Manhattanville Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 187.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.87 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 06/04/2025 to 06/11/2025, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is administered enteral tube feedings, received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications. This was evident in 1 (Resident #151) of 2 residents reviewed for Tube Feeding and 1 of 8 residents reviewed during the Medication Administration Task. Specifically, during observation on 06/09/2025 at 9:50 AM, Resident #151's enteral tube feeding formula that was being administered was not labeled with the resident's name, the date and start time of the administration, or the flow rate. Additionally, during medication administration observation conducted on 06/10/2025, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 did not verify the functioning of Resident #151's gastrostomy tube before administering medications. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Enteral Tube Feedings with a reviewed date of 06/2025 documented that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 06/04/2025 to 06/11/2025, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors. This was evident in 1 (Resident #151) of of 8 residents reviewed during the Medication Administration Task. Specifically, Resident #151 was not administered 5 milliliters of Ferrous Sulfate 300 milligram/5 milliliters as ordered by the Physician. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Administration which was last reviewed on 04/2025 documented that medications are administered by the licensed nurse in accordance with the physicians order. Whenever medications are administered, the dose, frequency, timing and route of administration are consistent with the order. Resident #151 had active diagnoses of Iron Deficiency Anemia, Chronic Kidney Status, and Gastrostomy Status. A Care Plan titled Anemia/Hematology last updated on 04/10/2025 documented that Resident #151 had alteration in hematological system related to anemia and is below normal hemoglobin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 06/05/2025 to 06/11/2025, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and under proper temperature controls. This was evident in 1 (Unit 3) of 5 medication storage areas observed. Specifically, 1.) Calcitonin spray was kept in the medication cabinet and was not refrigerated, 2.) The medication refrigerator was not locked, and 3.) An opened vial of haloperidol had no date of when it was first opened. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Medication Storage which was last reviewed in 2025 documented medications requiring refrigeration will be stored in a separate locked refrigerator. All medications, including treatment items, are stored in a locked cabinet or room inaccessible to residents and visitors. On 06/11/2025 at 12:59 PM, the Unit 3 medication room was observed with Registered Nurse #3. A bottle of unopened calcitonin spray with a label that stated refrigerate was observed in the medication cabinet and was not refrigerated. There was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 06/04/2025 to 06/11/2025, the facility failed to ensure food were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident in 1 (Unit 3) of 3 units observed. Specifically, expired frozen food were stored in Unit 3 pantry refrigerator. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Storing of Food Brought in by Families with a reviewed date of 06/2025 documented if a family member brings in food for a resident, the food must be labeled with the resident's name and date it was put in the fridge to ensure it is not stored for too long. All food that is stored in the fridge and not consumed within 72 hours will be disposed of. On 06/09/2025 between 12:47 PM to 12:57 PM, the refrigerator in the Unit 3 pantry was observed, with: 1.) an opened box of fish sticks with a best by date of 05/10/2025, the box was labeled with a resident's name and had a handwritten date of 03/15/2025. 2.) An unopened box of honey roasted turkey breast with a best by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 06/04/2025 to 06/11/2025, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evident in 1 (Resident #152) of 1 resident reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions out of a total sample of 38 residents. Resident #152, who was diagnosed with Clostridium Difficile, was not cohorted and was sharing a room with another resident who was not infected with Clostridium Difficile. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Clostridium Difficile reviewed on 02/2025 documented that measures are taken to prevent the occurrence of Clostridium Difficile Infections among residents. Residents with Clostridium Difficile Infections are placed in a private room if available, or cohorted in the [NAME] oom with other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/9/23 and 3/16/23, the facility did not ensure that resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. Specifically, the Comprehensive Care Plans (CCPs) for residents with significant weight loss were not updated and revised. This was evident for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for Nutrition out of 38 sampled residents. (Residents #18, #17, and #22,). The finding is: The facility Policy for Comprehensive Care Planning dated 11/1997, last revised 01/2023 documented that A Comprehensive Care Plan for each resident shall be developed through an interdisciplinary team approach. A Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) team has been established to review each resident's own unique personal needs in an integrated and coordinated manner. Reviews are conducted on initial admission, readmission, hospital return, significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/9/23 to 3/16/23, the facility did not ensure that comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #26, Resident #29) reviewed for Accidents out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) had not been developed for safety measures related to smoking for Resident #26 and Resident #29. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Planning reviewed 1/23 documented Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) shall be developed through an interdisciplinary team approach and CCP team review each resident's own unique personal needs in an integrated and coordinated manner. 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range. Specifically, the facility did not effectively monitor a resident that was at risk for weight loss and weight fluctuations with a weight loss of 19.08 % in 6 months, and 5.09% in less than 1 month. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Nutrition out of a sample of 38 residents investigated. (Resident # 22). The findings are: The facility's policy titled Weights dated 05/06, last revised 01/2023 documented: A loss or gain of 3lbs a week and 5lbs a month will be communicated by CNA to the Charge Nurse and a reweigh will be done in the presence of the Charge Nurse for validation. A confirmed weight loss or gain will be communicated to MD/NP, RD, NOK and documented in the CCP (Comprehensive Care Plan) with corresponding intervention. Resident #22 was admitted with diagnoses that included Cerebrovascular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/9/23 to 3/16/23, the facility did not ensure that the medical care of each resident was supervised by a physician. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that the physician monitored changes in the resident's health status and provided interventions to address a resident's undesired significant weight loss over the period of 6 months. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Nutrition out of a sample of 38 residents investigated. (Resident # 22) The finding is: The facility's policy titled Physician dated 09/2016, last revised 02/2023, documented: Resident will be seen by Primary Physician/ Nurse Practitioner on Admission/ Readmission; Monthly (every 28-30 days); Significant Change; PRN/ as requested by resident/NOK The facility's policy titled Weights dated 05/06, last revised 01/2023, documented: A loss or gain of 3lbs a week and 5lbs a month will be communicated by CNA to the Charge Nurse and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification survey conducted from 3/9/23 to 3/16/23, the facility did not ensure that a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) performed by the Consultant Pharmacist was reviewed and acted upon by the attending physician or medical director in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #26 and Resident #71) reviewed for Unnecessary Medications Review out of a total sample of 38 residents. Specifically, 1). the physician did not act upon the consultant pharmacist's recommendations to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for residents receiving antidepressant medication, and 2). A pharmacy consultant recommendation for a Psychiatry consult to evaluate symptoms of depression and the therapeutic goals of Cymbalta was not completed. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Pharmacy Services with last revised date 2/2023 that the medication regimen of each resident must be reviewed at least once a month by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY