repositioned every two hours and assistive heal protectors were applied correctly, resulting in additional pressure ulcers for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #81). Findings include: Resident #81 Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including encephalopathy, unspecified, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, generalized, contracture of muscle, left lower leg, osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage IV, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, personal history of traumatic brain injury. Resident #81's Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment, dated 07/04/23, was initiated at admission and an observation end date of 07/10/23. Section M (skin conditions) documented a Braden skin assessment was completed and the resident was at risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to prevent neglect of a resident when medication was not administered per a physician's order resulting in death for 1 of 31 residents sampled for medication review (Resident #1) and prevent resident to resident abuse for 8 of 8 residents sampled with documented resident to resident altercations (Resident #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14). Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cardiac arrest, cause unspecified, and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], documented Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for cardiac arrest. The resident received a cardiac catheterization and suffered another brief arrest during the procedure. Resident #1's discharge medications included Brillinta (ticagrelor) 90 milligrams (mg), take one tablet by mouth two times a day for 30 days. A Nursing Progress Note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to administer significant medications per physician order resulting in death for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cardiac arrest, cause unspecified, and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], documented Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for cardiac arrest. The resident received a cardiac catheterization and suffered another brief arrest during the procedure. Resident #1's discharge medications included Brillinta (ticagrelor) 90 milligrams (mg), take one tablet by mouth two times a day for 30 days. A Nursing Progress Note dated [DATE], documented Resident #1 was admitted to the facility and did not have shortness of breath, breathing difficulties, or chest pain. The resident's heart rate and rhythm were regular. Resident #1 reported the hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a resident's drinking water placed on the floor was not in close proximity to a urinal holding the resident's bodily fluids for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #17), 2) clean linens were kept covered during transport and delivery, 3) a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) cleaned a tablet splitter before and after use during medication administration, 4) hand hygiene supplies were readily available to staff and staff performed hand hygiene as required when performing wound care for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #4), 5) Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented appropriately for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 13), and 6) Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) were implemented according to facility policy and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #100). This deficient practice had the potential to spread infectious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan related to oxygen administration was revised when the resident's oxygen order was discontinued for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #70). This deficient practice had the potential to result in staff being unaware of the services required by the resident to reach and maintain their highest practicable level of functioning.Findings include:Resident #70Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and emphysema.A physician's order dated 11/13/2026, and discontinued on 01/29/2026, documented to administer oxygen at 3 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula continuously every shift for emphysema.Resident #70's clinical record lacked documentation of an active physician's order for oxygen therapy.A care plan focus, initiated 01/14/2026,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an ileostomy received care consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's care plan for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #32), by not conducting and documenting a formal assessment of the residents ability to safely perform ileostomy self-care before allowing independent management of the pouch, not providing and documenting education on safe infection control, when to report problems; and, not ensuring staff provided and accurately documented ileostomy care and monitoring in accordance with physician orders and the care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to result in improper ostomy management, leakage, skin breakdown, infection, and inaccurate documentation of care.Findings include:Resident #32Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including ileostomy status, cognitive communication deficit, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to identify, report, and address signs and symptoms of dehydration for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #13) by not ensuring staff assessed, documented, or implemented required care plan interventions and physician orders related to hydration needs. The deficient practice had the potential for worsening dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, delayed treatment, and compromised physical well being.Findings include: Resident #13 Resident#13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, and contractures. On 02/10/2026 at 8:26 AM, Resident#13 was observed lying in bed with dry, cracked lips. On 02/11/2026 at 1:30 PM, Resident #13 was observed with dry, cracked lips and sunken eyes. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) assigned to Resident #13's care, confirmed the resident had dry, cracked lips, signs, and symptoms consistent with dehydration. The LPN stated the Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the enteral nutrition was administered in accordance with physician orders and facility policy for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #13). This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for aspiration and inadequate nutritional intake.Findings include: Resident #13 Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, and contractures. A physician order dated 04/08/2025, documented Jevity 1.5 continuous feeding at 65 milliliters (ml) per hour, to be turned off at 10:00 AM for four hours and restarted at 2:00 PM. On 02/10/2026 at 8:56 AM, Resident #13 had a tube feeding (a surgically placed device that delivers nutrition, fluids, and medicine directly into the stomach) running at a rate of 60 ml per hour. A physician order, dated 04/07/2025, documented to have the head of bed up 30-45 degrees during feeding and for one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a safety sign was posted on the outside of a resident door related to oxygen (O2) therapy for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #50) and 2) a resident requiring oxygen therapy was assessed timely when the resident complained of shortness of breath for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #113). These deficient practices had the potential to result in improper handling of oxygen equipment increasing the risk of fire and compromising resident safety as well as the potential to result in physical and emotional distress.Findings include: Resident #50 Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary hypertension, and congestive heart failure. A physician's order dated 01/29/2026, documented to administer oxygen (O2) @ 4 liters/minute via nasal cannula continuously. A care plan dated 01/30/2026, documented monitor peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SPO2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen administration was stopped and the concentrator removed from the resident's room when the physician's order for oxygen was discontinued for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #70). The deficient practices had the potential to cause residents to use an unnecessary medication with possible adverse effects.Findings include:Resident #70Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and emphysema.A physician's order dated 11/13/2026, and discontinued on 01/29/2026, documented to administer oxygen at 3 liters per minute (lpm) via nasal cannula continuously every shift for emphysema.Resident #70's clinical record lacked documentation of an active physician's order for oxygen therapy.An alert progress note dated 01/29/2026, documented Resident #70's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1) medications were secured in a locked cart and inaccessible to residents, visitors, and unauthorized staff when two medication carts and a treatment cart were left unlocked and unattended by a nurse, and 2) expired medications were removed from 1 of 2 medication carts inspected for medication storage. This deficient practice had the potential for residents, visitors, and unauthorized staff to have access to medications not prescribed or intended for the individual and for expired medications with diminished efficacy to be administered to residents. Findings include: Medication carts and treatment cart: On 02/09/2026 at 12:03 PM, the medication cart located at the entrance to the 100 Hall was unlocked and unattended. The top left drawer was pulled open approximately six inches. On 02/09/2026 at 12:04 PM, the Registered Nurse (RN) walked out of the Cafe room, walked up to cart and closed the top left drawer. The RN verbalized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to enforce its non smoking policy and failed to ensure staff refrained from smoking on facility property. The deficient practice created potential fire hazards and compromised the safety of residents, staff, and visitors.Findings include:On 02/09/2026 at 7:45 AM, two staff members were observed standing outside the front entryway near the handicap parking spaces next to the facility van, while smoking. Both employees extinguished the cigarettes and re entered the front entrance at 7:51 AM. The area was within the main entrance zone of the facility.On 02/09/2026 at 8:41 AM, there was an open ash tray with cigarette butts outside of the back entrance to the kitchen area of the facility.On 02/09/2026 at 9:41 AM, the Administrator verbalized the facility was a non-smoking campus. Residents and staff who smoke cigarettes, were to smoke off of the property. The Administrator confirmed the facility followed the facility smoking policy.On 02/11/2026 at 11:04 AM, there was an ashtray with two cigarette buts outside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident gave informed consent prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #80). This deficient practice had the potential for a resident to experience adverse side effects of a medication without deciding if the benefit to the resident was greater than the risk. Findings include: Resident #80 Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of depression, unspecified. The physician's order dated 10/17/2024, documented Escitalopram Oxalate oral tablet 5 milligrams, give one tablet by mouth in the morning for depression as evidence by lack of energy and feeling of sadness. The Psychoactive Medications Disclosure and Consent form signed 12/05/2023, did not indicate if the resident accepted or declined the Escitalopram. On 12/05/2024 at 8:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized the consent form should have indicated if the resident accepted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) the activities care plan addressed a resident's visual impairment and the need for staff to support and assist the resident with personalized activities for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #9). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent staff caring for the resident to be aware of the resident's personalized interests and how the staff could assist the resident to meet the resident's activity related goals. 2) A care plan was developed to address monitoring for a resident with bilateral lower extremity edema for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #86). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to suffer adverse health outcomes because of staff caring for the resident being unaware of the need to monitor for signs of leg swelling. 3) A care plan was developed for the use of bed rails for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #208). This deficient practice had the potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) performed the duties as outlined in the State Board of Nursing Nurse Practice Act with safe medication administration when the LPN failed to check blood sugar levels prior to the administration of insulin for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #212). The deficient practice had the potential to expose the resident to medication errors resulting in additional health complications. Findings include: Resident #212 Resident #212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including type two diabetes mellitus without complications. On 12/02/2024 at 2:17 PM Resident #212 explained while waiting for lunch on 12/02/2024, the resident was sitting with the resident's daughter and a nurse approached the table to check the resident's blood sugar levels. The nurse told the resident the nurse would be back to administer the resident's insulin and the nurse walked away. The nurse came back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident dependent upon staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) had brief changes overnight for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #36). This deficient practice had the potential to compromise resident hygiene, comfort, and dignity, and increase the risk of skin breakdown and infections. Findings include: Resident #36 Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, a disease which causes muscle pain and weakness and trouble moving arms and legs, repeated falls, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, other reduced mobility, and pressure ulcer of sacral region, unspecified stage. On 12/02/2024 at 9:28 AM, Resident #36 verbalized the resident was ignored by the night shift staff and was only receiving a brief change once overnight. The resident explained the night shift staff should change the resident every two to three hours, however the staff only came in and changed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a visually impaired resident received individualized activities based on the resident's preferences and goals for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #9). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident feeling a loss of independence and negatively impact the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unqualified vision loss, both eyes and depression, unspecified. On 12/02/2024 at 9:08 AM, Resident #9 verbalized the resident would participate in group activities when the activities were accessible for the resident, but the resident did not have any activities the resident could do while the resident was by themself. An Activity Interview for Daily and Activity Preferences, dated 11/04/2024, documented it was very important to the resident to have mystery and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication for neuropathy (a nerve condition causing pain, numbness, tingling, swelling, or muscle weakness in different parts of the body) was refilled timely to prevent the resident from missing eight doses of the medication for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #9). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident experiencing unrelieved nerve pain the medication was prescribed to treat. Findings include: Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including other chronic pain, pain, unspecified, pain in left ankle and joints of left foot, and pain in right knee. On [DATE] at 9:18 AM, Resident #9 verbalized the resident had not received a scheduled pain medication over the weekend. The resident explained the medication was usually given three times a day to prevent the resident from having pain in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident's blood sugar levels were tested timely prior to the administration of insulin for a resident with type two diabetes mellitus for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #212). This deficient practice had the potential to cause the resident to experience hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia symptoms related to blood sugar levels not being regulated. Findings include: Resident #212 Resident #212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including type two diabetes mellitus without complications. On 12/02/2024 at 2:17 PM Resident #212 explained while waiting for lunch on 12/02/2024, the resident was sitting with the resident's daughter and a nurse approached the table to check the resident's blood sugar levels. The nurse told the resident the nurse would be back to administer the resident's insulin and the nurse walked away. The nurse came back over one hour later to administer the insulin to the resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not have a bottle of over-the-counter medication unsecured on the resident's bedside table when the resident did not have an order for the medication or to keep medications at the bedside for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident #9). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident self-medicating and suffering adverse reactions or medication interactions. Findings include: Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified, type II diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, and long term (current) use of insulin. On 12/03/2024 at 2:40 PM, a medication bottle was on the top of the bedside table to the left of the resident, in between the resident's bed and the curtain separating the resident from the resident's roommate. The label on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to protect a resident from being kicked by another resident for 1 of 8 sampled complaint and Facility Reported Incident (FRI) residents (Resident #5). Findings include: Resident #5 Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit and major depressive disorder, recurrent, in partial remission. Resident #6 Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, vascular dementia, moderate, with agitation, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. FRI #NV00070234, dated 01/16/24, documented Resident #5 reported to the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) the resident was kicked in the leg by Resident #6, resulting in a bruise on Resident #5's left knee. A social services progress note dated 01/16/24, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within the required timeframe. Findings include: Resident #5 Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit and major depressive disorder, recurrent, in partial remission. A social services progress note dated 01/16/24 at 9:25 AM, documented Resident #5 reported to the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) the resident was kicked in the leg by another resident. The initial Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #NV00070234 was submitted to the SA on 01/16/24 at 6:51 PM. The incident was documented as physical abuse. On 02/27/24 at approximately 3:00 PM, the Administrator verbalized all types of abuse were to be reported to the SA. The Administrator confirmed allegations of physical abuse were required to be reported to the SA within two hours of becoming aware of the allegation. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment temperature logs were completed daily and hand hygiene supplies were available for dietary staff to wash their hands at hand washing stations with the ability to affect 119 of 119 residents. Findings include: Temperature Logs On 02/27/24 at 8:50 AM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted, and for temperature logs were hanging on the side of a reach-in refrigerator. The following logs documented the most recent temperatures of kitchen equipment: -Fridge and Freezer temperature log last completed 02/21/24 -Front fridge temperature log last completed 02/24/24 -Front fridge temperature log last completed 02/20/24 -Dishwashing and rinsing temperature log last completed 02/21/24 On 02/27/24 at 9:34 AM, the Food Services Manager (FSM) verbalized the expectation was all the logs were to be completed daily to ensure proper functioning of the kitchen equipment and ensure the residents would not become ill from faulty equipment. The FSM confirmed the logs were not up to date and was unsure if all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure there were eight hours of consecutive Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for two of 30 days reviewed for staffing. This deficient practice could have allowed all 116 residents residing in the facility on the affected dates to go without proper assessments or certain cares RNs can perform. Findings include: Review of the facility nursing schedules and Registered Nurse Employee Timesheet for the affected dated revealed the following days where an RN was scheduled for less than eight consecutive hours: - on 12/02/23 an RN worked from Midnight until 6:31 AM for a consecutive total of six hours and 31 minutes, and an RN worked from 5:55 PM until Midnight on 12/03/23 for a consecutive total of six hours and five minutes worked. - on 12/03/23 an RN worked from Midnight until 6:31 AM for a consecutive total of six hours and 31 minutes, and an RN worked from 5:55 PM until Midnight on 12/04/23 for a consecutive total of six hours and five minutes worked. On 12/14/23 at 11:55 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized the DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to resolve the reported grievances from a resident regarding physcian order not being followed and preferred for double portions of food to be served at each meal for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #169). Findings include: Resident #169 Resident #169 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including depression, unspecified, rhabdomyolysis and muscle weakness, generalized. Resident #169's diet order dated 11/28/23, documented regular diet, regular texture and double portions. On 12/11/23 at 12:23 PM, Resident #169 explained double portion sizes were supposed to be served at each meal. The resident often felt hungry after each meal because the double portion sizes were only served occasionally. The resident filed a grievance with the facility about not receiving double portion sizes on 12/05/23, however the resident had not received any follow up from staff relating to the grievance filed. The lunch meal ticket for Resident #169 dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to interview all persons involved in an investigation of misappropriation for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #55). Findings include: Interview and Documentation Resident #55 Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, dependence on wheelchair, and cognitive communication deficit. Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #NV00069936, documented the following: On 11/28/23, Resident #55 notified the Administrator and Social Worker there was $1600.00 missing from the resident's room. The resident kept the money hidden in the resident's bedroom and had the money since March 2023 from the sale of a vehicle. The resident had counted the money weekly and found the money was missing when the resident went to count the money on 11/28/23. On 12/11/23 at 3:48 PM, Resident #55 explained someone had stolen the resident's money from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #23). Findings include: Resident #23 Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #23's last quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], section E0200 (Behavioral Symptoms - Presence and Frequency) completed on 11/23/23, documented behavior not exhibited for item B (verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others. Such as threatening, screaming, and/or cursing at others). Section E0800 (Rejection of Care - Presence and Frequency) documented the behavior, rejection of care, was not exhibited. A Psychiatric Evaluation note dated 11/16/23, documented Resident #23 became agitated and angry during the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) assessment and accused the clinician of checking to see if I am stupid. Resident #23 used foul language to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) care planned interventions for administering a resident's as needed (prn) pain medication were followed for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #53), 2) a care plan related to wounds was complete and person centered for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #81), and 3) a care plan related to anemia was complete and person centered for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #40). Findings include: Resident #53 Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pain, unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), and difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. On 12/11/23 at 9:35 AM, Resident #53 verbalized the resident had been experiencing pain in the resident's left leg and the pain was constant. Order Audit Reports for Resident #53 documented the following medications were ordered for pain: - Acetaminophen tablet 325 milligrams (mg) tablets. Give two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered prior to the expiration date for 1 of 10 residents observed during medication administration (Resident #29) and nystatin (a medicated powder) was applied by an individual with the required skills and training to administer medications for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #23). Findings include: Resident #29 Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified asthma, uncomplicated and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, Resident #29 asked a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for an inhaler. The LPN administered two puffs of albuterol sulfate 90 micrograms (mcg) per actuation (act) to Resident #29. After the resident had taken the medication, the albuterol sulfate inhaler was noted to have an expiration date of 07/2018. On [DATE] at 10:36 AM, the LPN confirmed the albuterol sulfate inhaler was expired and had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure nystatin (a medicated powder) was applied by an individual with the required skills and training to administer medications for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #23). Findings include: Resident #23 Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, unsteadiness on feet, generalized weakness, difficulty walking, not elsewhere classified, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A physician's order dated 12/05/23, documented nystatin external powder 100000 units/gram (gm), apply to bilateral breast fold topically in the morning for dermatitis for seven days and apply to bilateral breast fold topically at bedtime for dermatitis for seven days. An alert note dated 12/08/23, written by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) documented Resident #23 had a shower on 12/08/23, and after the shower a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) patted the area dry and applied nystatin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unsecured in a resident's room by allowing a resident access to self-administer a medication and creating a potential accident by leaving a medication unsecured for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #74). Findings include: Resident #74 Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. On 12/11/23 at approximately 11:00 AM, during a tour of the facility, an inhaler of Breztri Aerosphere was unsecured on Resident #74's bedside table. The door to the resident's door was open. A physician's order dated 11/16/23, documented Breztri Aerosphere Inhalation Aerosol 160-9-4.8 microgram (MCG) (Budesonide-Glycopyrrolate-Formoterol Fumarate). Inhale two puffs orally in the morning and two puffs at bedtime for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident's portable oxygen tank was not empty and oxygen tubing on the portable oxygen tank was changed per a physician's order for 1 of 22 sampled residents (resident #23). Findings Include: Resident #23 Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Empty Oxygen Tank A physician's order dated 09/20/23, documented to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) continuously via nasal cannula for shortness of breath and hypoxia. On 12/11/23 at 2:53 PM, Resident #23 was wearing a nasal cannula conected to an empty portable oxygen tank on the back of the resident's wheelchair. On 12/11/23 at 3:00 PM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 confirmed Resident #23's oxygen tank was empty and should have been replaced or the resident should have had oxygen connected to the resident's oxygen concentrator. On 12/14/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (prn) pain medications were administered as ordered and non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to medicating a resident with a prn pain medication for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #53). Findings include: Resident #53 Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pain, unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), and difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. On 12/11/23 at 9:35 AM, Resident #53 verbalized the resident had been experiencing pain in the resident's left leg and the pain was constant. Order Audit Reports for Resident #53 documented the following medications were ordered for pain: - Acetaminophen tablet 325 milligrams (mg) tablets. Give two tablets (650 mg) every four hours as needed for severe pain. The medication's start date was 09/18/23. - Tramadol 50 mg tablet. Give one tablet by mouth every six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure medication was administered with an error rate of less than five percent (%). There were 37 opportunities and five medication errors. The medication error rate was 13.51%. Findings include: Resident #29 Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified asthma, uncomplicated and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 administered two puffs of albuterol sulfate 90 micrograms (mcg) per actuation (act) to Resident #29. After the resident had taken the medication, the albuterol sulfate inhaler was noted to have an expiration date of 07/2018. On [DATE] at 10:36 AM, LPN1 confirmed the albuterol sulfate inhaler was expired and had been administered to Resident #29. An Order Review History Report for Resident #29 documented the following: -albuterol sulfate hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol solution 108 (90 base)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1)unsecured medications were not left in a resident's room for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #74), 2) an open date was written on a multi-dose vial in 1 of 1 sampled medication storage rooms, 3) expired medications were removed from 1 of 3 sampled medication carts, and 4) medication labels included an expiration date for 2 of 3 sampled medication carts. Findings include: Resident #74 Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. On 12/11/23 at approximately 11:00 AM, during a tour of the facility, an inhaler of Breztri Aerosphere was unsecured on Resident #74's bedside table. A physician's order dated 11/16/23, documented Breztri Aerosphere Inhalation Aerosol 160-9-4.8 microgram (MCG)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide meals based on resident's preferences for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #169). Findings include: Resident #169 Resident #169 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including depression, unspecified, rhabdomyolysis and muscle weakness, generalized. On 12/11/23 at 12:23 PM, Resident #169 explained double portion sizes were supposed to be served at each meal. The resident often felt hungry after each meal because the double portion sizes were only served occasionally. The resident filed a grievance with the facility about not receiving double portion sizes on 12/05/23. The lunch meal ticket for Resident #169 dated 12/11/23, documented the resident would be receiving a cheeseburger and would be getting double portions. The resident verbalized there was one cheeseburger on the plate. A Grievance/Complaint Report dated 12/05/23, documented Resident #169 was supposed to be receiving double…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents sampled for vaccinations (Resident #63 and #74) were screened for eligibility to receive a COVID-19 vaccine, education regarding the vaccine was provided to the resident and/or the resident representative, and the vaccine was offered and either administered or declined. Findings include: Resident #63 Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Resident #63's state immunization record downloaded and printed on 12/13/23 at 11:16 AM, by the [NAME] President (VP) of Clinical Services lacked documented evidence the resident was administered a COVID -19 vaccine in 2023. The vaccine record documented the second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine was administered on 01/14/22.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of property when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) borrowed money from a resident and failed to pay the money back to the resident for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #7). Findings include: Resident #7 Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 09/22/23, with diagnoses including unspecified acquired deformity of right lower leg, dorsalgia, unspecified and other chronic pain. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 08/11/23, documented Resident #7 had reported to the facility, the resident had let a CNA borrow $100.00 to go toward the CNA's nursing degree; however, the CNA failed to return the money to Resident #7. A Complaint Form dated 08/14/23, documented Resident #7 filed a grievance explaining the resident had let a CNA borrow $100.00, however the CNA made no attempt to pay the money back to the resident. The employee was put on leave…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent two residents (Resident #8 and #9) from elopement from the facility. Findings include: FRI #NV00068634 documented on 05/21/23, a resident was found at a hardware store across the street from the facility. Resident #8 Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, cognitive communication deficit, and impulsiveness. An Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 05/12/23, document the resident was at low risk for wandering. A Brief Interview for Mental Status dated 05/15/23, documented the resident was severely impaired, with a score of two. A Daily Skilled Charting Progress Note dated 05/16/23, documented the resident had multiple episodes of confusion and was attempting to open exit doors in hallways. An Incident Progress Note dated 05/21/23, documented the resident's family member had called the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-02-12 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing hours were posted daily in the facility.This deficient practice had the potential to prevent residents and visitors from being informed of the total number of nursing staff and the actual hours worked each day.Findings include: On 02/09/2026 at 8:02 AM, the daily nursing hours posted behind the front desk reception area was dated 02/06/2026. On 02/09/2026 at 8:09 AM, the Administrator confirmed the posting at the front desk was dated 02/06/2026 and should have been changed to the current date. The Administrator verbalized the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Nursing Aide Staffing Coordinator, was responsible for updating the postings daily. On 02/09/2026 at 8:26 AM, the nursing hours posted at the first-floor nurses' station was dated 02/06/2026. On 02/09/2026 at 8:29 AM, the nursing hours posted at the second-floor nurses' station was dated 01/31/2026. On 02/09/2026 at 10:30 AM, the CNA, Nursing Aide Staffing Coordinator, responsible for updating the postings, confirmed all three of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-02-27 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to include in the written Notice of Transfer or Discharge provided to residents for January 2024, the reason for transfer or discharge, the effective date and/or the location of the transfer or discharge for 8 of 36 discharged residents in January 2024 (Resident #3, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, and #15). Finding include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, type II diabetes mellitus without complications, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, unspecified asthma, uncomplicated, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Resident #3's Notice of Transfer or Discharge with a notification date of 01/28/24, lacked an effective date and a reason for the transfer or discharge. Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including arthropathic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-14 · tag F0638 — widespreadAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed or submitted timely for the months of February, March, April, May, June, July, September, and October 2023. Findings include: On 12/13/23 at 9:29 AM, the Regional Minimum Data Set (MDS) Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed the late completion of 14 of 112 assessments for February 2023 with a total error percentage of 12.50, and 17 of 150 assessments for March 2023 with a total error percentage of 11.33. The Regional MDS RN verbalized due to staff turnover the completion error rate had increased for the months of February and March 2023 and the Regional MDS RN was now overseeing the completion of the resident assessment process. The MDS 3.0 Error Detail Reports documented the following late completions or submissions: -April 2023 documented 98 total completions and submissions. 17 admission assessments were submitted more than seven days after the entry date, and 42 comprehensive assessments were completed more than 14 days after the entry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$75,670 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $75,670 — penalty dated 2023-12-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRAY ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| GRAY, ZACHARY | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| GRAY, CHELSEY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| ASL REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| WINGFIELD HILLS RD. LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| LEBOWITZ, ANDREW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 02/01/2022 |
| NADORA, MARIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| NASRAWY, JOSEPH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| REVIVE HEALTH SENIOR CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2022 |
| ILYAS, IRTQA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2023 |
| MODINA, KAITLYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/02/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295088. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.