No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Good Shepherd-Fairview Home INC

80 Fairview Avenue, Binghamton, NY 13904 · Non profit - Corporation · 54 certified beds · (607) 724-2477 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (607) 724-2477 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,153 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,153 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-24)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
276-280 Robinson St · (607) 722-2769 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
163 Robinson St · (607) 722-4976 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
160 Robinson St · (607) 762-5409 · Call to confirm hours
Park
54 Fairview Ave · (607) 772-7208 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.8%14.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.4%1.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%19.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.6%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.3%12.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.0%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.1%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.2%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control37.1%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.9%13.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.7%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.1%20.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.7%9.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.441.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.221.361.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 271 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.97U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.56hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.40hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 136 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.97 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.3%CMS range 48.0–59.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.8–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.9–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.80
RN hoursweekends
55.6%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 49.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-01)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00368765), the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1's care plan documented to remove the walker from their room when not in use. Subsequently, the resident fell from bed, their neck became entangled on the basket attached to their walker, and they were found without a pulse or respirations and expired. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy past non-compliance, to Resident #1. Findings include: The facility policy, Accident/Incident Prevention and Risk Management, revised 4/2023, documented each resident would receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents and the residents' environment would be managed to be free of accident hazards. Fall and elopement risk evaluations were completed within the electronic record upon admission, quarterly, annually and with any significant changes. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not develop care plans that describe the resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental and psychosocial needs and preferences and how the facility will assist in meeting these needs and preferences for (4) of four (4) residents (Residents #65, #4, #8, and #5) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #65 and #4's care plan did not include the use of anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication. Resident #8's care plan did not include the use of diabetic medications and Resident #5's care plan did not include the use of antihypertensive medications. Findings include: The facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plan, revised 7/2019, documented each discipline was responsible for the initiation and augmentation of problems with correlating goals and approaches to address care areas, to support the highest quality of care. Interdisciplinary team members were expected to have analyzed each triggered care area assessment related to their discipline and would have made care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025 to 8/1/2025, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #5) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5's enhanced barrier precautions were not followed, and wound care was completed without appropriate hand hygiene, clean supplies, and precautions to prevent contamination of the wound. Additionally, Licensed Practical Nurse #15 did not perform hand hygiene consistently during their medication administration between residents.Findings included: The facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 11/2024, documented enhanced barrier precautions were utilized to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms to residents. Gowns and gloves were to be utilized during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions did not apply. Examples of high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/9/2024-9/16/2024, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #8) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #8's diabetes mellitus diagnoses was incorrect in the resident's electronic medical record and was incorrectly coded in their Minimum Data Set, their morning insulin sliding scale order was not updated timely per the Endocrinologist's recommendation, the resident had a low blood sugar outside their sliding scale parameters with no documented notification to the provider, did not have maximum parameters on their sliding scales on when to notify the provider, and did not have a person-centered diabetic management care plan. Additionally, the resident did not have the recommended diabetic eye exam scheduled. The facility policy, Emergency Procedure Hyperglycemia, effective 4/2022, documented the nurse was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025 - 8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed (Resident #5). Specifically, Resident #5 had a pressure ulcer that was not reclassified to its proper stage once opened and they did not have their ordered protective dressing applied to their hand as ordered to maintain skin integrity. Additionally, the resident's privacy was not maintained during wound care. The facility policy, Skin-Wound Assessment and Care, effective 4/2022, documented the interdisciplinary team were to minimize pressure and risk factors to the resident's skin and ensure adequate hydration and nutrition to maintain skin integrity. A pressure ulcer means an ulcer and/or necrotic tissue overlaying a bony prominence that had been subjected to pressure, friction, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025 to 8/1/2025 the facility did not ensure a system of records and accounts of all controlled drugs was maintained for one (1) of two (2) nursing carts (Rehab Unit) reviewed. Specifically, the controlled substance accountability record was not accurately reconciled after the medication was administered to the resident for four residents.Findings include:The facility policy Controlled Medication Storage, effective 5/2018 documented controlled substances were subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and record keeping in accordance with federal, state, and other applicable laws and regulations. A controlled substance accountability record was prepared by the pharmacy/facility for controlled substance category medications including those in emergency supply. The following information was completed on the accountability form upon dispensing or receipt of controlled substance or use of controlled substance from the emergency supply: name of resident, prescription number,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025 to 8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one (1) of two (2) medication carts (Rehab Unit cart) and one (1) of one (1) medication rooms (Rehab Unit) reviewed. Specifically, the Rehab Unit medication cart had three multidose eye drops that were opened and expired. The Rehab Unit medication room had two single resident use medication vials that were unlabeled, there was expired flu vaccine in the medication fridge and a box of medications to be destroyed underneath the medication room sink. Additionally, the Rehab Unit medication cart was left unattended and out of sight of the licensed practical nurse during one observation.Findings include:The facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility, effective 5/2018, documented medications and biologicals would be stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025-8/1/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one (1) of two (2) kitchenette areas. Specifically, the 3rd floor kitchenette contained staff food items that were not properly stored, undated food items in the refrigerator, dishes were not dried properly after washing, and the air conditioning vent had debris on it.Findings include:The facility policy Unit Pantries effective 12/2024 documented dietary would check all unit pantry refrigerators and cupboards daily and discard items that were not labeled, not dated, expired, or items opened not sealed or covered properly. Unit refrigerators in the pantry were for resident items only and staff should not consume or store products in the resident refrigerators.The facility policy Sanitary Conditions effective 12/2024 documented storage areas including cupboards, shelves, and drawers were to be kept dry and clean from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00329838)surveys conducted 1/16/2024- 1/19/2024, the facility did not ensure residents were assessed for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative, and obtain informed consent prior to the installation of bed rails for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #24, #25, #27 and #38) reviewed. Specifically, for Residents #1, #24, #25, #27 and #38 there was no documented evidence the risks and benefits of bed rails were explained to the residents or their representatives or that consents were obtained prior to bed rail installation. Additionally, on 12/13/2023, Resident #24 was found sitting on the floor next to their bed with their left arm entrapped in the bed rail resulting in abrasions to their abdomen. Findings include: The facility policy Physical Restraints, reviewed 4/21/2022, documented physical restraints were any manual method or physical mechanical device, material or equipment attached…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 1/16/2024- 1/19/2024, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards and included the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts units (Unit 2 Long Hall medication cart) reviewed. Specifically, the Unit 2 Long Hall medication cart had 1 bottle of aspirin that was expired, 2 bottles of aspirin that did not have an expiration date listed, 1 multi-dose insulin pen that was not labeled with a resident name or an opened date, and 1 multi-dose insulin pen that was opened more than 28 days. Findings include: The facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility dated 2011 documented that stock medications would be kept separately from individually patient labeled medications. Outdated medications would be immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication destruction, and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order exists. The facility Insulin Injection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 1/16/2024-1/19/2024, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen (the main kitchen) reviewed. Specifically, the main kitchen dish machine area walls were unclean; the ceiling tile metal grid was rusty; and there were expired and undated bread products. Findings include: An undated facility policy Procedures: Walls, Kitchen-Cleaning documented the procedure frequency as needed and the time required was 15 minutes per each 10 foot x 10 foot wall section. The undated facility Food Storage Guidelines documented bread on a shelf was to be discarded after 4 days, and rolls were to be discarded after the package date. The following observations were made in the main kitchen on 1/16/2024 from 9:20 AM-10:50 AM: - the dish machine area walls were unclean, and the ceiling tile grid was rusty; - there was a loaf of club wheat bread that had a best by date of 1/7/2024; and - the bread shelf in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-09 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/7/21-9/9/21, the facility failed to ensure the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) was notified of a loss of service and was not in compliance with Federal, State, and Local Laws and Professional Standards. Specifically, NYSDOH was not notified of a loss of the commercial dish machine within the main kitchen according to the NYS DOH Nursing Home Incident Reporting Manual. Findings include: The NYSDOH Nursing Home Incident Reporting Manual last updated August 2016 documents the facility must report planned and unintentional concerns effecting kitchen sanitation. This section refers to situations that are planned, such as for evaluation or repair, as well as situations that are unplanned, unexpected or emergent in nature. At least one of the following elements must be present for an incident to be reportable to the NYSDOH: -Loss of service lasting or expected to last 4 or more hours. -There is no back-up system in place; or -The back-up system fails to work. -Planned or unexpected events that may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/7/21-9/9/21, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 kitchenette refrigerator (third-floor kitchenette) and 3 of 3 juice machines (second and third-floor kitchenette and main dining room juice machines). Specifically, the air temperature of the third-floor kitchenette refrigerator was not maintained at an appropriate temperature, and the juice within the second and third-floor kitchenette and main dining room juice machines was not maintained at appropriate temperatures. Findings include: 1. Third-Floor Kitchenette Refrigerator During an observation on 9/7/21 at 6:30 PM, the state thermometer was placed in the third-floor kitchenette refrigerator, the door to the refrigerator was opened and kept open for 30 seconds. The state thermometer temperature jumped from 43 Fahrenheit (F) to 56 F. During an observation on 9/8/21 at 9:15 AM, with the Food Service Director present, there was a poured glass of milk in the third-floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/7/21-9/9/21, the facility failed to ensure food and drinks were palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals (9/7/21 dinner and 9/8/21 lunch) reviewed. Specifically, multiple food items including pulled pork, peaches in syrup, Jello, cranberry juice, and Caesar salad were not served at palatable temperatures. Additionally, a container of coleslaw was not held at a safe temperature in a kitchenette refrigerator. Findings include: During an observation on 9/7/21 at 6:00 PM, a dinner meal tray was delivered to the resident in room C2. Temperature and taste tests were conducted on the meal tray and the resident received a replacement. At 6:03 PM the following temperatures were measured: - pulled pork 128 Fahrenheit (F); -peaches in syrup 68 F; - Jello 63 F. The pulled pork was not warm or palatable. The peaches in syrup and the Jello were not cold or palatable. During an interview on 9/7/21 at 6:15 PM, the dining room Supervisor stated that the peaches and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-08-01 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews during the recent recertification survey conducted 7/29/2025-8/1/2025 the facility did not ensure the results of the most recent survey and the corresponding plan of correction were readily accessible to residents and their representatives, as required. Findings include:The facility policy Resident Rights, revised in April 2022, documented the residents/family members/responsible party of resident's rights by posting within the facility, information to provide access to any representative or governmental agent as outline in federal and state code, legal or other services. During a Resident Council meeting on 7/30/2025 at 11:26 AM, the residents in attendance were unaware of the location of a copy of the most recent Statement of Deficiencies (Form CMS 2567) or Plan of Correction.During an observation on 7/30/2025, the main lobby had no visible information indicating the detailed availability of past survey information. Upon inspection, the survey binder was discovered in the lobby on top of a shelf, under a plant with random unrelated papers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,153 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,153 — penalty dated 2025-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LACLAIR, RYANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/22/2023
ALLABAUGH, FREDRICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
ANDREWS, JILLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
BUNNELL, KATHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
HALBERT, ROGERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
HYLE, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
LACEY, JOANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2012
LANOUETTE, DAWNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
RONEY, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
SEVEY, KYLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
WAGER, ELSIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
WEBSTER, ERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
ARNOLD, ULYSSESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/19/2023
MACKEY, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2015

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 32%Medicare 12%Other / private 56%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$432per resident / day
operating cost
$13,142per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$346per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335527. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next