Kings Harbor Multicare Cente

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 350 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 345 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the survey the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical restraints for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptom. This was evident for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #642) reviewed for Physical Restraints out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #642 was observed, on multiple occasions, in bed with two (2) upper half side rails raised on both sides. The siderail assessments were incomplete, the physician order documented use of a one (1) half side rail as an enabler, there was no documentation of the medical necessity for use of the side rails, and Resident #642 was not able to lower the bed rails voluntarily.The findings include:The facility policy titled Side Rails, last reviewed on 06/2025, stated that it is the policy of the facility to provide residents with side rails in a manner that promotes resident safety and dignity based on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to the state agency. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #273) reviewed for Accidents out of total 39 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not report Resident #273's incident of unknown origin, resulting in a nasal fracture, to the New York State Department of Health. The findings include: The facility's policy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #696) reviewed for Hospitalization out of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #696 had a change of condition and Urinalysis/Polymerase Chain Reaction testing (method to detect and identify pathogens (things that cause disease) was ordered on 02/09/2026 and results were not received until 02/19/2026 which confirmed that Resident #696 had a urinary tract infection. In addition, there was no documented evidence that the Medical Doctor and Resident #696's representative were notified when Resident #696 refused to provide a urine sample.The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Change in Condition effective date 03/2026 documented that it is facility's policy to establish a standardized process…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident in one (1) of three (3) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, facility's investigation dated 02/17/2026 at 5:04 PM, documented Resident #1 vomited undigested foods and there was no documented evidence that Resident #1's vital signs were done, or the Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 or the medical doctor were notified that Resident #1 vomited after dinner.The findings are:The facility's policy titled Notification of Changes dated 12/2024, documented it is the policy of the facility to immediately inform the resident, consults with resident's physician, and if known, notify the resident's legal representative or an interested family member when there is an accident or incident involving the resident, upon significant change in status or condition, or regarding changes in resident's rights. The members of the interdisciplinary team should address any changes in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff observation, interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00333408), the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident in one out three residents (Residents #1) sampled. Specifically, Resident #1 reported to Certified Nursing Assistant #1 on 02/09/2024 at 10:10 AM that they were unable to stand and that they had pain. Resident #1 was transferred, by Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Certified Nursing Assistant #1, before being assessed by Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 and before pain medication was administered. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and was diagnosed with an acute Pelvic fracture. There was no documented evidence of pain assessment or that pain medication was administered on 02/09/2024 prior to Resident #1 being transferred to the hospital. The findings include: The facility Policy and Procedure title Pain Assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Record reviews and interviews during the Recertification survey from 12/02/2024 to 12/09/2024, the facility did not ensure that all completed resident assessments were submitted and transmitted into the Quality Improvement Evaluation Assessment Submission and Processing in a timely manner. Specifically, 9 (Resident #10, Resident #76, Resident #83, Resident #326, Resident #345, Resident #355, Resident #420, Resident #493, and Resident #572) of 9 Minimum Data Set submissions reviewed for Resident Assessments were not submitted to Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services system within 14 days of completion. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Minimum Data Set 3.0 Submission revised 1/2024 documented it is the policy of [NAME] Harbor Multicare Center to ensure timely submission of all Minimum Data Sets to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services via Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System. Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 with assessment reference date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification/Complaint survey (NY00349608) from 12/02/2024 to 12/09/2024, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving resident to resident physical abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations were made, to the State Survey Agency. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 193 and # 325) of 5 residents reviewed for Abuse out of sample size 38 residents. Specifically, the facility did not report Resident # 325 hit Resident # 193 on the right shoulder with a grabber to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours after the allegation was made The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse - Prohibition Protocol, Types of Abuse, Response/Reporting with effective date 10/97 and last revision date 5/23, documented in the section Response/Reporting under abuse that the persons observing an incident of resident abuse or suspecting resident abuse must attempt to stop the abuse and must immediately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the Abbreviated Survey (NY 00351995), the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from physical abuse by nursing home staff. This was evident in one out of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 08/20/2024 at approximately 4:45 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 reported to Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 that at 6:53 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 assisted Certified Nursing Assistant #1, in the care of Resident #1. During care, Resident #1 held on tightly to Certified Nursing Assistant #1's hand, sinking their fingers into Certified Nursing Assistant #1's arm. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 raised their hand and with a deliberate, forceful slap to Resident #1's face between their forehead and eyes. The findings are: The Facility's Policy and Procedure titled Combative Resident with revision date 08/2023, documented it is the policy of the facility to maintain the safety of residents and staff during resident combative behavior/outburst. Any physical or verbal behavior/outburst…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00341680) on 08/27/2024-08/29/2024, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free of significant medication errors. This was evident for one out of five sampled residents (Resident #2). Specifically, on 05/08/2024 at approximately 10:50 PM, Registered Nurse # 1 administered 24 units of insulin Lantus (long-acting insulin) to Resident #2, who was not on insulin therapy. The Medical Doctor was made aware and immediately ordered dextrose 5 % and 0.45 % sodium chloride intravenous solution to be infused at 70 ml/hour for 24 hours. Fingerstick Blood Sugar and vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, and temperature), monitor every four hours for 24 hours. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure titled, Administration of Insulin Injection and Preparation with revision date 01/2018, documented it is the facility policy to administer insulin preparations safely and appropriately. The nurse responsibility included. Review medication order, identify resident, explain procedures, and follow the rights…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-05-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00312479) survey from 04/27/23 to 05/04/23, the facility did not ensure a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was developed and implemented to meet resident needs. This was evident for 3 (Residents #193, #513, and #936) of 41 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) a CCP related to abuse prevention was not developed for Resident #193 following a substantiated abuse allegation, 2) a CCP related to dialysis treatment was not developed for Resident #513 who receives dialysis, and 3) a CCP related to fractures was not developed for Resident #936 following a left rib fracture. The findings are: The facility policy titled CCP last revised 4/2022 documented the CCP should be kept current by all disciplines on an ongoing basis. Disciplines will be responsible for updating the plan of care when there is a new problem that requires that discipline to intervene. The care plan will be revised to reflect the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY