No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

South Lyon Medical Center

213 Whitacre St, Yerington, NV 89447 · Non profit - Corporation · 49 certified beds · (775) 463-2301 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (775) 463-2301 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
811 S Main St · (800) 275-8777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rex Drug0.5 mi
24 N Main St · (775) 463-2345 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
601 W Bridge St · (775) 463-3670 · Call to confirm hours
Park
MT Vw · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.1%12.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder6.1%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.5%1.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.3%5.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.0%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.6%13.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.7%22.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%89.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%15.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.6%17.1%17.1%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.01U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.16
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.87
RN hoursweekends
61.8%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 31.8 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an Infection Preventionist (IP) was employed by the facility at least part time each month from 12/27/2024 to 05/12/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to result in lapses in infection control and the Antibiotic Stewardship (ASP) program with potential for infections to spread throughout the facility and residents to be treated with ineffective antibiotics.Findings include: A facility document titled Payroll Status Form documented IP-1's last day of work at the facility was 12/26/2024. A facility document titled Payroll Status Form documented IP-2's first date of work at the facility was 05/12/2025. On 07/23/2025 at 8:42 AM, the Human Resource Manager (HRM) confirmed IP-1's last day of work at the facility was 12/26/2024, and IP-2's first day of work at the facility was 05/12/2025. The HRM verbalized to the best of the HRM's knowledge, there was not another individual who worked as an IP at the facility between 12/26/2024 and 05/12/2025. 07/23/2025 at 3:12 PM, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with intellectual disabilities (Resident #20) was provided the necessary care and services to address the resident's scratching and picking at their arms and legs. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the resident preventable discomfort and placed the resident at risk of skin infections from scratching and picking at skin. Findings include:Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness status unknown, subsequent encounter, mild intellectual disabilities, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation.Resident #20's Comprehensive Care Plan documented a care plan related to communication. The care plan documented an alteration in communication related to intellectual disability, dementia. The interventions included determining the resident's communication methods and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #1) was provided medication for pain relief per the physician's order and failed to ensure medications prescribed for pain as needed (PRN) included the severity of pain the medication was prescribed for. This deficient practice had the potential to result in discomfort, prolonged or unmanaged pain and/or an adverse drug event.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites, pain, unspecified, low back pain, unspecified, and age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture.A Physician's order dated 10/30/2024, documented to give Tylenol (acetaminophen) give 650 milligrams (mg) by mouth every four hours as needed for general discomfort for a pain level 1-4.The order did not specify the pain scale to used, such as 0-10, and did not include instructions regarding how much…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care between the facility and the dialysis center, a written contract and/or agreement with the dialysis provider, and a dialysis policy was developed for the care of a resident on dialysis for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmonitored and uncoordinated care for all residents on dialysis in the facility, and a preventable adverse event.Findings include: Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. A Comprehensive Care Plan included care plan initiated 07/22/2025, documenting Resident #2 required hemodialysis related to a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. A physician's order dated 04/25/2025, documented to take vital signs upon return from Dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays one time a day. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had a full time Director of Nursing (DON). This deficient practice could have allowed all 27 residents residing in the facility on the affected date to go without proper assessments or certain cares Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) perform and compromise the supervision of proper assessments and proper care due to lack of oversight. Findings include: On 07/21/2025, during entrance conference, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) explained the current Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) was acting as the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) until the position was filled. The Facility Assessment, last reviewed 03/2025, documented the Skilled Nursing Facility required a DON and hours would be based off of the facility needs. The Staffing Schedule for the week of 07/13/2025 through 07/26/2025, documented the DON was working in the facility for 32 hours each week. On 07/24/2025 at 8:51 AM, the DON explained working for the facility a total of 40 hours each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Oxygen flow was administered per physician orders for a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #9). This deficient practice had the potential to result in low Oxygen saturations and harm to the resident.Findings include: Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. A physician's order dated 09/26/2023, documented Oxygen (O2) via nasal canula (NC) at three liters per minute (LPM) as needed for shortness of breath. May remove as desired if breathing is comfortable. An Oxygen Saturations Summary Report documented an Oxygen flow of two LPM on the following dates:-On 07/06/2025 at 10:39 PM.-On 06/10/2025 at 8:22 PM.-On 06/09/2025 at 9:08 PM.-On 06/08/2025 at 8:03 PM.-On 05/01/2025 at 10:10 PM.-On 04/29/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment (FA) was accurate and included nicotine dependence and addiction with the facility's common diagnoses and conditions. This deficient practice had the potential to result in facility staff not receiving adequate training on the care of residents with nicotine dependence and addiction diagnoses and the needs of those residents not being met. Findings include: During the entrance conference with the facility on 07/21/2025, a list of cigarette smokers (smokers) residing in the facility and the FA was provided by the facility. The list of smokers in the facility included five residents. The smoking location was designated off the outside patio accessed through the facility dining room. The Facility Assessment last reviewed March 2025, did not include nicotine abuse or addiction nor a list of the number of active or current substance abuse disorders. On 07/24/2025 at 8:37 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized the DON assisted with reviewing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Oxygen administration was documented in the resident's medication administration record (MAR) for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #9). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmanaged Oxygen saturation levels.Findings include: Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. A physician's order dated 09/26/2023, documented to administer Oxygen (O2) via nasal canula (NC) at three liters per minute (LPM) as needed for shortness of breath. May remove as desired if breathing is comfortable. An Oxygen Saturations Summary Report documented an Oxygen flow of two LPM on the following dates:-On 07/06/2025 at 10:39 PM.-On 06/10/2025 at 8:22 PM.-On 06/09/2025 at 9:08 PM.-On 06/08/2025 at 8:03 PM.-On 05/01/2025 at 10:10 PM.-On 04/29/2025 at 8:13 PM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify a concern and ensure corrective action was implemented related to the lack of tracking and trending of infections and antibiotic use within the Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unnecessary antibiotic use and the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms.Findings include: On 07/24/2025 at 3:11 PM, during the QAPI review with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), the CEO verbalized the facility ceased tracking of infection prevention and control from August 2024 through May 2025, due to not having an Infection Preventionist on staff at the facility. The CEO explained as a result, the QAPI committee did not identify a concern related to the lack of antibiotic stewardship tracking for resident antibiotics. The facility policy titled, Quality Management Program, revised 06/2025, documented the performance improvement plan would address all systems of care and management practice. Performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) were implemented according to facility policy and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #6). This deficient practice had the potential to increase risk of spreading infectious organisms throughout the facility.Findings include: Resident #6 Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, unspecified site. An aerobic bacterial culture report dated 03/27/2025, documented light growth of MRSA to the resident's left leg. A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], documented an order for contact precautions related to MRSA. A Comprehensive Care Plan included a care plan initiated 06/18/2025, documenting Resident #6 had a chronic fistula to the left inner knee related to chronic MRSA. An intervention initiated 04/06/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) including tracking and trending of infections and antibiotic use from 08/2024 through 05/30/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents not receiving the correct or best antibiotic for infections resulting in prolonged or exacerbated infections and the spread of infections throughout the facility.Findings include:On 07/24/2025 at 2:46 PM, the facility was not able to provide documented evidence of an ASP, including tracking and trending of infections and antibiotic use between 08/2024 and 05/30/2025. On 07/24/2025 at 2:47 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed the IP had not been documenting data related to tracking and trending of infections and antibiotic use. The IP explained how the IP tracked infections and antibiotic use and monitored for trends but did not document the findings. The IP began working at the facility on 05/12/2025 and began to perform tracking and trending of infections and antibiotic use on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, and interview the facility failed to demonstrate effective administration by not ensuring the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) adequately interpreted and implemented effective infection control protocols per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance to effectively prevent the spread of COVID-19 (COVID) resulting in a wide spread outbreak of COVID amongst facility staff and residents. Findings include: A facility COVID tracking sheet documented between [DATE] and [DATE], 16 employees and 16 of 22 residents residing in the facility tested positive for COVID. (See Tag F880 for details). On [DATE] at 3:04 PM, the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) confirmed the facility had a COVID outbreak in the facility around October or November. The CNO explained the rooms at the far end of the hallway had been used in the past to isolate residents with COVID. The residents would have been able to ambulate in the hallways without coming in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance and the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Plan (IPCP) were followed regarding the management of COVID-19 (COVID). This failure resulted in an outbreak of COVID within the facility resulting in 16 employees and 16 of 22 residents (Resident #14, #18, #4, #19, #9, #10, #3, #11, #16, #21, #15, #2, #5, #6, #17, and #12) becoming infected with COVID during September and [DATE]. Resident #12 was transferred to an acute care hospital for treatment of COVID symptoms the facility was not able to manage. Resident #12 expired during this hospitalization. Findings include: Employees An untitled and undated facility spread sheet utilized for tracking employee COVID status, documented during the months of September and [DATE], facility employees were tested for COVID as follows. -On [DATE], a consulting physician with a hire date of [DATE], tested positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect and abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) within the required time frame for 1 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #18). This deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being investigated timely. Findings include: Resident #18 Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was submitted to the SA on 11/27/2024, documenting an allegation of resident neglect and abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The FRI documented the alleged incident occurred on 11/22/2024, and the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) was notified of the allegations on 11/25/2024 by the long-term care unit secretary. On 01/29/2025 at 1:41 PM, the Director of Nursing Secretary (DON Secretary) verbalized the facility's abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, and interview the facility failed to demonstrate effective administration by not ensuring the facility's influenza (flu) and pneumonia (PNA) vaccination program included 1) screening residents for eligibility to receive the vaccines, 2) the provision of education related to the risk and benefits of the vaccines to residents and/or the resident's representative preventing the resident or the resident's representative from making an informed decision regarding the vaccines, 3) a process for determining/selecting the correct PNA vaccine for each resident per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance. This failure resulted in substandard quality of care. Findings include: Influenza Vaccine The facility lacked documented evidence 23 of 26 residents eligible or potentially eligible to receive a flu vaccine were screened for eligibility to receive a flu vaccine and lacked documented evidence education related to the 2023/2024 flu vaccines was provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1) the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) policy was reviewed annually, 2) education regarding the ASP/antibiotic use was provided to staff and residents, #3) a process was in place to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) was made aware when a resident had a new infection and an antimicrobial medication was prescribed, 4) an antibiotic time out was performed to ensure the best treatment was being provided to residents, and 5) the IP had a process in place related to communicating infection, treatment, and prescribing concerns to prescribing providers. Findings include: Antibiotic Stewardship Policy A facility policy titled Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, revised on 10/2023, lacked the following components: -Antibiotic use protocols related to prescribing antibiotics, including documentation of the indication, dosage, and duration of use of antibiotics -A process for periodic review of antibiotic use by prescribing practitioners such as: review of labs and med…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist ( IP) 1) completed a specialized IP training course, 2) provided education related to the Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) to staff 3) understood and conducted an antibiotic time out (an active reassessment conducted of an antimicrobial prescription 48-72 hours after the first administration), 4) had a process in place to ensure residents and staff were offered vaccines (see tag F883 and F887), and 5) the IP communicated with providers regarding prescribing trends, needs, and outcomes, with the potential to effect the facility's entire census of 27 residents. Findings include: Specialized Training A facility document titled Payroll Status Form, dated 10/13/2022, documented the facility's IP had a hire and status (role) date of 10/13/2022. The role was documented as Infection Preventionist. On 07/16/2024 at 7:39 AM, the IP verbalized the IP had completed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Infection Preventionist Training Course…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 26 of 27 residents residing at the facility were screened for eligibility to receive immunization with an influenza (flu) vaccine and/or a pneumonia (PNA) vaccine and failed to ensure education related to the vaccines was provided resulting in substandard quality of care (Resident #4, #27, #16, #10, #24, #11, #15, #14, #19, #6, #13, #5, #23, #2, #1, #3, #22, #21, #9, #7, #20, #18, #12, #26, #17, and #8). Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The resident was [AGE] years of age (YOA). Resident #27 Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, unspecified, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified, and unspecified asthma, uncomplicated. The resident was 95 YOA. Resident #16 Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including COPD, chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1) the Infection Control and Prevention Plan (IPCP) policy was reviewed annually, and 2) enhance barrier precautions (EBP) were being implemented for 2 of 2 residents with indwelling medical devices (Resident #1 and #4). Findings include: Infection Control and Prevention Plan The facility's IPCP policy documented the policy was last reviewed by the facility on 10/2022. The facility was not able to provide evidence the policy had been reviewed and/or revised after 10/2022. The policy referred to IPCP as the hospital's IPCP, referenced duties for hospital staff, and did not include language indicating the policy included the Long Term Care facility. The IPCP lacked the following elements: -a list of reportable communicable diseases and a process for reporting to the appropriate state agencies. -prohibition of employees with communicable diseases or infected skin lesions from direct contact with residents or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0575 — isolated
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups contact information posted in the facility were in a language understandable to residents. Findings include: On 07/16/2024 between 10:30 AM and 11:00 AM, during the Resident Council Interview, one of seven residents verbalized through a translator device, they were not aware of where the State agencies and advocacy groups contact information was located. This resident only read and spoke Spanish. On 07/16/2024 at 2:45 PM, the Director of Nursing verbalized none of the postings were understandable for the resident who read and spoke only Spanish. The DON confirmed the postings should be in a language understandable to the resident. The facility policy titled Resident Communication Rights, revised 07/2015, documented residents had the right to receive communication orally and in writing, including Braille or in a format and language the resident understands.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from resident-to-resident verbal abuse and harassment for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #16). Findings include: Resident #16 Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including adjustment disorder with anxiety and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #15 Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and nutritional anemia, unspecified. On 07/16/2024 at 10:43 AM, Resident #16 verbalized a resident had been harassing them and calling them names. On 07/16/2024 at 11:04 AM, Resident #15 verbalized they believed Resident #16 had stolen a picture out of their room. The resident explained they believed Resident #16 must be gay because they took the picture. Resident #15 verbalized they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to report and investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident verbal abuse and harassment for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #16). This deficient practice could allow allegations of abuse to occur and not be reported for investigation. Findings include: Resident #16 Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including adjustment disorder with anxiety and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #15 Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and nutritional anemia, unspecified. On 07/16/2024 at 10:43 AM, Resident #16 verbalized a resident had been harassing them and calling them names. On 07/16/2024 at 11:04 AM, Resident #15 verbalized they believed Resident #16 had stolen a picture out of their room. The resident explained they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed timely for 3 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #26, #19, and #7). Findings include: Resident #26 Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, fall on same level, and unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbances. The clinical record for Resident #26 included documentation of the physician visits during the first 90 days were dated 05/11/2024, and 07/01/2024. The record lacked documented physician visits in June of 2024 by either a physician or a nurse practitioner. On 07/23/2024 at 10:24 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #26 lacked a physician's visit in June of 2024. The DON explained a physician visit should had been completed as the resident was to be seen every 30 days for the first 90 days. Resident #19 Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and personnel record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had an annual performance evaluation completed timely for 1 of 2 CNAs employed greater than one year, sampled for personnel record review (Employee #7). Findings include: On 07/17/2024 at 11:04 AM, the Human Resources Supervisor participated in an interview to confirm the accuracy of the Personnel Records Checklist completed by the facility for 20 employees. Employee #7 Employee #7 was hired as a CNA with a start date of 04/01/2023. The CNA's personnel record lacked documented evidence of the completion of an annual performance evaluation. On 07/17/2024 at 1:53 PM, the Human Resources Supervisor confirmed the CNA's personnel record lacked documented evidence of the completion of an annual performance evaluation. The facility policy titled Performance Evaluation, revised 06/2019, documented employees would be evaluated by their supervisor annually in the month of their hire date.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the label on a bottle of Morphine oral suspension (a liquid medication) included a measuring guide for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #2). Due to this failure the facility was not able to determine if the medication was correctly reconciled in the facility's Narcotics Reconciliation log and/or if the medication had been diverted. Findings include: Resident #2 Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, heart failure, unspecified, and unspecified atrial fibrillation. A physician's order dated 06/20/2024, documented Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) oral solution 20 milligrams/milliliters (mg/ml), give 0.1 ml by mouth every two hours as needed for pain related to chronic pain syndrome. A Controlled Drug Record for Resident #2 documented Morphine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication was prescribed to a resident with a diagnosed indication for use for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #9). Findings include: Resident #9 Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance and depression, unspecified. On 07/17/2024 at 3:17 PM, a Registered Nurse (RN) verbalized Resident #9 was administered Buspirone three times a day for behaviors such as yelling out, banging their fists, and throwing items. A physician's order dated 10/19/2023, documented Buspirone Hydrochloride (HCI) 15 milligram (mg) tablets. Give one tablet by mouth three times a day for anxiety as evidenced by outbursts and inconsolable crying. A physician's order dated 10/19/2023, documented antianxiety medication Buspar (Buspirone) - monitor for clinical side effects associated with the medication: appetite changes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were not repackaged for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #3) Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including nondisplaced oblique fracture of shaft of right tibia, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, age related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, unspecified site, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, other muscle spasm, and localized edema. A physician's order date 05/10/2024, documented hydrocodone-acetaminophen (Norco) oral tablet 5-325 milligram (mg). Give one tablet by mouth every six hours for chronic arthritic pain. A Controlled Drug Record belonging to Resident #3, documented on 07/17/2024, the remaining count of Norco was 105. On 07/17/24 at 7:52 AM, during an inspection of the section one medication cart, conducted with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a vegetable substitute of equal nutritive value was offered to 1 of 27 residents' trays observed during tray line (Resident #27). Findings include: Resident #27 Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. The lunch menu for 07/16/2024, documented roast turkey, Brussels sprouts, and corn pudding. Resident #27's Food Likes and Dislikes on the tray card, documented dislikes Brussels sprouts. On 07/16/2024 at 12:07 PM, during tray line observation, Resident #27's tray was plated with turkey, corn pudding and mashed potatoes were substituted for Brussels sprouts. On 07/16/2024 at 3:34 PM, the Registered Dietician (RD) verbalized when a resident had dislikes being served for the meal, the resident should be offered a substitute comparable in nutritional value. The RD confirmed mashed potatoes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide meals based on resident's preferences for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #27). Findings include: Resident #27 Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Resident #27's Food Likes and Dislikes on the tray card, documented dislikes carrots. On 07/16/2024 at 11:32 AM, the Dietary Manager verbalized if a resident disliked what was being served, those items were to be marked on the tray card for the [NAME] to be aware of what was and was not to be on the resident's plate. The Dietary Aide was responsible for checking the tray card to make sure the plate did not contain resident dislikes. On 07/16/2024 at 3:34 PM, the Registered Dietician (RD) verbalized when a resident had dislikes being served for the main entree, the resident should not be served items the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify 1) the facility lacked screening and implementation for pneumococcal (PNA) and influenza vaccinations and education was not provided for declinations and consents were not obtained for vaccinations given 2) the Infection Preventionist (IP) had not completed a specialized IP training course 3) the Infection Control and Prevention Plan (IPCP) policy was reviewed annually and contained outdated information, and 4) the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) policy was reviewed annually and contained outdated information. Findings include: Screening and Implementation for Pneumococcal (PNA) and Influenza vaccinations On 07/18/2024 at 8:29 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not have a process in place for screening residents for eligibility to receive a flu vaccine and did not provide education related to flu vaccines to the residents. The DON confirmed consents were signed at admit and new consents were not signed prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was screened for eligibility to receive a COVID-19 (COVID) booster vaccine, education regarding the vaccine was provided and the CNA had an opportunity to make an informed decision to receive or decline the vaccination, and 2) 1 of 6 residents reviewed for immunization with a COVID booster vaccine were screened for eligibility to receive the vaccine, education regarding the vaccine was provided to the resident or the resident's representative, and the resident or the resident representative had the opportunity to make an informed decision to receive or decline the vaccine. Findings include: CNA The facility lacked documented evidence a CNA with the hire date of 10/25/2020, was screened for eligibility to receive a COVID booster vaccine, education regarding the vaccine was provided and the CNA had an opportunity to make an informed decision to receive or decline the vaccination. The CNAs state immunization record documented the CNA recieved a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0941 — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure communications training was completed by staff for 1 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #4). Findings include: Employee #4 Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietician on 09/11/2003. Employee #4's personnel record lacked documented evidence of communication training. On 07/23/2024 at 9:42 AM, the Human Resources Supervisor verbalized all staff were required to complete Communication training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter. The Human Resources Supervisor confirmed Employee #4 did not have Communication training. The facility policy titled Communication Training, effective 04/2022, documented employees were to complete Communication training at a minimum of annually.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0942 — isolated
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights training was completed by staff for 1 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #4). Findings include: Employee #4 Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietician on 09/11/2003. Employee #4's personnel record lacked documented evidence of resident rights training. On 07/23/2024 at 9:42 AM, the Human Resources Supervisor verbalized all staff were required to complete Resident Rights training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter. The Human Resources Supervisor confirmed Employee #4 did not have Resident Rights training. The facility policy titled Resident Rights Training, effective 08/2022, documented employees were to complete Resident Rights education at a minimum of annually.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure elder abuse training was completed timely for 7 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #4, #7, #10, #11, #17, #19, and #20). Findings include: Employee #4 Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietician on 09/11/2003. Employee #4's personnel record documented elder abuse training completed 10/06/2022, however lacked documented evidence elder abuse training was completed in 2023. Employee #7 Employee #7 was hired as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 04/01/2023. Employee #7's personnel record documented elder abuse training completed 10/29/2023, however was completed more then 30 days after hire. Employee #10 Employee #10 was hired as a Licensed Practical Nurse on 06/06/2024. Employee #10's personnel record lacked initial elder abuse training completed prior to starting work on the floor. Employee #11 Employee #11 was hired as a Registered Nurse (RN) on 01/22/2024. Employee #11's personnel record documented elder abuse training completed 06/12/2024,however was completed more then 30 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) training had been completed to include objectives of resident care needs for 1 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #4). Findings include: Employee #4 Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietician on 09/11/2003. Employee #4's personnel record lacked documented evidence of QAPI training. On 07/23/2024 at 9:42 AM, the Human Resources Supervisor verbalized all staff were required to complete QAPI training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter. The Human Resources Supervisor confirmed Employee #4 did not have QAPI training. The facility policy titled Quality Management Program, revised 11/2017, documented all staff shall receive annual training on the facility's QAPI program.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolated
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely infection control training to all staff to ensure proper procedures and standards of the program for 1 of 20 sampled employees (#4). Findings include: Employee #4 Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietician on 09/11/2003. Employee #4's personnel record lacked documented evidence infection control training had been completed. On 07/23/2024 at 9:42 AM, the Human Resources Supervisor verbalized all staff were required to complete infection control training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter. The Human Resources Supervisor confirmed Employee #4 did not have infection control training. The facility policy titled Infection Control Training, effective 01/2021, documented education and training would be provided to all healthcare personnel annually.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0946 — isolated
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure compliance and ethics training was completed timely for 1 of 20 sampled employees (#4). Findings include: Employee #4 Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietician on 09/11/2003. Employee #4's personnel record lacked documented evidence of compliance and ethics training. On 07/23/2024 at 9:42 AM, the Human Resources Supervisor verbalized all staff were required to complete Compliance and Ethics training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter. The Human Resources Supervisor confirmed Employee #4 did not have compliance and ethics training. The facility policy titled Compliance and Ethics Training, Effective 10/2022, documented all employees complete Compliance and Ethics continuing education. Education and training shall be provided to all staff annually.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health training was completed timely for 1 of 20 sampled employees (Employee #4). Findings include: Employee #4 Employee #4 was hired as the Registered Dietician on 09/11/2003. Employee #4's personnel record lacked documented evidence of behavioral health training. On 07/23/2024 at 9:42 AM, the Human Resources Supervisor verbalized all staff were required to complete Behavioral Health training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter. The Human Resources Supervisor confirmed Employee #4 did not have Behavioral Health training. The facility policy titled Behavioral Health Care Training, effective 07/2022, documented employees were to complete Behavioral Health Care training at a minimum of annually.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly and residents received the portion sizes indicated on the facility's menu with the potential to affect the entire facility census of 27 residents. Findings include: Food Storage On 09/25/23 at 10:11 AM, in a reach-in refrigerator, there were two sealed packages of hard boiled eggs, each containing a dozen. The packages were labeled with a use-by date of 08/29/23. A third package was open and unsealed, containing six hardboiled eggs with the same use-by date of 08/29/23. The Dietary Supervisor verbalized the hardboiled eggs should have been used or thrown away by 08/29/23 because they could have made residents sick if consumed after the use-by date. The Dietary Supervisor explained the opened package of six hard boiled eggs should have been transferred to a different container for storage and labeled. On 09/25/23 at 10:24 AM, in the dry food storage room there was a bag of Cheetos, opened and spilling from the bag. On 09/25/23 at 10:29 AM, the Dietary Supervisor confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on dining observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident was served at the same time as two other residents at the same table in the dining room for 1 of 3 residents at a table (Resident #8). Findings include: Resident #8 Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. On 09/25/23 at 11:55 PM, Resident #8 was sitting in a wheelchair at a table in the dining room with two other residents. Resident #8's table mates were served lunch trays and Resident #8 was not served a lunch tray. On 09/25/23 at 12:08 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) delivered Resident #8's lunch tray. On 09/25/23 at 12:18 PM, the CNA verbalized lunch was always delivered in two separate tray carts. The CNA explained the tray carts usually came out together but were sent out one at a time on 09/25/23, during the lunch service. The expectation was all residents sitting at a table would be served at the same time. The CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #18). Findings include: Resident #18 Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's with late onset, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with psychotic disturbance and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, with psychotic disturbance. Behavioral Progress Notes for June 2023, documented Resident #18 had five instances of verbal aggression. Behavior Progress Notes for the seven day look back period included the following: -On 06/28/23 the resident was being assisted with removing shoes and got agitated. The resident told the nurse Get out of here! The staff member left the resident's room for five minutes and returned to the room. The resident was pleasant. -On 06/29/23 the resident was entering other resident rooms. Staff attempted to stop the resident from entering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was created timely for the treatment and care needs for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #475). Findings include: Resident #475 Resident #475 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Resident #475's clinical record lacked documented evidence a baseline care plan was completed for oxygen use. On 09/26/23 at 10:33 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN) verbalized Resident #475 was on 3 liters per minute of supplemental oxygen. The RN confirmed the resident was admitted to the facility with oxygen and there was no baseline care plan. On 09/26/23 at 10:48 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained baseline care plans were required to be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility and explained baseline care plans…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of emphysema, unspecified. On 09/26/23 at 10:47 AM, Resident #4 was resting in bed while wearing a nasal cannula. The resident's oxygen concentrator was set at 2.5 liters per minute (LPM). A physician's order dated 09/24/23, documented oxygen via concentrator at 2.0 LPM via nasal cannula every hour for low oxygen saturation. On 09/26/23 at 10:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized Resident #4 had an order for oxygen administration and was currently receiving oxygen administration via the nasal cannula from an oxygen concentrator. On 09/26/23 at 12:07 PM, the Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed Resident #4 was receiving oxygen administration and oxygen administration should be care planned. The RN confirmed Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan had not been updated to include oxygen administration. On 09/26/23 at 1:34 PM, the DON verbalized oxygen administration should be care planned since oxygen was a medication and an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1) an order for comfort care included the indication for comfort care, 2) the facility had a policy and process to help direct care and concerns related to comfort care, and 3) a resident was reassessed for continued need to remain on comfort care for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings include: Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, type II diabetes mellitus, and other chronic pain. Diagnoses including dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with agitation, Parkinson's disease, violent behavior, disease of pancreas, unspecified, other nonspecific abnormal findings of lung field, and elevation of levels of liver transaminase levels were entered into the resident's clinical record during the resident stay at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was supervised during eating while allowing resident to eat in a reclined position for a resident with chewing difficulty and medication administration for 2 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #16 and #18). Findings include: Resident #16 Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of unspecified dementia, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. On 09/25/23 at 11:26 AM, Resident #16 explained the resident did not like the resident's bed because it did not go up enough to sit the resident comfortably during eating. The resident verbalized the resident had a fear of choking due to the reclined back. Resident #16's physician ordered diet dated 04/13/23, documented No Concentrated Sweets diet Mechanical Soft texture, regular consistency.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to 1) obtain a physician's order for oxygen therapy for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #475), and 2) administer oxygen therapy per a physician's order for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #4). Findings include: Resident #475 Resident #475 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Resident #475's clinical record lacked documented evidence of a physician's order for the use of oxygen. On 09/25/23 at 4:03 PM, Resident #475 was in the dining room on oxygen administered via a nasal cannula. The resident's oxygen administration was set at three liters per minute (LPM). On 09/26/23 at 10:30 AM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) confirmed Resident #475 was receiving oxygen at three LPM. Resident #475's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly and were not left unsupervised with a resident who could not self-administer medications for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #18). Findings include: Resident #18 Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's with late onset, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with psychotic disturbance and dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, with psychotic disturbance. A Behavior Incident Progress Note dated 09/19/23, documented during the evening shift, the resident complained of a headache and was getting loud with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The LPN handed Resident #18 a Tylenol tablet and decided to leave the resident alone, without observation of the resident swallowing the medication, because the resident was upset. The LPN documented not knowing if the resident had taken the Tylenol tablet. On 09/26/23 at 12:35…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate effective administration by not ensuring the facility's policy regarding comfort care included a procedure to direct the care and assessment needs of residents placed on comfort care. Findings include: The facility's policy related to comfort care did not include a process directing the care, assessment, and monitoring of residents on comfort care, including criteria to initiate or discontinue comfort care. On 09/26/23 at 2:56 PM, the Administrator confirmed the facility's policy related to comfort care lacked a procedure/process to guide the care of residents requiring comfort care. The Administrator confirmed the facility should have a policy related to the process for initiating comfort care, monitoring the resident for declines and improvements, and needed care and concerns. The facility policy titled Comfort Care, undated, documented in total comfort care was discussed on a case by case basis with the Medical Director and Nursing staff/resident/responsible party. Respecting their advanced directives and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify 1) the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship (ASP) policy and processes included the criteria the facility used to define infections and the use of data collection and monitoring tools, including an antibiotic time out, 2) the lack of a process to ensure COVID-19 (COVID) vaccines were ordered and administered timely to residents wishing to receive the vaccine, and 3) a policy and process was in place to guide appropriate care of residents placed on comfort care. Findings include: Antibiotic Stewardship Program On 09/26/23 at 2:48 PM, the Administrator confirmed the QAPI committee did not identify concerns related to the ASP/policy's failure to include criteria to be used for the identification of infections, such as McGeer's criteria, and the lack of data collection and monitoring tools used to ensure appropriate antibiotic use, such as an antibiotic time out. The Administrator could not explain how the QAPI committee could have identified a concern…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, document review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) included a process for conducting antibiotic timeouts with the potential to affect any resident prescribed antibiotics in the facility. Findings include: On 09/26/23 at 12:09 PM, the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) verbalized the Pharmacist only reviewed antibiotics prescribed during the Pharmacist's on-site visits twice a month. The CNO confirmed a resident could complete a course of antibiotics prior to the Pharmacist reviewing to ensure the correct antibiotic was prescribed and the nursing staff did not perform an antibiotic time out or contact the Pharmacist for review of the antibiotic prior to administering the medication. On 09/26/23 at 12:28 PM, the Administrator verbalized the feedback to the prescriber did not happen in real time and the facility did not use any criteria or a formal documented process to determine appropriate antibiotic use prior to administration of antibiotics. The facility policy titled Antimicrobial Stewardship…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents requesting a COVID-19 (Covid) vaccination received the vaccine in a timely manner to protect the residents from potential exposure from Covid positive staff for five of five residents who requested the vaccine (Residents #7, #8, #19, #475, and #476). Findings include: Resident #7 Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified and type two diabetes mellitus without complications. Resident #8 Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified and other forms of dyspnea. Resident #19 Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. Resident #475 Resident #475 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-09-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing hours were posted daily in the facility. Findings include: On 09/26/23 the facility lacked nursing hours posted for a census of 27 residents. On 09/26/23 at 9:58 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized the nursing hours for 09/26/23, were not posted on the clipboard in the main hallway to be available to residents and visitors and confirmed the clipboard was used by the facility for the required posting. The DON confirmed the nursing hours posted on the clipboard were last updated on 09/25/23. The DON verbalized the Unit Secretary was responsible for the posting and confirmed the Unit Secretary should have updated the posting.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHRISTENSEN, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/31/2013
HUNTLEY, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/27/2022
LAWSON, JOANNEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/27/2022
REESE, ALYCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/24/2024
TURNER, EMILYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/27/2023
WEIR-COOLEY, VERONAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/26/2018
WILKINSON, LEAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/24/2024
WILSON, CARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/17/2023
INSERRA, TONIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2013
SOUTH LYON HEALTH CENTER INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/05/1990
WARTGOW, KALEBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Nevada Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Nevada
$11,786/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,463/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,241/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 295011. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next