No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Finger Lakes Center For Living

20 Park Avenue, Auburn, NY 13021 · Non profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (315) 255-7188 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations$101,300 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $101,300 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-20)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
77 Nelson St · (315) 252-9562 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.4 mi
25 Seminary St · (315) 253-7393 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
25 Seminary St · (315) 255-1022 · Call to confirm hours
Park
11-35 Market St · (315) 252-7874 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
38 Rochester St · (315) 776-4391

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.5%14.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.1%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.5%1.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%19.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.2%13.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%6.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.1%13.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.8%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.6%20.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.2%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.861.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.781.361.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 241 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 102 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.6%CMS range 52.3–63.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.6–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge49.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.3–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.661.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
1.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.33
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
33.7%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-06)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2022-10-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during a survey (iQIES #2733288), the facility failed to implement immediate measures to protect residents from abuse for two (2) of four (4) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed. Specifically, there was witnessed verbal and physical abuse by Certified Nurse Aide #7 toward Resident #1. Certified Nurse Aide #7 continued to have access to residents, resulting in an incident of verbal abuse with Resident #2. There was no documented evidence that a registered nurse completed assessments on Resident #1 or Resident #2 on [DATE] after the incidents of witnessed abuse. Specifically:-On [DATE] at approximately 4:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide #9 witnessed Certified Nurse Aide #7 handling Resident #1 roughly, spraying them with perfume when they were combative with care, and making a verbally abusive statement. Certified Nurse Aide #9 reported the incident to Registered Nurse Supervisor #12, who did not assess Resident #1. Certified Nurse Aide #7 continued to have access to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during a survey, the facility failed to timely report witnessed verbal and physical abuse for two (2) of four (4) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed, resulting in the alleged perpetrator having continued access to residents. Specifically, on 02/01/2026 at approximately 4:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide #9 witnessed Certified Nurse Aide #7 handling Resident #1 roughly, spraying them with perfume when they were combative with care, and making a verbally abusive statement. Certified Nurse Aide #9 reported the incident to Registered Nurse Supervisor #12, who did not assess Resident #1. Certified Nurse Aide #7 continued to have access to residents, and after supper, they made a verbally abusive statement to Resident #2, which was witnessed by Certified Nurse Aide #10. Certified Nurse Aide #7 continued to have access to residents until they were suspended from duty on 01/01/2026 at 8:00 PM. Certified Nurse Aide #7 was sent home on suspension at 8:00 PM.The facility's failure to report abuse timely resulted in potential for harm that is Immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (IQIES #2626859), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medications errors for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for admission orders. Specifically, Resident #1's hospital discharge medications included an anticoagulant (blood thinner). The medication was not ordered upon admission, and the resident did not receive an anticoagulant from 09/02/2025 - 09/18/2025. Resident #1 was subsequently sent to the hospital and diagnosed with a deep vein thrombosis (a blood clot in a vein). This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 and the likelihood of serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death that was Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to resident's health and safety for all residents with potential admission/readmission orders.Findings include:The facility policy Medication Ordering, revised 05/07/2025, documented all medication orders were transcribed into the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (#2626859) the facility did not ensure a significant medication error was reported to the State Agency as required for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1's hospital discharge medications included an anticoagulant (blood thinner), the medication was not ordered upon admission to the facility, and the resident did not receive an anticoagulant from 9/2/2025 - 9/18/2025. Resident #1 was subsequently sent to the hospital and diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis (a blood clot in a vein). The facility did not report the incident to the New York State Department of Health in the required time frame.Findings include:The August 2016 New York State Department of Health Incident Reporting Manual documented neglect as the failure to provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate and appropriate services, treatment and/or care to a resident of a residential health care facility while the resident is under the supervision of the facility. Neglect may include but is not limited to failure to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00383652), the facility did not ensure one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed received their needed respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #1 had a medical order for oxygen at bedtime, and on 6/13/2025 their oxygen tubing with the nasal cannula was not applied as ordered by Licensed Practical Nurse #3. This resulted in a decrease in Resident #1's oxygen saturation, and they were subsequently transferred to the emergency department to be evaluated for their respiratory distress. Findings include: The 3/6/2025 facility policy, Oxygen Administration, documented the nurse should: - verify a physician's order for oxygen before administration of oxygen; - assess for signs and symptoms of cyanosis (skin, nails and lips turn a blue color due to lack of oxygen in the blood) and hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in body tissues that can cause confusion and difficulty breathing); - check to make sure oxygen tubing was connected to the oxygen source and oxygen turned on; and - place appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00381595), the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #1-4) reviewed. Specifically, the facility investigation was not thorough and did not identify concerns related to: -Resident #1's roommate (Resident #2) alleged on 5/19/2025 Certified Nurse Aides #1 and 2 yelled at Resident #1 while providing care. There was no documentation Resident #1 was assessed by a qualified professional, Certified Nurse Aides #1 and 2 continued to work at the facility after the allegation was made, and there was no documentation the Administrator was notified of the allegation. -Resident #2 reported on 5/19/2025, they developed a headache due to Certified Nurse Aides #1 and 2 yelling at Resident #1 and they (Resident #2) required a pain-relieving medication for the headache. There was no documentation Resident #2 was assessed by a qualified professional. - Certified Nurse Aide #6 reported while they provided care to Resident #3 on 5/19/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 9/3/2024-9/6/2024, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen had multiple unclean areas, expired food, and unwrapped and undated food. Findings include: The facility policy, Food Storage, dated 10/2001 documented food and supplies would be received and stored properly by the general kitchen worker. Food was rotated so the first food in was the first food out. The facility policy Infection Control for nutritional services dated 2/2002 documented the work area was kept clean and sanitary. All work surfaces, except the cooking surface, and all floors in the Nutritional Services food preparation area were cleaned daily with an approved disinfectant. Storage areas shall be adequate, cleaned thoroughly weekly, and inspected daily by the Director of Nutritional Services. All refrigerator units were cleaned thoroughly weekly. Food stored in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/3/2024-9/6/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 2 medication rooms (Interlaken). Specifically, the Interlaken medication room refrigerator temperatures were not consistently documented. Findings include: The facility policy, Medication Refrigerator Temperature Logs, created 12/2019, documented medication refrigerator temperatures were documented once in the morning and once in the evenings. If the refrigerator temperature was above 46 degrees Fahrenheit or below 36 degrees Fahrenheit both maintenance and the Director of Nursing should be notified. During an observation on 9/3/2024 at 2:11 PM the Interlaken medication room refrigerator did not have documented temperatures for the day shifts on 8/6/2024, 8/7/2024, and 8/12/2024; and for the evening shifts on 8/3/2024, 8/4/2024, 8/5/2024, 8/6/2024, and 8/11/2024. During an interview on 9/6/2024 at 8:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #4 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during recertification survey conducted 9/3/2024-9/6/2024, the facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #29 and #50) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #29 and #50 were missing food items or had the wrong items on their meal trays. Findings include: The facility policy, Meal Tray Accuracy, dated 12/2022, documented residents were provided with appropriate supplements, adaptive equipment, and items requested at mealtimes within the current diet order to ensure accuracy of residents' meal trays. 1) Resident #29 had diagnoses including tachycardia (fast heartbeat), anxiety, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The 6/22/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff with eating, and weighed 112 pounds. A 6/7/2024 Physician #10 order documented the resident was to receive a ground solid diet. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 10/11/22-10/14/22, the facility failed to provide separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs listed in Schedule II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1976 and other drugs subject to abuse for 1 of 3 medication carts (the stepdown unit medication cart) reviewed. Specifically, all prescribed controlled drugs on the stepdown unit were stored in an untethered medication cart and not in a permanently affixed compartment as required. Findings include: The 12/10/2020 facility policy addendum titled Medication Administration/Storage--Covid documented narcotics would be removed from the medication lock box in med room for individual med pass and placed back in the lock box in the medication room in lock box designated per hall for C hall and top of A hallway following completion of medication pass. Step down narcotics will follow the same medication count each shift, however, they will remain in step down medication cart.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-09-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 9/3/2024-9/6/2024, the facility did not ensure the Director of Nursing served as a unit manager only when the facility had an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents. Specifically, Acting Director of Nursing #2 served as the Unit Manager for the Stillwater Unit in addition to their full time Director of Nursing role. The findings are: The undated facility Director of Nursing job description documented the Director of Nursing had the authority and responsibility for planning, directing, and supervising all nursing personnel and services to ensure that safe, adequate, and quality care was delivered to all residents. Additionally, the Director of Nursing supported the vision of uncompromising dedication to excellence in assisting the community members to grow in spirit, experience dignity, live with a sense of fulfillment, and meet the challenges of their changing lives. The undated Facility Unit Manager job description documented the Unit Manager reported to the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$101,300 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $79,655 — penalty dated 2026-02-20
  • $21,645 — penalty dated 2025-10-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRADY, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
CORNELL, CHRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
D'AGOSTINO, RAYMONDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
DALY, ELANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
DURANT, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
EDINGER, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
FRANCESCHELLI, ANTHONYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
GOULD, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
IANNOLO, PATSYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2014
PABIS, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2013
RICCIO, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
RUNKLE, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2014
SHERBURNE, ALANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
ALEXANDER, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
BERLUCCHI, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2008
LESCH, JASONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
RACKMIL, MELISSAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/25/2024
SYRETT, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2023
CASTERLIN, NABRASKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/17/2024
CONWAY-RUSSELL, KATHERINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/23/2021
EVANGELISTA, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/26/2011
LADOUCE-WILSON, KATRINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/02/2022
PATEL, PARTHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/07/2021
SCHALLER, CHRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335785. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next