Morris Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 191 beds and averages 187.2 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.74 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.85 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. This was evident in one out of six residents (Resident #1) sampled for elopement. Specifically, Resident #1, who was severely cognitively impaired, with a history of wandering behavior and identified as an elopement risk exited the facility grounds unsupervised on 05/08/2026 at 12:30:40 AM per video surveillance footage and has not been found. Resident #1 exited through the New Wing Hall lobby (1st floor); the alarm on the exit door did not activate due to alarm system malfunction. Resident #1 was last seen on 05/08/2026 at 12:15 AM by Certified Nursing Assistant #1 in a hallway on the first-floor unit. Resident #1 was not identified as missing until 8:20 AM. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance.The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled Care of Residents with Wandering Behavior dated 12/05/2025 states that policy is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during a Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00312961) survey, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #284) of 4 residents reviewed for Accidents of 38 total sample residents. Specifically, on 3/19/2023 Resident #284 fell in their room when left unsupervised by a Certified Home Health Aide (HHA) #1 assigned to provide the resident one-to-one (1:1) observation. Subsequently, Resident #284 sustained a left scalp hematoma (bruising and swelling) and left hip fracture. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #284 that was not immediate jeopardy. The findings are: The facility policy titled Constant Observation for Safety of Resident dated reviewed 3/20/2023 documented constant observation is for a resident who is always kept within visual contact (eyesight), with no visual barriers between staff and resident, enabling rapid intervention to transfer the resident to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-14 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the direct care staffing information based on payroll data was submitted based on the schedule specified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Specifically, the facility failed to submit the direct care staffing data for fiscal year Quarter 1/2026 (10/01/2025 - 12/31/2025) timely.The findings include:The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long Term Care Facility Policy Manual version 2.7 dated 06/2025 documented Section 6106 of the Affordable Care Act requires facilities to electronically submit direct care staffing information (including agency and contract staff) based on payroll and other auditable data. Direct care staffing and census data will be collected quarterly and is required to be timely and accurate. Staffing and census data will be collected for each fiscal quarter. The deadline for submissions must be received by the end of the 45th calendar day (11:59 PM Eastern Time) after the last day in each fiscal quarter in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during survey the facility failed to ensure that services provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards of quality. This was evident in one (1) out of six (6) residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, on 05/08/2026, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 documented in the Medication Administration Record that they administrated medications to Resident #1 and took the resident's vital signs at 7:00 AM. Additionally, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 documented in the Treatment Record that they monitored Resident #1 at 7:30 AM. According to the facility video surveillance footage, Resident #1, who was severely cognitively impaired, with a history of wandering behavior and identified as an elopement risk exited the facility grounds unsupervised on 05/08/2026 at 12:30:40 AM and has not been found. Resident #1 was last seen on 05/08/2026 at 12:15 AM by Certified Nursing Assistant #1 in a hallway on the first-floor unit. Resident #1 was not identified as missing until 8:20…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to identify hazards and risks to ensure residents were adequately supervised to avoid elopement. Immediate Jeopardy was determined on 05/13/2026 when direct care and nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision with safety monitoring to prevent an elopement. Resident #1 was able to exit the facility unsupervised on 05/08/2026 at 12:30:40 AM due to alarm system malfunction. Resident #1 who was severely cognitively impaired, with a history of wandering behavior and identified at risk for elopement has not been found. These circumstances subjected to likelihood of serious adverse outcome that was immediate jeopardy for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interviews during survey conducted the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 failed to accurately document in Resident #1's medical record. This was evident for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, on 05/08/2026, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 documented in the Medication Administration Record that they administrated medications to Resident #1 and took the resident's vital signs at 7:00 AM. Additionally, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 also documented that they monitored Resident #1 at 11:30 AM and 7:30 AM in the Treatment Record that they monitored Resident #1 at 7:30 AM. According to the facility video surveillance footage, Resident #1, who was severely cognitively impaired, with a history of wandering behavior and identified as an elopement risk exited the facility grounds unsupervised on 05/08/2026 at 12:30:40 AM and has not been found. Resident #1 was last seen on 05/08/2026 at 12:15 AM by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00365258) conducted from 01/26/2025 to 01/31/2025, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet residents' needs in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, 1.) Several residents reported the facility was short staffed of Certified Nursing Assistants which resulted in lack of timely staff response to residents who needed assistance, 2.) Multiple nursing staff members reported lack of sufficient staffing, 3.) Facility's staffing levels were repeatedly below facility assessed levels, and 4.) Excessively low weekend staffing was triggered in the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report. The findings include but are not limited to: 1.) The facility's policy titled Staffing Coverage with a last reviewed date of 12/01/2024 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 01/26/2025 to 01/31/2025, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident in 2 of 5 units observed. Specifically, 1.) Unit 4 emergency drug box contained expired medications, and 2.) Unit 5 medication cart was observed with insulin pens that were not properly and sanitarily stored and were not marked with the dates they were opened. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Storage of Medications with a revised date of 10/20/2023 documented that the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. All medications will be stored, distributed, and administered, in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy for destruction. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 01/26/2025 to 01/31/2025, the facility did not ensure food were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during kitchen and dining observation. Specifically, 1.) The kitchen walk-in refrigerator and freezer contained opened and undated food items. 2.) The 5th floor unit refrigerator contained unlabeled and undated food items. The findings are: 1.) The facility's policy titled Stock Rotation/Dated Items and Safe Defrosting of Nutritional Items with a revised date of 01/28/2025 documented that items received from the meat and chicken company will be placed in a plastic bin with a cover. The bins will be labeled with date arrived, date pulled for defrosting, and the date to be used. On 01/26/2025 at 11:33 AM, kitchen observation revealed the following: the freezer was observed with 6 plastic bins containing frozen meats that were not labeled/dated. The walk-in refrigerator was observed with 4 plastic bins containing thawed meat and an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00340915), the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent an elopement. This was evident in one out of six residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 exited the facility on 05/01/24 at 4:22 pm undetected by staff. Facility staff became aware at 7:10 pm that Resident #1 was missing. According to staff, dinner was served between 5:00 pm and 6:00 pm and they were unaware that Resident #1 was missing. Resident #1 was found by a facility staff member on 05/05/24 at around 4:55 pm at a bus stop and was brought back to the facility. Resident #1 had no visible injuries but was sent to the hospital for a wellness check. The findings are: The facility's Policy titled Wandering and Elopement, last reviewed date 11/20/23, documented that the policy of this facility is to ensure that residents will be maintained in a safe and secure manner and protected from any harm. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview conducted during the recertification survey from 6/26/23 to 7/3/23, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was observed during review of the Kitchen. Specifically, cold sandwiches and milk were not maintained at the proper temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers dated 11/1/21 documented that the facility will ensure safe refrigerator/freezer maintenance, temperatures, sanitation and will observe food expiration guidelines. During an observation of the kitchen on 6/28/23 at 11:30 AM, the Food Service Director (FSD) and the Dietary [NAME] (DC) #2 were observed calibrating a thermometer in the kitchen to test food items on the tray line. DC #2 removed two turkey sandwiches and FSD removed 4-ounce milk from the walk-in fridge. Temperature checks of the cold food items revealed that 1) turkey sandwich measured 52 degrees F, 2) second…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 6/26/23 to 7/3/23, the facility did not implement an effective pest control program so the facility is free of pests. This was evident during environmental observations. Specifically, fruit flies were observed during the initial tour of the kitchen, in food service director's (FSD) office and in the conference room of the facility. The findings are: The facility policy titled Pest Control dated 11/2/21 documented the facility shall establish and maintain an integrated pest control program to ensure a healthy, clean, and safe environment for our residents, families, and staff and to comply with infection control practices. On 6/26/23 at 9:31 AM, an initial tour of the Kitchen was conducted with the Dietary [NAME] (DC). Multiple fruit flies were observed flying around the ice machine and a puddle of water dripping from the ice machine. Behind the ice maker was observed with open drainage exposed and standing water. On 6/26/23 at 11:40 AM, fruit flies were observed in the FSD office. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY