The Commons On St Anthony, A S N F & Short T R C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 557 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 218 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 297 beds and averages 291.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00333847), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 was care planned for transfers with a mechanical lift and certified nurse aides #1 and #2 did not utilize a mechanical lift when transferring the resident out of bed; certified nurse aides #14 and 15 did not use a mechanical lift when transferring the resident back into bed, and the resident was not assessed timely after complaints of extreme pain. Subsequently, Resident #1 was found with a fractured arm. This result in actual harm to Resident #1 that was not immediate jeopardy. Findings include: The 6/7/2019 Transferring Residents with Assistive Devices facility policy documented a mechanical lift was used for residents who were unable to, or inconsistently bear weight on one or both legs and participated less than 50% during the transfers; all total lifts (mechanical lifts) were to utilize 2 staff. Transferring a resident that required maximal assistance without a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the services arranged or provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality for one of six residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 had increased confusion, urinary frequency and a strong urine odor, a physician order was obtained for a urinalysis, culture and sensitivity and Resident #2's urine sample was not collected to rule out a urinary tract infection. Findings include:The 04/01/2024 facility policy, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status documented a significant change of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without interventions by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions.The undated facility policy, Laboratory Specimens Collection of Routine Urine Specimen documented explain procedure to resident, bring equipment to the bedside and provide privacy. Require resident to urinate, place urine in specimen cup and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence in a manner and an environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #196) and for 3 of 8 resident units (Units 3, 5, and 6) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #196's room had personal care information posted in an area visible to other residents and visitors; and Units 3, 5, and 6 had signs on the elevators documenting they were out of order to keep cognitively impaired residents from using the elevators. Findings include: The facility policy, Quality of Life-Dignity, dated 1/10/2023, documented residents were to be treated with dignity and respect at all times. Each resident should be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances their sense of wellbeing, level of satisfaction with life, and feeling of self-worth and self-esteem. Signs indicating the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during recertification and abbreviated (NY00318491) surveys conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to receive visitors of their choosing at the time of their choosing, subject to the resident's right to deny visitation when applicable, and in a manner that did not impose on the rights of another resident for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #243) reviewed. Specifically, the facility restricted Resident #243's family member's visitation based on the resident's healthcare proxy's wishes. Findings include: The facility policy, Visitation Policy, dated 5/23/2023, documented unless visitation was suspended to comply with applicable laws or regulations, the residents were permitted to receive visitors 24/7 subject to the resident's wishes and the protection of the rights of other residents in the facility. The facility recognized the resident's needed to maintain contact with the community they lived and/or were familiar with and they could have visitors as they wished. The facility provided 24-hour access to all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility did not ensure the individual financial record was available to the resident through quarterly statements and upon request for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #93 and #198) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #93 and #198 were not provided with personal fund statements within 30 days after the end of the quarter, and upon request. Finding include: The facility policy, Resident Fund Policy and Procedures, dated 10/1/2015, documented the Resident Banker was on duty Monday- Friday from 9:00 AM-12:00 PM and from 1:00-3:00 PM; resident fund statements were delivered to the resident and/or authorized representative quarterly and showed the prior quarter's transactions; and the resident and/or authorized representative could request balance and/or printed statements during banking hours. Resident #93 was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a progressive neurological disorder). The 10/23/2024 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet medical and nursing needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #20) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #20 did not have footrests and lateral supports while in their scoot chair (a specialty chair used to improve positioning and mobility) as planned. Findings include: The facility policy, Turning and Repositioning, dated 3/27/2024, documented the resident would receive the required assistance for repositioning based on their assessment from the interdisciplinary team. Repositioning would be provided to prevent the development of secondary conditions that could infringe on the resident's ability to function at the highest practical level attainable. The certified nurse aide would provide turning and repositioning per the care plan and document in the electronic medical record plan of care. Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00356778) surveys conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standard of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and #232) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #232 had bilateral (both sides) above the knee amputations and the facility did not follow up on a prosthetics (artificial limb) referral timely and Resident #1 experienced an emotionally distressing event that was not addressed timely. Findings include: The facility policy, Request for Consultation and Follow Up, dated 1/22/2024, documented upon return from an appointment, the nursing staff conveyed the results of the consultation to the attending provider and the recommendations for additional interventions or follow-up. The consult form was dated and initialed and indicated it had been reviewed by nursing. The facility policy, Resident Rights and Notice of Resident Rights and Responsibilities. dated 4/30/2024, documented the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00347746) surveys conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #238) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #238's urinary drainage collection bag was not positioned below the level of the bladder to promote free urine flow (allows urine to back flow into urinary tract). Findings include: The facility policy, Catheter Care Indwelling Urinary Catheter, revised 12/2023, documented the urinary drainage device drainage bag was positioned below the level of the bladder at all times and tubing was positioned to prevent urine reflux toward the bladder. The facility policy, Urinary Tract Infection Prevention and Catheter Use and Care, dated 12/12/2023, documented leg bags (a small urine collection bag attached to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents who required dialysis services (filtration of blood when the kidneys do not work) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #152) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #152 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and: - did not have ongoing assessments of their condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments; - there was inconsistent communication and collaboration between the dialysis center and the facility; - the resident did not receive a bagged lunch prior to attending dialysis as planned; - the resident frequently did not complete treatments due to discomfort from the mechanical lift pad left under them in their wheelchair, and medical was not notified; - staff documented the resident's permacath (central catheter used for long-term venous access) dressing was dry and intact and the resident did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility did not post on a daily basis the current resident census and the total number, and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift, in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors for 5 of 5 days. Specifically, the current daily resident census and nurse staffing schedules were located on the nursing supervisor/staffing office door that was down a hallway off the main lobby and not readily accessible to visitors or residents. Findings include: There was no documented facility policy on nurse staffing posting requirements. The daily nurse staffing information was observed posted on the nursing Supervisor/Staffing office door located down a hallway off the main lobby that was not readily accessible to visitors and residents: - on 10/28/2024 at 4:09 PM. - on 10/29/2024 at 8:15 AM. - on 10/30/2024 at 8:50 AM. - on 10/31/2024 at 7:56 AM. - on 11/1/2024 at 7:39 AM and did not include the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00356778) surveys conducted 10/28/2024-11/1/2024, the facility did not ensure routine and emergency drugs and biologicals were provided to 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 was not administered the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine (helps protect against a common respiratory virus, RSV) timely after the vaccine was ordered in 2023 and 2024. Findings include: The facility policy, Resident Immunizations, dated 3/27/2024, documented upon admission resident's immunization records were reviewed. If the resident had not received the respiratory syncytial virus vaccine and was [AGE] years of age or older, the vaccine would be offered, and an order was obtained. Prior to administration, the vaccine information sheet was reviewed with the resident or designated health care proxy and consent was obtained. Resident #1 had diagnoses including heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,512 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,512 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY