New Riverdale Rehab and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 140.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.58 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.65 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00371559) Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents were free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. This was evident in two (2) (Residents #242 and #117) of two (2) residents reviewed for abuse out of 31 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #242 who had history of physically abusive behavior and physical altercations with other residents, was not provided adequate supervision and monitoring despite staff being aware of Resident #242's behavior. Subsequently, on 02/08/2025 at approximately 12:30 PM, Resident #242 punched Resident #117 in the head while both residents were in the bathroom. Resident #117 sustained laceration to the left eyebrow area that required emergency medical intervention. Resident #117's injury required seven (7) sutures and necessitated two (2) trips to the emergency room. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #117 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. This was evident in 1 (Unit 3) of 3 resident units. Specifically, residents' rooms were not cleaned, had broken appliance and furniture, and chipped paint. The findings include but are not limited to: The facility's policy titled Maintenance Service with a revised date of 01/07/2025 documented maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. During multiple observations from 03/12/2025 at 9:23 AM to 03/14/2025 at 12:35 PM, the following were observed in Unit 3: room [ROOM NUMBER]E 308A had urine-stained mattress, and a closet with holes and missing a lock. room [ROOM NUMBER]E 308B was noted with strong urine odor, missing nightstand, and sticky floor with brown colored stains. room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00371559 and NY00372528) Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment including injuries of unknown origin are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to the administrator of the facility and to the State survey agency. This was evident in 5 (Residents #25, #36, #93, #117 and #242) of 31 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) On 02/14/2025 at approximately 4:00 PM, Resident #25 reported that the Certified Nursing Assistant assigned to them the night before was too rough. This alleged abuse incident was not reported to the New York State Department of Health. 2.) On 02/04/2025, Resident #93 was observed with right eyelid swelling and dark discoloration. Resident #93 was unable to explain how they sustained the swelling and discoloration. This injury of unknown source was not reported to the New…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team based on a resident's changing needs, goals, and in response to current interventions. This was evident in 1 (Resident #40) of 31 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #40's comprehensive care plan was not reviewed and revised after each incident of non-compliance with the smoking policy. The findings are: The facility policy titled Care Plan-Comprehensive with a last revised date of 01/2025 documented that assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. The Interdisciplinary Team reviews and updates the care plan when the desired outcome is not met. Resident #40 had diagnoses that included Anxiety Disorder and Schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that it promoted and facilitated a resident's right to self-determination through support of resident's choice. This was evident in 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for Choices out of 31 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #5's bathing preference was not honored. The findings are: The facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, Shower with the last revised date of 01/2025 documented that it is the facility's policy to shower residents, cleanse and refresh them, observe their skin, and increase circulation. Staff are to check the assigned shower schedule for their shift. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases and Heart Failure. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #5 had intact cognition and that it was very important for Resident #5 to choose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident was developed and implemented, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. This was evident in 1 (Resident #36) of 3 residents reviewed for care planning out of 31 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #36 had no comprehensive care plan developed to address at risk for abuse. The findings are: The facility policy titled Care Planning- Interdisciplinary Team with a last revised date of 01/2025 documented that the interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of resident care plans. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Arthritis and Hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #36's cognition was intact. On 03/12/2025 at 2:14 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that the services provided or arranged by the facility as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, met professional standards of quality. This was evident in 1 (Resident #39) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications and Medication Regimen Review. Specifically, serum depakote level was ordered for Resident #39 on 02/12/2025. There was no documented evidence that the serum level was obtained. Cross Reference: F756 Drug Regimen Review, Report Irregular, Act on F711 Physician Visits - Review Care/notes/order The findings are: The facility policy titled Laboratory and Diagnostic Test Results with a revised date of 01/2025 documented that the Physician will identify, and order diagnostic and laboratory testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs. The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests. The laboratory, diagnostic radiology…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that a resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise. This was evident in 1 (Resident #122) of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, Resident #122 had significant weight loss of greater than 7.5 % in the last 3 months from November 2024 through February 2025 with no proactive interventions. The findings are: The facility policy titled Weight Policy with a revision date of 03/2025 documented the purpose of this procedure are to determine the resident's weight and height, to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident, and to provide a baseline height…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit. This was evident in 1 (Resident #39) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications and Medication Regimen Review. Specifically, the Nurse Practitioner failed to follow up on the results of a serum Depakote level ordered on 02/12/2025. Cross Reference: F756 Drug Regimen Review, Report Irregular, Act on F658 Services Meet Professional Standards The findings are: The facility policy titled Laboratory and Diagnostic Test Results with a revised date of 01/2025 documented that the Physician will identify and order diagnostic and laboratory testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs. The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests. The laboratory, diagnostic radiology provider or other testing source will report test…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/12/2025 to 03/19/2025, the facility failed to address an irregularity identified during Drug Regimen Review to minimize or prevent adverse consequences. This was evident in 1 Resident (Resident #39) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications and Medication Regimen Review. Specifically, on 02/11/2025, the pharmacy consultant recommended Depakote serum level for Resident #39. There was no evidence that the serum level has been obtained. The findings are: The facility policy titled Drug Regimen Review with a revised date of 03/2025 documented that in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations 42 CFR 483.45, the Consultant Pharmacist shall review the medical record of each resident and perform a Drug Regimen Review at least once each calendar month. The Consultant Pharmacist shall identify, document, and report possible medication irregularities for review and action by the attending Physician, where appropriate. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00315600, NY00316068) from 6/13/23 to 6/21/23, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours, to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). This was evident for 4 (Resident #43, Resident #92, Resident #99 and Resident #117) of 4 reviewed for abuse out of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the facility did not report an allegation of resident to resident abuse involving Resident #43 and Resident #117 to the NYSDOH within 2 hours. 2) the facility did not report an allegation of resident to resident abuse involving Resident #92 and Resident #99 to the NYSDOH within 2 hours. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse, Mistreatment, and Neglect dated 1/95 and updated 2/7/23 documented the Office of Health Systems Management (OHSM) will be notified immediately by administration, if in fact there is a reasonable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$46,905 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $46,905 — penalty dated 2025-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CITADEL CARE CENTERS — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY