Kings Harbor Multicare Cente

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 350 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 345 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 720 beds and averages 666.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: 39Number of residents cited: N/A Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure that the direct care staffing information based on payroll data was submitted based on the schedule specified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Specifically, the facility failed to submit the direct care staffing data for fiscal year Quarter 1 2026 (10/01/2025 - 12/31/2025) timely. The findings include:The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long Term Care Facility Policy Manual version 2.6 dated 06/2022 documented Section 6106 of the Affordable Care Act requires facilities to electronically submit direct care staffing information (including agency and contract staff) based on payroll and other auditable data. Direct care staffing and census data will be collected quarterly and is required to be timely and accurate. Staffing and census data will be collected for each fiscal quarter. The deadline for submissions must be received by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1 Based on observation, record review, interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident was assessed by an interdisciplinary team to determine their ability to safely self-administer medication when clinically appropriate. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #439) reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, there were multiple observations of a Ventolin HFA inhaler left unsecured at Resident #439's bedside, and there was no evidence Resident #439 had been assessed by the interdisciplinary team, and a determination made that they could safely self-administer the medication. In addition, there was no documented evidence of a physician's order for this medication.The findings include:The facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications dated 09/1997, last revised 09/2024, documented those residents deemed capable, and who desire to self-administer their medications, will be permitted to do so, after appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:5Number of residents cited:1Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they immediately informed the resident, consulted with the resident's physician and notified the resident's representative when there was a need to alter treatment significantly. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #630) reviewed for Pain Management out of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #630 or their designated representative was informed when Dilaudid was initiated and added to their pain management regimen.The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Pain Assessment, Education and Management effective 3/2006 and revised 01/2025 documented information on pain may be obtained from the resident, family members or observation of the resident. The policy also stated the pain assessment will be performed by a Registered Nurse using the pain assessment tool which includes documentation of pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the survey the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical restraints for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptom. This was evident for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #642) reviewed for Physical Restraints out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #642 was observed, on multiple occasions, in bed with two (2) upper half side rails raised on both sides. The siderail assessments were incomplete, the physician order documented use of a one (1) half side rail as an enabler, there was no documentation of the medical necessity for use of the side rails, and Resident #642 was not able to lower the bed rails voluntarily.The findings include:The facility policy titled Side Rails, last reviewed on 06/2025, stated that it is the policy of the facility to provide residents with side rails in a manner that promotes resident safety and dignity based on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to the state agency. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #273) reviewed for Accidents out of total 39 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not report Resident #273's incident of unknown origin, resulting in a nasal fracture, to the New York State Department of Health. The findings include: The facility's policy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #696) reviewed for Hospitalization out of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #696 had a change of condition and Urinalysis/Polymerase Chain Reaction testing (method to detect and identify pathogens (things that cause disease) was ordered on 02/09/2026 and results were not received until 02/19/2026 which confirmed that Resident #696 had a urinary tract infection. In addition, there was no documented evidence that the Medical Doctor and Resident #696's representative were notified when Resident #696 refused to provide a urine sample.The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Change in Condition effective date 03/2026 documented that it is facility's policy to establish a standardized process…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evident on one (1) of 17 resident units (Unit 5 East), and one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #683) reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, 1). Housekeeping Aide #1 was observed in the room of a resident on contact/droplet precaution clostridium difficile (bacterial infection that affects the colon) and was not wearing a gown and did not perform hand washing before exiting the room, and 2). During a wound care observation, Resident #683's sacral (a bone located at the base of the lower back and between the hip bones) pressure ulcer was observed undressed and covered with wash cloths, gauze pads were not opened in a manner to maintain cleanliness, Registered Nurse #9 did not change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident in one (1) of three (3) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, facility's investigation dated 02/17/2026 at 5:04 PM, documented Resident #1 vomited undigested foods and there was no documented evidence that Resident #1's vital signs were done, or the Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 or the medical doctor were notified that Resident #1 vomited after dinner.The findings are:The facility's policy titled Notification of Changes dated 12/2024, documented it is the policy of the facility to immediately inform the resident, consults with resident's physician, and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or an interested family member when there is an accident or incident involving the resident, upon significant change in status or condition, or regarding changes in resident's rights. The members of the interdisciplinary team should address any changes in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff observation, interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00333408), the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident in one out three residents (Residents #1) sampled. Specifically, Resident #1 reported to Certified Nursing Assistant #1 on 02/09/2024 at 10:10 AM that they were unable to stand and that they had pain. Resident #1 was transferred, by Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Certified Nursing Assistant #1, before being assessed by Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 and before pain medication was administered. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with an acute Pelvic fracture. There was no documented evidence of pain assessment or that pain medication was administered on 02/09/2024 prior to Resident #1 being transferred to the hospital. The findings include: The facility Policy and Procedure title Pain Assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification/Complaint survey (NY00349608) from 12/02/2024 to 12/09/2024, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving resident to resident physical abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations were made, to the State Survey Agency. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 193 and # 325) of 5 residents reviewed for Abuse out of sample size 38 residents. Specifically, the facility did not report Resident # 325 hit Resident # 193 on the right shoulder with a grabber to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours after the allegation was made The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse - Prohibition Protocol, Types of Abuse, Response/Reporting with effective date 10/97 and last revision date 5/23, documented in the section Response/Reporting under abuse that the persons observing an incident of resident abuse or suspecting resident abuse must attempt to stop the abuse and must immediately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY