Elizabeth Church Manor Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 160 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, during the abbreviated survey (NY00354300) the facility failed to ensure residents remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 7 of 55 residents (Residents #1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 who had severely impaired cognition, had a contour mattress and right side bed rail (assist rail) and was not assessed for appropriate alternatives to the bed rail, was not assessed for entrapment risk, did not have the risks and benefits of a bed rail reviewed, and there was no informed consent from the resident's representative before installation of the bed rail. Subsequently, the resident was found with their body out of the bed and their head wedged between the bed rail and the mattress and was pronounced deceased . Additionally, Residents #4, #5, #6, #8, and #9 had multiple risk factors identified on their bed rail assessments and were recommended to have bed rails applied; Residents #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 did not have risks…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-30 · tag F0700 — widespread
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00354300), the facility failed to ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails to ensure there was no gap between the bed rail and mattress wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body for 55 of 55 residents (Residents #1-#16 and #18-#56) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 had a contour mattress and a right side bed rail. The facility did not inspect and regularly check the mattress and bed rail for areas of possible entrapment. Additionally, the facility did not evaluate alternatives to bed rails, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative or obtain informed consent prior to the installation of bed rails for Resident #1 and all 54 residents with bed rails (Refer to F689). Subsequently, on 9/15/2024, Resident #1was found with their body out of their bed with their head wedged between the bed rail and the mattress. The resident had no pulse or respirations and was pronounced deceased . This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/28/2025-8/1/2025 the facility did not ensure sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 2 of 3 resident units (Units 1 and 3). Specifically, Unit 1's and 3's meal trays were consistently delivered after the posted scheduled mealtimes and concerns were identified with the effectiveness of meal preparation and other food and nutrition services. Deficiencies related to food and nutrition services were identified in F 809 Frequency of Meals/Snacks at Bedtime; F 812 Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve; and F 814 Dispose of Garbage and Refuse Properly.Findings include:The Resident Listing Report, dated 7/28/2025, documented the facility's resident census was 117. The undated facility policy Dietary Staffing, documented the facility should maintain adequate and qualified dietary personnel, including management and support staff, to ensure that all meals and snacks were safely prepared, handled and serviced in a timely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00385403) surveys conducted 7/28/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence for 2 of 3 units (First and Third Floors) reviewed. Specifically, the First floor meals were served more than 30 minutes late; the Third floor meals were served more than 30 minutes late, and dining table residents were not served together. Additionally, deficiencies were identified in sufficient dietary support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service (F802) that led to an undignified dining experience.Findings include:The undated facility policy, Dining Experience Policy, documented meals would be served at consistent, scheduled times, with flexibility for alternate meal schedules. Communal dining was encouraged for socialization. The undated facility policy, Dignity, documented meals would be served in a manner that maintained dignity and avoid treating residents as a task and resident would be encouraged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/28/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards in one (1) out of one (1) main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen was unclean, had damaged freezer storage equipment, improperly stored utensils, and improper storage of food products.Findings include: The undated facility policy Kitchen Cleaning and Sanitation, documented all surfaces in the kitchen and food preparation areas were to be cleaned and sanitized regularly to maintain a safe environment for food storage and preparation, and to ensure the prevention of foodborne illness and cross-contamination. The undated facility policy Refrigerator and Freezer Cleaning and Temperature Monitoring, documented the facility performed routine cleaning of all cold storage equipment and made sure it functioned properly. The food should be stored six inches off the floor.The undated facility policy Food Storage, documented the facility stored all food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/28/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly in one (1) of one (1) main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen garbage and refuse areas were not maintained to prevent attraction and harborage of pests.Findings include: The undated facility policy Garbage Disposal and Waste Management, documented all garbage, refuse, and waste was collected, stored, and disposed of in a manner that minimized health risk and prevented pest infestation. Kitchen waste was to be emptied multiple times a day. The exterior waste storage should be covered and secured to prevent pest access and kept free of overflowing waste. During an observation on 7/28/2025 at 10:40 AM, there were piles of trash and debris scattered on the ground around the dumpsters outside the main kitchen.During an interview on 7/30/2025 at 12:23 PM, Food Service Manager #13 stated the kitchen garbage was taken down the hall and put out the side door and into the dumpsters at the end of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/28/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure as needed orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #14) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #14 had a physician order for as needed Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) that was not reevaluated for appropriateness or discontinuation after 14 days. Findings include: The undated facility policy PRN [as needed] Medication Administration Policy, documented special precautions were taken with psychotropic [as needed] medications, which required time-limited orders and clinical justification. Psychotropic medications were any drug that affected brain activities related to mental processes and behavior. All [as needed] orders must include the duration of the order (especially for psychotropics). [As needed] orders for psychotropic medications must be limited to 14 days, unless the attending physician documented and justified the need for continuation. The medications could not be renewed automatically and must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/28/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently both during day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility did not review and update the facility assessment as necessary. Specifically, the facility assessment did not accurately reflect the clinical nutrition staff and department heads.Findings include:The 2024-2025 Facility Assessment documented the incorrect name of the Director of Nursing. The assessment documented the facility resources needed to provide competent support and care for the resident population every day and during emergencies. The assessment listed one Director of Nurses with a New York State license; 1 Director of Food and Nutrition which included Food service Director/ Diet technician/Registered Dietitian, Certified Dietary Manager, 3 cooks, and 6 food service aides. The registered dietitian listed was not full time or a department head, and the facility did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/28/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #4) reviewed. Specifically, during Resident #4's wound dressing treatment Licensed Practical Nurse #8 did not perform hand hygiene when changing from contaminated to clean gloves. Findings include:The undated facility Wound Care Dressing Change, documented hand hygiene was required before starting the dressing change, after removing soiled dressings, and at the end of the procedure. Resident #4 had diagnoses including Stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) left heel pressure ulcer. The 6/16/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, an unhealed pressure ulcer, infection of the foot, received pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0882 — isolated
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/28/2025 - 8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure one qualified individual, who was not the Director of Nursing, was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program. Specifically, the Assistant Director of Nursing was not qualified based on education, training, experience or certification to assume the role of Infection Preventionist and the Director of Nursing assumed those duties.Findings include: The undated facility policy Infection Surveillance, documented the Infection Preventionist served as the leader of surveillance activities, maintained documentation of incidents, findings, and any corrective actions regarding infection control. They were responsible to report findings to the Quality Assurance Committee and public health authorities.The undated facility Emergency Phone Numbers form documented Director of Nursing #2 was also the Infection Preventionist. Assistant Director of Nursing #3 was the Director of Nursing in Training and the Assistant Director of Nursing.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-30 · tag F0837 — widespread
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during abbreviated surveys (NY00354147 and NY00354300), it was determined the facility and governing body failed to ensure that residents received appropriate quality of care by allowing the following deficient practices to exist, placing residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death: F 689 Accident Hazards and F 700 Bedrails. Specifically, the facility's governing body did not establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility. Subsequently, there were outdated and a lack of operational policies and equipment to ensure resident safety. Findings include: The facility policy Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, dated 2/2018 defined governing body as individuals who were legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operations of the facility. A quality deficiency was anything the facility considered to be in need of further investigation and correction or improvement. Examples included problems such as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 8/19/2024-8/22/2024, the facility did not make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances for 3 of 8 anonymous residents and for 5 additional grievances (Residents #38 [2 grievances], #47, #79, and #94) reviewed. Specifically, 3 residents from the Resident Council meeting stated their grievances were not always acted upon or resolved and they were not provided with a reason why. Additionally, there were five grievances that did not have documented resolution. Findings include: The facility policy Grievances, reviewed 8/2017, documented the facility would ensure prompt resolution of all grievances regarding the resident's rights. The Grievance Official was responsible for overseeing the grievance process through to its' conclusion and issuing written grievance decisions to the resident. Prompt efforts to resolve included the facility acknowledgement of the grievance and active work toward the resolution of the grievance. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$151,625 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $151,625 — penalty dated 2024-08-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to UNITED METHODIST HOMES — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY