No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Putnam Ridge

46 Mt Ebo Road North, Brewster, NY 10509 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (845) 278-3636 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (845) 278-3636 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1511 Rte 22 · (845) 940-1101 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
16 Mount Ebo Rd S Ste 21
Grocery
1511 Route 22 · (845) 940-0575 · Call to confirm hours
Park
115 Doansburg Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.4%14.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.0%1.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.8%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.6%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.0%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.8%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.0%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.6%13.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.1%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.5%20.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.2%9.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.141.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.651.361.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 375 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 222 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.3%CMS range 52.2–63.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.8–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.8–9.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.12
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
45.4%
Total nursing turnover
35.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 148.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-10-25)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2020-09-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (#2601270, and #2577313), it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and/or assistance to prevent accidents for two (2) of four (4) residents (Resident #164 and #116) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) on the morning of 08/26/2025, Resident #164 was noticed in bed with a contusion (bruise) to their right face, right elbow, and a forehead laceration (skin wound). The facility investigation determined Resident #164 who required two (2) staff assist for bed mobility and/or transfers was provided one (1) staff assist which resulted in an 08/25/2025 fall from bed. Subsequently, Resident #164 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with an acute (sudden) intertrochanteric (thigh) right femur (thigh bone) fracture (broken bone), and 2) Resident #116 was not provided with one (1) hour safety checks to prevent falls as per the plan of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey and an abbreviated survey (#2601270 and 2577313), the facility did not ensure development and/or implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet resident needs for two (2) of four (4) residents (#164 and #116) reviewed for accidents, three (3) of five (5) residents (#20, #44, and #63) reviewed for activities, one (1) of two (2) residents (#41) reviewed for positioning and one (1) of three (3) residents (#142) reviewed for restraints. Specifically, 1. implementation of two person staff assistance for transfer/bed mobility was not provided for Resident #164 as per care plan 2. there was no documented evidence of a care plan to address the use/release schedule of a lap/seat belt for Resident # 142 and 3. the use of hand rolls was not implemented as per physician order and there was no documented evidence of a care plan to address the physician ordered use of rolled gauze in the hands and knee abductor roll when in the wheelchair for Resident #41.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#2582376) the facility did not ensure resident choice related to provider of health care services was met for one (1) of one (1) resident investigated for choices. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #23 continued to provide care for Resident #75 after their representative communicated a preference of not having Certified Nurse Aide #23 provide care to Resident #75.The findings include:Resident #75 had diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The grievance dated 07/11/2025 documented a request was made on 12/14/2024 that Certified Nurse Aide #23 not be assigned to care for Resident #75. On 01/12/2025, Certified Nurse Aide #23 was observed by Resident #75's son providing cares to Resident #75.The Significant Change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #75 had severely impaired cognition, no behaviors, and was dependent on staff assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#2601270), the facility did not ensure all alleged violations of abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours to the state survey agency for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #164). Specifically, on the morning of 08/26/2025 Resident #164 was observed with a bruise to the right eye and bruise to the right arm that was not reported to the state agency until 08/26/2025 at 11:05 PM. The findings include:The policy and procedure titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting dated 01/09/2001, last revised 09/2024 documented if the events that cause the reasonable suspicion (but no later than 2 hours after forming suspicion). Resident #164 had diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction, Pulmonary Embolism, and an unspecified intellectual Disability.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (A resident assessment tool) dated 06/20/2025 documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment. And was dependent with all activities of daily living. The Accident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#2583366), the facility did not ensure that activities of preference and interest were available and designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #20) reviewed for behavior-emotional care and one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for restraints (Resident #7). Specifically, 1) Resident #20 was observed on multiple occasions wandering in the hallways of the unit and not participating in activities; 2) Resident #7 missed an activity that was held off the unit because the activities staff was unable to transfer the resident from an enclosed frame walker to a wheelchair.The findings include1)Resident #20 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, dementia, schizophrenia, and depression. The 05/25/2025 care plan titled Behavior Symptoms Wandering documented exhibits wandering as evidenced by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#2583366) the facility did not ensure sufficient staff to provide services to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being as per individualized care plan for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #20) reviewed for behavior and emotional care. Specifically, ongoing monitoring/supervision and thirty-minute checks were not consistently implemented for Resident #20 with a history of wandering and defecating/urinating in inappropriate places. The findings include:Resident #20 had diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia, schizophrenia, and depression. A 07//09/2025 Grievance documented a family member observed Resident #20 stabilizing themself by putting their hand on top of Resident #126's head and they were fumbling with the drawstrings on their pants. Resident #20's private area was close to Resident #126's face. No staff were supervising Resident #20 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00384916), the facility did not ensure that comfortable and safe temperature levels were maintained in all areas during a heat emergency, when the air conditioning unit on one unit (Dogwood), located on the first floor of the building, was not functional on 06/23/2025. Specifically, the facility could not provide documentation that temperatures in resident rooms were adequate or comfortable during the breakdown of the air-conditioning system from 06/23/2025 to 06/24/2025. The air-conditioning was restored to residents' rooms on 06/24/2025 at 3:00 PM. The Administrator stated that they did not check resident room temperatures, as this was not part of the facility's policy. Since the hallway temperatures on Dogwood were within regulation, the air-conditioning issue was not reported as a heat emergency. The findings include: The facility policy titled Heat Emergency states that, during all seasons, a comfortable temperature must be maintained throughout the occupied areas of the facility, consistent with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00357873, NY00372738, NY00373759, NY00339079), the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staffing to attain or maintain the well-being of each resident. Specifically, 1) upon review of the staffing schedule for multiple days and on all three shifts of staffing for each floor for February 2025, March 2025 and April 2025, the facility did not provide adequate staffing to meet the needs of the residents and were staffed below their minimum staffing levels on many occasions. 2) The findings are: The facility Staffing Plan dated 7/13/20 documented the nursing department will maintain sufficient nursing staff to meet the care needs of all residents. Nursing services are provided 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The Facility Assessment provided by the facility was last revised on 4/18/25. The last review by the Quality Assurance and Improvement Committee was on 1/30/25. The staffing plan documented a table describing the number of staff available to meet residents' needs, which listed the position of staff by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00339079, NY00357873, NY00372568, NY00373759, NY00337630, NY00354632, NY00364043, NY00372738) from 4/21/25 to 4/23/25, the facility did not ensure that resident's dignity was maintained. 1) Specifically, residents on Apple unit were observed eating lunch and dinner meals on the unit hallways and residents waited a long time for assistance with eating; and 2) Certified Nurse Aide #20 referred to Resident #13 who required assistance with eating as a feeder and Activities Leader #4 referred to Resident #17 as a feeder in the presence of other residents. The findings are: The undated facility policy titled Resident Rights documented the purpose was to ensure the preservation of every resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. 1) During multiple observations of meal services on 4/21/25 and 4/22/25, residents were observed eating lunch and dinner in the hallways of Apple unit. Residents were observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated (NY00372738, NY00373759) surveys, for 2 of 8 residents (#5 and #4) reviewed for activities of daily living, it was determined the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition and personal hygiene. Specifically: 1.) There was no documented evidence in the February 2025 Certified Nurse Aide Accountability Record that Resident #5 was toileted on the day or evening shift for 2/14/25 2.) Resident #4 was observed waiting over an hour for assistance with eating, after the meal was delivered. Findings include: 1) Resident # 5 had diagnoses including Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Arthritis and Depression. The 2/9/25 Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, documented the resident's cognition was intact and they required substantial to maximal assistance for toileting. The 2/1/25 Activities of Daily Living Care Plan documented Resident #5 required substantial to maximal assistance for bed mobility and was dependent for transfers with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F684 Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY 00372568) the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident # 8) reviewed for medications. Specifically, Resident #8 had a seizure disorder, the immediate-use seizure medication was not transcribed from the Hospital Discharge Summary and not available when the resident had a seizure, resulting in the resident being transferred to the hospital for treatment. The findings are: The Policy and Procedure titled Medication Administration last revised 12/24, documented all medication entries in electronic medical record will require two nurses to review each order. Nurse reviewing the order must ensure the order is routed to the proper place. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of seizure disorder, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, unspecified intellectual disabilities. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2). Resident #12 had diagnoses Alzheimer's disease, dementia and depression. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff with all activities of daily living. A physician order dated 11/26/24 documented to administer Baclofen 5 milligrams give 0.5 tablet (2.5 milligrams) 2 times per day, every day at 10 AM and 6 PM. Nurse's Progress Notes dated 12/4/24 documented the resident's family member was concerned that Baclofen might be making the resident lethargic. Registered Nurse Unit Manager #1 spoke with Nurse Practitioner #1 and Baclofen 2.5 milligrams was changed to once daily from twice daily. A physician order dated 12/4/24 documented to administer Baclofen 5 milligrams, give 0.5 tablet (2.5 milligrams) once daily. A physician order dated 12/5/24 documented to administer Baclofen 5 milligrams, give 0.5 tablet (2.5 milligrams) once daily. The December 2024 Medication Administration Record documented the physician's orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0811 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Surveys (NY00354632, NY00357873, NY00337630, NY00372738, NY00372568, NY00373759, NY00364043, NY00339079) 4/21/25 to 4/23/25, the facility did not ensure one of five residents (Resident #11) were fed by staff members who completed a State-approved training course to assist residents in eating or drinking as required by regulations. Specifically, the facility was not able to provide documentation that Unit Assistants successfully completed a State approved training course for one Resident Assistants (Unit Assistant #26) observed feeding Resident #11 during a lunch meal. The findings are: Resident #11 diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, Dementia and abnormal weight loss. The 4/21/25 Physician Order documented regular diet, blenderized texture, thin liquids consistency, aspiration precautions. The 3/19/25 Minimum Data Set documented Resident # 11 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including eating and on a mechanically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00339079, NY00357873, NY00372568, NY00373759, NY00337630, NY00354632, NY00364043, NY00372738) conducted 4/21/25 to 4/23/25, the facility did not ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection and did not ensure there was a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infection and communicable disease for all residents. Specifically, 1) facility staff were observed entering and exiting a contact and droplet isolation room (Resident #14) without donning and doffing personal protective equipment or performing hand hygiene. 2) Licensed Practical Nurse #3 was observed with their thumb entering the milk carton for Resident # 9 and Activities Leader #4 was observed with their thumb entering the top of milk carton for Resident #17. 3) Resident #18 was positive for respiratory syncytial virus and was observed walking up and down hallways of Apple unit without a mask during lunch and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00345900, NY00332503), the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 12 out of 39 residents reviewed for identification bands. Specifically, during an observation on 11/12/2024 there were 12 residents on the Apple unit observed without identification bands in place. The findings are: The facility Medication Administration policy dated 12/2016 and last revised 10/2023 documented that prior to administration of medication, the nurse must verify the resident's identification by checking the resident's identification band with the patient's name and medical record number. During observation conducted on 11/12/2024 at 3 PM on the Apple unit, there were 12 out of 39 residents noted without identification bands in place. During an interview on 11/12/2024 at 11:10 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated most of the residents they administered medications to today on the apple unit did not have an identification band in place. Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00345900, NY00332503), the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staffing to attain or maintain the well-being of each resident for 39 residents on Unit A as determined by the facility nursing coverage plan as necessary to meet the needs of the residents. The findings are: The Facility Nursing Coverage Plan policy dated 8/3/2021 documented the purpose was to outline a staffing plan that shall be used to determine the personnel recommended for each shift as defined for each unit's core coverage and as necessary to provide the scope of services required to meet resident care. The Facility Assessment provided by the facility was last revised on 8/16/2024. The last review by the Quality Assurance and Improvement Committee was on 9/18/2023. The staffing plan documented a table describing the number of staff available to meet residents' needs, which listed the position of staff by title, as well as the number of full-time employees that hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00345900, NY00332503) the facility did not ensure medications were administered in accordance with the prescriber's order or in accordance with professional standards for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, (1) Resident #1 had an order for the medication Depakote sprinkles, for their seizure disorder, and was administered their medication outside of the regulated time of an hour before or an hour after the scheduled time on 10/30/2024, 11/7/2024, 11/11/2024 and 11/12/2024. There was no documented evidence that the physician was made aware of the medication being administered late. (2) Resident #2 had an order for the medication Carbidopa-Levodopa, for their Parkinson's disease, and was administered their medication outside of the regulated time of an hour before or an hour after the scheduled time on 8/30/2024, 9/4/2024, 9/6/2024 and 9/17/2024. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00345900, NY00332503), the facility did not ensure the residents environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 out of 3 (Residents #2, #3) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, (1) Resident #2 who had history of falls and required moderate assistance for transfers had falls from their wheelchair on 8/3/2024, 8/8/2024, 8/30/2024, 9/14/2024, 9/29/2024 with no injuries; (2) Resident #3 had unwitnessed falls on 8/7/2023, 11/14/2023, 1/5/2024 and 1/10/2024 with minor injuries. There was no documented evidence that new interventions were implemented to prevent further falls and care plans were not updated on each occurrence for both Residents #2 and #3. The findings are: The Facility Fall Risk Assessment and Fall Prevention policy dated January 2003 and last revised November 30, 2017, documented all residents will be free of falls and free of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00345900), the facility did not ensure that a resident with urinary and bowel incontinence received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections. This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for incontinence. Specifically, Resident #1 who was always incontinent of bladder and bowel functions and dependent on direct care staff for cares was diagnosed with a urinary tract Infection on 5/7/2024 and 9/9/2024. Review of Resident #1's certified nurse accountability reports for May 2024, June 2024, July 2024, August 2024, and September 2024 revealed numerous occasions where there was no documented evidence of direct care staff providing bladder and bowel incontinence care. The Findings are: The undated Facility Incontinence policy documented residents who are incontinent of urine, feces, or both are kept dry, clean and comfortable while maintaining their dignity. Disposable diapers and pads are used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00345900, NY00332530) the facility did not ensure a facility-wide assessment documented what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations including nights and weekends. The assessment did not include a review of individual staff assignments and systems for coordination and continuity of care for residents within and across the staff assignments. Findings include: The Facility Assessment provided was last completed on 8/16/2024 and last reviewed by the quality assurance and improvement committee on 9/18/2023. The staffing plan documented a table describing the number of staff available to meet residents' needs, which listed the position of staff by title, as well as the number of full time employees that hold these positions. On 11/12/2024 the facility wide assessment was reviewed and revealed the assessment did not include the staffing plan, the requirements of number of staff allotted for each unit or per shift. During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 5:45 PM the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-25 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility records, observation and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#NY00311199), from [DATE] through [DATE], it was determined the facility did not ensure any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than 4 months was competent to provide nursing and nursing related services, for 7 of 7 staff (Training Nurse Aide (TNA) #1-#7) reviewed for training. Specifically, TNAs were employed by the facility and functioned in the role of a nurse aide for greater than 4 months without receiving nurse aide certification. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published a quality, safety and oversight memorandum (QSO-22-15-NH-TLTC-LSC), originally dated [DATE], which documented that previous staffing waivers allowing nurse aides to work for greater than 4 months without completing a state-approved nurse aide competency evaluation program or passing an oral or written exam expired on [DATE], which required facilities to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-25 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of facility records during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY311199) form 10/17 to 10/25/23, it was determined the facility did not ensure each certified nurse aide received twelve hours of in-service education per year, based on their individual performance review for 4 of 8 CNAs (CNA #8, #9, #10 and #11) reviewed for inservices. Specifically, CNA #8 lacked 6 hours of training; CNA #9 lacked 10 hours of training; CNA #10 lacked 8.5 hours of training, and CNA #11 lacked 7 hours of training; and all 4 CNAs lacked an annual performance evaluation. Finding Include: Review of the facility records for in-service education, provided by the Infection Control Nurse/Educator (IP) #1, revealed: - CNA #8 received 6 hours of in-service in 2023, and the last performance evaluation was completed 12/12/20. - CNA #9 received 2 hours of in-service in 2023, and the last performance evaluation was completed 9/7/22. - CNA #10 received 3.5 hours of in-service in 2023, and the last performance evaluation was completed 2/12/20. - CNA #11 received 5 hours of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 10/17/23 through 10/25/23, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 4 medication carts (Cedar and Apple). Specifically, medications were not stored in a clean environment on medication carts located on the Cedar and Apple units and undated/expired drugs and biologicals were discovered on medication carts of the Cedar and Apple unit. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Medication Storage, last revised 4/2014 documented medications should be stored in an orderly, organized manner in a clean area and that expired/discontinued/contaminated medications will be removed from the medication storage areas and disposed. During a medication storage observation on 10/24/23 at 5:30 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #2, the following was observed on the Cedar Unit medication cart: -1 undated, opened tobramycin eye drops -1 undated, opened bottle of olopatadine eye drops -1 undated, opened bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview conducted during a recertification survey conducted 10/17/23 through 10/25/23, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, food items in the walk in refrigerator and the cook's refrigerator were unlabeled and undated. The rack designated for dry pans was wet. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled storage of food in the facility refrigerator dated 4/8/22 documented,all items must have received dates written. Stored items must be labeled with a name and open date. All items opened and prepared over 72 hours ago must be discarded. The initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 10/17/23 from 9:10 AM to 9:50 AM and the following were identified: - A rack of bread with ten loaves of bread in a plastic bag had no receive date. - The walk-in refrigerator had a package of approximately ten slices of cheese that were not labeled or dated; a small pan of applesauce was not labeled; and a small pan of yogurt was dated 10/15 but not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #62), reviewed for activities of daily living, that care was provided in a manner to maintain dignity. Specifically, the urinary (Foley) catheter bag for Resident #62 was not concealed to prevent direct observation by other residents and their families. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Urinary Catheter Care, last revised 9/21, documented that privacy must be provided when a resident has the presence of an indwelling urethral catheter. Resident # 62 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 7/30/2023, documented that Resident #105 had moderately impaired cognition and was totally dependent of 2 or more staff for toilet use, and required the extensive assistance of 1 staff member for assistance with personal hygiene. A physician order dated 10/15/23 documented Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews during the recertification survey from 10/17/23-10/25/23, the facility did not ensure that the call bell system was accessible for 7 (Residents #115, #60, #105, #109, #132, #72 and #12) of 12 residents reviewed for Environment. Specifically, multiple observations revealed that call bells designated for Residents #115, #60, #105, #109, #132, #72 and #12, were not within the resident's reach. The findings are: 1.) Resident #115 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, senile degeneration of the brain, and major depressive disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #115 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision with bed mobility and transfers, and extensive assist of one staff with toileting. The fall care plan dated 4/11/22, documented for the call bell to be within reach. On 10/17/23 at 09:48 AM, Resident #115 was observed in bed awake, the call bell was hanging on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (# NY00317914) from 10/17 to 10/25/23, the facility did not ensure all injuries of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated and reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #449 reported an unwittnessed fall and broken arm that was not thoroughly investigated to rule out abuse. Findings include: Resident # 449 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Parkinson's, and dementia. The Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had intermittent confusion, required use of an assistive device for gait and balance, had a history of falls and was at high risk for falls. The Skilled Nursing Progress note dated 9/20/22 at 10:05 PM, documented Resident #449 was alert with periods of confusion and required contact guard and limited assistance with transfers and toileting. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 10/17/23 to 10/25/23, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene for one (Residents #64) of five residents reviewed for ADL's. Specifically, Resident #64 was observed on multiple occasions with urine-soaked pants and on one occassion was observed not out of bed as planned. Findings include: Resident #64 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to vascular dementia, hypothyroidism, muscle weakness, and orthostatic hypotension. The Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 7/26/23, documented Resident #64 had severely impaired cognition, and required extensive assist of two with toileting and transfers. The 11/25/2020 urinary/bowel incontinence/UTI prevention care plan documented the resident was incontinent of bladder and was to be toileted. Interventions included incontinent cares every two hours and as needed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00312435, NY00323395) surveys conducted 10/17/232023 - 10/25/2023, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #23, #299, and #105) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, 1) Resident #23, had a physician order for Clonazepam (anxiety medication) and received an incorrect dose. 2) Resident #299 was sent to a medical appointment without an aide and the consultant physician refused to see the resident without an aide. 3) Resident #105 was administered crushed medications without a physician's order. Findings include: 1.) Resident #23 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hyperlipidemia, and major depressive disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of one for bed mobility and transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #302) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #302 who was assessed at high risk for falls on admission and was observed attempting to stand up from their wheelchair without staff assistance or redirection. The findings are: Resident #302 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including lack of coordination, non-displaced fracture of seventh cervical vertebra, and dementia without behavioral disturbance. The fall assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was at high risk for falls with score of 17. The occupational therapy (OT) evaluation dated 10/14/23 documented the resident assessment identified 3-5 deficits in areas of physical, cognitive, psychosocial skills resulting in activity limitation or participation restrictions. The resident presented with impairments in balance, mobility and strength…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/17/23 to 10/25/23, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of no more than 5%, during a medication administration observation, when 3 of 25 opportunities (12%) resulted in error and impacted 2 of 6 residents (Resident #132 and #136). Specifically, 1) Resident # 132 was administered Metoprolol Extended Release Tablet crushed instead of whole, and 2) Resident #136 was administered medication through a feeding tube without flushing between 2 medications. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Medication Administration dated 12/16 documented that nurses should double check and ensure all medications were administered to patient/resident as per MD order. 1. Resident #132 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. The current physician order as of 10/23/23, documented to administer metoprolol succinate ER 50 milligram tablet extended-release 24 hr, by mouth once daily for ventricular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and abbreviated survey (NY00323395) the facility did not ensure that each resident's representative was informed about appointments for 1 of 2 (Resident # 299) residents reviewed for notification. Specifically, Resident #299 was not seen at an orthopedic appointment due to not having an escort, and family was not contacted to accompany resident. Findings include: Resident #299 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fracture of T9-T10 vertebra (thoracic spine), subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, diabetes, and congestive heart failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #299's cognition was intact and the resident had a fall with fracture in the last 2-6 months. The physician order dated 8/9/23 documented resident may go out on pass with family or outside appointment. The Out of House Appointment and Transportation Worksheet dated 8/9/23, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification and abbreviated (NY00323392) survey, the facility did not implement a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives, time frames and appropriate interventions based on comprehensive assessments for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #299) reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, for Resident #299 there was a non-compliant care plan for the TLSO back brace, which had no documented goals or interventions. The findings are: Resident #299 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of T9-T10 vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, diabetes, and congestive heart failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 9/5/23 documented the resident's cognition was intact and the resident had a fall with fracture in the last 2-6 months. The physician order dated 8/10/23 documented wear TLSO Brace when out of bed. The Non-compliant with TLSO Brace Care Plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00316737, NY00319286), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse was reported immediately to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH). This was evident for 2 of 4 (Resident # 1 and #2) Residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, (1) the facility was notified of an abuse allegation on 5/12/2023 by Resident#1's family. The facility did not report the incident to NYS DOH until 5/16/2023; (2)The Facility was notified of an alleged abuse incident involving Resident #2. The incident was reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/28/2023. The facility did not report the incident to NYS DOH until 6/30/23. The findings are: The Facility Policy on Abuse Prevention and Reporting dated 1/9/2017, last revised 12/30/2019 documented residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone including but not limited to facility staff. All staff will notify their supervisor who will notify their RN Supervisor. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00319286), the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #2) reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, on 6/27/2023, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) was witnessed rough handling and calling Resident#2 demented and saying they did not have the patience to deal with the resident, when CNA#1 was getting the resident ready for a shower and during a transfer from the shower bed back to bed. The Findings are: The Facility Policy on Abuse Prevention and Reporting dated 1/09/2017, last revised 12/30/2019 documented residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone including but not limited to facility staff. Verbal abuse is defined as oral or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and/or derogatory terms to residents within hearing distance or ability to comprehend. Examples of verbal abuse include but are not limited to threats of harm or saying things to frighten the resident. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during an Extended Survey (#NY000264371), the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the administrator failed to have a system in place for monitoring/inspecting the condition of hoyer pads and indicating which staff would be responsible for monitoring/inspecting the hoyer pads. The Findings Are: Facility Policy and Procedure titled Mechanical Lift revised August 2018 indicates all staff must assure that all hoyer slings are in good repair. If sling is noted to be in disrepair it must be taken out of service. Facility Accident/Incident Report indicated that the Director of Nursing (DON) completed the investigation on 09/17/2020 and removed the equipment from the unit. The investigation indicates Resident #1 was being assisted from the wheelchair to the bed via the hoyer lift with assist of 2 staff. When Resident # 1 was lifted via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide and maintain an infection control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, (1) the staff did not consistently apply personal protective equipment (PPE) upon entry to a room where a resident on contact-based precautions resided and (2) equipment used for transferring residents was observed being dragged on the floor. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #31) and during a facility observation on 1 of 4 units (Apple). The findings are: 1. Resident #31 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospital stay for treatment of pneumonia. Review of laboratory tests from the hospital revealed the resident was infected with Clostridium Difficile (C. diff. - a bacterial infection of the colon). The resident was placed on Contact Precautions (used to prevent the spread of infection from touching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-07-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the nurse aides were provided the required hours of training and annual in-service training on dementia care management and resident abuse prevention to ensure safe delivery of care. This was evident for 10 of 10 Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs # 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) reviewed for nurse aide training. The findings are: The CNA annual in-service training records were reviewed with the In-service Coordinator in the afternoon of 7/24/18 and on 7/25/18 at 4:20 PM. This review revealed that none of the following CNAs were provided 12 hours of training annually (based on their date of hire) and that the mandatory training on abuse prevention and dementia care was not being done annually. Specific findings include: - CNA #3 was hired on 4/18/08. Documented evidence revealed 1/30/17 as the last date of abuse in-service training. There was no evidence that dementia care management training was provided since at least 4/2017. The total hours of training received since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that care and services were provided in accordance with the residents' care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #95) reviewed for physical restraints; for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization/quality of care (Resident #24); and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #140). Specifically, the facility did not: (1) ensure that an assistive device (Velcro seatbelt) used to prevent the resident from falling off a chair was released in accordance to the physician's order. (2) address Resident #24's ongoing weight gain; (3) consistently maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis center regarding the care of Resident #140 who was undergoing dialysis treatment; and The findings are: 1. The facility Restraint Policy dated [DATE] stated that if a restraint is utilized it must be released every 2 hours for at least 10 minutes for prescribed activities as per physician orders, and will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not re-evaluate the person-centered care plan and develop appropriate interventions for 1 of to address changes in the resident's current health status. Specifically, a care plan for constipation was not revised to address issues related to a resident's recent hospitalization. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (#140) reviewed for constipation /quality of life. The finding is: Resident #140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease, Dehydration and Constipation. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 6/28/18 indicated the resident's bowel pattern did not include constipation, cognitively intact, and required extensive assistance of one person for most aspects activities of daily living. The nursing progress note dated 6/18/18 indicated the resident complained of stomach discomfort and stomach was very bloated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-07-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #31) reviewed for tube feeding that the necessary care was provided to ensure sufficient fluid intake in accordance with the physician's order. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that additional water (automatic water flushes) for hydration was administered in accordance with the physician's order. The findings are: Resident #31 has diagnoses that include Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) and Dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) of 7/6/18 revealed that the resident was fed via a feeding tube. The care plan for tube feeding and nutrition/hydration dated 3/22/17 revealed that the resident was fed via a tube due to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and CVA and that the resident's nutrition/hydration needs will be met by tube feeding. The most recent laboratory report dated 7/3/18 revealed that results were indicative of one's hydration status, electrolytes and blood urea nitrogen were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-07-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that there was adequate indication for initiating and continuing an antipsychotic medication used to treat the behavioral symptoms of 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #31). Specifically, (1) the clinicians assigned to the care of the resident did not consider the diagnosis of a urinary tract infection as a possible cause for the change in the resident's behavior prior to initiating the use of Zyprexa to address this change; (2) specific behaviors were not documented quantitatively and qualitatively to assess the effectiveness and determine the need for ongoing use of the medication; and (3) evidence was lacking regarding ongoing documentation and evaluation of the utilization of non-pharmacological interventions in accordance with the antipsychotic plan of care. The findings are: Resident #31 is an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews conducted during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure that medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards. Specifically, 1 of 4 medication carts (Birch Unit) reviewed for medication storage, one insulin pen and 2 insulin vials were observed to be opened and undated, and one insulin vial was observed to be opened, undated and unlabeled. The finding is: Observation of medication storage was conducted on 7/23/18 from 4:15 to 4:45 PM on the Birch Unit low side and the following were noted: - One opened, undated vial of Humalog insulin; - One opened, undated vial of Lantus vial; - One opened, undated Levemir FlexTouch insulin pen, and - One opened, unlabeled vial of Lantus. The manufacturer's recommendation stated that Humulin vials in use must be used within 28 days or be discarded; Lantus vials in use must be used in 28 days; and Levemir Flextouch insulin pen must be kept at room temperature once in use and discarded after 42 days. The expiration date of the insulin vial or pen is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that food items kept in resident refrigerators were stored to prevent potential for food borne illness on 2 out of 4 resident units Cedar and Dogwood) . Specifically, foods brought in from the outside were not properly labeled and dated. The findings are: The resident refrigerators were checked on all 4 units on 7/19/18 at 1:30 PM. The following was observed: A. Cedar unit: broccoli cheese soup from a local store was opened and half full, no name or date. The RN unit manager stated she would throw it away. B. Dogwood unit: four plastic containers of food were observed in the refrigerator: a pasta salad without a name or date; another kind a salad had no name and undated; another salad container without a date; and bow-tie pasta without a name and date. A Food Service Worker (FSW) who was present at the time of observation was interviewed on 7/19/18 at 2:05 PM and she stated that nursing was supposed to label and date the food items and keep track of how long they've been in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GREENBERGER, ERICIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 02/01/2010
WILLINGER, CHAYAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST80%since 02/01/2010
LEVIN, JANETIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/23/2018

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 11%Other / private 17%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$411per resident / day
operating cost
$12,504per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$380per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335824. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-10-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next