Brooklyn United Methodist Church Home
1485 Dumont Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11208 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (718) 827-4500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,039 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-06)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.7% | 14.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 5.8% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 19.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.0% | 12.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.7% | 13.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 6.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.3% | 19.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.7% | 20.6% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.5% | 9.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 1.70 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.40 | 1.36 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.6%CMS range 6.1–13.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.7%CMS range 5.2–15.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.39 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00334732), the facility failed to ensure that a resident, identified as an elopement risk received adequate supervision to prevent elopement from the facility. This was evident in 1 out of 3 residents sampled (Resident #1). Specifically, on 03/01/2024, Resident #1, who had severely impaired cognition and had a wander alert device in place since 02/29/2024 at 10:01 pm, left the building undetected at 11:49 am. Facility staff became aware that Resident #1 was missing from the unit on 03/01/2024 at approximately 12:20 pm. Resident #1 was located by Resident #1's relative on 03/01/2024 and notified the facility at 5:30 pm that Resident #1 was at the hospital and would be returning to the facility. On 03/01/2024 at 10:05 pm, Resident #1 returned to the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy Past Noncompliance with the potential for serious harm to 24 residents' who were at risk for elopement. The findings include: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00360005), the facility did not ensure a resident's designated representative was notified of changes in condition. This was evident in one out of three residents (Resident #2) sampled. Specifically, a Health Status Note dated 11/05/2024 documented Resident #2 complained of left eye pain. An assessment was done and revealed mild swelling to the left eye. The Medical Doctor was informed and an ordered for Diclofenac eye drops. There is no documented evidence that Resident #2's designated representative was notified of the changes in condition. The findings are: The facility policy titled: Family Notification revised 01/2025 documented it is the facility's policy to notify the resident, the representative/designee or guardian whenever there is a transfer, room change and change in the resident's condition. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Hypertension and Cerebrovascular Accident (a medical term for a stroke). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00372860), the facility did not ensure that a resident was free from abuse. This was evident for one (1) out of nine (9) residents (Resident #1) sampled. Specifically, the facility's dining room surveillance video recording dated 02/22/2025 showed at 9:05 AM Certified Nursing Assistant #1 hit Resident #1 on their left upper shoulder (once) with the back of their left hand, then walked out of the dining room, after Resident #1 threw liquid on Certified Nursing Assistant #1 who was standing behind them. Housekeeper #1, who was in the dining room, then walked over to Resident #1 and wheeled the Resident out of the dining room at 9:08 AM. Resident #1 was assessed by Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 with no visible injury, pain, or discomfort. The findings are: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property was revised on 08/2024. The policy states that each resident will be free from Abuse and will be protected from abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00372860), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, were reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident in one out of nine (9) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, the facility's dining room surveillance video recording dated 02/22/2025 showed at 9:05AM Certified Nursing Assistant #1 hit Resident #1 on their left shoulder after Resident #1 picked up a cup and without looking tossed the content…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey from 01/02/2025 to 01/10/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident, or their designated representative was provided appropriate notification at the termination of Medicare Part A benefits. This was evident for 3 (Residents #47, #51, and #99) of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Specifically, the facility did not provide appropriate notification at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services ended as required and did not provide the designated form for notification in the nursing home setting. The findings are: The facility policy titled Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage revised 07/2024, documented that it is the facility policy to provide advance notice to Medicare beneficiaries of expected non coverage of services(denial) under Medicare Part B. Effective January 1,2012. CMS form R-131 will be utilized to provide timely advance notification to residents/ designated representatives. 1. Resident #47 was discharged from Medicare Part A services on 11/01/2024 with 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews during the Recertification survey from 01/02/2025 to 01/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that the residents' environment was maintained in a safe, sanitary, and comfortable manner. Specifically multiple observations were made of ceiling tiles and resident equipment and found to be unsanitary and in disrepair. This was evident for 1 of 3 resident units (Unit 3). The findings are: The facility policy titled Homelike Environment dated 10/02/24 state that residents are provided with a safe clean and comfortable and homelike environment. During multiple observations on the 3rd floor unit from 01/02/2025 to 01/10/2025 the following was observed: 1. ceiling tiles along the unit corridors were noted in disrepair, not firmly affixed to the ceiling, cracked and stained. 2. Corridor borders were noted to not be firmly attached and layered with dirt and dust. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] B had brownish water-stained ceiling tiles. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] B had a broken wall bumper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 01/02/2025 to 01/10/2025 the facility did not ensure a safe functional environment for residents, staff, and public. This was evident for the staff bathroom and nursing station on 1 (Unit 3) of 3 Units. The finding is: The facility policy titled Homelike Environment dated 10/02/24 stated that residents are provided with a safe, sanitary and orderly environment. During multiple observations on the 3rd floor unit from 01/02/2025 to 01/10/2025 the following was observed: 1. The Staff bathroom adjacent to the Tub Room had a loose and wobbly toilet seat. 2. in the Nurse's Station: a. the Plexi glass was covered with dust, dirt and streaks. b. two swivel chairs were layered with dirt and dust. c. the call bell console was layered with dust and dirt d. there was an accumulation of dirt and dust on the floors underneath the desk e. the computer screen monitors and phones were layered with dust. On 01/10/25 at 09:40 AM, Housekeeper #2 was interviewed and stated that only the floors in the Nurse's station…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 01/02/2025 to 01/10/2025, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evident for 1 (Resident #76) of 1 resident reviewed for Pressure Ulcer out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #2 failed to practice appropriate infection control and placing the barrier on a visibly soiled overbed table and did practice appropriate hand hygiene and glove changes during wound care. The findings are: The facility policy titled Wound Care effective date 07/2024 and last reviewed 08/08/2024 stated that the purpose is to provide information regarding identification of pressure injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors as well as to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. The policy also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/23 to 9/18/23, the facility did not ensure the daily nurse staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This was evident for the total census of 113 residents. Specifically, the daily staffing information was observed posted on the wall near the staff time clock, not in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers reviewed 4/20/23 documented the facility will post daily for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. On 9/10/23 at 9:51 AM, observation of the facility's daily staffing was made on the main floor and revealed that daily staffing dated 8/23/23 was posted on the wall near the staff time clock, not visible to residents and visitors. On 9/10/23 at 11:52 AM, the observation of unit 3 revealed there was no daily staffing observed posted on the unit. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure the residents had a right to organize and participate in resident groups in the facility. This was evident during Resident Council wit Resident #64, #95, #39, #118, #53, #56, and #16. Specifically, the facility did not take reasonable steps to organize and assist residents with meeting regularly as a Resident Council. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Council Rights in Nursing Homes dated 3/2/2023 documented the facility must provide a resident council with private space for meetings and make residents aware of upcoming meetings. On 09/11/2023 at 11:48 AM, a Resident Council meeting was held with Resident #64, the President of Resident Council, and Resident #64, and Resident #95, #39, #118, #53, #56, and #16. All residents in attendance stated the facility does not assist with scheduling and organizing Resident Council meetings that residents could regularly attend without staff present. The Resident Council has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure residents were provided with the contact information for the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (SLTCO). This was evident in the lobby and 1 (3rd Floor) of 3 units. Specifically, the posted telephone number for the SLTCO was incorrect in the lobby and on the 3rd Floor. The findings are: On 09/11/2023 at 11:48 AM, a Resident Council meeting was held with Resident #64, the President of Resident Council, and Resident #95, #39, #118, #53, #56, and #16. Resident #53 and #39 stated the SLTCO contact information posted throughout the facility was incorrect and they attempted to contact the SLTCO but were unable to do so. On 9/11/2023 at 1:55 PM, the SLTCO poster including the contact telephone number was observed in the main lobby and 3rd Floor bulletin boards. A phone call was attempted using the telephone number listed and no contact was made with the SLTCO office. The phone number listed was not the currently published contact number for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and complaint (NY00310185), the facility did not ensure the residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable environment. This was evident for the outdoor patio and 3 of 3 resident floors (2nd, 3rd, and 4th). Specifically, 1) the outdoor patio was observed with paper cups, gloves, and cigarette butts on the ground and overgrown shrubs, trees, and grass; 2) the 2nd floor was observed with sticky dirty furniture, sticky floors stained black at the baseboards, broken dressers, peeling paint, sagging unhooked privacy curtains, a bed frame in disrepair, missing mirror, urine odor, and a stained faucet with a loose handle in resident rooms and dirty air conditioning (AC) units in the dayroom; 3) the 3rd floor was observed with a broken AC unit, dirty windowsills, broken floor and wall tiles, a leaking rust colored sink, urine odor, and a hole in the wall of resident rooms; and 4) the 4th floor was observed with mismatched peeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00302016 and NY00318527) from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported within 2 hours, or events not involving abuse were reported within 24 hours to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). This was evident for 1 (Resident #92) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and 1 (Resident #79) of 2 residents reviewed for accidents out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #92 reported a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pushed them in the chin and the facility did not report the allegation to the NYSDOH within 2 hours, and 2) the facility did not report Resident #79 was found on the floor in their room with left arm redness and sheering within 24 hours. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property dated 4/20/23 documented the resident will be free…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and staff interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00318546 and NY00318527) survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 2 (Resident #171 and #79) of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #171 was observed with a bump and redness to their forehead that was not thoroughly investigated, and 2) staff statements were not obtained to rule out abuse when Resident #79 was found on the floor. The findings are: The facility policy titled Accident/Incident (AI) Report dated 3/9/2023 documented promptly submit completed statements from all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) related to the AI to the Nursing Supervisor within the tour of duty. 1) Resident #171 had diagnoses of Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #171 had severely impaired cognition. On 9/14/2023 at 5:28 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was developed and implemented. This was evident for 5 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #s 60, 109, 110, 66, and 27). Specifically, Resident #60 had no CCP for Glaucoma. Resident #66 and #109 had no CCP developed to address dental issues. Resident #110 had no CCP developed to address the care needs of Latent Syphilis. Resident #27 had no CCP to address pain. The findings include but are not limited to: The facility policy and procedure title Comprehensive Care Plan last updated on 4/20/23 stated that an individualized comprehensive care plan will be developed and implemented for each resident. The policy further stated that the care plan will be maintained within the medical record of each resident in the facility. The care plan will be developed by an interdisciplinary team of health care professional as appropriate to the need of each resident. 1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/23 to 9/18/23, the facility did not ensure resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) were reviewed, revised, and implemented after each assessment. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Pain Management (Resident #87) and 1 (Resident #79) of 2 residents reviewed for Accidents out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) CCPs related to Pain Management/Therapy were not reviewed and revised quarterly to reflect current pain management regimen for Resident #87, and 2) the CCP related to Resident #79's risk for falls was not reviewed and revised to reflect updated interventions after the resident had an incident on 6/19/2023. The findings are: The facility policy titled CCP dated 4/20/2023 documented CCPs are reviewed and revised quarterly and as needed. 1) Resident #87 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of Schizophrenia, Osteoarthritis and Diabetes Mellitus. The Minimum Data Set 3.0…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and complaint (NY00318527) survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure residents remained free of accidents and hazards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #79) of 2 residents reviewed for Accidents and the 1 (2nd Floor) of 3 resident units. Specifically, 1) Resident #79 was not adequately assessed for fall risk following each fall, did not have a CCP related to fall risk with adequate interventions that was reviewed upon each fall, and did not receive supervision to prevent further falls; and 2) there were observations of a 2nd floor window in the floor dayroom that can fully open, an eyewash station without an eyewash device in place, a dental office with an x-ray machine and drill that remained unlocked, and a wet shower room floor without a wet floor sign. The findings are: 1) Resident #79 had diagnoses of bipolar disorder and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the recertification and complaints (NY00307070, NY00318546, survey from 9/10/23 through 9/18/23, the facility did not ensure there was sufficient staff available to meet residents' needs considering the number, acuity and diagnose of the facility's resident population as determined by the Facility Assessment. Specifically, 1) the facility reported short staffing on weekends confirmed by a review of the Daily Staffing and the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, 2) Resident #171 was discovered with an injury of unknown origin on a day when the unit was short of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), and 3) Resident #121 reported not receiving care on a day when the facility was short of CNAs on their unit. The findings include but are not limited to: The Facility Staffing policy reviewed 4/20/23 documented that each nursing unit will have adequate staff to safely and effectively complete resident care on a daily basis. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was evident during 7 of 7 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Permittees and 1 of 1 Registered Nurse (RN) Permittees employed by the facility. Specifically, the facility employed 7 LPN Permittees and 1 RN Permittee to work in the capacity as a licensed nurse without the required application approval and documented RN supervision. The findings are: The facility policy titled Limited Permit dated 5/12/2023 documented the facility employs nurses who do not hold a New York State (NYS) license by accepting a permit from the NYS Education Department (NYSED). Permits to practice a RN or LPN are issued by the NYSED after filing an application. No Permittee will be allowed to begin employment without form N5 of the NYSED. Upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023,the facility did not ensure a quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program that use evidence to define and measure indicators of quality and facility goals, include resident choice, and address all systems of care and management practices. This was evidenced Specifically, the facility's QAPI topics were not reflective of previous State Survey Inspection results and the method of gathering measurable data was not accurate or adequate to identify quality improvement. The findings are: The facility policy titled QAPI Plan dated 1/23/23 documented Governing Body is responsible for: 1) Identifying and prioritizing problems based on performance indicator data. 2) Incorporating resident and staff input that reflects organizational process, functions and services provided to residents. 3) Ensuring that corrective actions address gaps in the system and are evaluated for effectiveness. 4) Setting clear expectations for safety, quality, rights, choice and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and complaint (NY00310185) from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. This was evident for the outside area of the facility and 1 (2nd floor) of 3 Units. Specifically, the outside surrounding area of the nursing home had overgrown grass and shrubs and garbage on the sidewalks and in the parking lot, and insects hovering around standing water in a cart near the entrance to the facility; and, the 2nd Floor had a nursing station that had chipped and missing veneer and broken filing cabinets. The findings are: The facility policy titled Terminal/Environmental Room Cleaning dated 4/20/2023 documented the facility will maintain a clean environment for resident care that meets professional standards. 1) On 9/10/2023 at 8:30 AM, 9/11/2023 at 9:00 AM and 10:00 AM, and 9/12/2023 at 11:36 AM, the grass and shrubs surrounding the facility in the parking lot and along the perimeter fence and sidewalk were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident's right to formulate an advance directive (AD). This was evident for 1 (Resident #371) of 33 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #371's AD status was not determined with their Legal Guardian (LG) upon readmission to the facility. The findings are: The facility's policy titled AD dated 4/21/2023 documented in the event residents cannot make their own decisions the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) process will be followed. Resident #371 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia and diabetes mellitus. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #371 was severely cognitively impaired. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) related to AD and initiated 5/26/2022 documented Resident documented maintain communication with Resident #371's LG regarding all needs and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/23 to 9/18/23, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments were completed in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 (Resident #103, #105) of 2 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. Specifically, 1) Resident #103's Discharge MDS was not completed within 14 calendar days from the Assessment Reference Date (ARD), and 2) Resident #105's Discharge MDS was not completed within 14 calendar days from the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). The findings are: 1. Resident #103 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Dementia, Hypertension, and Obstructive Uropathy. The physician note dated 5/5/23 documented resident noted AMS/hypotension/hypoxia, possible severe sepsis vs shock. Oxygen started and 911 was activated. Resident was discharged to the hospital on 5/5/23. There was no documented evidence a Discharge MDS was completed upon Resident #103's discharge to the hospital on 5/5/2023. 2. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and complaint (NY00318527) from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure services met professional standards of practice. This was evidenced for 1 (Resident #79) of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #79 was found on the floor in their room and was placed back in bed by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) prior to receiving an assessment by a Registered Nurse (RN). The findings are: Resident #79 had diagnoses of bipolar disorder and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #79 was severely cognitively impaired and had a fall since their prior assessment that did not result in injury. Resident #79 required extensive assistance of 2 people for walking in their room and for transfers. On 09/14/2023 at 12:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the complainant who stated they came to visit Resident #79 on 6/19/2023 after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/2023 to 9/18/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident received quality care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #24) of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #24 was observed on multiple occasions without compression stockings in place as ordered to address left lower extremity (LLE) edema. The findings are: The untitled facility policy related to anti-embolic stocking use dated 1/2023 documented report and document application of compression stockings, any skin issues, or other changes noted with the resident. Resident #24 had diagnoses of schizophrenia and dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #24 was severely cognitively impaired and required the extensive assistance of 1 person for dressing. On 09/10/23 at 09:59 AM, Resident #24 was observed wheeling themselves in wheelchair in the hallway towards their room. Resident #24 had LLE swelling and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 9/10/23 to 9/18/23, the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This was evident for Resident #371 reviewed for Position/Mobility out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #371 had bilateral upper and lower extremity contractures and was observed without an abduction/contraction cushion (ACC) as per Medical Doctor Order (MDO). The findings are: The facility policy titled Assistive/Adaptive and Positioning Devices dated 4/2023 documented the assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) will be responsible for the application of devices according to the Plan of Care and signs the CNA Accountability record every shift daily. Resident #371 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and schizophrenia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #371 was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview conducted during the Recertification and abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure policies and procedures to prevent loss of controlled drugs were implemented. This was evident on 1 of 3 units reviewed for Medication Storage (Unit 3). Specifically, a bag containing a pair of glasses and dentures (top and bottom) were stored in the Unit 3 narcotic cabinet. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Medication Storage last reviewed on 4/20/2023 documented that the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Only person authorized (Licensed Nurses) to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. On 9/12/2023 at 3:35 PM, an observation of the medication storage room on the 3rd floor was conducted with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #4). A small plastic bag containing a pair of glasses and full dentures (top and bottom) was observed in the narcotic cabinet. On 9/18/2023 at 12:34 PM, the Licensed Practical Nurse on the unit (LPN#4) was interviewed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/23 to 9/18/23, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 2 (2nd Floor and 4th Floor) of 3 units. Specifically, 1) medications were not kept in locked compartment and were on the 2nd Floor Nursing Station, and 2) the 4th Floor medication cart contained unopened eye drops labeled with directions to refrigerate until opened. The findings are: The policy titled Medication Storage dated 4/20/2023 documented the facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Only Licensed Nurses are authorized to prepare and administer medications and have access to locked medications. 1) On 09/10/23 at 12:07 PM, medication blister packs containing 3 pills of Seroquel 50mg, 3 pills of Finasteride 5mg, 3 pills of Lexapro 20mg, and 3 pills of Eliquis 5mg were observed on the 2nd Floor Nursing Station desk, open to the public and accessible to anyone walking in the hallway.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 9/10/23 to 9/18/23, the facility did not ensure adequate dental services were provided for a resident with tooth pain. This was evident for 1 (Resident #66) of 2 reviewed for Dental out of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #66 had tooth pain that was not evaluated by the dentist in a timely manner. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Dental Services - Hygiene Program, reviewed 4/20/23, documented the program will meet residents' specific oral hygiene and dental care needs. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Dementia, Glaucoma and Depression. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented resident #66 had severely impaired cognition for decision making and daily life tasks. During an interview on 9/10/23 at 11:43 AM, Resident #66's family member stated that the resident's toothache was reported to the nurse about three months ago, but the family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each Resident or resident representative was offered the opportunity to participate in the revision and/or review of the comprehensive care plan. Specifically, residents were not invited to quarterly care plan meetings. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Care Plan and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Dental out of a sample of 24 residents. (Resident #42 & Resident #1) The findings are: 1. The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan last reviewed 09/21/21, documented that the resident and his or her legal representative, are encouraged to attend and participate in the resident's assessment and in the development of the resident's person-centered care plan. The policy also documented that care plans be reviewed at least quarterly by the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) and revised as necessary. Resident #42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Anxiety Disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. Specifically, a resident's room was observed on multiple occasions to be cluttered with food items, plastic utensils and clothing strewn on the window sills, overbed table, closet, and floor. This was observed during environmental observations on 1 of 3 units. (Unit 2) The findings are: The facility policy and procedure Maintenance of Facility corridors and other floor areas dated 4/22/15 and revised on 8/3/21 documented that the policy is to maintain the corridors and all other floor areas clean, orderly, neat, and free of obstructions. The purpose is to maintain good infection control practices. Resident's rooms are cleaned daily on the 7-3 shift by the housekeeper on the assigned floor. The housekeeper on each unit will clean 3 rooms thoroughly. During observations of the environment conducted on Unit 2 on 1/18/2022 at 11:37 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification survey and Complaint investigation (NY 00264258) the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency. Specifically, the facility did not report the self-inflicted injury of a resident to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) within 2 hours. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Accidents out of a sample of 24 residents. (Resident #323). The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident's property, effective 11/28/16 and reviewed on 11/01/21, documented that the facility will ensure that that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview during the recertification and abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure that a person centered comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to address the resident's medical needs. Specifically, there was no care plan developed to address the use of psychotropic medications. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication out of a sample of 24 residents. (Resident #40) The finding is: The facility policy and procedure Comprehensive Care Plan revised on 9/21/21 documented that a written comprehensive care plan will be developed and implemented for each resident in conjunction with the resident and the resident's representative. An individual comprehensive care plan will be maintained within the medical record of each resident at the facility. The physical, mental, and psychosocial condition of the resident will determine the composition of the interdisciplinary team. The care plan will be developed as appropriate to the need of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification survey and Complaint investigation (NY00264258) the facility did not ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the back courtyard of the facility, unsupervised at night, with injury to wrists, abdomen, and inner thigh. This was evident for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed for Accidents out of a sample of 24. (Resident #323) The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident's property, effective 11/28/16 and reviewed on 11/01/21, documented that it is the policy of BUMCH ([NAME] United Methodist Church Home) that each resident will be free from Abuse. The policy also documented that resident will be protected from abuse, neglect, and harm while they are residing at the facility. Resident #323 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Depression and Psychotic Disorder. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that infection control practices and procedures were maintained. Specifically, 1) oxygen tubing was observed touching the floor on multiple occasions, and 2) residents were observed on the unit sitting in less than 6 feet apart from each other and were not wearing face masks. This was evident on 1 out of 3 units observed for infection control. (Unit 4) The findings are: 1. Resident # 99 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Viral Hepatitis and Legionnaire disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident cognitive level is severely impaired and required dependent assistance for most Activities of Daily Living. The MDS also documented that the resident is receiving oxygen therapy, trach care and suctioning. On 01/18/22 at 10:46 AM, 01/18/22 at 12:22 PM, 01/19/22 at 10:29 AM and on 01/20/22 at 12:30 PM, Resident #99 was observed seating in geriatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-01-10 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 01/02/2025 to 01/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that survey result reports for the 3 preceding years were readily available to residents and visitors upon request. Specifically, upon review of the survey binder, only survey results for the year 2023 were included in the survey binder. In addition, notice of the availability of the survey results reports was not posted in areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public. The findings are: On 01/06/2025 at 10:05 AM, during the Resident Council meeting nine of nine residents verbalized that they did not know where the Department of Survey results were posted in the facility. Six of nine residents had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as follows: The BIMS test presents a scoring scale that guides the interpretation: 0 to 7 points indicates severe cognitive impairment, 8 to 12 points indicates moderate cognitive impairment, 13 to 15 points indicates cognitive intactness. Resident 44 with BIMS score of 15/15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-01-10 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews during the Recertification survey from 01/02/2025 to 01/10/25, the facility did not ensure that total number of nursing staff and actual nursing staffing hours are posted in a prominent place readily accessible to the residents and visitors. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Staffing Policy dated 03/02/2020 last reviewed 07/2024 stated that the facility will post daily for each shift number of personnel responsible for providing direct care for residents. The policy also stated that within two hours of the beginning of the shift, the number of licenses Nurses such as Licensed Practical Nurses, Registered Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants directly responsible for resident care will be posted in a prominent location accessible to residents and visitors and a clear readable format. During the Recertification survey from 01/02/25 to 01/08/2025, staffing postings for nursing staff documenting projected hours for day, evening and night shifts were observed on a bulletin board on the left side of the hallway which was not accessible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,039 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,039 — penalty dated 2024-03-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHUE, SHERWIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/1990 |
| HOFMANN, JOANNA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2010 |
| JONES, CLEOLENE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2016 |
| MODESTE, WENDY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2010 |
| MURDOCK, DELROY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2017 |
| NATION, GERTRUDE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2017 |
| PITTERSON-COHEN, SANDRA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2005 |
| BORSUK, YOAV | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/25/2022 |
| ORRIOLA, VICTOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/13/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NY
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335604. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.