No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Schervier Nursing Care Center

2975 Independence Avenue, Bronx, NY 10463 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 366 certified beds · (718) 548-1700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (718) 548-1700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2023Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0570)$22,894 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0570)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,894 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2735 Henry Hudson Pkwy W · (718) 796-1851 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
565 W 235th St · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
19 Knolls Cres · (718) 884-5154 · Call to confirm hours
Park
700 Kappock St · (718) 430-1800 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3250 Arlington Ave · (718) 548-4470

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.2%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.1%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms71.2%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.2%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.3%19.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.9%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.5%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.7%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.391.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.711.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 274 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 232 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.6%CMS range 34.5–48.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.0%CMS range 7.1–11.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 5.0–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.561.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
42.6%
Total nursing turnover
36.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 366 beds and averages 353.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.99 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-31)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2024, the facility did not ensure it promoted and facilitated resident self-determination through support of resident choice. This was evident in 2 (Resident #9 and #212) of 4 residents reviewed for Choices out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Residents #9 and 212's bathing preferences were not honored. The findings are: The facility policy titled Bathing/Showering or Bed Bath Residents with a last revised date of June 2022 documented that it is the policy of the facility to have a procedure for Bathing/Showering or Bed Bath residents. Residents usually receive a shower or bath at least twice a week. If residents refuse showers and baths, then the staff should offer bed baths to the residents. 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Neurogenic Bladder, Depression, and Quadriplegia. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented it is very…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025, the facility did not ensure timely completion of each resident's quarterly review assessments. This was evident in 2 (Residents #311 and #322) of 5 residents reviewed during the Resident Assessment Task. Specifically, Residents #311 and #322's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were not completed within 14 days of the assessment reference date. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set with a last revised date of 08/2024 documented the interdisciplinary team collects, organizes, and evaluates relevant information concerning all residents' health and overall condition, completing the assigned portions of the Minimum Data Set assessments within the required time frame. The policy did not specify the timeframe for completion of resident assessments. Resident #311's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 02/12/2025 had a documented completion date of 03/20/2025. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/24/2025 to 03//2025, the facility did not provide food and drink that were palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This was evident in 1 (Unit 1) of 1 unit observed during Dining Task. Specifically, food served during lunch in Unit 1 had suboptimal temperatures. The findings are: The facility policy titled Food Safety with a reviewed date of 11/2023 documented that the Dining Services Director/Cook will be responsible for food preparation techniques which minimize the amount of time that food items are exposed to temperatures less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit per state regulation. During the Resident Council meeting conducted on 03/26/2025 at 2:16 PM, Resident #145 stated that the breakfast trucks are delivered to Unit 3 early at around 7:00 AM but are given out by staff after 8:45 AM to 9:00 AM. Resident #94 stated that the food stays in the truck most of the time, and one person gives out the trays to 30 residents, so it gets cold by the time they get their trays.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025, the facility did not ensure all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment are in safe operating condition. This was evident in 1 (Resident #231) of 2 residents reviewed for Hospitalization, out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain Resident #231's bed in proper working condition. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Homelike Environment with a last reviewed date of 04/2024 documented it is the policy of the facility to provide a homelike environment for all residents, ensuring comfort, dignity, and quality of life while maintaining safety, cleanliness, and compliance with regulatory standards. Resident #231 had diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, and Hyperlipidemia. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #231 was cognitively intact and was independent in all activities of daily living. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-31 · tag F0923 — isolated
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00362960) Survey conducted from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident's room had adequate outside ventilation by means of windows or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two. This was evident in 1 (Resident #67) of 3 residents reviewed for Environment out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #67's room had no operable window that can provide good air circulation. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Homelike Environment with a reviewed date of 04/2024 documented it is the policy of the facility to provide a homelike environment for all residents, ensuring comfort, dignity, and quality of life while maintaining safety, cleanliness, and compliance with regulatory standards. Resident #67 had diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Bipolar Disorder. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #67 was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00341219), the facility did not ensure a resident was adequately supervised to prevent accidents. This was evident in one (1) out of three (3) residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 05/02/2024 at 1:00 PM, Resident #1 who was cognitively declining left the facility unescorted for a self-arranged clinic appointment without the knowledge of the facility's nursing staff. Resident #1 's wheelchair was bumped by a truck while crossing the street. Resident #1 had right elbow pain but there were no fractures. The Findings are: The facility's Elopement and Wandering policy dated June 2023, documented the purpose of the policy is to prevent occurrences of residents leaving the facility undetected. Elopement is defined in the policy as when a resident goes beyond the safe environment of the clinical area and exits the building undetected without proper authorization. The policy also states that an interdisciplinary team assesses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey conducted on 10/02/23 - 10/11/23, the facility did not ensure that residents were cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced their dignity. This was evident for 1 (Resident #199) of 6 residents reviewed for Dignity and random observations of 4 residents (Resident #s141, 184, 144, 199, and 47) on 1 of 8 units observed for Dining. Specifically, (#1) On 2 occasions a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 was observed administering medication (insulin) to the resident in the hallway next to the nursing station (Resident #199) and on another occasion LPN #8 was observed assessing the resident's fingerstick in the hallway next to the nursing station (Resident #31). (#2) On 2 occasions during lunch service, 2 staff members Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 and the Transporter/Unit Helper were observed standing and feeding the resident (Resident #10). (#3) On 2 separate occasions a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #10 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview conducted during the re-certification survey, the facility did not ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were completed timely. This was evident for 6 of 12 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment (Resident #s 54, 255, 38, 162, 114, and 156). Specifically, quarterly MDS assessments were not completed within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled MDS Assessment & Submission revised 8/23 documented that the federal and state required MDS assessments are set, completed accurately, and submitted timely for all residents. IDT collects, organizes, and evaluates relevant information concerning all residents' health and overall condition, completing the assigned portions of the MDS assessments within the required time frame. Resident # 154- Quarterly Assessment ARD date 9/1/2023 and completed date 9/17/2023. Resident # 255- Quarterly Assessment ARD date 8/30/2023 and completed date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/2/2023 to 10/11/2023, the facility did not ensure an ongoing activities program was provided to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident for 4 (Residents #210, #82, #503, # 284, and #123) of 8 residents reviewed for Activities. Specifically, (1) Resident #210 was not provided with a program of activities appropriate for their mental and physical abilities. (2) Resident #123, a resident with severely impaired cognition, was observed for extended periods of time without meaningful activities, and there was no activity plan to provide activities to the resident while in their room. (3) Resident #503 was not provided with adequate assistance to attend preferred activities. (4)Residents #82 and #284 were observed for extended periods in the 5 South Television (TV) room on several occasions not participating in any meaningful activities The findings include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00318133)Survey from 10/02/23 to 10/11/23, the facility did not ensure that residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. This was evident for 3 (Resident #10, #453, #242) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents out of 40 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #453 had an unwitnessed 2nd fall in their room after being left alone and unsupervised by staff directly following the 1st fall, 2) Resident #242 was observed being wheeled backwards with their legs dragging, by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) in a scoot chair, and 3) Resident #10 was observed coughing uncontrollably after being fed by the unit helper. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure entitled Accident and Incident Reporting and Investigating, last reviewed 10/2023, states that the facility will ensure that all accidents or incidents are promptly reported. 1) Resident #453 had diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during the re-certification and Complaint Investigation survey, the facility did not ensure individual resident financial records were made available to resident and resident representatives through quarterly statements. Specifically, quarterly statements were not provided in writing to residents and/or resident representatives within 30 days after the end of the quarter. This was evident for 1 resident reviewed for Personal Funds (Resident #19), out of total sample of 38 residents. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure on Resident's Right regarding Funds dated 05/2002, last revised 12/2019 documented that the facility will permit each resident the right to manage his/her personal financial affairs; will ensure that the resident/designee will have ability to view their active balance and have access to their funds. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility 07/11/2014, with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Arthritis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0570 — isolated
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that an appropriate surety bond was purchased, or otherwise assurance satisfactory to the Secretary was provided, to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. Specifically, there is no surety bond in place to assure the residents fund against lost. This was evident for 434 residents who maintained personal funds accounts, current total balance of $356,043.48, (Three hundred fifty-six thousand, forty-three dollars, and forty-eight cents) The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure on Resident's Right regarding Funds dated 05/2002, last revised 12/2019 documented that the facility will permit each resident the right to manage his/her personal financial affairs; will ensure that the resident/designee will have ability to view their active balance and have access to their funds. Resident Fund Trial Balance as of 10/03/2023 documented Total Account: 434; Current balance: $356,043.48, (Three hundred fifty-six thousand, forty-three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/2/2023 to 10/11/2023, the facility did not ensure that Advance Directives (AD) were implemented in a manner that was consistent with resident's wishes. This was evident for 1 (Resident #183) of 41 total sampled residents. Specifically, facility did not ensure Resident #183's AD that included specific instructions not to provide antibiotics or IV were followed. The findings are: The facility procedure and policy titled Advance Directives reviewed 3/22 documented residents and their designated representatives to formulate and express (in writing or verbally) advance directives for medical care. Advance directives can include but is not limited to a MOLST(Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment), Health Care Proxy, Living Will or Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care Decision Making. Resident #183 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, Diabetes Mellitus and Anxiety Disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/2/2023 to 10/11/2023, the facility did not ensure the resident's representative was notified of a significant change in resident's condition and a need to alter treatment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #183) of 41 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #183's designated representative was not notified of initiation of IV antibiotic therapy and fluids administered for resident who developed an infection. The findings are: The facility procedure and policy titled Notification of Changes in a Resident's Status revised 8/22 documented that all relevant team members, residents and designated representatives be appropriately informed of changes in resident's status. Resident #183 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, Diabetes Mellitus and Anxiety Disorder. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented resident had severely impaired cognition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident was free from physical restraints. Specifically, a resident had half upper side rail on the left side and half lower side rail on the right side up. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Physical Restraints (Resident #254). The findings are: Policy and Procedure titled Side Rail Use, last revised in August of 2022 stated as follows: It is the policy of Schervier Nursing Care Center that side rails will be used only when they are deemed to benefit the resident in increasing his/her mobility in bed, as an assistive device/enabler. Physical restraints are defined as any manual method of physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached to or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Resident #254 diagnosed with hypertension, anxiety and osteoarthritis. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00319294) survey from 10/02/2023 to 10/11/2023, the facility did not ensure all allegations of abuse, including injuries of unknown origin were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) within two hours. This was evident for 2 (Resident #11 and #20) of 41 total sampled residents. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure entitled Accident and Incident Reporting and Investigating, last reviewed 10/2023, states that the facility will ensure that all accidents or incidents are promptly reported. Following an occurrence, the nurse notified the Nurse Manager/Supervisor, who initiated an Accident/Incident Report. The Director of Nursing signs off on the Accident/Incident Report and calls in the event to the Department of Health as applicable. 1) Resident #11 had diagnoses of Epilepsy, Hemiplegia, and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #11 Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY00319294) survey from 10/02/2023 to 10/11/2023, the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse, including injuries of unknown origin, were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 2 (Resident #11 and #20) of 41 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) there was no documented evidence an investigation was conducted when Resident #11 reported a fall to their designated representative and complained of headaches and tenderness to their forehead, and 2) there was no documented evidence an investigation was conducted for Resident #20 who had ecchymosis to their forehead. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Prevention, and Intervention dated 1/2020 documented all departments/all staff identifies and immediately reports all allegations, reports or witnesses' incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. Reports including new bruising, injuries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/2/23 to 10/11/23, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment was completed in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #504) of 12 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Specifically, the admission MDS assessment was not completed within 14 calendar days from the Assessment Reference (ARD) Date (Resident #504). The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled MDS Assessment & Submission revised 8/23 documented that the federal and state required MDS assessments are set, completed accurately, and submitted timely for all residents. IDT collects, organizes, and evaluates relevant information concerning all residents' health and overall condition, completing the assigned portions of the MDS assessments within the required time frame. Resident #504 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS assessment with ARD of 3/29/23 was completed late on 4/26/23. On 10/11/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification/ Complaint survey (NY00307350 & NY003188668), the facility did not ensure that a person-centered comprehensive care plan (CCP) was developed and implemented to address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. Specifically, No CCP developed and implemented for resident's use of IV Antibiotic for chronic Urinary Tract infection (UTI). This was evident for 1 of the 5 complaint investigations (Resident #71). The findings are: The facility policy and Procedure titled Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Care Planning dated 11/2010, last revised 08/2020, documented: Interdisciplinary clinical team, upon completion of the comprehensive assessment, develops, at a minimum, care plans for the triggered care areas .In addition, reviews and updates the care plan as needed, after an occurrence, or any sig changes; implements a care plan for episodic conditions Resident #71 was admitted to the facility 12/16/2021,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 10/2/23 through 10/11/23, the facility did not ensure that a resident Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was reviewed and/or revised after each assessment and as needed to reflect the resident's needs. This was evident for 2 out of 41 residents reviewed (Resident # 82 and #289). Specifically:1) CCP related to Activities for Resident #82 were not reviewed and revised quarterly, and 2) the Nutrition CCP for Resident #289 was not reviewed quarterly and after a significant weight loss. The Findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Care Planning, with the last reviewed date of 8/2020, documented that, at a minimum, every quarter after the scheduled comprehensive assessment, meets, evaluates, and revises the resident's care plan. In addition, it reviews and updates the care plan as needed after any significant change. 1.) Resident #82 was admitted with diagnoses that include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews during the Recertification survey on 10/2/2023 to 10/11/2023, the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited range of motion (LROM) received appropriate treatment and needed services, and equipment to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion and contracture. This was evident for 1(Resident # 321) of 2 residents reviewed for Position, Mobility. Specifically, Resident #321 had changes in the right wrist with negative x-ray findings. The wrist issues continued and were not assessed by an Occupational Therapist (OT)/Physical Therapist (PT). The orthopedist recommended Occupational Therapy (OT)/Physical Therapy (PT), a right wrist brace, and Range of Motion (ROM) as tolerated. Resident #321 never received the OT/PT or right wrist brace as ordered. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Transcription of Medical Orders revised 9/20 documented that the Clinical Nurse Manager is responsible for reviewing all MD/Nurse Practitioner orders received for the day. Reviews the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/2/23 to 10/11/23, the facility did not ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for a resident's needs as described in the plan of care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #242) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents out of 40 sampled residents. Specifically, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #6 was not competent in the usage of a scoot chair that was assigned to Resident #242. The findings are: The facility's policy titled 'Inservice Education', last revised 11/22, documented that the purpose is to maintain a high standard of resident care, and that will include subjects based on other topics deemed necessary for quality care. On 10/05/23@ 12:30 PM, the State Surveyor (SS) was sitting at the nursing station on Unit 2 South, when they heard CNA #6 say put up your legs, put up your legs. The SS then observed CNA #6 pulling Resident #242 backwards, in a scoot chair,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview during the Recertification/Complaint survey (NY00307350 & NY003188668), the facility did not ensure that resident was provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of the resident. Specifically, resident's medication was not crushed prior to administration as per physician's order and the plan of care. This was evident for 1 of the 5 complaint investigations (Resident #71). The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure for Medication Administration dated 09/2016, last revised 01/2022, documented: Orders automatically transferred to the EMAR/ETAR (electronic Medication/Treatment Administration Record); Prior to administering medication/treatment the nurse will verify orders by comparing the written medication order against the order entered into PCC (Point Click Care) On 10/03/23 at 01:04 PM, during the Medication Administration observation, LPN #1 was observed administering Senna tablets to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/2/2023 to 10/11/2023, the facility did not ensure that foods were served at an appetizing temperature during meal service. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #37) reviewed for Food out of total 41 sampled residents. Specifically, hot food items served during lunch meal service were not maintained at palatable and appetizing temperatures. The findings are: The facility procedure and policy titled Food Safety dated 3/21 documented that all foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degrees F for hot holding and less than 41 degrees F for cold food holding. Temperature for TCS foods will be recorded at time of service and monitored periodically during meal service periods. The lunch meal times for 2 South starts 11:30AM to 11:40AM, 2 North starts 11:40AM to 11:50AM, 3 South starts 11:50AM to 12:00PM and 3 North starts at 12:00PM to 12:10PM. Resident #37 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey 10/02/23 - 10/11/23, the facility did not ensure that food was stored according to professional standards for food safety. This was evident for 1 of 8 unit pantries observed for the Kitchen task (Unit 3 North). Specifically, food items were stored in the pantry refrigerator without being labelled and dated. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Unit Pantry Stock last revised in July 2019 stated as follows: All items opened must be labeled with date opened and use-by-date. Labels will be provided by the Dining Services Department. Items brought in by family members for resident use must be also labeled with date brought in, use-by date and resident name. On 10/02/23 at 10:10 AM, upon pantry inspection conducted on the Unit 3 North the surveyor observed (#1) 11 cupcakes stored in a large cardboard box in the pantry refrigerator, which was not labeled or dated, (#2) A metal tray with 2 plastic bags containing water and (#3), 3 open containers of juice which were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY 00309085), the facility did not ensure that a resident receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. This was evident in 1 out of 5 residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 01/15/2023, at approximately 9:00 AM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, that Resident #1 had redness to the chest and the clothes in the chest area was wet. LPN #1 observed the redness on Resident #1's chest but did not notify the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) or the Medical Doctor (MD). On 01/15/2023 at 7:00 PM, CNA #2 observed redness with a blister on Resident #1 's chest and reported to LPN #1. LPN #1 observed redness on Resident #1's chest and documented in the MD's notification book. On 01/16/2023 at 4:24 PM, LPN #1 informed RNS #1 of redness to Resident #1 chest area. On 01/16/2023 at 9:22 PM, a Physician's Progress Note documented that the MD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00320576), the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by nursing home staff. This was evident for one out of three residents (Resident #1) sampled for abuse. Specifically, on 07/21/23, an undated video clip provided by the Administrator, showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 roughly grabbed Resident #1's upper right arm. Resident #1 did not sustain any visible injuries. The findings are: The facility Policy and Procedure, Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation Prevention, and Intervention reviewed January 2020 states that Facility will treat each resident with respect, and full recognition of his or her dignity and individuality. The Facility is committed to prevention of abuse, neglect or exploitation and prompt investigation of allegations and instances of resident abuse, neglect and/or exploitation. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00321535), the facility did not ensure that infection control practices were maintained. Specifically, on 08/25/2023 at 9:50AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 entered a positive COVID-19 resident's (Resident #3) room without donning gloves and an isolation gown. CNA #3 exited the positive COVID-19 resident room, then entered a non-COVID-19 room afterward. Additionally, CNA #3 did not perform hand hygiene. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure Cohorting for COVID-19 residents dated 02/2023 documented nursing staff are trained and educated to render care to those residents who are testing negative for COVID-19 and then follow the facilities infection control protocol and removes personal protective equipment (PPE) and washes their hands, and then render care to the resident who tests positive for COVID-19. During an observation on 08/25/2023 at approximately 9:50AM CNA #3 was observed picking up food trays from a positive COVID-19 room without donning an isolation gown and gloves. CNA # 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that residents were cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced their dignity. Specifically, a resident's Foley catheter bag and tubing were left uncovered and exposed to public view. This was evident for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for Dignity out of a sample of 39 residents. (Resident #300) The finding is: The facility's policy titled Urinary Catheter Change/Care created in 2011, revised on 01/15/19, documented that nursing staff is to ensure that the urinary bag is not touching the floor, and the bag is covered for privacy. Resident #300 was admitted with diagnoses that included Heart Failure, Neurogenic Bladder, and Hypertension. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident's cognitive status was severely impaired, and the resident required extensive assistance with transfer, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The Physician's order dated 04/22/21 documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents with limited Range of Motion (ROM) were provided services and treatment to increase ROM and to prevent further decrease in ROM, including the provision of equipment. Specifically, a resident observed with limited range of motion on the right hand was not being provided with interventions to help maintain the joint integrity and prevent a worsening contracture. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Position/Mobility out of a sample of 39 residents. (Resident #151) The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Rehab/Assistive Devices dated 12/2010, last reviewed 11/2020, documented that the nurse will assess resident to see if there is a physical change in status that would warrant a rehab referral; get MD order for rehab evaluation. The PT/OT Therapist evaluates resident as per MD order; will provide Rehab/Assistive Devices if indicated;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Specifically, the facility did not effectively monitor a resident who was at risk for weight loss and weight fluctuations and who sustained a significant weight loss. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Nutrition out of a sample of 39 residents. (Resident # 44) The finding is: The facility policy titled Weight Monitoring Program created on 11/2011, revised on 01/16/20 documented the following: The facility will identify significant, undesirable weight gain\loss and initiate a plan of care to address undesirable weight changes. The policy also documented that the Dietician would review all completed weights and arranges for re-weights within 48 hours if weight change is 5 pounds or more (or 3 pounds for residents < 100 pounds). The policy further documented that the Dietician reviews all completed weights and identifies any resident with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set assessments were electronically transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Data System within 14 days after assessments were completed. This was evident in 3 (Residents #21, #120, and #193 ) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Residents #21, #120, and #193's Minimum Data Set assessments were not transmitted within 14 days after the assessments were completed. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set with a last revision date of August 2024 documented that the federal and state-required Minimum Data Set assessments are completed accurately and submitted in a timely manner for all residents. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #21 was completed on 03/01/2025 and was transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Data System on 03/21/2025. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #120 was completed on 03/01/2025 and was transmitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-10-11 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments were submitted and transmitted into the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in a timely manner. This was evident for 12 of 12 residents reviewed out of 117 Residents triggered for Resident Assessments. (Resident #s 308, 82, 105, 140, 181, 257, 205, 52, ). Specifically, admission, annual, and quarterly MDS assessments were not submitted and transmitted within 14 calendar days after the assessments were completed. The findings include but are not limited to: Resident # 105 had an Annual assessment completed on 8/31/2023 as per the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). The assessment was not submitted to the CMS System until 10/04/23 Resident # 308 had an assessment completed on 9/05/2023 as per the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). The assessment was not submitted to the CMS System until 10/04/23 Resident # 82 had a Q assessment completed on 8/29/2023 as per the Assessment Reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,894 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $13,762 — penalty dated 2023-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KOHEN, ELIYAHUIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 03/01/2020
LANKRY, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST80%since 03/01/2020
RAHMANAN, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SAXENA, AMITIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$67.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$17.5M
Related-party expense25% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 16%Other / private 5%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $17.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$550per resident / day
operating cost
$16,705per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$529per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335015. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next