Grand Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
700 White Plains Road, Bronx, NY 10473 · For profit - Corporation · 240 certified beds · (718) 518-8892 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0609) — most recent Jun 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $563,175 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-09)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.1% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 5.8% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.1% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.3% | 19.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.0% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.1% | 13.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.9% | 95.3% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.0% | 19.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 13.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.4% | 78.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.3% | 20.6% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.2% | 9.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.23 | 1.70 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.10 | 1.36 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 35.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.4–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 35.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 45.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.8–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 187.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.99 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2026-02-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to establish and maintain a system to accurately reconcile, verify, and oversee methadone medications received from an external opioid treatment program. This was evident for 10 (Residents #2, 16, 28, 49, 50, 53, 114, 142, 146, 177) of 23 residents enrolled and receiving methadone (a long-acting opioid used to treat opioid use disorder) through an opioid treatment program. Specifically, a review of methadone administration records revealed 10 of 23 residents received dosages inconsistent with physician's orders. The licensed nurses reported the administration process of methadone doses obtained and intended for residents registered with an external opioid treatment program did not include medication-order reconciliation. In addition, the facility failed to provide a policy or procedure outlining the process for ensuring that the dosage and formulation of methadone supplied by external opioid treatment programs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the surveythe facility failed to ensure timely assessment and evaluation of a resident's change in condition. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #7) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #7 had a bruise on top of their left eyebrow extending towards the temple that was not identified, assessed, or documented until observed by the State Surveyor. The resident was identified as high risk for falls and was receiving aspirin therapy, which increases the risk for bleeding complications. The facility failed to conduct and document a skin assessment, evaluate for possible head injury, initiate monitoring, or notify the physician in accordance with professional standards of practice. This resulted in no actual harm with a potential for serious harm that is Immediate Jeopardy to all residents' health and safety.The findings include: The facility policy titled Skin Assessment dated 01/2026 documented it is the policy of this facility to ensure that each resident receives skin assessment on an ongoing basis to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey and Partial Extended Survey (Complaint NY00362627, NY00363035, NY00363415, NY00358811) beginning [DATE], it was determined that this Special Focus Facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable temperature levels. This was evident on five of five resident floors, where 59 out of 59 rooms sampled had temperatures below the Federal and State requirements in accordance with 42 CFR Part 483 and 10 NYCRR: 415.29. Specifically, four complaints were submitted to the State Agency regarding loss of heat in the facility from [DATE] through [DATE], naming six residents affected. An additional six residents filed grievances at the facility on the loss of heat in their rooms from [DATE] through [DATE]. The facility did not have documented evidence they had identified resident room temperatures were at safe and comfortable ranges. This resulted in no actual harm with likelihood for more than minimal harm to all residents in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey and Partial Extended Survey (Complaint NY00362627, NY00363035, NY00363415, and NY00358811), the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the Administrator failed to provide effective leadership and oversight to ensure that comfortable and safe temperature levels were maintained in residents' rooms and common areas. In addition, the Administrator failed to have an effective system in place to ensure the boiler room equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. This resulted in no actual harm with the likelihood of more than minimal harm to all residents in the facility, which was Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are: 1. Cross refer to F584. Six resident grievances were filed between 12/02/2024 and 12/06/2024 concerning the lack of heat in their rooms. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Abbreviated Survey and Partial Extended Survey (Complaint NY00362627, NY00363035, NY00363415, and NY00358811), the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. This was evident in 5 of 5 resident units Specifically, the facility failed to routinely maintain their boiler equipment. This resulted in the facility's heating system malfunctioning, causing temperatures in residents' rooms and common areas to fall below the required range. This resulted in no actual harm with likelihood for more than minimal harm that is Immediate Jeopardy and substandard quality of care to resident health and safety, in accordance with 42 CFR Part 483 and 10 NYCRR: 415.29 The findings are: A review of the facility's boiler service contracts revealed the annual service contract to maintain the boiler system expired on [DATE], the facility currently had no service contract in place. A service quote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving injury of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #7) of four (4) sampled residents. Specifically, on 09/13/2025 Resident #7 was unable to stand on their left leg and was transferred to the hospital. The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of left femur (thigh bone) fracture (break in the bone). Resident #7 was severely impaired in cognition and was unable to explain how they sustained the fracture. The facility reported the injury of unknown source to the New York State Department of Health on 09/23/2025 at 11:53 PM, 10 days after the change in resident's condition was observed. The findings are: The facility policy titled Reporting Alleged Violations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00373346), the facility did not ensure a comprehensive clinical assessment was done to identify changes in a resident's condition. The facility did not ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident in one (1) out of four (4) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on [DATE], Resident #1 was observed with stuffy nose, low grade fever of 100.5-degree Fahrenheit, and restlessness. There was no documented evidence that the medical doctor was informed of the resident's change in condition. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that the resident was assessed after the acetaminophen was administered. Resident #1expired on [DATE]/2025 at 9:49 AM due to cardiac arrest secondary to coronary artery disease. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 with the potential for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death that was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00350179) from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents were free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. This was evident in 2 (Resident #118 and #151) of 6 residents reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, Resident #118 who had history of stealing and being involved in physical altercations, was not provided supervision and monitoring despite the staff being aware of Resident #118's behavior. Subsequently, on 08/02/2024, Resident #118 snatched a $20 bill from Resident #151's hand while they were on the elevator. Resident #151 hit Resident #118's head with a cane. Resident #118 sustained head lacerations that required emergency medical intervention. Resident #118 had 14 staples to the wound. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #118 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. Cross Reference: F657 - Care Plan Timing and Revision The findings are: The facility's policy on Abuse Prohibition and Prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and observations conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00350179) Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024 the facility did not ensure that comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised periodically and after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. This was evident for 3 (Resident #84, #118, and #151) of 7 residents reviewed for Catheter Care and Abuse out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Resident #84's care plan for indwelling catheter/external urinary appliance was not reviewed and revised after the Resident returned from an emergency room visit due to urinary retention and pain at the urinary catheter insertion site. Additionally, Resident #84's care plan for indwelling catheter/external urinary appliance was not reviewed and/or revised after each comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. 2.) Resident #118's care plan interventions for behavior and victimization were not reviewed and evaluated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-30 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents or their designated representatives received quarterly personal funds account statements. This was evident in three (Residents #15, 74, and #101) of five residents reviewed for personal funds out of 29 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documentation demonstrating quarterly personal funds account statements were provided to the designated representatives of Residents #74 and #101 for the quarters ending 06/30/2025, 09/30/2025, 12/31/2025, and 03/31/2026, and to Resident #15's designated representative for the quarters ending 09/30/2025 and 12/31/2025.The findings include:The facility policy titled Resident Banking and Personal Funds, reviewed January 2026, stated the facility is responsible for managing and accounting for resident personal funds in accordance with applicable regulations and that quarterly account statements shall be provided to the resident or the resident's designated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure designated representatives of cognitively impaired residents were notified when resident personal funds accounts approached or exceeded the Supplemental Security Income resource limit. This was evident in two (Residents #74 and #101) of five residents reviewed for personal funds out of 29 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide documented evidence that designated representatives were notified, or that attempts to notify them were made, when resident personal fund balances reached or exceeded the Supplemental Security Income resource limit.The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Banking and Personal Funds , last reviewed January 2026, stated that Medicaid residents shall be notified when their personal funds account balance reaches $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit for one individual.The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Informational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property. This was evident in three (Residents #15, #74, and #101) of five residents reviewed for personal funds out of 29 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility authorized withdrawals from the personal fund accounts of cognitively impaired residents to purchase clothing and shoes without documented authorization from their designated representatives. The findings include:The facility's policy titled Resident Purchases and Clothing, last reviewed January 2026, stated that when a resident lacks decision-making capacity, reasonable efforts will be made to notify the resident's designated representative of identified clothing or personal item needs and provide the representative with the opportunity to obtain the requested items. When reasonable efforts to contact the representative are unsuccessful, purchases using resident funds may be made only in accordance with facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse and an injury of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated. This was evident in three (Resident #164, #32, and #132) of four residents reviewed for abuse out of 29 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) The facility failed to conduct thorough investigation after Resident #164 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for complaints of chest pain radiating to the left side and was subsequently diagnosed with rib fractures (broken bone). In addition, the facility failed to document findings to determine whether abuse, neglect, or other factors contributed to the injury. 2.) The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of a resident-to-resident altercation involving Residents #32 and #132 on 04/23/2026. The findings include: The facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition and Prevention, last reviewed December 2023, stated the facility is responsible for the prompt and thorough investigation of alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident or their representative was afforded the opportunity to participate in their care planning process. This was evident in one (Resident #101) of five residents reviewed for resident rights related to care planning out of 29 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide documentation that advance notice was provided to Resident #101's designated representative, or attempted to be provided, before the care plan meetings occurred.The findings include:The facility's policy titled Care Plan, reviewed January 2026, stated that the facility will develop and maintain a comprehensive, person-centered care plan based on the resident's assessment, goals, preferences, strengths, needs, and clinical condition. The policy further stated that the resident and/or the resident's designated representative will be encouraged to participate in the care planning process, as appropriate.Resident #101 had diagnoses including dementia (loss of thinking, memory, and reasoning abilities), Type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician's orders. This was evident for 10 (Residents #2, 16, 28, 49, 50, 53, 114, 142, 146, 177) of 23 residents on methadone (a long-acting opioid medication that is used to reduce withdrawal symptoms in people addicted to heroin or other narcotic drug) maintenance therapy. Specifically, the facility administered methadone doses that differed from the physician ordered dose resulting in significant medication errors. See F-755.The findings are:The undated facility policy titled Medication Administration Policy Documentation-General, documented that medication administration and documentation shall occur in a timely and accurate manner. The electronic administration record shall serve as the source from which all medications are poured and administered and on which medication doses are charted. The licensed nurse assures the five rights: compares the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-24 · tag F0841 — patternDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted during the survey, the medical director failed to collaborate with the facility to develop procedures for the safe and accurate provision of medications. Specifically, the medical director failed to ensure that current standards of practice were followed regarding the development and implementation of policies to reconcile, verify, and oversee methadone medications received from external opioid treatment programs. The findings are:Please refer to F755 and F760. The facility's policy titled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation with a reviewed date of 01/2026 stated that the medical director's role is to provide oversight of medical care practices and regulatory compliance programs; and to oversee clinical standards. During an interview on 02/12/2026 at 11:33 AM, Attending Physician #1 stated they have residents on methadone maintenance program. They stated they are unsure what methadone dosage each resident is supposed to receive. However, the residents must receive the dosage indicated on the methadone bottle.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-09 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a qualified dietitian or another clinically qualified nutrition professional, including a director of food and nutrition services, was employed part-time, full-time, or as a consultant. Specifically, the facility has employed a non-registered dietician as their full-time dietician and food service director without the oversight of a registered dietician or certified food service director since September 2025.The findings are:The undated facility policy, titled Food Service Management, documented that the food and nutrition services department head must meet New York State Department of Health requirements for food service manager, and plans, organizes, supervises, and directs all administrative and operational activities of the Food and Nutrition Services Department.A review of the Facility Survey Report, New York State Department of Health Form 1550, revealed it was signed by the facility operator and principal partner and dated 12/01/2025. The report lists the license number of the previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1.) The walk-in refrigerator contained prepared food items and defrosting meats that were unlabeled and undated. 2.) A pantry refrigerator contained expired, undated and unlabeled resident food.The findings are:The facility's policy and procedure titled Safe Defrosting and Food Labeling, with a revision date of 01/2025, documented that all potentially hazardous foods should be thawed and labeled safely to prevent foodborne illness and comply with Department of Health and regulatory requirements. All prepared, opened, or repackaged foods stored in refrigeration, freezers, or dry storage must be clearly labeled with the product name, date prepared or opened, and use-by/discard date. All frozen food items placed into the freezer must be labeled with the product name and the date frozen. When frozen items are removed from the freezer and placed into refrigeration for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was evident during review of Food and Nutrition Services, Administration, Infection Control, Physical Environment, and Training Requirements. Specifically, 1.) The Administration did not monitor and enhance the quality of care and services as indicated by widespread deficiencies and repetition of deficiencies that were cited on previous recertification surveys. 2.) The Nursing Services were not administered adequately to ensure that infection prevention and control practices were maintained, and that Certified Nursing Assistants received the required 12 hours of in-service training. The findings are: 1. Cross refer to F801, F812, F842, F908, and F919The Administration was aware that the facility's licensed dietitian resigned, and the facility needs to employ a qualified dietitian to oversee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program and plan with governance and leadership oversight. Specifically, the facility had widespread deficiencies in the areas of Food and Nutrition Services, Administration, Infection Control, Physical Environment, and Training Requirements. In addition, the facility had deficiencies (F656, F711, F801, F812, F835, F865, F880) from previous Recertification surveys that were repeatedly cited in the current survey whereby plans of correction were previously accepted by the New York State Department of Health, but the facility had no documented evidence of implementation or maintenance of outcomes.The findings are:The facility policy and procedure titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan last updated on 01/2025 stated that the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee meets at least monthly and consists of the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, department heads, and residents and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. This was evident during the Infection Control Task. Specifically, the facility had no system to monitor antibiotic use. There was no system of reports related to antibiotic usage and resistance data. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program with a reviewed date of 06/2024 documented the facility maintains an active Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of its Infection Prevention and Control Program. The Infection Preventionist, under the oversight of the Director of Nursing, coordinates the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. The Medical Director and Consultant Pharmacist support the program through clinical guidance and oversight of antibiotic use. The policy documented that the facility monitors antibiotic prescribing patterns and outcomes. A review of Resident #1's medical record showed that Resident #1 had a diagnosis of urinary tract infection. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 12/01/2025 to 12/09/2025, the facility did not maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. Specifically, during the observation of the dishwashing task and review of the associated daily temperature logs the mechanical dishwasher was below 150 degrees Fahrenheit on more than one (1) occasion. Review of the Kitchen Equipment invoice dated 11/06/2025 indicated that the mechanical dishwasher has been malfunctioning, and the facility had failed to pay the vendor to have it repaired. The findings are:The facility policy titled Dishwasher and Manual Sanitizing Policy, with revision date 03/2025, documented that the facility will ensure all dishware, utensils, and food-service equipment are safely washed and sanitized at the required temperatures, and that an approved chemical sanitizing method is used whenever the dishwasher or booster heater is not fully operational.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This was evident for one (1) of 11 residents (Resident #88) reviewed for accidents out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #88 who was identified as at risk for falls, was observed without floor mats and their bed not in the lowest position as stated in their care plan. The findings are:The facility's policy and procedure titled Falls Prevention with a revision date of 05/14/2023 documented that it is the policy of the facility to assess all residents for their fall risk potential and institute an appropriate plan of care designed to prevent/reduce falls. A Fall Risk Assessment Score totaling 21 or more places the resident at risk for falls and therefore a prevention protocol should be initiated immediately. The protocol plan of care is entered onto the resident's care plan. The licensed Nurse will use the established protocols for fall risk prevention as a basis for the resident's plan of care. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care. This was evident for one (1) of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #8). Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a physician evaluated Resident #8 after a fall incident on 07/30/2025. The findings are: There was no documented evidence the facility has a policy related to physician services. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (a condition that affects blood sugar levels), hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 10/23/2025 documented Resident #8's cognition as intact and was independent in bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. A nurse's progress note by Registered Nurse #7 dated 07/30/2025 at 10:39 AM documented that Resident #8 was sitting in the day room, asleep on the chair, and fell to the floor. A scant amount of blood was noted on the left nostril which was cleaned; there was no further bleeding was noted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident in accordance with professional standards and practices that are systematically organized and readily accessible. This was evident for five (5) of five (5) residents (Resident #'s 4, 7, 56, 68, and 88) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, the residents' drug regimen review reports were not readily available for review upon request. The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Drug Regimen Review dated 06/2025 documented that Consultant Pharmacist shall perform Medication Regimen Review for each resident at least monthly; upon completion, shall provide written documentation of all recommendations and submit monthly to the facility for attending prescriber or designees to respond. The Facility shall maintain copies of all Drug Regimen Review recommendations along with prescriber responses in an easily retrievable location for presentation to surveyors upon request.On 12/03/2025 between 10:00 AM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was offered the pneumococcal and influenza immunizations. This was observed in five (5) of nine (9) residents (Residents #25, #88, #99, #153, #202) sampled for immunizations out of a total of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Residents #25, #88, and #202 were offered, educated, received or declined the influenza immunization, and there was no documented evidence that Residents #25, #88, #99, #153, and #202 were offered, educated, or received or declined the pneumococcal immunization.The findings include:The undated facility policy titled Influenza Vaccine, documented that all residents who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza.The undated facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccines, documented that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was offered the COVID-19 immunization. This was observed in four (4) of nine (9) residents (Residents #25, #99, #153, #202) sampled for immunizations out of a total of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence related to the screening, administration or declination, and education on the COVID-19 immunizations for Residents #25, #99, #153, and #202.The findings include:The facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control last reviewed 06/2025 documented the COVID-19 vaccine will be offered to all residents upon admission as part of the facility's routine immunization program. Each resident will be screened to determine their vaccination status and clinical eligibility. All screening results, vaccine offerings, consent/refusals, and vaccination administration will be documented.Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate equipment to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area. This was evident for 25 out of 25 rooms on the second floor. Specifically, call bell systems did not function as designed and residents were given hand bells. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Preventative Maintenance Program with a last reviewed date of 01/2025 stated that the Maintenance Director will be responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance services to ensure that the building, grounds and equipment are maintained in a safe and operable manner. On 12/02/2025 at 10:16 AM, the call bell system was tested on the second floor. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s call light went on when the bell was pressed but there was no bell sound either in the unit's north corridor or at the nursing station.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility failed to ensure that certified nurse aides were provided the required 12 hours of in-service training per year. This was evident for five (5) of five (5) Certified Nursing Assistants reviewed for nurse' aide training requirements. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that Certified Nursing Assistants #14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 were provided 12 hours of annual in-service training. The findings are:A facility document titled Employee Education Inservice Policy with a last reviewed date of 06/2025 stated that the facility will maintain an ongoing in-service education program to support staff competency.The Facility-wide Assessment with a last reviewed date of 09/2025 documented nurse aide in-service training must include no less than 12 hours per year.During a record review of personnel files for Certified Nursing Assistants #14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, who were all currently employed by the facility, there was no documented evidence that the above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident was notified of the transfer or discharge, and the reasons for the move, in writing and in a language and manner they understand for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #153) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 35 residents. Specifically, the facility did not complete a notice of discharge or transfer when Resident #153 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The findings are:The policy and procedure titled Transfer and Discharge (including Against Medical Advice) last revised 01/2025, documented that when the facility initiates a transfer or discharge, notice will be provided to the resident and representative in a manner they can understand.Resident #153 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive fear, worry, and anxiety that interfere with daily activities), bipolar disorder(a chronic mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #142) of one (1) resident reviewed for transmission-based precautions in the Infection Control task out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #142 who had diagnoses of Osteomyelitis (infection in a bone) and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (a type of infection resistant to several antibiotics) had no care plan to address infection and contact precaution. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plans with a reviewed date of 09/2022 documented it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents are provided food that accommodates their allergies, intolerances, and preferences. This was evident for one (1) out of 38 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for food preferences. Specifically, during observation on 12/01/2025, Resident #35 who preferred chicken and fish during meals, and disliked beef and pork, was noted with pork in their lunch tray. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Food Preference dated 07/2022, last revised 06/2025, documented: The facility recognizes each resident's right to reasonable food choices and preferences, including cultural, religious, and personal preferences. Resident preferences should be honored to the extent possible while following physician and diet orders, allergy restrictions, and safety requirements. Resident #35 was admitted with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), asthma (a condition that causes your airways to swell, narrow and fill with mucus),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained. This was evident for one (1) unit (six (6) of five (5) resident units. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant #5 picked up Resident #152's pillow from the floor and placed it under Resident #152's head without changing the pillowcase.The findings are:The facility policy titled Linen Handling and Infection Control reviewed 12/2024 documented the purpose is to establish safe and sanitary procedures for handling clean and soiled linens and resident clothing in order to prevent the spread of infection within the facility, including residents on contact precautions and those with blood, body fluids, or wound drainage on linens.In an observation on 12/01/2025 at 10:07 AM, Resident #152 was in their reclining wheelchair in the hallway with a pillow on the floor adjacent to them. Certified Nursing Assistant #5 picked up the pillow from the floor and placed it under Resident #152's head without changing the pillowcase.During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-29 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist completed specialized training in infection prevention and control that include infection preventionists role, infection surveillance, outbreak, antibiotic stewardship, and other recommended Infection prevention and control (IPC) training that must be sufficient to perform the role of an Infection Preventionist. Evidence includes: Pursuant to regulation, the facility must designate one or more individual(s) as the infection preventionist, who, among other requirements, must have completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. The facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 02/2022 documented the facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. There was no documented evidence the Infection Preventionist received specialized training on facility infection prevention and control. On 05/27/2025 at 10:04…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident's right to privacy during medical treatment and confidentiality of medical records was maintained for one (1) (Resident #183) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Registered Nurse #4 performed Resident #183's blood glucose testing (measures the level of sugar in blood), administered an insulin injection, and administered enoxaparin (an injectable that prevents blood clot) while in the hallway. Additionally, Registered Nurse #4 walked away from the medication cart without locking the computer monitor, exposing Resident #183's medical information. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Resident Dignity with a revised date of 01/2025 documented the facility will promote and protect resident's rights and ensure each resident is cared for in a manner that maintains or enhances their dignity, individuality, and quality of life. The policy documented residents have the right to privacy during care, communication, and personal interactions. Resident #183 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (NY00377759, NY00377846), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving misappropriation of resident property were reported within 24 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that the results of all investigations were reported to the State Survey Agency within five (5) working days of the incident. This was evident in three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #4, #5, and #6) sampled for abuse. Specifically, 1.) On 4/07/2025 at 2:30 PM, Resident #4 reported that Patient Care Assistant #1 borrowed money from them to repay a loan from Resident #5. Resident #4 alleged that Patient Care Assistant #1 did not pay them back. The facility initially reported the misappropriation allegation to the New York State Department of Health on 04/11/2025 at 4:59 PM. In addition, the facility did not submit a Follow-Up Investigation Report within five (5) working days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate all alleged violations involving abuse for one (1) (Resident #158) of five (5) sampled residents. Specifically, the Director of Recreation received a report from Resident #158 alleging they were threatened by an unidentified Certified Nursing Assistant. An investigation was not immediately initiated, and measures were not put in place to ensure further potential abuse did not occur. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition & Prevention with a last revised date of 12/2024 documented all allegations or reasonable suspicions must be reported to a staff member's immediate supervisor, and to the Director of Nursing and/or the Administrator immediately upon discovery. The facility initiates internal investigations immediately, to be completed within five (5) business days. Resident #158 had diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves), Hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of your body), and Adjustment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address a resident's full code status for 1 (Resident #171) of 38 sampled residents. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan with a revised date of 08/2024 documented the comprehensive care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility's policy titled Resident's Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives with a revised date of 01/2025 documented advance directives will be reviewed during care plan meetings to determine whether updates are needed Resident #171 had diagnoses which included Paranoid Schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by paranoia, delusion, and hallucination), Anxiety Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder (a mental health condition characterized by extreme mood swings). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 04/25/2025 documented Resident #171 had intact cognition and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that infection control prevention and practices were followed during wound care treatment for 1 of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Registered Nurse #6 and Licensed Practical Nurse #2 failed to follow infection prevention and control practices while performing wound care treatment. The findings include: The facility policy titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management Policy, with a revised date of 12/2024, documented that the facility is committed to prevention and effective management of pressure ulcers to ensure optimal resident care and quality of life, thus providing appropriate interventions. An Infection Prevention and Control Policy titled Clinical Operations, with a revised date of 12/2024, documented that staff will be trained on infection control procedures and practices including pertinent procedures, supplies, and equipment related to infection prevention and control. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Vascular Dementia (a group of symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to address the recommendations made by the Pharmacy Consultant during medication regimen review for one (1) (Resident # 162) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The medication regimen review report for Resident #162 dated 12/09/2024 documented that the pharmacy consultant was unable to locate the recent documentation of current need/effect, absence/presence of side effects, ability or lack of ability to taper current dose in chart for trazodone. The attending physician agreed to the recommendation and documented that a psychiatry consult will be ordered. However, no psychiatry consult was completed for Resident #162 to address the pharmacist's recommendation. The findings include: The facility policy titled Monthly Drug Regimen Review with a last revised date of 07/2024 stated the Consultant Pharmacist shall identify, document, and report possible medication irregularities for review and action by the attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to administer all physician ordered medications for 1 of 35 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #164 was not administered two consecutive doses of sertraline (an antidepressant) as ordered by a physician. The findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Administration and Documentation with a last reviewed date of 07/2024 established that medication administration and documentation shall occur in a timely and accurate manner, within one hour before or after prescribed time. Staff uses prudent, professional judgment by informing the physician in a timely manner when medications are held, refused, or otherwise unavailable for administration. On 05/22/2025 at 10:52 AM, Resident #164 was interviewed and stated they did not receive their medication for depression this morning or yesterday morning. Resident #164 further stated that the nurse informed them the medication was ordered but was not delivered to the facility yet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to store schedule II medications in locked compartments, failed to keep medication cart locked or under direct observation, and failed to dispose of expired supplement in 1 (3rd Floor) of 3 units observed. The findings include: The facility's policy titled Medication Storage with a last reviewed date of 06/2024 stated outdated medications will be destroyed and that Schedule II controlled drugs are stored under double lock and key. During observation on 05/28/2025 at 11:56 AM, the medication cart on the 3rd Floor was unlocked with Registered Nurse #1 not in close proximity of the medication cart. A bottle of ProStat (a supplement for increased protein needs) with an expiration date of 03/27/2025 was stored in the 3rd Floor medication cart. It was also noted that the narcotic box inside the medication cart was not locked. On 05/18/2025 at 2:53 PM, Registered Nurse #1 was interviewed and stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00373346), the facility did not ensure the designated resident's representative was notified of changes in the resident's condition. This was evident in one (1) out of four (4) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 02/01/2025, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 informed License Practical Nurse #1 Resident #1's had a stuffy nose. On 02/01/2025, License Practical Nurse #1 documented Resident #1 had a low grade fever of 100.5-degree Fahrenheit, and was restlessness. The medical doctor and the family were not notified. The findings are: The Facility's Policy on Designated Representative Notifications reviewed 12/2024, documented the facility will notify the resident's approved representative as designated in their records. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Epilepsy, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Depression with Schizophrenia, Traumatic Brain Injury and Urinary/Fecal incontinence and Constipation. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated11/23/2024, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00347302, NY00351629, and NY00351064) conducted from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the residents' needs in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, 1) Several residents reported the facility was short staffed of Certified Nursing Assistants, especially during the evenings, and weekends, which resulted in lack of timely staff response to residents who needed assistance with toileting, bathing, and personal care. 2.) A review of the actual staffing schedules dated from 07/01/2024 to 11/21/2024 revealed staffing assignments were consistently less than the projected staffing needs specified in the Facility Assessment and on the daily staffing schedules for Certified Nursing Assistants. The findings include but are not limited to: The Facility Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/13/2024- 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure performance reviews of every nurse aide was conducted at least once every 12 months, and that regular in-service education was provided based on the outcome of these reviews. This was evident for 5 (Certified Nursing Assistants #8, #15, #16, #17, and #18) of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants reviewed for nurse aides' training requirements. The findings are: The facility policy titled In-Service Training: Nurse Aide dated 06/2024 documented that performance reviews must be completed for nurse aides at least every 12 months. The Facility Assessment Tool dated 10/2024 documented that performance reviews will be conducted, and that the reviews will provide structured feedback and that the process will highlight individual strengths and identifies areas needing improvement. The facility assessment did not specify the frequency of performance reviews. A review of personnel files for Certified Nursing Assistants #8, #15, #16, #17, and #18 showed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was evident during review of Activities of Daily Living, Staffing, Infection Control, Medication Storage, and Quality Assurance. Specifically, 1.) The Administration did not ensure the facility was sufficiently staffed to meet the residents' needs. In addition, the Administration did not monitor and enhance the quality of care and services as indicated by repetition of deficiencies that were cited on previous recertification surveys (F641, F657, F725, and F761) 2.) Nursing Services were not administered adequately to ensure that assistance with activities of daily living were consistently provided to the residents, that drugs were stored in a sanitary manner, infection control practices were maintained, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure it has an active governing body that is responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management of the facility. Specifically, based on the multiple deficient practices that were identified during the Recertification Survey, there was inconsistent communication between the facility Administrator and the Governing Body to ensure management of the facility and regulatory compliance. The findings are: The facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement with a reviewed date of 04/2024 documented the Governing Body and/or executive leadership is responsible and accountable for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program. Governing oversight responsibilities include ensuring the program identifies and prioritizes problems and opportunities that reflect organizational processes, functions, and services provided to residents based on performance indictor data, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that the quality assurance and performance improvement program identified and prioritized problems and opportunities that reflect organizational process, functions, and services provided to residents based on performance indicator data, resident and staff input, and other information. Specifically, the facility had widespread deficiencies in the areas of Nursing Services, Administration, and Infection Control. In addition, the facility had deficiencies from previous Recertification surveys that were repeatedly cited in the current survey (F641, F657, F725, F761, and F865). Also, the facility failed to ensure the Governing Body's oversight of the facility's quality assurance and performance improvement program and activities. The findings are: The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan with a revision date of 05/04/2023 documented the plan was designed to provide guidance in assessing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/13/2024 -11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained. This was evident for 7 (Residents #69, #47, #92, #412, #87, #7, #74) of 10 residents, from 3 different units, observed for medication administration. Specifically, 1.) Licensed Practical Nurse #4 failed to sanitize the blood pressure machine and cuff after each resident use. 2.) Registered Nurse #5 failed to sanitize the glucometer (a medical device used to measure the amount of sugar in the blood) after each resident use. 3.) Licensed Practical Nurse #1 failed to sanitize the blood pressure machine and cuff after each resident use. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Equipment Cleaning last reviewed 06/2024 documented that any equipment shared between residents must be cleaned and disinfected between uses to prevent cross contamination. The policy also documented that all resident care equipment, including example blood pressure monitors, must be cleaned and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint Survey (NY00351064) from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services and assistance to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene. This was evident for 2 (Residents #48 and #169) of 7 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Residents #48 and #169 were not provided regular showers according to their plan of care. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living with a reviewed date of 05/2023 documented a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene. The facility's policy titled Nursing Home Activities of Daily Living Policy and Procedure for Showering with a revised date of 10/2023 documented residents will be offered a shower as specified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident at risk for developing pressure ulcers, receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 (Resident #123) of 3 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #123, who had history of healed pressure ulcers and had a care plan for use of a pressure ulcer relieving device when in bed, was observed with deflated air mattress on 3 occasions. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Mattress Management and Maintenance with a revision date of 06/2024 documented all mattresses will be regularly inspected, cleaned, and maintained to meet safety, hygiene, and comfort standards. Specialized mattresses, such as pressure relief mattresses, will be used as needed to support residents' clinical needs including prevention and management of pressure ulcers. Resident #123 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00350179) Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This was evident in 1 (Resident #118) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #118 exhibited multiple incidents of behavior symptoms such as stealing from other residents and had been involved in resident-to-resident altercations. The facility did not evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions to address Resident #118's behavior, lacked individual approach in the care plan to address Resident #118's behavior, and lacked monitoring and supervision of Resident #118's behavior that may provoke reaction from other residents. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Behavioral Health Policy with a reviewed date of 06/2024 documented the facility provides…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/13/2024 through 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that all medications and biologicals used in the facility were safely stored. Specifically, insulin pens were not stored in a sanitary manner to prevent cross-contamination. This was evident during observations (Unit 5) conducted for the Medication Storage Task. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Medication Storage with a revision date of 09/07/2023 documented that medication must be stored in accordance with manufacturer's specifications, sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, and secured in locked areas in compliance with State and Federal requirements and accepted professional standards of practice. On 11/19/2024 at 10:52 AM, an observation was conducted of the medication cart on the 5th floor. Four different resident insulin pens were observed stored together in a compartment in the top drawer of the medication cart. On 11/19/2024 at 10:53 AM, Registered Nurse #1 who was administering medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00351064) Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that it promoted and facilitated a resident's right to self-determination through support of resident's choice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #48) of 7 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #48's bathing preference was not honored. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Nursing Home Resident Rights with a reviewed date of 06/2022 documented the resident has a right to choose activities, schedules, health care and providers of health care services consistent with their interests, assessments, and plan of care. The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living with a reviewed date of 05/2023 documented the facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not deteriorate unless unavoidable. The policy documented a resident who is unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review conducted during the Complaint Survey (NY00339166, NY00332772), the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices. This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, 1.) On 04/02/2024, Resident #6, who had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, had not been given the prescribed Lantus Insulin (a long-acting insulin used in adults with type 2 diabetes) at 9:00 PM. 2.) On 10/24/2023, Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with hospital discharge orders for an antibiotic intravenous infusion for bacteremia (a medical condition characterized by bacteria in the bloodstream). A review of medical record revealed the antibiotic had not been ordered or administered to Resident #4. The findings are: 1.) Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include Diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/03/2024 to 06/11/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident received foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #191) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. Specifically, Resident #191 did not receive the recommended wound treatment made by the Infectious Disease consultant and podiatrist for the care and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. The findings are: The facility policy titled Foot Care, with an effective date of 06/2023, documented that residents receive appropriate care and treatment to maintain mobility and foot health. Residents are provided foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. Overall foot care includes the care and treatment of medical conditions to prevent foot complications from these conditions (Diabetes, Peripheral Vascular disease, and immobility, etc.). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/03/2024 to 06/11/2024, the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #191) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. Specifically, there was no documented evidence the treatment recommendations from the Infectious Disease consultant and podiatrist for Resident #191's diabetic ulcer on the left foot were reviewed by the attending physician. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that Resident #191's diabetic ulcer on the left foot was evaluated by the attending physician and/or the nurse practitioner. The findings are: The facility policy titled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation, last reviewed on 01/2024 documented it is the policy of the facility to ensure the physician takes an active role in supervising the care of residents. A physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY 00320443, Case #NY 00320343), the facility did not ensure each resident was free from physical abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, on 07/18/2023 at 7:22 PM, the facility's surveillance video recording showed Security Guard (SG) #1 pushed Resident #1 to the wall to prevent them from leaving the back exit of the facility and then pushed Resident #1 towards the elevator. The findings are: The facility's Policy on Abuse Prevention and Reporting which was last revised on 10/10/2022, documented it is the policy of the Facility to ensure that all residents are treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of dignity and individuality including privacy in treatment and care for personal needs. The Policy documented that the Facility has zero tolerance for abuse. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder, Anxiety, and Depression with Anoxic Brain Injury. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 05/26/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-09 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to examine the results of the most recent survey conducted by state surveyors or post them in a place readily accessible to residents and family members. Specifically, on 12/02/2025, resident interviews at the Resident Council Meeting and subsequent observations confirmed that the facility failed to ensure survey results were readily accessible to residents and the public.The findings are:The facility's policy and procedure entitled Survey Results with a documented review date of 06/2025, stated that the facility will post the most recent standard (annual) survey results and any subsequent complaint survey results in an area available to residents, families, visitors and surveyors.During the resident council meeting held on 12/02/2025 at 10:10 AM, 11 residents who were in attendance stated that they do not have access to the survey results. Resident #35 stated that the facility has posted signage noting the location of where the results can be found.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Facility-wide Assessment included the services provided. Specifically, the Facility Assessment continued to list Hospice as a service provided by the facility. However, an interview with the Administrator confirmed that the facility had terminated their contract with a certified hospice provider in 2021.The findings are:The facility's Facility Assessment, last reviewed 09/2025, states that the Facility Assessment will be completed annually and will be updated when a significant change occurs. The tool further stated that the Facility Assessment will document resources and services needed to meet resident needs.During an interview on 12/01/2025 at 1:40 PM, a family member of Resident #88 stated that Resident# 88 was admitted to the facility for Hospice Care (comfort care provided with an end-of-life diagnosis). They stated that the hospital discharge planner and the facility's website documented that the facility provided Hospice Care. However, upon admission, they found that hospice was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to convey the personal funds accounts to the probate jurisdiction administering the residents' estates within 30 days of expiration for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 3 sampled residents. The findings include: The facility admission Agreement, with a revised date of 08/2023, documented refunds for the balance in the personal account, less amounts owed to Grand Manor, will be made to the resident after discharge. Following a resident's death, refunds will be made to the probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate or by a New York small estate affidavit unless the funds are otherwise properly claimed by the Department of Social Services to recoup Medicaid payments. The Admission, Discharge, and Transfer Activity Detail Report documented Resident #1 expired on [DATE]. The Residents Funds Ledger documented there was no disbursement for remaining funds and final accounting sent to the Public Administrator until [DATE]. The Admission,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) accurately reflected a resident's status for two (2) (Residents #75 and #183) out of 38 total sampled residents. The Minimum Data Set assessments inaccurately documented Residents #75 and #183's medications. The findings include: The facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set 3.0 Resident Assessment and Minimum Data Set Completion, with a last reviewed date of 08/20/2024, documented the facility is to ensure accurate assessment that reflects resident's condition and Minimum Data Set Coordinator to transmit files, print validated report and correct any errors. 1.) Resident #75's annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented insulin injection was administered during the last 7 days. A review of Resident #75's physician's orders and medication administration record did not include administration of insulin. 2) Resident #183's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — widespreadEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status. This was evident for 3 (Residents #462, #311, and #118) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Resident #462's discharge status was inaccurately documented in the Minimum Data Set assessment. 2.) Resident #311's diagnosis of Schizophrenia was not documented in the Resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment. 3.) Resident #118's behavior symptoms was inaccurately documented in the Minimum Data Set assessment. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set with a reviewed date of 06/2024 documented residents are assessed using a standardized and comprehensive process to identify care needs, ensure proper care delivery, and support resident-centered care planning. The facility policy titled Minimum Data Set 3.0 Completion with a reviewed date of 12/09/2021 documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-21 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/13/2024 to 11/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that the direct care staffing information based on payroll data was submitted based on the schedule specified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Specifically, the facility failed to submit the direct care staffing data for Quarter 3 2024 (April 1 - June 30) in a timely manner. The findings are: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long Term Care Facility Policy Manual version 2.6 dated 06/2022 documented Section 6106 of the Affordable Care Act requires facilities to electronically submit direct care staffing information (including agency and contract staff) based on payroll and other auditable data. Direct care staffing and census data will be collected quarterly and is required to be timely and accurate. Staffing and census data will be collected for each fiscal quarter. The deadline for submissions must be received by the end of the 45th calendar day (11:59 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$563,175 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $25,805 — penalty dated 2025-12-09
- $239,046 — penalty dated 2025-12-09
- $291,973 — penalty dated 2024-11-21
- $6,351 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-09 for 88 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-14 for 91 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIEBMAN, MARTIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 33% | since 03/01/1990 |
| ROSENBLATT, SHARI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 33% | since 06/22/1994 |
| LIEBMAN, BRADLEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335744. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.