No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

River Ridge Living Center

100 Sandy Drive, Amsterdam, NY 12010 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (518) 843-3503 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (518) 843-3503 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2025$3,387 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $3,387 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-30)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
67 Division St · (518) 842-2723 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
151 Guy Park Ave · (518) 212-6020 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
165 W Main St · (518) 627-0637 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Port Jackson, 15 Erie Ter · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.2%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.5%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.9%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%13.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers16.4%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%19.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.4%13.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.2%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%9.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.271.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.571.361.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 150 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.3%CMS range 27.5–45.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.8%CMS range 9.9–18.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.9%CMS range 6.1–14.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
67.9%
Total nursing turnover
88.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-18)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurately documented for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #1, Nurse Practitioner #1 incorrectly documented Resident #1 had multiple pressure areas during four encounters dated 2/10/2026, 2/17/2026, 2/24/2026 and 3/19/2026.Findings include:The facility's Policy titled Charting and Documentation dated 10/22, last reviewed 4/2026 documented all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate.Resident #1 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a survey, the facility did not maintain a pest-free environment and an effective pest control program in two (2) of two (2) private resident shower rooms and two (2) of three (3) main shower rooms. Specifically, (a.) dead ants and live & dead water bugs were found in a private shower room located in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]; (b.) dead ants were found in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s private shower room; (c.) dead and live ants were found in shower room on Unit A across the hall from room [ROOM NUMBER] and the shower room on Unit C across the hall from rooms #57 and #58. This is evidenced by: During observations on 3/17/2026 at 1:47 PM, both dead insects and live insects were found crawling s in the private shower room inside room [ROOM NUMBER].During observations on 3/17/2026 at 2:25 PM, dead ants were found around the floor in a private shower room inside room [ROOM NUMBER].During observations on 3/17/2026 at 2:26 PM, little black ants were found crawling on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for three (3) (Resident #s 19, 34, and 38) of 25 residents reviewed, and for residents on C Wing. Specifically, (a) Resident #19 was given plastic utensils for their meal; (b) Resident #34 returned from an early morning dialysis appointment and was placed in their room without access to the call bell. The resident requested to return to bed and was left sitting in their wheelchair for over an hour; (c) Resident #38 was not provided their adaptive built-up utensils for their meals; (d) staff on C Wing were entering residents rooms before properly knocking on the door. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled, Resident Rights and Dignity, revised 10/2025, documented the facility's policy of ensuring and respecting all residents' rights. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for one (1) (Resident #17) of 25 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #17's personal clothing was not laundered and returned within a timely manner according to professional standards of practice. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Personal Property revised November 2024, documented Resident belongings are treated with respect by facility staff, regardless of perceived value. A representative of the admitting office advises the resident, prior to or upon admission, of the types and amount of personal clothing and possessions that the resident may keep in his or her room. The resident's personal belongings and clothing are inventoried and documented upon admission and updated as necessary. The facility promptly investigates any complaints of misappropriation or mistreatment of resident property. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents were aware of the grievance process. Specifically, (1.) grievance forms were not readily available to residents; (2.) residents did not have the option to file a grievance anonymously; and (3.) seven (7) of the 7 residents present at the Resident Council meeting reported they did not know the process by which to file a grievance. This is evidenced by: The facility Policy and Procedure titled, Grievance Policy, effective 12/2019, last revised 2/2025, documented each resident had the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. The facility would provide a mechanism for filing a grievance/complaint without fear of retaliation and/or barriers of service. To ensure residents were informed, the facility would conduct documented quarterly education on the grievance process during Resident Council meetings and as needed. This education would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for three (3) (Resident #s 24, 32, and 73) of 25 residents reviewed for Care Plans. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #24, the intervention for oxygen therapy as per physician order was not consistently followed; (b.) Resident #32 had reported an allegation of abuse, during the , that was not investigated or reported. No comprehensive care plan was added to the resident's person-centered care plan for at risk for victim of abuse and/or victim of abuse; and (c.) Resident #73 had kidney failure, was receiving dialysis and had no comprehensive care plan for dialysis. . This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions for two (2) (Resident #s 32 and 68) of 25 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #32, the Comprehensive Care Plan for Respiratory Therapy was not reviewed and revised to include changes in the resident's refusal of their C-pap (continuous positive airway pressure machine) for severe sleep apnea. Specifically, (b.) Resident #68's Comprehensive Care Plan for musculoskeletal disorder (a condition that affect the muscles, bones, and joints) was not revised after the resident refused use of a wedge in between their thighs for positioning. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, updated, 1/2024, documented a comprehensive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during a recertification survey and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00328519), the facility did not ensure an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility has control and provides supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents for two (2) (Resident #s 58 and 74) of five (5) residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #58 there was no adequate supervision to prevent an elopement; (b.) for Resident #74 a container of triamcinolone acetonide (a prescription cream) was stored on top on the nightstand in the resident's room permitting access to this cream by the resident or anyone that entered the room. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure titled Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting revised 2024, documented this facility is in compliance with current rules and regulations governing accidents and/or incidents involving a medical device. The Facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary respiratory care and services that were consistent with professional standards of practice for four (4) (Residents #'s 24, 32, 34, and 61) of 5 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. Specifically, supplemental oxygen was not provided as ordered by the physician. This is evidenced by: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy, dated January 2024, documented that the facility was to provide respiratory therapy assessment and treatment to residents with deficiencies or abnormalities of pulmonary function for whom a provider's order had been written. Resident #24: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs resulting in swelling and irritation inside the airways that limit airflow into and out of the lungs), emphysema (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, (1) an analysis of the actual staffing schedule showed that on multiple occasions from 1/01/2025 to 3/17/2025, the facility was below the minimum levels required; (2) staff reported a lack of sufficient staffing; and (3) residents reported during interviews that the facility was short-staffed at times, and this resulted in call bells not being answered timely and long wait times for care to be provided This is evidenced by: Upon entrance to the facility on 3/11/2025 there were 109 residents residing on 3 units. Upon observation and review of the Facility Staffing Sheet there were 3 Registered Nurses, 6 Licensed Practical Nurses, and 8 Certified Nurse Aides on duty. The Facility Assessment, last reviewed on 1/10/2025, documented the facility's bed capacity was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure development of policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review that included, but was not limited to, time frames for the different steps in the process. Specifically, the facility policy titled, Long Term Care Solutions, Drug Regimen Review did not identify time frames for when the Pharmacist would notify the facility and Physician of irregularities, how long the Physician had to respond to the report or how long the nursing staff have to address identified issues requiring nursing intervention. This is evidenced by: An undated policy titled, Long Term Care Solutions, Drug Regimen Review documented, Upon completion of a drug regimen review by the consultant pharmacist the following steps are taken: If an irregularity is identified, the consultant pharmacist documents the relevant drug and summary of recommendation in the resident's medical record. A separate drug regimen review document is completed by the consultant pharmacist whenever an irregularity is identified. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed 5% for two (2) (Resident #s 41 and 80) of 13 residents observed during a medication pass for a total of 27 observations. This resulted in a medication error rate of 7.41%. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure titled Administering Medications revised February 2024, documented . only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so. As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record: (a) the date and time the medication was administered. (b) the dosage. (c) the route of administration. (d) the injection site (if applicable); (e) any complaints or symptoms for which the drug was administered. (f) any results achieved and when those results were observed; and (g) the signature and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for three (3) ( A, B, and C Wings) of three (3) medication carts, and 1 (C Wing) of 2 medication rooms reviewed. Specifically, (a.) 1 Novolog Kwik insulin pen was in a bag labeled Degludec insulin; (b.) 8 insulin kwik pens and 3 vials of insulin had no open and or expiration dates; (C.) 2 bottles of Megace liquid were discontinued; (d.) 3 inhalers had no open and or expiration dates; (e.); 3 bottles of eye drops had no open and or expiration dates; (f.) 1 bottle of eye drops opened [DATE], expired as of [DATE]; (g.) 1 opened bottle of Jevity Tube feed with 200 milliliters remaining was found in the medication room refrigerator; (h.) 1 black extra-large ice pack belonging to a discharged resident was found in the medication room refrigerator. 1 crate overflowing with discontinued medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #'s NY00349575 and NY00370532), the facility did not ensure that food and drink were palatable and attractive for two (2) (Residents #19 and 32) of 11 residents reviewed for palatable and appealing food and drink. Specifically, (a.) residents complained that the food was cold, unattractive, and generally unpalatable during the resident council meeting; (b.) Resident #19's lunch tickets did not match what the resident received during their lunch service on 3/17/2025; (c.) Resident #32 complained of cold, unattractive, and not palatable food, and during lunch service on 3/13/2025, the resident's food tray did not match their ticket This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Food and Nutrition Services, dated 1/2024, documented that the facility would provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, considering each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0810 — pattern
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that special eating equipment and utensils were provided for one (1) (Resident #38) of seven (7) residents reviewed for dining. Specifically, for Resident #38, adaptive eating equipment was not provided to maintain or improve the resident's ability to eat independently. This is evidenced by: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility with unspecified dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), essential (primary) hypertension (persistent high blood pressure), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin, leading to high blood sugar levels). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 2/15/2025 documented the resident had moderate impairment in cognition, was able to make themselves understood, and was usually able to understand others. During an observation on 3/11/2025 at 1:02 PM, Resident #38 was eating lunch in the common area. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, or served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and two (2) of three (3) kitchenettes. Specifically, equipment, floors, and walls were not clean and/or were in good repair, and the facility did not have the correct equipment to test the chemical sanitizing solution. This is evidenced by: During observations of the main kitchen on 3/11/2025 at 10:18 AM, the following was noted: 1. Test papers to check the sanitizing solution did not have a graduation of 150 parts per million of quaternary ammonium compound graduation and another above 400 parts per million of quaternary ammonium compound. The efficacy range as stated on the sanitizer concentrate label was between 150 and 400 parts per million of quaternary ammonium compound. 2. The following items were soiled with food particles: Bulk food containers. Shelving. Sheet pan rack. Stoves. Floor under cooking line equipment. Shelving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food brought for residents by family or visitors was stored safely and in a way that is either separate or easily distinguishable from facility food on one (1) (A-Wing Unit) of three (3) resident units. Specifically, resident food stored in the resident unit kitchenette refrigerators was not properly labeled. This is evidenced by: The document titled, Food Brought by Family/Visitors and dated 11/2024, documented that food brought to residents are to be labeled with the resident name, date, and use-by date. During observations on the A-Wing Kitchenette on 3/11/2025 at 11:16 AM, two restaurant entrees were not labeled and dated. During an interview on 3/11/2025 at 2:51 PM, Administrator #1 stated that the staff should label food brought to residents with the resident name, date received, and the date to discard the food. They further stated that staff would be re-educated on labeling food brought to residents. 10 New York Codes, Rules, and Regulations 415.14(h)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00349575), the facility did not ensure it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and did not maintain infection control prevention during dressing changes for two (2) (Resident #s 32 and 47) of four (4) residents reviewed for pressure sores. Specifically: (a.) for Resident #32, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not set up and maintain a clean field and proper infection control that included proper hand hygiene was performed, during a dressing change to prevent contamination of a resident's wound; (b.) for Resident #47, Licensed Practical Nurse #5 did not change gloves and hand sanitize during the dressing change; (c.) Staff did not maintain isolation precautions by closing doors to isolation rooms with residents who were positive for Covid 19 and on droplet precautions; (d.) the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not maintain a pest-free environment and an effective pest control program on one (1) of six (6) resident units. Specifically, small fly infestation was found. This is evidenced by: During observations on 3/11/2025 from 10:15 AM through 12:35 PM, Little black flies were found in the corridors by Room #s 54, 57, 62, and 73. Little black flies were found flying around a resident with a feeding tube on the C-Wing. During observations on 3/12/2025 at 9:45 AM, little black flies were found flying around staff serving meal trays. During an interview on 3/11/2025 at 11:30 AM, Family Member #10 stated that the fly infestation was so bad they covered the television in the resident room and that it helped when the trash was removed from the room. During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 12:15 PM, Certified Nurse Aide #3 stated there have been black flying bugs since they were hired, and that though the facility had a pest control vendor, the problem was worse on some days more than other days.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure an interdisciplinary team assessed residents to determine their ability to safely self-administer medication when clinically appropriate for one (1) (Resident #16) of one (1) resident reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, Resident #16 was observed sitting in the solarium (a room that permits abundant daylight and views of the landscape while sheltering from adverse weather) of the B Wing administering their nebulized medication without being assessed as to whether they could safely self-administer their medication. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Administering Medications, updated February 2024, documented that residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, had determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic systolic congestive heart failure (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00370532), the facility did not ensure each resident's right to make choices about aspects of their life that were significant for them for two (2) (Resident #'s 32 and 34) of 25 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #32 did not have a choice of time for application of their C-PAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine. (b) Resident #34 did not have a choice of time for returning to bed after dialysis (treatment for kidney disease) appointments. This is evidenced by: Resident #32: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder where breathing stops during sleep due to a blockage in the airway causing a decrease in oxygen delivery to the body), and osteomyelitis of the spine (bone infection from an open wound that is infected). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect for one (1) (Resident #14) of seven (7) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Specifically, for Resident #14, a Certified Nurse Aide provided care to the resident by themselves when the resident was care planned to be a two person assist with care. This resulted in the resident falling out of bed, sustaining ecchymosis (bruising) to their right facial area and a laceration above their right eye. Floor mats that were care planned to be on both sides of the bed parallel to the bed due to Resident #14 being at risk for falls were not in place during care when Resident #14 fell out of bed. This is evidenced by: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of vascular dementia (dementia caused by a series of strokes. Restricted blood flow due to strokes reduced oxygen and glucose delivery to the brain, causing cell injury and neurological deficits in the affected region), epilepsy (a brain disease where nerve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during a recertification survey and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00370532), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, or no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for two (2) (Residents #14 and #32) of seven (7) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (a.) an allegation of a Certified Nurse Aide not following care plan recommendations while they provided care for Resident #14 on 3/08/2025 which resulted in the resident falling out of bed sustaining ecchymosis (bruising) to the facial area and a head laceration above their eye was not reported to the New York State Department of Health until 03/10/2025. Specifically, (b.) for Resident #32 an allegation of abuse that had been reported to staff resulting in a mark on the resident's face was not been reported to New York State Department of Health by the facility. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that it maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, provided nutrition care and services to each resident consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment, recognized, evaluated, and addressed the needs of every resident for two (2) (Resident #s 51, and 64) of five (5) residents reviewed for nutrition/hydration status maintenance. Specifically, (a.) Resident #51's weight was not monitored as indicated in their comprehensive person-centered plan of care despite being at risk for weight changes, and a quarterly dietary assessment was not completed to address the nutritional status of this resident. (b.) for Resident #64, nutritional care plan was not implemented, quarterly dietary nutrition status assessment was not completed, and weight were not done as scheduled despite Resident #61 being at risk for weight changes. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled Nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00370532), the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for one (1) (Resident #32) of seven (7) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #32 reported an allegation of abuse and rough treatment when a nurse put on their C-Pap (continuous positive airway pressure machine) mask on them during an overnight shift between 1/25/2025 and 1/26/2025. The facility did not initiate an investigation until 3/18/2025 after the resident was reviewed during the survey process between 3/11/2025 through 3/18/2025. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program - Reporting and Investigating, last updated October 2024, documented the residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident's property, and exploitation. All allegations of abuse are thoroughly investigated immediately. 1. All allegations are thoroughly investigated. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey dated 01/03/23 through 01/10/23, the facility did not prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and three (3) of 3 kitchenettes. Specifically, the automatic dishwashing machine was not operating within the manufacturer's specifications, equipment and floors required cleaning, and a refrigerator and a table required repair. This is evidenced as follows: During observations on 01/03/23 at 10:18 AM, in the main kitchen, the automatic dishwashing machine final rinse registered both zero degrees Fahrenheit (F) at 40 pounds per square inch (psi) and zero parts-per-million (ppm) of available chlorine while tableware was being washed; the operating instruction on the dishwashing machine state that the final rinse temperature is to be 180 F at between 15 psi and 25 psi. The slicer, floor mixer, table mixer, K-rated fire extinguisher, dry storage room door, and dietician office storage room were soiled with food particles, dirt, and/or grime.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-10 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview during the recertification survey dated 01/03/23 through 01/10/23, the facility did not ensure foods brought to residents by family and other visitors was in accordance with adopted regulations in three (3) of 3 kitchenettes. Specifically, food brought to residents was not labeled and discarded per the facility policy. This is evidenced is as follows: The document titled Food Brought in from Outside Facility and dated 09/25/2020 documented that food brought in from the outside will be labeled by staff with the resident name, the date the item(s) was brought to the facility, resident room number, and will be discarded on the third day. During observations on 01/03/23 at 10:18 AM, in the C-Unit Kitchenette refrigerator, a homemade entre was labeled with the name of Resident #38; the label did not include a date; a homemade entre was labeled with the name of Resident #58 and the date 12/25/22; and a restaurant breaded cheese sticks and pizza did not have a label. In the A-Unit Kitchenette refrigerator, an entre was labeled with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the Recertification Survey conducted 1/3/23 through 11/10/23, the facility did not ensure written notice of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative for 2 (Residents #81 and #100) of 2 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that the medical record included documentation that a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident or/or their representative upon discharge to hospital. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Bed Reservation/Retention dated 9/26/16, documented all residents will be informed verbally and in writing at the time of admission and again at the time of transfer of the (Facility name) bed retention/reservation policy. Resident #81: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, anxiety disorder, and pressure ulcer of sacral region. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 11/7/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during a recertification survey on 1/3/2023 through 1/10/2023, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (Resident #62) of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #62, the facility did not ensure wound care treatments to the resident's Stage 4 sacral wounds were provided in accordance with the physician order. This is evidenced by: Resident #62: Resident #62 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of pressure ulcer (refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) of sacral region; stage 4 (full-thickness skin and tissue loss), hypertension, and anemia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 9/28/2022, documented the resident was cognitively intact, could understand others and could make self-understood. The Policy and Procedure titled Skin Care Protocol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences was provided for 1 (Resident #78) of 3 residents reviewed for food. Specifically, for Resident #78, the facility did not ensure the resident was consistently provided with food preferences as documented on their meal tickets on 1/6/2023 and 1/9/2023. This was evidenced by: Resident #78 Resident #78 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of diabetes, hyperkalemia, and acute kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 11/21/2022, documented the resident was able to make themselves understood, understand others, and was cognitively intact. The undated Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Resident Food Preferences, documented food preferences would be identified by the Dietician or nursing staff. Whenever possible, staff would attempt to accommodate resident food preferences. The undated P&P titled Resident Nutrition Services, documented prior to serving food trays, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-10 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure special eating equipment and utensils were provided for a resident who needed them for 1 (Resident #47) of 9 residents reviewed for dining. Specifically, for Resident #47, the facility did not ensure adaptive eating equipment was provided as documented on the resident's meal ticket for breakfast, lunch, and dinner on 01/06/2023. This was evidenced by: Resident #47 Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, and osteoarthritis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 11/12/2022, documented the resident was able to make themselves understood, usually able to understand others, and severely cognitively impaired. The undated Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Eating Environment, documented adaptive self-help devices were provided as needed, as per the resident's plan of care, and as identified on meal tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute or serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Food preparation and serving areas and equipment are to be kept clean. Specifically, equipment, floors, and walls were not clean. This is evidenced as follows. The main kitchen and the unit kitchenettes were inspected on 09/22/2020 at 9:34 AM. The slicer, steamtable insert pans, table mixer, microwave oven, bulk food containers, butcherblock island drawers, stove, shelving, wall fan, floor fan, floor under cooking equipment in the main kitchen; walls and carts in the dishwashing machine room; and floors and walls in the kitchenettes were soiled with food particles, dirt, or grime. The Director of Food Service stated in an interview on 09/22/2020 at 10:34 AM, that she will review the daily routine cleaning list, update it, check every morning to verify all cleaning has been completed; and will contact the housekeeping department to have the kitchenettes cleaned. 10 NYCRR 415.14(h);…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #71) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. Specifically, for Resident #71, the facility did not ensure an alleged incident involving the resident being restrained to a wheelchair with a gown was reported to the Administrator within 2 hours of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 (Resident #'s 18 and 19) of 18 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #18, the facility did not provide monitoring for effectiveness of medication administered on an as needed basis and for Resident #19, the facility did not assist the resident with a range of motion or a home exercise plan as recommended by a physical therapist to prevent decline in functional ability to bilateral lower extremities. This is evidenced by: Resident #18: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, ulcerative colitis, and stage 4 colorectal cancer. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 7/14/20, documented the resident had no cognitive impairment could understand others, and could be understood. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity had been reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it and if there was to be no change in the medication, the attending physician should document his or her rationale in the resident's medical record for 3 (Resident #'s 49, 53, and #64) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, for Resident #'s 49 and #64, the facility did not ensure irregularities noted by the pharmacist during medication regimen reviews were reviewed by the physician; and for Resident #53, the facility did not ensure the physician documented a rationale in the resident's medical record when the consultant pharmacist identified an irregularity during a medication regimen review. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Drug Regimen Review last reviewed 7/2020, documented a separate Drug Regimen Review (DRR) document was completed by the consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-09-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Specifically, the trash compactor was leaking waste and the compactor area was heavily soiled. This is evidenced as follows. The trash compactor area was inspected on 09/22/2020 at 10:19 AM. The trash compactor was leaking a black-brownish liquid onto the ground, and the trash compactor portal area was heavily soiled with a black greasy buildup on the standing area and in front of, above, below, and around the compactor door. The Food Service Director stated in an interview 09/22/2020 at 10:35 AM, that he first noticed the compactor leaking last Friday, July 27, 2018. The Environmental Services Manager stated in an interview on 07/30/2018 at 1:30 PM, that she will contact the vendor to replace the trash compactor and will have the entire compactor area thoroughly cleaned. 10 NYCRR 415.14(h)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are accurately documented and complete for 2 (Resident #'s 19 and 42) of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #19, the facility did not ensure accurate documentation was reflected for a resident's transfer out of bed; for Resident #19, the facility did not ensure documentation was completed for physician ordered treatments for wound and skin care; for Resident #42, the facility did not ensure the resident's medical record included accurate documentation of the resident's physician ordered oxygen tubing change. This was evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Charting and Documentation Policy last reviewed 2/2020, documented that treatments or services performed are to be recorded in the medical record; documentation in the medical record will be objective, complete and accurate; and documentation of procedures and treatments will include care-specific details,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$3,387 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $3,387 — penalty dated 2024-01-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BRAUNSTEIN, EDWARDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 01/01/2014
GELLIS, CHERYLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF5%since 01/01/2014
RUTHIE HIRSCH ESTATEOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/28/2013
BRAUNSTEIN, MICHAELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2013
EINHORN, BENJAMINIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2013
HIRSCH, DANIELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2014
MCCLARREN, CYNTHIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
WALDMAN, JONATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 12%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$354per resident / day
operating cost
$10,769per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$326per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335422. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next