Ross Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 109.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. This was identified during the Kitchen Task. Specifically, during follow-up kitchen tours on 01/15/2026 and on 01/16/2026, the walk-in freezer temperatures were observed to be 26 degrees Fahrenheit (the food safety requirement should be at or below zero (0) degree Fahrenheit). Additionally, one (1) of the three (3) evaporator fans in the walk-in freezer were not operational. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Food Storage dated 01/13 documented all perishable foods are stored in either refrigerators maintained at 41 degrees [Fahrenheit] or below, or freezers at zero (0) degree [Fahrenheit], or below respectively. A reliable thermometer shall be installed and maintained in all refrigeration and freezer units and monitored on a daily basis. The United States Food and Drug Administration Refrigerator and Freezer Storage Chart dated March 2018 documented freezing [temperature] of zero (0) degree…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not immediately inform the resident's Physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychological status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychological status in either life threatening conditions or clinical complications). This was identified for one (1) (Resident #84) of two (2) residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, on 12/15/2025 Resident #84 was identified with an undesired significant weight loss of 5% in one month, and on 1/16/2026 an undesired significant weight loss of 10.2% in 3 months. There was no documented evidence that the resident's Physician was notified of the resident's significant weight loss.The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Resident Change in Condition last revised in 10/2025 documented should a resident experience a medical change in condition that indicates an emergency of acute illness, it is the expectation that the Registered Nurse on duty will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review (Incident # 2677700), the facility did not ensure each covered individual report immediately, but not later than two (2) hours, to the administration of the facility and to the New York State Department of Health after the allegation was made. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #116) of two (2) residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, on 11/23/2025 at 2:00 AM, Resident #116 reported a verbal abuse allegation to Licensed Practical Nurse #5. Registered Nurse #2 was made aware of the abuse allegation and did not report the incident to the facility administration until 11/24/2025, 24 hours after the allegation was made.The finding is:The facility's policy titled Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident's Property, last reviewed 06/22/2018, documented verbal abuse as any use of oral, gestured or written languages which uses degrading or derogatory terms towards residents. Mental abuse is defined as but not limited to harassment which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented to meet each resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #37) of two (2) residents reviewed for Position and Mobility. Specifically, Resident #37 required use of a pillow for the lower extremities to prevent direct contact of the boney prominences (knees) due to contractures as per the resident's plan of care. On multiple observations, the resident was observed without the use of the pillow in between the knees.The finding is:The facility policy titled Management and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers dated 12/2024 documented interventions to use devices, such as pillows and foam wedges to prevent direct contact between bony prominences and consult with the Physical Therapist for the positioning devices.The facility policy titled Assistive/Adaptive and Preventative/Positioning Devices dated 02/2025 documented a knee separator to be used to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure the resident maintained, to the extent possible, acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #84) of two (2) residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, on 12/11/2025, Registered Dietitian #1 documented Resident #84 as having a weight loss of 5.4 pounds in one-month (a 4.5% decrease in the resident's usual body weight) and recommended weekly weights for four (4) weeks to further assess the accuracy of the resident's weight trends. On 12/15/2025, Registered Dietitian #1 documented Resident #84 triggered for an undesired significant weight loss (5% in one month). The weekly weights were not completed as per the recommendations, and no new dietary interventions were put in place. On 1/16/2026, Resident #84's weight reflected an additional loss of 4 pounds (3.57%) in one month and an undesired significant weight loss of 10.2% in 3 months. The finding is: The facility's policy titled,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility did not ensure that parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #117) of one (1) resident reviewed for Antibiotics. Specifically, Resident #117 had a physician's order to infuse Ceftriaxone (antibiotic) medication; however, the route of infusion was not specified in the order. During multiple occasions, Resident #117 was observed with a Peripheral Intravenous Catheter in their left hand. There was no physician's order for the assessment and care of the intravenous catheter.The finding is: The facility policy titled initiation and management of intravenous therapy revised on 10/2025 documented a valid order from a licensed practitioner for Intravenous fluids authorizes nursing staff to initiate peripheral access as necessary to carry out the prescribed treatment. A separate order for peripheral intravenous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were assisted in obtaining routine Dental Care. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #5) of one (1) resident reviewed for dental care. Specifically, Resident #5 was not seen by a Dentist since their admission to the facility in June 2024. The finding is:The facility's policy titled, Dental Services, last reviewed 10/2025, documented residents will be seen and evaluated by the Dentist upon admission, annually, as requested by the resident and/or representative, and as needed with a significant change of condition. The policy did not state if a physician's order was required for a resident to be seen by a Dentist.Resident #5 had diagnoses which included hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a form of diabetes mellitus characterized by high blood sugar, insulin resistance, and lack of insulin). The 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility did not ensure that it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious diseases. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #88) of six (6) residents reviewed for Medication Administration Task. Specifically, during the medication administration task, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 removed a calcium /vitamin D3 tablet (vitamin supplement) from a blister pack with their bare hands. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 broke the tablet in half and put the two halves of the tablet in the souffle cup and proceeded to offer the medication to Resident #88.The finding is:The facility policy titled Medication Administration last reviewed/revised 12/2025, documented pills should not be handled with fingers. Pour directly from blister packs into souffle cup.Resident #88 was admitted with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder that damages neurons leading to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility did not ensure call systems were accessible to each resident while residents were in their rooms. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #57) of one (1) resident reviewed for call systems. Specifically, during multiple observations, Resident #57 was observed in bed, and the call bell was out of their reach.The finding is:The facility policy titled Call Bells last revised on 12/2025, documented to have a call bell at the bedside within reach. The purpose of the call bell is to provide the resident with a method of communication to assist in meeting needs in a timely manner.Resident #57 was admitted with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (brain tissue dies due to lack of blood, oxygen, and nutrients), dementia (a decline in thinking skills due to damaged blood vessels in the brain), and epilepsy (a neurological disorder that causes seizures, loss of consciousness and unusual behavior). Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Abbreviated Survey case #NY00368340 and initiated on 1/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents have the right to a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely, including that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not create a safety risk. This was identified for 8 of 18 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. Specifically, a complaint was received reporting that the East unit of the facility was freezing cold affecting all the residents on that unit. The finding is: The facility's policy titled; 'Cold Weather Emergency' updated 1/16/2025 documented under Plan A Residents are to be checked and temperatures are to be taken immediately on all residents. All rooms are to have adequate supply of blankets. If temperatures are below 70 degrees Fahrenheit resident's temperatures will be taken every four hours. An observation tour was conducted on 1/15/2025 at 10:45 AM on the East…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $526K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY