Regeis Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 236 beds and averages 218.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IIDR2026-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse were investigated thoroughly and that residents were protected from further abuse during the investigation. This was evident for one (1) out of six (6) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 02/17/2026 at 5:30 PM, Resident #2's visitor reported to the Director of Nursing that they observed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 roughly handle and hit Resident #1 on the buttock. The Director of Nursing failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse and remove Certified Nurse Assistant #1 from direct care and access to residents after allegations were reported. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care with the likelihood of serious harm to 222 residents.The findings include:The facility's policy and procedure title Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property last revised on 09/11/2025, documented Residents of the facility will be protected from abuse, neglect, mistreatment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical abuse. This was evident for one (1) out of six (6) residents (Resident #1) sampled for abuse. Specifically, on 02/17/2026 at 5:30 PM, Resident #2's visitor reported to the Director of Nursing that they observed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 rough handed and hit Resident #1 on their buttock. A review of the facility surveillance video footage dated 02/17/2026 at 4:34 PM corroborated what the visitor reported to the Director of Nursing and later reported to the New York State Department of Health. The findings are:The facility's Policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy and Protocol dated 09/11/2025 documented Residents of facility will be protected from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property in accordance with state and federal regulations. The policy also states the facility has zero tolerance for any kind of patient abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident for one (1) out of six (6) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 02/17/2026 at 5:30 PM, Resident #2's visitor reported to the Director of Nursing that they observed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 rough handed and hit Resident #1 on their buttock. The facility did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, Resident #1 who has unsteady gait and was at risk for fall, was seen on the facility's surveillance video footage on 02/17/2026 ambulating in the hallway without assistance. Resident #1 walked over to the other side of the hallway, where a cart stocked with personal protective equipment was, then rolled the cart into two residents' rooms. The findings are:The facility's Policy titled Incident/Accident Prevention Program dated 02/09/2026 states it is the policy of the facility to monitor and evaluate any adverse occurrence which is not consistent with the routine operation of the facility or care of a resident(s). All accidents/incidents where there are mistreatment, neglect, abuse, or injuries of unknown origin will be reported to the Director of Nursing/Designee and Administrator/Designee immediately for further review and reporting based on State and Federal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was evident in one (1) out of six (6) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 02/17/2026 at 5:30 PM, Resident #2's visitor reported to the Director of Nursing that they observed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 abused Resident #1. The facility surveillance video footage dated 02/17/2026 at 4:34 PM corroborated what the visitor reported to the Director of Nursing and later reported to the New York State Department of Health. Facility administration did not immediately investigate the alleged abuse and protect residents from further potential abuse. Additionally, the facility did not report the alleged allegation of abuse to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours after the allegation was made.The findings are:The facility's Policy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 01/13/2025 to 01/21/2025, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to address each residents' medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was evident in 1 (Resident #146) of 1 resident reviewed for Antibiotic Use, out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, a care plan was not developed for Resident #146's diagnosis of Sinusitis and antibiotic use. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan with a revised date of 12/27/2024 documented that the residents of the facility will have an individualized Comprehensive Care Plan completed in accordance with Federal and State requirements. The Comprehensive Care Plan will include measurable objectives and timetables in order to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs which are identified from the comprehensive assessment (MDS 3.0) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 1/13/2025 to 1/21/2025, the facility did not ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Insulin (Resident #149), out of a sample of 37 residents investigated. Specifically, Resident #149 had a physician's order to notify the physician when Resident's finger stick blood sugar (method of drawing drops of blood from the finger for testing the blood glucose level) result is less than 200 milligrams per deciliter or more than 350 milligrams per deciliter. The licensed nurse failed to notify the physician when Resident #149's finger stick blood sugar was lower than 200 milligrams per deciliter on 7 occasions from 1/02/2025 through 1/13/2025 and higher than 350 milligrams per deciliter on 3 occasions from 12/02/2024 through 12/31/2024. In addition, Resident #149 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 1/13/2025 to 1/21/2025, the facility did not ensure that food served were at an appetizing temperature. This was evident in 1 (Resident #134) of 4 residents reviewed for Dining Observation out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, food served during lunch meal service was not maintained at palatable and appetizing temperatures. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Meal Service with a reviewed date of 10/2023 documented that the facility will assure adequate and appropriate meal service to all residents. The facility's policy titled Food Preparation and Appropriate Temperature with a revised date of 9/26/2024 documented that hot foods will be held at 135 degree Fahrenheit or higher. Resident #134 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #134 had intact cognition and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/28/22 to 12/05/22, the facility did not ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter, receives the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible. This was evident for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for Urinary Catheter out of 39 total sampled residents (Residents #34, #62, #149). Specifically, 1) there were multiple observations of Resident #34's Foley Catheter (FC) drainage bag touching the floor and there was no physician order (PO) for FC, 2) there were multiple observations of Resident #62's FC drainage bag touching the floor, and 3) there were multiple observations of Resident #149's FC drainage bag touching the floor. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Urinary Catheter Care last revised 07/20/2021 documented goal with urinary catheter is to maintain patency and minimize the risk of urinary tract infection. 1) Resident # 34 had diagnoses of obstructive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/28/22 to 12/05/22, the facility did not ensure that a person-centered comprehensive care plan (CCP) was developed and implemented to address the residents' medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #73) of 1 resident(s) reviewed for Dialysis and 1 (Resident #544) of 1 resident(s) reviewed for Hospitalization out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) a CCP was not developed to address Resident #73 hemodialysis (HD) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) treatment and, 2) a CCP was not developed to address Resident #544's oxygen therapy. The findings are: The facility policy titled CCP last revised 11/01/2017 documented the CCP will include measurable objectives and timetables in order to meet the resident's Medical, Nursing, Mental, and Psychosocial needs which are identified from the comprehensive assessment Minimum Data Assessment 3.0 (MDS). Additional problems,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 11/28/2022 to 12/5/2022, the facility did not ensure residents were involved in developing the comprehensive care plan (CCP) and making decisions about their care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #81) of 3 residents reviewed for Participation in Care Planning out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #81 was not invited to participate in their quarterly CCP meeting with the interdisciplinary team (IDT). The findings are: The facility policy titled CCP dated 11/1/17 documented the IDT prepares the CCP which includes the resident and the resident's family or legal representatives. The resident and the resident's representative should be involved in the development of the CCP. Resident # 81 had diagnoses of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance and schizophrenia. The Quarterly Minimum Date Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident # 81 had moderate cognitive impairment and no designated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$54,890 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $54,890 — penalty dated 2026-03-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY