Wilkinson Residential Health Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 111.9 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-05-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure control and accountability, determine that drug records were in order, that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled. Specifically, (a.) a count was not completed prior to narcotic access keys being handed from one licensed nurse to another; (b.) nursing staff did not document nursing unit narcotics as having been counted by two licensed nurses and signed at the beginning and end of each shift on the facility-provided Controlled Substance Count Sheets for three (3) of three (3) nursing units; and (c.) the facility did not complete periodic reconciliation of controlled substance records. This is evidenced by: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Controlled Substance Shift Count, last reviewed 7/2023, documented: Verification of the number of Class II-IV controlled substances on hand would be minimally done at the beginning and end of each shift by the licensed nurse of the outgoing and on-coming shift. Each individual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview conducted during a recertification and abbreviated (Case #NY00377111) survey , the facility did not ensure that resident environments were as free from accidents or hazards as was possible for three (3) (Resident #s 40, 44, and 358) of five (5) residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Specifically, (a.) Resident #40, who was at risk for elopement and required supervision, was left alone outside unsupervised for 98 minutes on [DATE], and unable to get back into the building; (b.) an expired ointment medication was left on the Resident #44 ' s bedside table on [DATE], permitting access to the ointment by the resident or anyone that entered the room; and (c.) for Resident #358 - who was documented as someone who wandered with significant risk to themselves – was not adequately monitored when they wandered out of the facility to an adjacent building on [DATE]. This is evidenced by: The Wandering and Elopement Policy, last reviewed 6/2024, documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary respiratory care and services that followed professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan, and the resident's choice for three (3) (Resident #'s 44, 63, and 79) of five (5) residents reviewed for oxygen administration. Specifically, (a.) supplemental oxygen flow rate was not ordered by the physician for Resident #'s 44 and 63; (b.) for Resident #79 oxygen therapy was not monitored and physician orders were not followed for cleaning and maintaining respiratory therapy equipment according to professional standards of practice. This is evidenced by: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration and Use, last reviewed 8/2024, documented that oxygen use for residents was per physician orders. It further documented that staff were to verify the liter flow the resident was on as well as the oxygen saturation for residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (Case # NY00358788) survey, the facility did not ensure it had sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, (a.) the facility did not perform the appropriate competency evaluations for licensed nursing staff to measure the pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully; (b) Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 did not document or assess Resident #359 when a procedure was ordered, and mental status changes occurred. Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 did not remain available to assess the resident during an ordered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven (7) days a week. Specifically, a review of staffing revealed a Registered Nurse was not scheduled for eight (8) consecutive hours per day on 1/19/2025 and 3/02/2025. This is evidenced by: The facility assessment dated 2024, documented that the staffing plan was based on the resident population and their needs for care and support. The staffing plan documented the following daily staffing needs: one (1) to three (3) Registered Nurses on day shift, zero (0) to two (2) Registered Nurses on evening shift, and zero (0) to one (1) Registered Nurses on night shift. The facility, Job Title Report, dated 1/01/2025 to 3/31/2025, documented that the facility did not have a Registered Nurse for eight (8) consecutive hours in the facility on the following dates: 1/19/2025 and 3/02/2025. There was no documented evidence of staffing waivers in place for the facility both before or during the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, food was not cooled properly, dented cans were with the common stock, and sanitizing solution testing papers were expired. This is evidenced by: During observations in the main kitchen on 5/19/2025 at 9:40 AM: • Cooked pasta in the walk-in refrigerator was 47 degrees Fahrenheit. • One #10 can of Banana Pudding had a V-shaped dent in the seam which broke the seal of the can (can was in the walk-in refrigerator speed rack). Director of Food and Nutrition disposed of the pasta and the #10 can of Banana Pudding immediately. • The test papers used to check the concentration of the solution for manually sanitizing equipment had an expiration date of 2020. During an interview on 5/19/2025 at 10:03 AM, Director of Food and Nutrition Services #1 stated that the pasta was cooked yesterday afternoon and should have been cooled to 41 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00343349, NY00344172, NY00345225, and NY00379263), the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect for three (3) (Resident #s 40, 44, and 53) of eight (8) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Specifically, (a.) on 6/02/2024, Resident #40 was left unattended outside of the facility by Certified Nurse Aide #7 for an extended period of time; (b.) on 6/12/2024, Certified Nurse Aide #8 did not follow Resident #44's care plan to use a mechanical lift which resulted in an injury to the residents foot; (c) on 5/27/2025, Certified Nurse Aides #'s 5 and 6 did not provide personal care to Resident #53 the way the resident preferred, causing Resident #53 to fight against the care, sustaining a bruise to their hand. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, 'Resident Abuse Prevention,' dated 5/2023, documented that the purpose was to provide residents, families, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00358788), the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for one (1) (Resident #359) of eight (8) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #359 reported an allegation of verbal/metal abuse and rough treatment during care given on the evening shift of 10/25/2024 by five (5) facility staff during an insertion of an indwelling Foley Catheter. The facility initiated an investigation on 10/28/2024, and did not determine where a bruise of unknown origin occurred and did not investigate the source of the bruise until 10/30/2024. This is evidenced by: Cross reference with F-684. The facility's policy and procedure titled 'Resident Abuse Prevention' dated 5/2023, documented staff shall report any unusual changes in residents' condition promptly so that occurrences, patterns, or trends that constitute abuse can be identified, such as suspicious bruising, change in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00358788), the facility did not ensure residents received appropriate care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice to maintain or improve their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (one) (Resident #359) of 1 (one) resident reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #359, Licensed Practical Nurse #2 did not notify the facility health care practitioner after the resident had a mental status change and became resistant to care during a physician ordered health care procedure on 10/25/2024. Furthermore, a Registered Nurse did not document or assess Resident #359 when a procedure was ordered and mental status change occurred. There was no documented evidence that a Registered Nurse completed a follow up assessment during an ordered procedure that required assessment, nor that a report was given to the oncoming Registered Nurse prior to outgoing Registered Nurse leaving the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey dated 08/03/2022 through 08/09/2022, the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans (CCP) were developed and implemented for each resident consistent with the resident rights and that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 5 (Resident #'s 9, 43, 71, 74, and #83) of 24 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #9, whose primary language is Spanish and whose English proficiency is limited, the facility did not ensure their comprehensive care plan included a plan for the resident to communicate effectively, for Resident #43, the facility did not ensure the CCP for a suprapubic catheter included monthly changes of the suprapubic catheter with the use of Diazepam and did not ensure the CCP for mood included personalized interventions, for Resident #71, the facility did not ensure the CCP included a care plan to address the routine care and maintenance of the resident's enteral feeding tube, for Resident #74,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in NY